Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Changes to game

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> WarPlan >> Changes to game Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Changes to game - 11/29/2019 5:02:43 AM   
Twotribes


Posts: 6929
Joined: 2/15/2002
From: Jacksonville NC
Status: offline 		Please don't make changes just cause someone wants you too. I have seen games ruined for me at least by players demanding changes and the programmer caving to their demands. Reasoned change is ok but I like what I see so far and being very conservative hate change for no other reason then it "feels" good.
Post #: 1
RE: Changes to game - 11/29/2019 10:26:18 AM   
Barthheart


Posts: 3194
Joined: 7/20/2004
From: Nepean, Ontario
Status: offline 		+100

_____________________________

Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body,
but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming "WOW, what a ride!"

(in reply to Twotribes)
Post #: 2
RE: Changes to game - 11/29/2019 1:38:19 PM   
Franciscus


Posts: 809
Joined: 12/22/2010
From: Portugal
Status: offline 		Yep, agreed

_____________________________

Former AJE team member

(in reply to Barthheart)
Post #: 3
RE: Changes to game - 11/29/2019 2:24:36 PM   
mroyer

 

Posts: 914
Joined: 3/6/2016
Status: offline
Also agreed.

Some change is good and some is bad. Some change is essential and some is inconsequential.
The trick is careful, deliberate evaluation to separate good/essential from bad/inconsequential.

-Mark R.

(in reply to Franciscus)
Post #: 4
RE: Changes to game - 11/29/2019 2:39:26 PM   
gwgardner

 

Posts: 6722
Joined: 4/7/2006
Status: offline 		+1

(in reply to mroyer)
Post #: 5
RE: Changes to game - 11/29/2019 3:01:09 PM   
sol_invictus


Posts: 1961
Joined: 10/2/2001
From: Kentucky
Status: offline 		It seems that Alvaro is taking the appropriate course by considering suggestions but thinking about any ramifications and testing them first. He certainly isn't making changes on a whim just because someone made a post.

_____________________________

"The fruit of too much liberty is slavery", Cicero

(in reply to gwgardner)
Post #: 6
RE: Changes to game - 11/29/2019 3:44:35 PM   
elmo3

 

Posts: 5820
Joined: 1/22/2002
Status: offline 		No wargame design survives contact with the enemy, uhm I mean the customers....

_____________________________

We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester

(in reply to sol_invictus)
Post #: 7
RE: Changes to game - 11/29/2019 3:47:41 PM   
AlvaroSousa


Posts: 9927
Joined: 7/29/2013
Status: offline 		I take down suggestions. I discuss them with my top beta testers. I try to expand all the ramifications of the implementation of them.

It is nice to see a post from all of you on this subject though calling for DON'T change. My premise is that if I see two sides arguing an issue and I don't find an issue with it then the item is pretty balanced.

When there is only 1 side then I know something is wrong.
When my math is wrong there is something wrong.
When I noticed I don't use a function something is wrong. Like we will have a BB change for advancements because it was pointed out no one is using the Large Warships advancement and I agreed because I never used it either. But with the splitting of the WW1 and WW2 type historical battleships I can make that a functional tech.

Some other things like the supply system, winter effects, and partisans the beta testers and myself think are correct. It is a matter of learning how to play the game better.

I look at the AARs and try to determine skill levels of players and strategies. Even in Beta I did. One thing I noticed that there are many ways to approach the game and counter your opponent.

Some things I noticed....

If you are constantly short on oil.... you might be building too many oil dependent units and not leveraging them correctly.
If you are constantly short on manpower... you are making too many low odds attacks.
If you are short on logistics... you are building too many fancy high logistic units.
If you are having partisan problems... you don't have enough units in key locations.

It's really interesting see players play in varying styles from my own. I learned some things and had to balance others.

The real results will be seen over time as hundreds of games are played and feedback given.

_____________________________

Creator Kraken Studios
- WarPlan
- WarPlan Pacific

Designer Strategic Command
- Brute Force (mod) SC2
- Assault on Communism SC2
- Assault on Democracy SC2
- Map Image Importer SC3

(in reply to sol_invictus)
Post #: 8
RE: Changes to game - 11/29/2019 7:43:45 PM   
sfbaytf

 

Posts: 1122
Joined: 4/13/2005
Status: offline 		Its been suggested the one thing missing is a "soul". I would suggest looking at how Decisive Campaigns Barbarrossa handles it. The use of cards that influence the game is very, very well done. I think just outright borrowing (pirating) the system is something that would be a very good addition not only to Warplan, but the upcoming Pacific version.

Games like War in the Pacific and most other Pacific games just never feel right. Don't get me wrong I love Witp, but games, especially PBEM are just outright formulaic. Any competent Japanese player forms the navy into Kiito Buto -a giant death start and rampages in the early going.

