Chickenboy
Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: warspite1
quote:
ORIGINAL: Zap
Just be be clear, the reason you don't see me with 39,000+ post like one, Ah, I mean some posters is because mine are just quality. So if you took that into the calculation I would or should be awarded a number in the area of 500,000. No bragging just fact.
warspite1
I think you've missed a fundamental point Zapster ol' son and you conflate number of posts and quality of posts to come to the wrong arbitrary conclusion.
Yes there are some posters, such as yourself, with a relatively low post count / length of time on the forum.
OK. So far we're in agreement. An unusually well-written post thus far, Warspite1. Considering that you have difficulty with even the most basic written communication, I'm impressed.
quote:
However, as you say, you make up for the low post count with the sheer quality of posts. Your posts are, without question, erudite, witty and, in the language of cool kids nowadays - always en point.
OK. You lost me again.
quote:
But equally there are those with similar posts/time % whose posts range from okay to simply meh....and of course Zorch fits into the latter category.
OK. Back on track. Good boy, Warspite1. Good boy. Here's a cookie.
quote:
There are those with a solid, middling post count that also raise the bar in terms of quality – Orm is an example of this, with over 17,000 posts of the highest Scandinavian quality.
I don't understand. Do Orm's posts seem cold, overly-taxed and smelling like salmon? 
quote:
But your wish to denigrate those with a high post count, simply on the basis of a high post count, is just plain wrong. Shockingly so. Yes I agree there are posters with a large post count - and Chickenboy is an obvious example - where said post count is inflated to a ridiculous degree by posts that are paragons of virtue. Why, I'm unworthy to virtually grovel before him and lick his e-boots.
OK. Tracking you again.
quote:
But I notice the target of your ire is a poster you refer to only by number of posts - 39,000+ - but don't name that poster. You are of course referring to me and I am extremely upset at this totally unwarranted attack on someone who is widely recognised as being Matrix's greatest living poster.
OK. Still in agreement. Except for the unwarranted bit. And the 'greatest' bit, I'm in full agreement with everything here.
quote:
One only has to look at some of the posts to realise the greatness that lives within the very bosom of the Matrix family:
23 September 2009 – “Yes, I agree”
26 March 2011 – “+1”
4 April 2012 – “Oh get lost Zorch you maggot, you’re talking out of your behind as usual”
16 May 2014 – “Hello, is it me you’re looking for?”
4 August 2017 – “Vorsprung durch technik”
3 September 2018 - “I believe the children are our future”
12 May 2019 - "Bosom"
But don’t just take my word for it - look at the testimonials:
“I liKed waspite1 they are my Friends” - soojan
“A wordsmith to compare with Dickens, Shakespeare and all the greats” – Anonymous
"Is he still here?" - Numerous forumites
“That’s my boy!” – Mummy warspite1
“Er….who? what?” The New York Times
"I'm green buttoning this buffoon" - numerous forumites
"Marry me warspite1!!" - Jenna Coleman
"No marry me warspite1!!" - Alison Brie
“Wasn’t this the dumbarse that claimed to be the rightful heir to the British throne?” – The Daily Telegraph
“Haven’t we banned this bozo yet?” – The Matrix management team
"He said bosom fnarr, fnarr" - warspite1
I think the above is proof if proof be needs be, that what I am saying is correct (as usual). A full written apology is acceptable Zap.
Don't forget 'bottom'. I have that in my notes from October 3, 2015. That was a great post. Unlike your other 39317.
_____________________________
|
Printable Version
RE: Hello - 
a toast.
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread