Low number of reviews on steam

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Low number of reviews on steam

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Armored Brigade >> Low number of reviews on steam

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Low number of reviews on steam - 11/4/2019 2:19:37 AM

blaa

Posts: 55
Joined: 12/23/2016
Status: offline

Currently it is sitting at 29 reviews, meaning it flies under the radar. 29 is a really, really low number for such a quality game. And for some reason the store page says it only got 15 reviews, probably dismissing the "free key" reviews.
Might wanna leave it a review if you haven�t already.

Post #: 1

RE: Low number of reviews on steam - 11/4/2019 3:30:14 AM

exsonic01

Posts: 1131
Joined: 7/26/2016
From: Somewhere deep in appalachian valley in PA
Status: offline

+1

https://www.reddit.com/r/Steam/comments/9yd7vs/in_your_opinion_what_do_you_consider_a_good_steam/
Steam review may not be the best material to score the game, but at least it clearly impacts on potential customer's decision making. In that sense, reviewing a game can be a support to the game, whether it is recommendation or not. I believe constructive, suggestive negative review can help the game in long run, if it is not hate review. Let's review this game so that devs can continue this game.

(in reply to blaa)

Post #: 2

RE: Low number of reviews on steam - 11/4/2019 11:40:18 PM

nikolas93TS

Posts: 619
Joined: 2/24/2017
Status: offline

Thanks guys!

Currently we are at 36 reviews (18 from Steam), all of them positive, and we seem to have reached New and Trending list on the Steam homepage. We are satisfied with sales and very positive feedback so far, particularly since this is not a game that, at least graphically, appeals to a mainstream public.

(in reply to exsonic01)

Post #: 3