Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

South Pacific Strategy

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> South Pacific Strategy Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
South Pacific Strategy - 3/20/2020 2:46:15 AM   
Scott_USN

 

Posts: 715
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: Eagle River, Alaska USA
Status: offline
What is your plan for the South Pacific and Central post late 42? Do you take Rabaul or bypass? I never know how to crack that nut, Rabaul seems to be really fortified. Kevieg(sp) I usually take pretty easy which isolates the bases in the area.

I guess my question is do you follow the historical campaign or mix it up? I always seem to not take on the Marshall Islands. Nothing there of much worth. But the jump to Marianas seems a little bit too far. Honestly I love the 1942 era and early 43 but haven't pushed to PI ever.
Post #: 1
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/20/2020 2:46:51 AM   
Scott_USN

 

Posts: 715
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: Eagle River, Alaska USA
Status: offline
This is just AI some of the harder ironman.

(in reply to Scott_USN)
Post #: 2
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/20/2020 4:39:24 AM   
geofflambert


Posts: 14863
Joined: 12/23/2010
From: St. Louis
Status: offline
Stay away from the girls in Tahiti.

_____________________________



(in reply to Scott_USN)
Post #: 3
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/20/2020 5:07:55 AM   
Scott_USN

 

Posts: 715
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: Eagle River, Alaska USA
Status: offline
Too late

(in reply to geofflambert)
Post #: 4
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/20/2020 8:24:52 AM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
Personally, I would bypass Rabaul and any other heavily defended base that I would not need to take. That way they are life fire targets for training purposes AND the units will stay there and not return. Very important if you want to take Tokyo proper itself.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Scott_USN)
Post #: 5
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/20/2020 2:57:06 PM   
Macclan5


Posts: 1065
Joined: 3/24/2016
From: Toronto Canada
Status: offline
Excellent question Scott

Verses the AI

Rabul is taken more easily than Truk - depending upon time frame. Rabul lacks coastal artillery (at least in my experience) and you can take it successfully - quickly - with about 3 Infantry Divisions / Armor / Artillery support. It develops to a size 9 Airstrip and a good harbor for large ships including an AR / ARD allowing solid damage repair / support.

Is it worth the investment though ?

1) It allows you a great airbase - with Liberators - to suppress Truk.
2) It allows you a great airbase - with all bombers - to suppress Hollandia / Northern New Guinea et al
3) It allows you a good port with an AR ARD to support significant ship repairs to a point if operating off the Philippines Sea
4) You can isolate a significant garrison in the jungle and "play bomber practice" with American Airframes building up significant experience with minimal risk.

However all of the above can actually be accomplished by taking Kaveign / Admiralty Islands as well - with significantly less troop concentration - disruption - amphibious shipping deployment - Carrier support - etc

However you will also have to suppress Rabul as an airbase (likely in addition to Truk)

I think it is mostly a personal choice dependent on your "timing in the game" and resource deployment.

Historically of course it was bypassed.

There is no one answer fits all.

In a PBEM game ? No idea.





_____________________________

A People that values its privileges above it's principles will soon loose both. Dwight D Eisenhower.

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 6
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/20/2020 3:20:08 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline
I think the Allied player is smart to bypass large troop concentrations if possible; you need major bases at some point, but in that area there are alot of options. A destroyed Japanese unit can rebuild easily, but a bypassed IJA unit is just stuck.

Good Japanese human players know this, and might counter this by defending that area with Nav Gd and other units that can be easily airlifted out. Yes it means the ground defense is weak, but if the US Army can land, it's because the US Navy has control of the air and sea, so the battle is lost at that point anyway, only a matter of time.

