DaBabes Mod OoB issue

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

DaBabes Mod OoB issue

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> DaBabes Mod OoB issue

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

DaBabes Mod OoB issue - 7/5/2019 9:48:59 PM

TheElf

Posts: 3870
Joined: 5/14/2003
From: Pax River, MD
Status: offline

Anyone else playing this mod notice the 38th Division is attached to the 16th Army and not the 23rd? This is killing my timetable for Hong Kong...

Intentional? Looking for an answer from John or duly designated Babes Maven.

_____________________________

IN PERPETUUM SINGULARIS SEDES

Post #: 1

RE: DaBabes Mod OoB issue - 7/5/2019 11:12:06 PM

BillBrown

Posts: 2335
Joined: 6/15/2002
Status: offline

It is the same in the stock scenario 1 and 2.

(in reply to TheElf)

Post #: 2

RE: DaBabes Mod OoB issue - 7/5/2019 11:35:43 PM

TheElf

Posts: 3870
Joined: 5/14/2003
From: Pax River, MD
Status: offline

hmmm, I guess they thought it unfair to charge the PPs to move it out of China once HK fell. I kinda wish I had some support for it atm.

_____________________________

IN PERPETUUM SINGULARIS SEDES

(in reply to BillBrown)

Post #: 3

RE: DaBabes Mod OoB issue - 7/5/2019 11:35:57 PM

spence

Posts: 5400
Joined: 4/20/2003
From: Vancouver, Washington
Status: offline

According to Wiki it was part of the 23rd Army until 4 Jan 1942. That's after the fall of Hong Kong. It was then assigned to 16th Army.

It also says its 230th Regt had its designation changed to the 3rd Mixed Regt which took part in the Java Campaign (probably after some small units were attached). Do both the 230th Regt and the 3rd Mixed Regt exist in the game?

(in reply to TheElf)

Post #: 4

RE: DaBabes Mod OoB issue - 7/5/2019 11:37:44 PM

jdsrae

Posts: 2716
Joined: 3/1/2010
From: Gandangara Country
Status: offline

I�ve mainly played Scenario 1 and when I noticed 38th Div�s HQ wasn�t strictly historically accurate I just assumed it was an intentional OOB decision for game play reasons, so the Japan player now doesn�t have to save their first 1500 PP to buy it out to use it in 16th Army.
Your mod makers might just have had the same thought or might not have questioned that Scenario 1 decision.

_____________________________

Currently playing my first PBEM, no house rules Scenario 1 as IJ.
AAR link (no SolInvictus): https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4684655

(in reply to BillBrown)

Post #: 5

RE: DaBabes Mod OoB issue - 7/6/2019 11:46:01 AM

Uncivil Engineer

Posts: 1014
Joined: 2/22/2012
From: Florida, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jdsrae

I�ve mainly played Scenario 1 and when I noticed 38th Div�s HQ wasn�t strictly historically accurate I just assumed it was an intentional OOB decision for game play reasons, so the Japan player now doesn�t have to save their first 1500 PP to buy it out to use it in 16th Army.
Your mod makers might just have had the same thought or might not have questioned that Scenario 1 decision.

The game could also give the Japanese player an extra 1500 PP to facilitate the HQ change. But, it's unlikely most JFBs would use them to change 38 Div HQ - there are so many other uses.

(in reply to jdsrae)

Post #: 6