Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Radar questions

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich >> Radar questions Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Radar questions - 4/9/2019 11:06:19 AM   
CaptCarnage

 

Posts: 335
Joined: 5/24/2011
Status: offline
First off, what is the difference between red and white circles? I can see the whites are longer range but anything else?

And is it a viable strategy to knock them out? There are so many of them.
Post #: 1
RE: Radar questions - 4/9/2019 11:53:28 AM   
drmweaver2

 

Posts: 34
Joined: 3/30/2019
Status: offline
A long answer isn't as clear... so here's the short version.

Why wouldn't you want to take out a radar site?
Only possible disadvantage I see is MAYBE tipping off a raid is coming nearby.
But if you took it out a few days earlier, that is no longer much of a relevant consideration.

(in reply to CaptCarnage)
Post #: 2
RE: Radar questions - 4/9/2019 12:13:02 PM   
simovitch


Posts: 5488
Joined: 2/14/2006
Status: offline
Red circles are CHL (chain home low) sites that can detect aircraft flying as low as 500' The white circles are CH (chain home high) That can detect only above 3000'

In BTR these are called Freya and Mammut sites respectively.

< Message edited by simovitch -- 4/9/2019 12:33:16 PM >


_____________________________

simovitch


(in reply to drmweaver2)
Post #: 3
RE: Radar questions - 4/9/2019 1:40:08 PM   
CaptCarnage

 

Posts: 335
Joined: 5/24/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: drmweaver2

A long answer isn't as clear... so here's the short version.

Why wouldn't you want to take out a radar site?
Only possible disadvantage I see is MAYBE tipping off a raid is coming nearby.
But if you took it out a few days earlier, that is no longer much of a relevant consideration.




but is it worth it? There are so many overlapping ones, that the question is whether it is worth it or not to spend raids and bombs on radars...

But yeah about tipoff I actually tried to knock a few out in the Netherlands and Belgium and it seems that the result was a massive influx of enemy fighters in that area, so the next raid group I planned a little north of NL was completely obliterated, I lost 50% of bombers.

So why wouldnt you take one out? Maybe thats why... Dont know if they are related but it makes sense as a defensive tactic.

< Message edited by CaptCarnage -- 4/9/2019 1:49:22 PM >

(in reply to drmweaver2)
Post #: 4
RE: Radar questions - 4/9/2019 3:24:48 PM   
warshipbuilder


Posts: 1960
Joined: 2/23/2013
From: C-eh-n-eh-d-eh
Status: offline
quote:

but is it worth it? There are so many overlapping ones, that the question is whether it is worth it or not to spend raids and bombs on radars...


You have lots of FB units, use them. Just take out 3 or 4 along you ingress/egress route and use your RCM units on the Mammut sites. That should cut down on the bad guys reaction time. I used this as a tactic in a PBEM game and it worked pretty good. Yes it does give your plan away, so every now and again, you send your main force in a different direction and just use a diversionary force through the hole. Keeps the other guy guessing.

_____________________________

warshipbuilder

Any ship can be a minesweeper, once.
ED/BTR Ressurection Project
https://www.bombercommandmuseumarchives.ca/

(in reply to CaptCarnage)
Post #: 5
RE: Radar questions - 4/10/2019 2:14:34 AM   
drmweaver2

 

Posts: 34
Joined: 3/30/2019
Status: offline
Is it worth it?
Obviously, your mileage may vary.
For me, it IS worth it - starting on Turn 1.

My first 10 turns in a 500+ turn campaign always have at least 4 radar target missions. Turn 1 may have as many as 20.

Shorter scenarios...adjust as time, resources and your goals (whether game defined victory conditions or just what you want) permit or demand. To be honest, I've only played a couple of the shorter scenarios as I decided to "learn as I go", though I have re-started campaigns a couple times after realizing I hadn't understood what I was doing the first 30 turns (a couple times).

(in reply to warshipbuilder)
Post #: 6
RE: Radar questions - 4/10/2019 5:05:47 AM   
CaptCarnage

 

Posts: 335
Joined: 5/24/2011
Status: offline
Many thanks for your insight warshipbuilder.

And as for dreamwesver, I also start with taking out Radar Stations but thats why I want to know if these are viable approaches.
And not for a few turns.
If you are new to the game and start to tell what people should do in Long Campaigns riggt before stating you have hardly played a Long Campaign then better hold your horses.

< Message edited by CaptCarnage -- 4/10/2019 5:08:34 AM >

(in reply to drmweaver2)
Post #: 7
RE: Radar questions - 4/10/2019 7:21:03 AM   
Denniss

 

Posts: 7902
Joined: 1/10/2002
From: Germany, Hannover (region)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: simovitch
In BTR these are called Freya and Mammut sites respectively.
Hmmm, not really. Freya was an air search radar with rotating antenna, Mammut was based on 8 static Freya antennas (2 rows of 4 mounted atop of the other). Mammut had a massive range increase over Freya.
Frey could only detect range and direction but required other radar types (like Würzburg) for alt but should be able to detect aircraft on all alt bands (low alt detection range was limited due to physics though).

(in reply to simovitch)
Post #: 8
RE: Radar questions - 4/10/2019 11:43:59 PM   
drmweaver2

 

Posts: 34
Joined: 3/30/2019
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CaptCarnage
And as for dreamwesver ... better hold your horses.
A careful read of my post would show that I didn't tell anyone what to do. I stated what I do and made an argument supporting it.

G* **** ** * ***e.

(in reply to CaptCarnage)
Post #: 9
RE: Radar questions - 4/11/2019 4:59:13 AM   
CaptCarnage

 

Posts: 335
Joined: 5/24/2011
Status: offline
:)
thanks for all the replies guys

(in reply to drmweaver2)
Post #: 10
RE: Radar questions - 4/20/2019 3:45:23 AM   
warshipbuilder


Posts: 1960
Joined: 2/23/2013
From: C-eh-n-eh-d-eh
Status: offline
Here is a list of the LW long range radar sites

Alkmar
Avranches
Barth
Bolzano
Borkum
Briest
Florennes
Grossenbrode
Jever
Langenhagen
Le Bourget
Monchy Breton
Morlaix
Nordhorn
Pforzheim
Rechlin-Larz
Rennes
Salzburg
Sint Denijs Westrem
Soesterberg
Stade
Volkel
Westerland
Zeltweg


_____________________________

warshipbuilder

Any ship can be a minesweeper, once.
ED/BTR Ressurection Project
https://www.bombercommandmuseumarchives.ca/

(in reply to CaptCarnage)
Post #: 11
RE: Radar questions - 4/24/2019 8:14:14 AM   
Denniss

 

Posts: 7902
Joined: 1/10/2002
From: Germany, Hannover (region)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: warshipbuilder
Rechlin-Larz
Larz should be Laerz, please check for proper in-game name (just in case it's a typo in the post here)

(in reply to warshipbuilder)
Post #: 12
RE: Radar questions - 4/24/2019 3:05:41 PM   
simovitch


Posts: 5488
Joined: 2/14/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Denniss


quote:

ORIGINAL: warshipbuilder
Rechlin-Larz
Larz should be Laerz, please check for proper in-game name (just in case it's a typo in the post here)


It's not a typo here, I'll get this fixed.

_____________________________

simovitch


(in reply to Denniss)
Post #: 13
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's Eagle Day to Bombing the Reich >> Radar questions Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.953