The use of the same system like Decisive Campaigns Barbarrossa could do much to bring a soul into WP.

Many reviewers have commented that in General Eastern Front games, just don't feel right, but Decisive Campaigns does. There were reasons why the Eastern Front was the way it was as was the Pacific Theater and Decisive Campaigns cards system could simulate that as well as give realistic historical alternatives without becoming ridiculous. In any case you have the option to just play without them if you so choose.

(in reply to AlvaroSousa)
Post #: 9
RE: Changes to game - 11/29/2019 8:38:03 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline 		For the manpower part I feel the game game'd me.
Whereas I had no priority in upgrade / replacement, the game simply upgraded everything first no matter what, replacing 0 when manpower was like at 99% - so had many turns of wasted manpower. I've not asked for a manpower change.

But the strategic bombing that is unstoppable and 39-41 Allied air dominance must be sorted. The production loss for Germany compromises the game by how I see it, between aerial losses to be replaced that are insane, and the strategic bombing (Reiterating Uk bomber gone from the start, and its range lowered, they'll gain range through techs, in due time).

Oil is too low for Axis, sorry. It's not about building fancy units. It's simply too low. Or the cost of units too high.
How much Axis gains a turn? A variable but let's say 70-80 at some point (barring bombing).
Subtract 30ish of unkeep once you're in total war. (units out of rail, passive units sticking there). So, net, 40 oil.
That's like averagely 20 unit usages if not less.
Move panzer, pay 1, attack with panzer, pay 2, add bomber to attack, pay 2-3, fighter escorting, 1 more! Oh! I've made 1 proper attack, and dang, 20-25% of my per turn oil is gone.
It's math, and it is not confutable.

(in reply to sfbaytf)
Post #: 10
RE: Changes to game - 11/30/2019 12:37:40 AM   
Rosseau

 

Posts: 2757
Joined: 9/13/2009
Status: offline 		I just change what I want, and I'm happy. But that doesn't work for multiplayer, obviously. So yes, real challenges in getting the balance right. Look at all the tweaking for WitE, and I'm sure some are still not happy.

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 11
RE: Changes to game - 11/30/2019 1:06:05 AM   
TrogusP96

 

Posts: 160
Joined: 6/15/2015
Status: offline 		Well maybe research time should be 365 days per advancement. The research success chance is 56%. what does this mean?
The upgraded units cost 20% more than their predessor. I like this as shows economies for sticking with older model. But I supposed the cost of techs underconstruction could diminish. Also, the number tanks in armor and panzer units continued to shrink as the war progressed except maybe SS and British Armoured Brigades. It seems the starting tech for certain unit types or techs that are mixee tech and doctrine like Breakthrough should be pre 1939 for certain units. The French Army was a mix of low quality reservists and better motorized and colonial troops? The pieces have a sameness that diminishes the national differences? although as the war progressed their was some convergence. The US perhaps should be the same across the board and maybe the UK. I guess their are the national effectiveness ratings, which I think is a great feature.

(in reply to Rosseau)
Post #: 12
RE: Changes to game - 11/30/2019 1:09:56 AM   
TrogusP96

 

Posts: 160
Joined: 6/15/2015
Status: offline 		Maybe its the mixture of national differences for land units but then each side has the capacity to build the same ships and planes which just wasn't so. The German Luftwaffe was not conceived as a strategic force yet they can start with 4 engine bombers right away with a one year delay on tech. The Allies can never catch up on effectiveness. Someone said stick with the vision in another thread - so what is it. So the allies are given a jump on the Strategic Advancement.

(in reply to TrogusP96)
Post #: 13
RE: Changes to game - 11/30/2019 1:13:32 AM   
TrogusP96

 

Posts: 160
Joined: 6/15/2015
Status: offline 		Print games change but printing limits the ability to change. Man oh man board gamers have "house rules" all the time some become rules or options in subsequent editions, maps and counters change. On the surface computer games seem imminently more flexible.

(in reply to TrogusP96)
Post #: 14
RE: Changes to game - 11/30/2019 5:12:34 AM   
tyronec


Posts: 4940
Joined: 8/7/2015
From: Portaferry, N. Ireland
Status: offline
quote:

Its been suggested the one thing missing is a "soul". I would suggest looking at how Decisive Campaigns Barbarrossa handles it. The use of cards that influence the game is very, very well done. I think just outright borrowing (pirating) the system is something that would be a very good addition not only to Warplan, but the upcoming Pacific version.

I bought Decisive Campaigns after reading a good review but didn't like the game at all. The cards system seemed kind of random, maybe a way to simulate history but not great for a game that you play multiple times because over time you would just learn what the cards do and it is not random any more.
Also read the review that said Warplan lacked 'soul', but this is a great game.
Guess we all have our preferences.

(in reply to TrogusP96)
Post #: 15
RE: Changes to game - 11/30/2019 7:29:06 AM   
raxulus2

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 11/8/2019
Status: offline 		You are right Alvaro.
We have to do with the balance, fuel, manpower, partisans etc...
And that's the challenge.
You have made choice on the design and for my own I think you do the good ones.
Of course some tweaks may be done and the patches are doing these.
One more time thanks for the game.
I am playing wargames for a very long time I am 63,(remember AH ans SPI, or SSI games) and Warplan is a very good one.
Keep going on and if a Pacific version is possible I'll buy a copy.
Thanks



(in reply to tyronec)
Post #: 16
RE: Changes to game - 11/30/2019 1:04:58 PM   
Almeron

 

Posts: 60
Joined: 8/4/2017
Status: offline 		I belive this game if fine. Of course there are some bugs, and balance changes needed, but overall, the developers did a great job. It's not overcomplicated, clean, and relative fast. I've spend 15-20+ hours with this game, and I enjoed.
My only issue, with this game is the debatable U-boot, and research system, but owerall I could live with them as well.

(in reply to raxulus2)
Post #: 17
RE: Changes to game - 11/30/2019 2:01:30 PM   
ago1000


Posts: 856
Joined: 8/6/2004
From: Canada
Status: offline 		++Agree. Game is great. Thank you to all. Developers, testers and Alvaro for your hard work and dedication to the game and continued presence to help tweak it.. Much appreciated. Love playing it and will continue to do so for a long time. (or at least until my better half tells me to get off the computer. lol)

(in reply to Almeron)
Post #: 18
RE: Changes to game - 11/30/2019 6:47:52 PM   
AlvaroSousa


Posts: 9927
Joined: 7/29/2013
Status: offline 		Everyone is very welcome and I am super please you all like it.

_____________________________

Creator Kraken Studios
- WarPlan
- WarPlan Pacific

Designer Strategic Command
- Brute Force (mod) SC2
- Assault on Communism SC2
- Assault on Democracy SC2
- Map Image Importer SC3

(in reply to ago1000)
Post #: 19
RE: Changes to game - 11/30/2019 7:45:13 PM   
ncc1701e


Posts: 7380
Joined: 10/29/2013
From: Utopia Planitia Fleet Yards
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tyronec

Also read the review that said Warplan lacked 'soul', but this is a great game.


Yes me too and I do not understand this remark honestly. Is it because there is no MS.406, no Sd.Kfz.222 or Sherman Firefly?
I think it is your imagination that brings "soul" to a game.

Alvaro, I have bought the game only recently. I criticized the game map and I continue. But other than that, this is really a good and fun game.

Enjoying it! (My wife not really ).


_____________________________

Chancellor Gorkon to Captain James T. Kirk:
You don't trust me, do you? I don't blame you. If there is to be a brave new world, our generation is going to have the hardest time living in it.

(in reply to tyronec)
Post #: 20
RE: Changes to game - 11/30/2019 8:02:21 PM   
Zovs


Posts: 6668
Joined: 2/23/2009
From: United States
Status: offline 		Technically speaking your soul is your mind, your will and your emotions. So not sure what the heck the fellow was griping about.

Warplan has a mind (the AI and yours in using the tools of the game). Warplan has a will (I will crush those units in my path to victory!) and Warplan does have emotions (that rascal John the Greek has confounded me again!!!!).

_____________________________


Beta Tester for:
Flashpoint Campaigns: Sudden Storm
War in the East 1 & 2
WarPlan & WarPlan Pacific
Valor & Victory
DG CWIE 2
SPWW2 & SPMBT scenario creator

(in reply to ncc1701e)
Post #: 21
RE: Changes to game - 11/30/2019 10:20:38 PM   
AlvaroSousa


Posts: 9927
Joined: 7/29/2013
Status: offline 		When the Wargamer said it has no soul I believe it's because I didn't have decision events (SC3), card play (DC), a moving scenario decision event (UoC), or a complex political system (HoI4)

I believe that is what they meant. I feel the reviewer didn't understand where the depth was.... hidden... in strategy that varies and could be countered. I play poker and there are many ways to play correctly vs how your opponent plays. WarPlan is like poker IMO. Third Reich was more like chess.

Feel free to comment on the Wargamer review and write your own comments good or bad. Either way it means people will at least look at my game and come to the forum driving sales via curiosity.

Wargamer Review
https://www.wargamer.com/reviews/warplan/

_____________________________

Creator Kraken Studios
- WarPlan
- WarPlan Pacific

Designer Strategic Command
- Brute Force (mod) SC2
- Assault on Communism SC2
- Assault on Democracy SC2
- Map Image Importer SC3

(in reply to Zovs)
Post #: 22
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> WarPlan >> Changes to game Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.656