Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) All Welcome

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) All Welcome Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 [9] 10   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 12/29/2018 9:14:58 PM   
Balou


Posts: 841
Joined: 7/24/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SparkleyTits

The heros of Tallinin indeed


Tallinin: how does supply work over solid frozen "shipping lanes" ?

@HLYA: Thanks for posting the pics !

< Message edited by Balou -- 12/29/2018 9:17:05 PM >


_____________________________

“Aim towards enemy“.
- instructions on U.S. rocket launcher

(in reply to SparkleyTits)
Post #: 241
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 12/29/2018 10:08:58 PM   
SparkleyTits

 

Posts: 898
Joined: 10/7/2016
From: England
Status: offline
Brian might still be able to get to around 4k working AFV for 42
Wish I could see his manpower stats now!!

Will be around the 70-80% TOE's for German panzers/mot I imagine without some fiddling?
Blunted but workable for Axis under the right circumstances so still not quite safe enough to sit on your laurels
If he gets off to a fairly decisive start/breakthrough in early 42 and doesn't get drawn into a drawn out slugging match while his lower numbers of AFV are going to be most taken advantage of he could make something happen

We will have to stay tuned to see if you have anything prepared half as well as your air arm to make sure that doesn't happen I guess

(in reply to Balou)
Post #: 242
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 12/29/2018 10:29:27 PM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Balou

quote:

ORIGINAL: SparkleyTits

The heros of Tallinin indeed


Tallinin: how does supply work over solid frozen "shipping lanes" ?

@HLYA: Thanks for posting the pics !


Looks like it is treated as normal land hexes(a bit abstract for sure, but check with EwaldvonKleist or Telemecus I am sure they would have the textbook answer) I know when BrianG had the rail cut to Leningrad it was 103ish to Tallinin. Was top priority to at least get Tallinin back in supply at a minimum.

You are welcome for the pictures. I believe tomorrow I should be able to finish up the turn to BrianG and update the AAR. Finally feeling better but still cough a ton when I sit up and when I walk around.

< Message edited by HardLuckYetAgain -- 12/29/2018 10:56:13 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Balou)
Post #: 243
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 12/29/2018 10:47:25 PM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SparkleyTits

Brian might still be able to get to around 4k working AFV for 42
Wish I could see his manpower stats now!!

Will be around the 70-80% TOE's for German panzers/mot I imagine without some fiddling?
Blunted but workable for Axis under the right circumstances so still not quite safe enough to sit on your laurels
If he gets off to a fairly decisive start/breakthrough in early 42 and doesn't get drawn into a drawn out slugging match while his lower numbers of AFV are going to be most taken advantage of he could make something happen

We will have to stay tuned to see if you have anything prepared half as well as your air arm to make sure that doesn't happen I guess


BrianG PZ's are still in pretty good shape. I think 2nd PZ was in the worst shape that I saw. He should be in decent shape with the rest I think. But to be effective he needs to get them off the line and refit/replace because at the moment I can account for every PZ Division and Moto Division the German side has except for 2 which are on the front lines. Not to mention he just launched an offense near Kursk.

BrianG has played the Blizzard extremely well imo. He played his strengths and took advantage of my weakness. But it has cost him on the loss of his tanks to play this way. In the Air he is hurting IMO. My whole goal now in the air is to shoot down German bombers. Even if it means losing hundreds to thousands of Soviet infantryman. Not an easy task with the production numbers of German bombers. I should be able to keep German fighters under control. All total I have only been able to capture 2 German Moto Divisions, 1 German Inf division, and a Hungarian division (i think it was). Loses are astronomical for both sides. Don't quote me on this becasue I am not in front of my gaming computer but I believe German loses stand at 1.1-1.2 million while Soviets is 4.4-4.5. But not for certain since not in front of PC.

< Message edited by HardLuckYetAgain -- 12/29/2018 10:56:49 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to SparkleyTits)
Post #: 244
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 1/30/2019 4:00:42 AM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline
I haven't forgotten about the AAR. Yes, I have to catch it up. I have to apologize for the delay but in the last month I took a severance package from my old company then immediately started another company with another person. I have had to interview and hire employees & come up with all the operations plans. Needless to say I have been busy. It will be a bit longer but I will get around to getting this caught up :)

_____________________________


(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 245
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 1/30/2019 4:11:37 AM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline
Some eye candy until I get to this.

