Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) Page: <<   < prev  38 39 [40] 41 42   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/2/2019 4:02:26 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
The battle map for China.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1171
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/2/2019 4:04:46 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
You've seen the Amoy results. Near Kukong I shock attacked his armor and laid waste to several of his units. One was destroyed and the others retreated.

I do see a vulnerability on my far southern flank. Scott could surround my division in the woods and use his airpower to prevent me from reopening it as he could hammer my units in clear terrain. I think Hong Kong Canton are important objectives not only for the VP but as ports and to bust open my flank on that side.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1172
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/2/2019 5:48:56 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
Hong Kong also has the shipyard which he could protect with his air units.

Congratulations on destroying an armored unit, it will be awhile before it is seen again. If ever.

As long as a unit has one point of supply, I think that it will act in combat like it is fully supplied.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1173
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/2/2019 11:59:22 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
He's not taking that many ship losses that would lead to a need for a front line ship yard. But those ports would be a big help to him and he could widen out the front with more access to clear hexes. As it currently stands, he's stymied in the rough terrain and I'm staying out of clear terrain at all costs!

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1174
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/3/2019 12:58:11 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
We've done a couple of basically quiet turns. My AA at Manila continues to conduct slow attrition on Scott shotting down 2-3 planes per turn. I can't stop him from bombing me but I figure each plane I shoot down makes up for 12 squads/devices when Manila falls. :) I'm pulling the CVs off of the pearl route as there has not been anything but it gives me an even more devious idea.

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1175
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/3/2019 12:58:40 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Here is the latest score report.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1176
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/3/2019 12:59:58 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Here's the latest from the main battle front in china. He has gathered his fleet in what looks like invasion/raid mode but I'm not sure where he's going with it. I had a sub that had a shot at a BB but missed. The ASW did not.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1177
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/3/2019 1:01:34 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Here is the Manila report. This will be quiet until Scott decides to do something.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1178
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/3/2019 7:24:25 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Looks like Okinawa is the target based on the pasting from the air that Scott just laid on it. I only have two brigades in the north but they have level 6 forts and wooded rough terrain. MTBs are going to try to disrupt the invasion so we'll see what happens. Shot down some planes over Manila and that about sums it up for now.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1179
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/3/2019 8:54:08 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
Minisubs available? Even a few barges to go into harms way and mess things up? Don't forget to send things at the enemy carriers to get them to run away.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1180
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/3/2019 9:17:05 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Sending 3 MTB TFs as we speak.

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1181
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/3/2019 9:21:32 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
How about barges to mess up his surface TF, maybe even get a carrier TF or two which then would react away - possibly towards LBA set to strike one hex short of the main carrier group?

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1182
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/3/2019 10:45:18 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Not a bad idea but, alas, I don't have a whole lot of supply to spend on those things at Okinawa. But, the MTBs did their job! They did not sink much (just a DE and a small AP (with a large AP reported as sinking in a collision)) but it did prevent the landing this turn as the landing force reacted away. I'm not sure how much good that will do me in the long run but I guess it removes the target hex one turn from his big shore bombardment that he put in. An MTB also put a torpedo into the Renown. No real reported damage but if Scott wants to fix it it will take a long long time.

I misjudged where his small invasion TF was going so my carriers did not do much. But, they also did not get hit by his carriers! I should be able to make it back to Tokyo without getting smashed by his CVs.

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1183
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/4/2019 1:01:20 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Okinawa invasion day two. This time Scott got ashore, but, oddly, in the afternoon with only a few units. He has been plastering the island with heavies and naval air which has increased my disruption but not done much damage to my units. I'm not sure how he managed to time the invasion for after the airstrikes but he did. We'll see if my CD fort can score some hits on the second wave (unless Scott and time the invasion again).

I'm gather forces to put some hurt on the Americans in China. My tank divisions should be good against his isolated armor.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1184
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/4/2019 1:03:33 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Otherwise, more planes shot down over Manila. As far as I'm concerned, Manila is doing exactly what I hoped. It is tying down lots of his troops and he keeps using his entire medium bomber force and losing 2-3 planes per day. Much better than having those bombs rain down on me in China or Okinawa! I think he needs to ignore Manila or just go in and dig me out of there. This is the worst of both worlds for him (IMHO).




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1185
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/4/2019 2:13:56 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
See if you can repeat with MTBs at Okinawa. You might also want to try night torpedo bombing as well. Using torpedo bombers with bombs at 1000 feet, they suffer no low altitude bomb loss like level bombers. You could also set that up for any resupply/reinforcement convoys to China. Even float planes at 1000 feet do good damage to DDs and transports.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1186
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/4/2019 3:04:19 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Oh, good idea. I'll give that a shot! Do betties do well at night at low altitude?

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1187
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/4/2019 4:59:43 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
That depends on the crews experience . The higher the better. Less than 50% experience won't fly. The bomb load for Bettys, Nells, and other twin engine torpedo bombers is two 250 kg bombs and four 60 kg bombs in normal range. The long range Nells can reach out 21 hexes with a torpedo! Kates have two 250 kg bombs, I presume the other single engine torpedo bombers do as well. If they can hit at night, that is better than wasting them on kamikazes. Jakes carry four 60 kg bombs as well, if I remember correctly. Those bombs work well enough on DDs and transports with no armor. It can cause the break up of his amphib task force. That should also work on CVEs if they also get targeted.

