Erik Rutins
Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000 From: Vermont, USA Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kull No offense Erik, but you could draw the same graph every flu season. Until there's a clear indicator that mortality rates are dramatically higher, or there's some sort of evolution into scarier varieties, it's hard to see the difference. Don't get me wrong, I'm currently visiting with my 90+ y/o parents and this thing is certainly worrisome from that perspective. But the fact that governments and the media are collaborating to scare the everybody on the planet and shut down the global economy over what amounts to "flu season 2.0", well, I don't see it. No offense taken at all, but there is already a huge amount of data that this is many times more lethal than the flu. The most optimistic estimates from NIH and CDC are in the 0.7% - 1.3% mortality range, while the WHO is saying 3.4%, whereas seasonal flue is about 0.1%. That's average mortality. It's closer to flu mortality for younger people, much much worse for older people. Unlike the flu, it is a lung illness - it attaches to the ACE2 receptors which are mostly in the lungs as I understand it, so people who develop severe illness immediately get a lung infection/pneumonia, which is a heck of a stress test on anyone. Whether it's as bad as 3.4% is debatable, but it's definitely not "just the flu". I wish it were.
_____________________________
|