Current OOB. Sadly the German OOB has risen by 600,000 since Feb time frame.

German armor replacement is back up to par.

Only in the Air am I keeping the German at bay. I figure by the end of 42 I should control the Air over 90-95% of the battlefield. I hope....






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by HardLuckYetAgain -- 1/30/2019 4:15:00 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 246
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 1/30/2019 4:20:31 AM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline
Here are my 218 fighters squadrons with 4,249 ready fighters sorted by Experience level. Not doing too bad with experience in the low 80's for the top units but most in the mid ranges 70's. They are my hornets looking for some place to put their stingers. They are itching for clear weather since they been losing experience sitting here playing with themselves :(




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 247
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 1/30/2019 4:26:42 AM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline
My full 80 squadrons of U2-VS's :) Yes I use these now in 41 & 42. In clear turns I am able to crank out some pretty sick numbers with these aircraft considering they are from WWI. It is not uncommon for me to get 40-70 killed men :) But of course I get the 4 or none too. But I think I have it figured out now and waiting for the clear weather to test out my theory with these guys. I will fill in when I write the AAR what I do but in a nutshell all 10 airbases are nothing but U2-VS stacked high.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 248
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 1/30/2019 4:31:18 AM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline
I am at 57 IL2 air groups of 160 total I plan on building at a minimum (2 full air armies worth). I will be building 8 more this turn which will put me at 65 :) Will take them a little bit to get up there but the process has started.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 249
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 1/30/2019 4:35:35 AM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline
Finally, the current front line. Next turn, the 1st week of May, is clear in the Europe zone & Southern Zone. Will see what happens there. But the first turn it is clear in Central and North all HELL is going to break loose!!! I hope you are prepared for it.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 250
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 1/30/2019 3:12:32 PM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline
Oh! Forgot this one. One of my top Front commanders with the most wins I bet you would have not guessed it was Kulik ;-P




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 251
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/2/2019 2:06:54 AM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline
Currently this game is on Brians Turn 52. I am not going to have the time to update this AAR from Turn 11-50 for the Soviet side. I just have way too much work along with this game to update any of those turns. I can show some pictures of Brians attack on Leningrad which begins on Turn 48 and here is turn 47 end of my turn.

Here is my setup for the first clear turn in the area. I basically set up to for a retreating withdraw with my current setup. I will take the loses on any of the routes that I am sure Brian will take advantage of on my front lines. My whole goal is make Leningrad a time sync to the end of June. If we go to the Mid part of July I would be ecstatic:). But here is my setup for defense with a pretty decent 3rd line with with high defense and not so semi trash divisions in the front.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by HardLuckYetAgain -- 3/2/2019 2:07:54 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 252
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/2/2019 2:34:09 AM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline
From turn 48 through 50 I lose every single battle Near Leningrad that the Germans initiate against my lines. I stopped counting the lost battles at 36 over those three turns. Not until turn 51 did a get a couple of holds on trash hexes. Shows the power of concentrated German firepower ;-). Not to mention the easy wins on the front lines that I gave them ;-)






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by HardLuckYetAgain -- 3/2/2019 3:54:45 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 253
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/2/2019 2:35:11 AM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline
Double post

< Message edited by HardLuckYetAgain -- 3/2/2019 3:52:38 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 254
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/2/2019 2:44:58 AM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline
Turn 49 was more of the same as I rail in a big enough force in Leningrad with high combat values to drive the Germans to the East to buy more time(I fully plan on losing these units). If the Germans are careless I will use the CAV to attack the Finns north of Leningrad and race for a possible victory to take the Finns out with 6 CAV Corps there. Currently there are only Finn Regiments on the North Border 1 per hex :)




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by HardLuckYetAgain -- 3/2/2019 4:01:55 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 255
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/2/2019 3:03:44 AM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline
Turn 50 was more of the same. All German wins, morale hit to Soviet units, and routes. This turn I stoped counting all the loses with no wins. The good note is that I am taking a good many Germans with me over the turns so not all that bad :). This turn I rail out an army from the North to the South somewhere ;-). Turn 51 I rail out 2 more armies from the North to the South and rest my bomber force from the map. I entice a cutoff of the last port with a weak Soviet right flank. Will see what Brian does but I never had the intention of holding Leningrad long term. The road to Berlin is paved in the South for me and the North will become a dead zone soon enough. I have gotten out the armies I want from the north for the pushing in the South where Brian has a much smaller force and he should be tied up a bit more up North But the bee stings in the South are starting to take their toll not to mention the previous turns I was able to take out about 400 German Fighters. The Air war is one step closer to Soviet domination (I hope).




