UP844
Posts: 1662
Joined: 3/3/2016 From: Genoa, Republic of Genoa (occupied by Italy) Status: offline
|
First, thanks to Hailstone for porting this scenario in ToTH. And now, what all of you are running away from screaming "Oh, no!!!"... my ramblings about the scenario . When the scenario is played using the Russians, it is fairly easy to set an ambush and to slaughter the Panzers as they drive to the bridge, especially since the rearmost ones remain inactive, waiting for a direct path to the VPs while the gaps between the woods are occupied by the frontmost Panzers. This unfortunate occurrence could be minimised by having a AI-only force (four or five Pz IVs) enter from the East edge of the map, so as to have the AI approach the bridge from two different directions. When the scenario is played using the Germans, the Russian AI has no chance to win, or even to make the German player sweat: besides being outwitted (as usual), the AI is also heavily outnumbered (the Germans have 14 tanks + 3 AT Guns vs 11 Russian tanks). To give the AI some chance, I think an AI-only second wave of Russian tanks (another 9-10 T-34s) should be added to the reinforcements arriving on turn 2. Finally, I have some doubts about the presence of 50mm PaK 38 and the 75mm PaK 97/38: I suppose they belong to some second-line infantry unit holding the bridge. The 20th Panzer Division was in good shape at the beginning of Bagration (it had a full strength Pz IV battalion, as well as two companies of Jagdpanzer IVs in its Anti-Tank battalion) and should have been equipped with 75mm PaK 40 AT guns.
_____________________________
Chasing Germans in the moonlight is no mean sport Siegfried Sassoon Long Range Fire (A7.22)........1/2 FP
|