_____________________________


(in reply to Macclan5)
Post #: 7
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/20/2020 10:05:58 PM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline
It depends on the setup for Rabaul. Do the Japanese hold Rabaul, Lae, Finschaeffen, Milne Bay and Port Moresby? How about the upper and lower Solomons? The answer to Rabaul (yes/no) differs depending on the ownership of these other bases. And the calculus for its consideration varies too. If the Allies have to fight through 3 or 4 other well-defended islands before they can sniff Rabaul's volcanic stench, then it may not be worth the assets and the time. However, if they already have Port Moresby and most of the other aforementioned God-forsaken pieces of terrain, then maybe it's a consideration.

So, Scott USN-what's the bigger picture?

_____________________________


(in reply to Macclan5)
Post #: 8
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/21/2020 5:48:55 AM   
Scott_USN

 

Posts: 715
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: Eagle River, Alaska USA
Status: offline
Yes PM is held by me, Guadalcanal area is held and landing at Kevieg(sp again)north of Rabaul. Every thing else in New Guinea is owned by Japanese, Milne Bay all the way across the north. Lost several ships at Kevieg and units. Including damage carriers and lost CVE, those things are magnets for attack.

Thanks for the suggestions. It just seems it is one of the most important points of the war.


(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 9
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/21/2020 5:51:12 AM   
Scott_USN

 

Posts: 715
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: Eagle River, Alaska USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Macclan5

Excellent question Scott

Verses the AI

Rabul is taken more easily than Truk - depending upon time frame. Rabul lacks coastal artillery (at least in my experience) and you can take it successfully - quickly - with about 3 Infantry Divisions / Armor / Artillery support. It develops to a size 9 Airstrip and a good harbor for large ships including an AR / ARD allowing solid damage repair / support.

Is it worth the investment though ?

1) It allows you a great airbase - with Liberators - to suppress Truk.
2) It allows you a great airbase - with all bombers - to suppress Hollandia / Northern New Guinea et al
3) It allows you a good port with an AR ARD to support significant ship repairs to a point if operating off the Philippines Sea
4) You can isolate a significant garrison in the jungle and "play bomber practice" with American Airframes building up significant experience with minimal risk.

However all of the above can actually be accomplished by taking Kaveign / Admiralty Islands as well - with significantly less troop concentration - disruption - amphibious shipping deployment - Carrier support - etc

However you will also have to suppress Rabul as an airbase (likely in addition to Truk)

I think it is mostly a personal choice dependent on your "timing in the game" and resource deployment.

Historically of course it was bypassed.

There is no one answer fits all.

In a PBEM game ? No idea.






So tasty for that harbor so few in the area! I should go read up on Rabaul and what happened to it after bypassed. So much to read so little time!

(in reply to Macclan5)
Post #: 10
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/21/2020 8:50:51 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Scott_USN


quote:

ORIGINAL: Macclan5

Excellent question Scott

Verses the AI

Rabul is taken more easily than Truk - depending upon time frame. Rabul lacks coastal artillery (at least in my experience) and you can take it successfully - quickly - with about 3 Infantry Divisions / Armor / Artillery support. It develops to a size 9 Airstrip and a good harbor for large ships including an AR / ARD allowing solid damage repair / support.

Is it worth the investment though ?

1) It allows you a great airbase - with Liberators - to suppress Truk.
2) It allows you a great airbase - with all bombers - to suppress Hollandia / Northern New Guinea et al
3) It allows you a good port with an AR ARD to support significant ship repairs to a point if operating off the Philippines Sea
4) You can isolate a significant garrison in the jungle and "play bomber practice" with American Airframes building up significant experience with minimal risk.

However all of the above can actually be accomplished by taking Kaveign / Admiralty Islands as well - with significantly less troop concentration - disruption - amphibious shipping deployment - Carrier support - etc

However you will also have to suppress Rabul as an airbase (likely in addition to Truk)

I think it is mostly a personal choice dependent on your "timing in the game" and resource deployment.

Historically of course it was bypassed.

There is no one answer fits all.

In a PBEM game ? No idea.






So tasty for that harbor so few in the area! I should go read up on Rabaul and what happened to it after bypassed. So much to read so little time!