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by HardLuckYetAgain -- 3/2/2019 3:05:11 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 256
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/13/2019 5:27:03 PM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HardLuckYetAgain


quote:

ORIGINAL: Beria

Will more be coming on this?

Would love to see this from your point of view next!


I did not think there was any interest so I have not posted in a long time. If there is an interest I can bring this up to date on the game from where I have it at the moment. Currently, we are on turn 38. As such, I need to get the turn back to BrianG but I have been sick in bed with double pneumonia for the past 4 days. All drugged out on the medicines ;-P


Due to lack of interest of this AAR it is now closed on this site. If you wish to follow the game you can follow BrianG’s AAR from the German perspective. If you are truly interested PM/Email me & I may give you access to my private server for the the BrianG game (The server has 147 WITE games I played over the years(I had more but lost a block of games when mergering my hard drive)

< Message edited by HardLuckYetAgain -- 3/13/2019 5:29:32 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 257
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/13/2019 5:59:26 PM   
EwaldvonKleist


Posts: 2038
Joined: 4/14/2016
From: Berlin, Germany
Status: offline
Why do you think there is no interest? At least I read the AAR. I have read an article on the frequency of thread replies once and it had a list (I think they even gave the phenomenom/the list a name) with reasons why there are no replies. I do not recall the details, but it was a long the lines no one is interested OR there is nothing that can be added (no controversy, nothing wrong or nothing of value that can be added) OR people do not understand what has been written etc.

The "there is nothing to add" is the case for me here. Of course that will change if you really allow a cut off of Leningrad

+ an AAR does benefit of a regular/turn by turn coverage, but there are different tastes.
Also look at the page hits, it is an indicator as well.

If there is a server with hundreds of WitE AARs somewhere I am for sure interested!

Regards and good luck in your game
EvK

< Message edited by EwaldvonKleist -- 3/13/2019 6:01:36 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 258
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/13/2019 6:58:43 PM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EwaldvonKleist

Why do you think there is no interest? At least I read the AAR. I have read an article on the frequency of thread replies once and it had a list (I think they even gave the phenomenom/the list a name) with reasons why there are no replies. I do not recall the details, but it was a long the lines no one is interested OR there is nothing that can be added (no controversy, nothing wrong or nothing of value that can be added) OR people do not understand what has been written etc.

The "there is nothing to add" is the case for me here. Of course that will change if you really allow a cut off of Leningrad

+ an AAR does benefit of a regular/turn by turn coverage, but there are different tastes.
Also look at the page hits, it is an indicator as well.

If there is a server with hundreds of WitE AARs somewhere I am for sure interested!

Regards and good luck in your game
EvK


Thank you EvK for the reply. The lecture block (the AAR) without question and answer from the forum, or even statements, to me equates to no interest. I need substantiation to put the time and effort into the AAR. If I am neither adding any value or interest then I can save all some time. I don’t mind doing an AAR considering I took a great deal of time to document every step of my breakout in the South on turn 53. I was hating life the next day at work because of it :(

As for Leningrad I am allowing Leningrad to be cut off. Post #256 I gave details on what I have been doing. Turn 53 there was breakthrough in the South and BrianG has some decisions to make with that breakthrough, along with his fighter force in tatters, a concentrated Soviet bomber force at will bombing with little to no German fighter interference causing massive casualties. Not to mention 10+ Soviet inf Corps in the 55-60 exp range and ?? Armor Corps in the 40 exp range. His concentrated force of 3 PZ Corps(my estimate) in the North is out of place to help where they are needed(far south). The north has nothing left for me, he can have it and the time it takes to capture it along with miles of forest. The future is South and Central part of the map.