If you are going after the big carriers, I would use torpedoes but bombs can also cause some good damage. Maybe even enough for the CV to break off and reduce the striking and CAP forces enough.

edited to include this: Make sure that you have good night naval search. If the bombers have radar, I believe that increases the search percentage by 5%. Lower moonlight should hurt as well as storms. But those help MTBs and any other surface task forces. Think of the Kitakami and Oi on a night surprise with 40 Long Lance torpedoes each.

< Message edited by RangerJoe -- 9/4/2019 5:07:22 PM >


_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1188
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/5/2019 12:57:17 AM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline
Is this the Yidish navy with the OI?

< Message edited by Bif1961 -- 9/5/2019 12:58:51 AM >

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1189
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/5/2019 2:35:57 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bif1961

Is this the Yidish navy with the OI?

Yes, but there is still no Vay!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 1190
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/5/2019 2:53:28 AM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bif1961

Is this the Yidish navy with the OI?

Yes, but there is still no Vay!


But there is Dreck, there is always dreck.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 1191
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/5/2019 2:41:33 PM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Bif1961

Is this the Yidish navy with the OI?

I still think that Kitakami was named wrong, it could've been so much better

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 1192
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/7/2019 4:01:52 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
What I really object to is how the program seems to protect Allied invasion TFs. I had a large Kamikaze attack on Scott's invasion fleet. I had six groups of fighters in Shanghai and southern Kysushu set to sweep. Airfields fine, high aggression commanders, squadron experiece of at least three of the squadrons was 60+, none lower than 48. This is what happened:

1) None of my fighters swept. And, the three groups in southern Kyushu stayed on the ground the entire day so Scott bombed them and destroyed 60+ fighters on the ground.

2) Some of my kamikazes flew in the morning and Scott's morning CAP, unswept, shot down almost all of them.

3) Then, as soon his morning CAP was exhausted (really when then were down to about 4 fighters), my kamikazes stopped flying so;

4) in the afternoon, the rest of the Kamikazes flew and Scott's reset CAP got to shoot down all of them as well. Naturally the fighter sweeps that did not fly in the morning did not fly in the afternoon (even the unbombed ones in Shanghai).

This also happened (see earlier posts) when Scott invaded china. That time, my fighters flew in the morning and took big losses to get his CAP down to zero and then the kamis waited and flew in the afternoon so that his reset CAP get to shoot down all of the fighters in the morning and then all of the Kamis in the afternoon.

It is really no fun to play a game where it appears that it is designed to hand Scott an aerial victory each time he leaves an invasion TF vulnerable to a mass attack. About 350 planes lost with no ships hit when you total up both attacks No Kamis get through but they and the CAP fly in such a way to insure that he basically gets to shoot down each plane.

(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 1193
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/9/2019 3:19:56 PM   
Gridley380


Posts: 464
Joined: 12/20/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: John B.
About 350 planes lost with no ships hit when you total up both attacks No Kamis get through but they and the CAP fly in such a way to insure that he basically gets to shoot down each plane.


I'd love to know what CAP settings and such he is using. Granted some of it may be luck, but I don't do nearly that well fending off kamikazi's even against the AI. *Some* get through (and should).

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1194
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/9/2019 10:34:14 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
I'm not sure of the answer to that question but I can ask. In the interim, his computer is down so it may be awhile before we get the next turn. :)

(in reply to Gridley380)
Post #: 1195
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/10/2019 12:40:26 AM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
Try setting the kamikazes to a very low altitude and try to get under the CAP. If he sets it too low, then your sweepers will chew up his CAP.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1196
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/11/2019 1:46:11 AM   
Bif1961


Posts: 2014
Joined: 6/26/2008
From: Phenix City, Alabama
Status: offline
Many Kamis flew very low and the popped up a few thousand feet right at the target area before the final plunge, this would help avoid radar and CAP detection until the final few minutes.

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1197
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/24/2019 11:38:20 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Ranger Joe, your answer would be good except (a) the first time I targeted the invasion fleet my sweeps flew in the morning and the kamis flew in the afternoon so the CAP was able to reset and (b) the second time my sweeps (coming from three different airfields) just did not sweep at all so half the kamis flew in the morning got chewed up and the other half obligingly waited until the afternoon so that the CAP would reset and then they all got shot down. I figure I lost close to 500+ planes and never even saw a ship.

(in reply to Bif1961)
Post #: 1198
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/24/2019 11:40:26 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
But, that's all old news even though it's irritating that the planes fly in such a way to maximize their deaths and minimize any risk to allied shipping.

Here we are at the start of October! I'm still maintaining a 20,000 point lead but Scott is pressing in. I did have a nice turn in the air shooting down 20 SBDs that were doing the normal bombing run over Naha.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1199
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 9/24/2019 11:42:19 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline
Supply still seems ok at more than 4.5 million and I do still have 1.59 million fuel so that should hold for awhile. I have more than enough heavy industry but I need to keep those factories fired up to make supply. the Light industry in Manila finally ran out of stockpiled resources so it waits for resources to build up and then it belches out 89 more supply points.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1200
Page:   <<   < prev  38 39 [40] 41 42   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) Page: <<   < prev  38 39 [40] 41 42   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.686