obvert
Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011 From: PDX (and now) London, UK Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: John B. Get Assista, your CAP plan was mentioned to the Emperor Himself and, when he saw the results from today's fighter sweeps it's rumored (and don't let this go to your head) that he laughed quietly to himself and had his secretary note your name in his private diary. Obvert, who came up with this scheme, gets an honorable mention. Here's the happy totals. P-38Js lead in losses followed by Corsairs! In fact, based on these figures Scott lost more planes than me. Even factoring in FOW this is very nice. Heck, he even lost 11 of the new P-47s! You also have to figure that he lost lots of pilots given that this was over my base and a number of hexes from home. He'll wear me down but let's hope this gives pause to his bombing of Palembang. My squadrons had a number of damaged planes but most have morale up in the 90s with law fatigue and the Jacks, who were hit hardest, have morale at 85. I"ve rotated in some fresh squadrons of Georges and some Zeros for the low altitude band. Here is a more comprehensive thread on the tests I ran to work out some details of the idea developed by Lowpe and influenced by some of Alfred's input. It's been highly successful, and some of the best high altitude planes suffer the most flying into a low CAP. Your results are good. As he adapts you'll have to tweak them, use specific models on specific altitude bands and occasionally pop up high as well to keep him honest. I've found recently though that the low CAP layering still does work against lower sweeps, it's just not as devastating. low CAP vs high sweep
_____________________________
"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill
|