_____________________________


(in reply to EwaldvonKleist)
Post #: 259
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/13/2019 8:27:20 PM   
EwaldvonKleist


Posts: 2038
Joined: 4/14/2016
From: Berlin, Germany
Status: offline
Hi,
quote:

If I am neither adding any value or interest then I can save all some time.

My post might have been ambigious here. I mean that the reader/commenter has nothing of value to add, not you (the thread creator).
In other words, to get few comments, you can write a perfect post (nothing to add), a complicated post (no one understands or has a starting point to ask questions from) or one that is of no relavance or whatever else.
When there is a report for one turn, your coverage is high-quality!

Your AAR has 9k hits with is quite good for an AAR with that length&age if you compare to other AARs. So people read but seem to do not comment.
Of course it is understandable that few comments are disappointing if you have put much work into it.

quote:

I was hating life the next day at work because of it :(

I know this WitE induced feeling too :D

I understand the rationale of luring the Axis to push North through bad terrain to draw away forces. Where I disagree is to sacrifice the comparatively high number of units in the Leningrad pocket if the Axis succeeds to cut it off.
Leningrad&backdoor strong OR Leningrad&backdoor weak but not Leningrad strong&backdoor weak.

Even if the Axis does not cut Leningrad off, they have inner lines, while you can only move out/reinforce through the port with low capacity.

Of course that does not matter if you can enforce a quick decision in the South with pockets.

How satisfied are you with your "kill the AFV" focus in this game so far?

Glad you have joined the U2VS fan club.


How is the state re the AAR-server?

Regards
EvK




< Message edited by EwaldvonKleist -- 3/13/2019 8:33:23 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 260
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/13/2019 8:37:32 PM   
M60A3TTS


Posts: 4014
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: offline
@HLYA: I've largely been on sabatical, so stop moping.

One would find it hard to criticize your defense of Leningrad, aided in no small part by Brian's bewildering decision to drive his panzerwaffe into the backwoods of Torzhok in 1941, effectively killing any chance of taking Leningrad or Moscow that year.

As to your northern position, I would question sacrificing guards cavalry corps in that pocket, although I am well aware that you and I place a differing value on their importance. What I have found is that guards cavalry are in a better position during inclement weather and moving away from a functioning railhead to advance and engage in combat later in the war (43-45). Part of that is due to the cost of deliberate attacks by cavalry remaining at 6 vs. 16 for the armor.

Why do you have three units in each hex along the Finnish No Attack Line? That means once you are squeezed to 3 units a hex, your defenders will rout or surrender that much sooner.

You seem a little too ready to write off Leningrad. You know that you don't need those ports like you used to as airhead supply is available now. Personally, I would already have corp-ed the guards rifle divisions along the Neva and be dug in for a long siege. Two armies, airbases on two hexes and a rifle brigade on each of the four hexes along the Finnish line will give you what you need to make the Axis player have to really work at digging you out.



< Message edited by M60A3TTS -- 3/13/2019 8:42:22 PM >

(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 261
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/13/2019 9:56:18 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
@HYLA, I've never played the game so I have no value to add. I've sold my soul to WiTPAE and don't have time for this one, but I enjoy reading the AARs (yours included) very much.

(in reply to M60A3TTS)
Post #: 262
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/13/2019 10:03:30 PM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS

@HLYA: I've largely been on sabatical, so stop moping.


Thank you for a reply M60. Welcome back!! I will now put on my happy face :-)

quote:

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS

One would find it hard to criticize your defense of Leningrad, aided in no small part by Brian's bewildering decision to drive his panzerwaffe into the backwoods of Torzhok in 1941, effectively killing any chance of taking Leningrad or Moscow that year.

As to your northern position, I would question sacrificing guards cavalry corps in that pocket, although I am well aware that you and I place a differing value on their importance. What I have found is that guards cavalry are in a better position during inclement weather and moving away from a functioning railhead to advance and engage in combat later in the war (43-45). Part of that is due to the cost of deliberate attacks by cavalry remaining at 6 vs. 16 for the armor.


Yes, I don't put high value on Cavalry in general. They are great for what you mentioned above and I have a nice cadre of other Cav Corps(12 more Corps). But I don't mind losing what I have there for the delay in and around Leningrad. Once lost they should be back in shape by the end of the year.

Thus Guard Cavalry made it look even better enticement for Leningrad to be encircled. I cared not if the Germans direct attacked or cut off the ports. What I do hope at a minimum is for the Germans to take to 2nd week of July to eliminate Leningrad. If the 3 PZ Corps(estimation from the "ctrl + 3" function, since I really don't do much recon now since I am sure of my lines) are held here to the end of June at a minimum then that will meet my minimum expectation.

quote:

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS

Why do you have three units in each hex along the Finnish No Attack Line? That means once you are squeezed to 3 units a hex, your defenders will rout or surrender that much sooner.

Very good question indeed. It is multi faceted.

1st, actually it is ALL hexes are stacked 3 high in Leningrad. With all the hexes in and around Leningrad filled with units any attack by the Germans would route the Soviet unit to the east instead of into Leningrad proper. Thus freeing them from the pot if you will. Any unit hungry German would not want to attack to lose a "juicy" morsel ;-) Since I had the front line stacked with large defense values and after Brians first attack sending the first set of 3 units far to the east it looks like he made the decision to cut off Leningrad proper. He wanted to force surrender all the units I guess. If he pursued a direct frontal assault all of those Guard units and units in general would 100% route to the east. So I set it up to go either way. With few towns in the north those units route way to the East on to a rail hex normally. Once they rally they are ready to go south

2nd, Many of those units in the rear were brigades set at 70% and division set at 20% TOE along with some AT Brigades set at 20%. If Brian wanted to cut off the ports these units can do one of two things. They can be ported out quickly being under 300 capacity OR they can be used to bring a front line division back up to full strength. Matter fact all units that are killed I use as replacement brigades/Divisions to my other Divisions on the map. It is a nifty replacement system once set up correctly. Many of these 20% TOE replacement divisions are nearing 40 experience so not much of an experience hit either :)

This replacement system is an excellent way to keep an offense going. You really only have to worry about the fatigue since you replace back to full every turn. I now have division at 20%, 30%, and 40% TOE in key areas of attacks. I do the same thing for my Armor Corps. Every Turn they are full strength.

Not to mention this is how you can get your Armor Corps high in Experience pretty quickly. Yes, when you convert 3 armor brigades into an Armor Corps your experience goes through the floor. Now if you take the corps and add in your top experienced armor brigades you start to quickly bring that experience up. I guess I should stop giving out too much information :(

3rd, There was an opportunity to use the 6 Cav Corps to try and do an offense towards Finland. Finlands border with Leningrad was only guarded by Regiments. Instead I decided to use them just to cause loses to the Germans. I have pretty much shunned attacking any other nationality besides the Germans until turn 53. (I should have tried Finland, that would have been interesting to say the least. But kind of defeated my purpose of inflicting loses on Germans)

quote:

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS

You seem a little too ready to write off Leningrad. You know that you don't need those ports like you used to as airhead supply is available now. Personally, I would already have corp-ed the guards rifle divisions along the Neva and be dug in for a long siege. Two armies, airbases on two hexes and a rifle brigade on each of the four hexes along the Finnish line will give you what you need to make the Axis player have to really work at digging you out.



Haven't written it off. Just my expectation is Panzers till the end of June and most Infantry to Mid July to be kept in Area. Anything beyond that I am ESTACTIC. I have been up in the air about making a Corps in Leningrad. At this stage of the game I feel it is better used around Moscow and or Stalino. I really debated about Corp'ing up the whole defense of defending the ports. But I didn't and may be forced to pay the price here in a little bit. Many of my resources now are tied up in the Center and South



_____________________________


(in reply to M60A3TTS)
Post #: 263
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/13/2019 10:07:40 PM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline
quote:

HardLuckYetAgain

If the 3 PZ Corps(estimation from the "ctrl + 3" function, since I really don't do much recon now since I am sure of my lines) are held here to the end of June at a minimum then that will meet my minimum expectation.



Let me clarify, I don't do much if any Recon unless I am going on the attack or to shoot down a few more German planes at the end of the turn. I will use recon to see if German fighters will fly to a hex. This way I will either send fighter escort or no escort (sometimes I have been burned on this :( Other than that once I have a line I am confident in I don't recon.


_____________________________


(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 264
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/13/2019 10:19:48 PM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EwaldvonKleist


Of course that does not matter if you can enforce a quick decision in the South with pockets.



I don't have a pocket. I do have a hole in his line with depth that should force units in his attacking wedge to turn around and deal with. Plus my units cut his only supplying rail line to that attacking wedge so supply has to travel a bit further.

quote:

ORIGINAL: EwaldvonKleist

How satisfied are you with your "kill the AFV" focus in this game so far?



You are talking about my employment of attacking his PZ Divisions to cause loses to his tank force? I did that in the Winter to great effect. I have done the same thing recently but with not so great a result.

quote:

ORIGINAL: EwaldvonKleist

Glad you have joined the U2VS fan club.



The way I have them set up they are doing excellent KIA's 30-50 per run on the experienced group. Not so much on the inexperienced group :( Like 0

quote:



How is the state re the AAR-server?


They are not AAR's. It is just folders with every one of my WITE games that I took snap shots of through the years. I was going to share out my BrianG game folder from that for those that wanted to see it. But maybe I will go ahead and continue here instead.

Regards
EvK






_____________________________


(in reply to EwaldvonKleist)
Post #: 265
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/13/2019 10:22:25 PM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: John B.

@HYLA, I've never played the game so I have no value to add. I've sold my soul to WiTPAE and don't have time for this one, but I enjoy reading the AARs (yours included) very much.


Thank you John B. I almost pulled the trigger on WiTPAE last week myself. But in the end I would have zero time to immerse myself in the game in my current schedule :(

_____________________________


(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 266
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/13/2019 10:24:54 PM   
M60A3TTS


Posts: 4014
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EwaldvonKleist

Glad you have joined the U2VS fan club.




Regards
EvK






You may consider yourself under arrest, Comrade General Armii. You were going to a position in the Far East, but now it's a show trial and twenty years hard labor at a rehabilitation camp.

(in reply to EwaldvonKleist)
Post #: 267
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/13/2019 10:34:48 PM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: M60A3TTS


quote:

ORIGINAL: EwaldvonKleist

Glad you have joined the U2VS fan club.




Regards
EvK






You may consider yourself under arrest, Comrade General Armii. You were going to a position in the Far East, but now it's a show trial and twenty years hard labor at a rehabilitation camp.


I know I know, I am guilty. Take me away please. I have 80 squadrons of U-2VS & they are causing some pretty nice loses to the Germans the way that I have them set up. I have 8 squadrons of Hurricane SHAP Fighter Bombers I have been happy with too. I am increasing that to 16 over the next couple of turns. I mean I really have so many fighters why not, not to mention LA-5's coming online soon and German fighter planes are becoming like hens teeth.

This is my current fighters on hand. Plus I can't kill off the darn U-2VS quick enough. I send them against the Panzers most of the time to be honest. I don't care if the AA shoots down 5-20 of them at a time ;-) My IL-2's go against the Infantry.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to M60A3TTS)
Post #: 268
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/13/2019 10:42:14 PM   
HardLuckYetAgain


Posts: 6987
Joined: 2/5/2016
Status: offline
My 4,033 fighters for current turn 53 Fighter Experience = mid 70's to 80. With Morale from 70-89 on majority. Still no guard fighters




Attachment (1)

_____________________________


(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 269
RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) A... - 3/13/2019 10:45:42 PM   
M60A3TTS


Posts: 4014
Joined: 5/13/2011
Status: offline
If you are trying to conserve IL-2s by leaving the panzers with their AA compliment to the U-2s, my question is why? The IL2M3 alone will have a total production run of something like thirty thousand. You can't run out of them unless you lose the factories early on. The only thing that you really save are trucks. You noted you want like 140-160 IL-2 regiments. You can in fact go higher than that, but again, it will eat more trucks than a U-2VS. That is the only advantage I can see. And as another option you could use level bombers which don't take as many losses against panzers.

(in reply to HardLuckYetAgain)
Post #: 270
Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 8 [9] 10   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: Red Star Ascending Axis (BrianG) VS Soviet (HLYA) All Welcome Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 [9] 10   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.454