US troops landed on the western end of New Britain (Rabaul's island) and took all of the island up to Rabaul. They then established a quarantine line to keep the 100K or so troops at Rabaul in their tiny perimeter. Not sure if the port was ever taken - I recall seeing pictures on this site of an ammunition ship exploding and I thought the caption said it was at Rabaul.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Scott_USN)
Post #: 11
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/21/2020 10:20:07 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
That was at Ulithi if I remember correctly.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 12
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/21/2020 11:40:34 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

That was at Ulithi if I remember correctly.

There were two different incidents of US ammo ships exploding in the Pacific. I will try and find the pictures.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 13
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/21/2020 11:55:36 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
Manus, for Mount Hood

quote:

USS Mount Hood (AE-11) was the lead ship of her class of ammunition ships for the United States Navy in World War II. She was the first ship named after Mount Hood, a volcano in the Cascade Range in Oregon. On 10 November 1944, shortly after 18 men had departed for shore leave, the rest of the crew were killed when the ship exploded in Seeadler Harbor at Manus Island in Papua New Guinea. The ship was obliterated while also sinking or severely damaging 22 smaller craft nearby.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Mount_Hood_(AE-11)

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 14
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/21/2020 11:58:33 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

SS John Burke (MC hull number 609) was an American Liberty Ship built during World War II, one of the 2,710 type 'EC2-S-C1' ships that carried all kinds and types of dry cargo during the war.[4] The ship was named for John Burke (February 25, 1859 – May 14, 1937), the 10th Governor of North Dakota. Burke was built at Kaiser Shipbuilding Company's Oregon Shipbuilding yard in Portland, Oregon. Burke's keel was laid November 20, 1942[4] and the hull was launched on December 13.[4] After fitting-out, Burke was delivered to the US Maritime Commission on December 23,[4] just 33 days after construction began. The War Shipping Administration then placed Burke under management of the Northland Transportation Company.[1]

On December 28, 1944, while transporting ammunition to Mindoro, Philippines, Burke was hit by a Japanese kamikaze aircraft, and disintegrated in a tremendous explosion with the loss of all hands.[5][6] John Burke was one of three Liberty Ships[7] and one of forty-seven ships sunk by kamikaze attack during World War II.[8]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_John_Burke

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accidents_and_incidents_involving_transport_or_storage_of_ammunition

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 15
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/22/2020 12:16:39 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
Yes, I was about to post that I had found the Mount Hood explosion at Manus. I must have been reading other stuff about Rabaul around the same time as I saw the Mt. Hood article.

I couldn't post it, but there is a long .gif clip of the Liberty ship John Burke being hit by a kamikaze and blowing up. Spectacular and tragic at the same time.
Try searching for it.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 16
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/22/2020 12:17:20 AM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

That was at Ulithi if I remember correctly.

There were two different incidents of US ammo ships exploding in the Pacific. I will try and find the pictures.


I can recall one being in port and the other at sea.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 17
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/22/2020 7:38:52 AM   
Sardaukar


Posts: 9847
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/Israel
Status: offline
Get Manus. More useful than Rabaul.

_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 18
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/22/2020 3:39:26 PM   
Chickenboy


Posts: 24520
Joined: 6/29/2002
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Scott_USN

Yes PM is held by me, Guadalcanal area is held and landing at Kevieg(sp again)north of Rabaul. Every thing else in New Guinea is owned by Japanese, Milne Bay all the way across the north. Lost several ships at Kevieg and units. Including damage carriers and lost CVE, those things are magnets for attack.

Thanks for the suggestions. It just seems it is one of the most important points of the war.



With your investment of Kavieng and your cordoning of Rabaul already underway, it sounds like you're pointing in the direction of 'cordon and starve' for Rabaul. Manus (Admiralty islands) is the next logical choice if it's reasonably attained. That's why it's one of the first defensive cordons that I reinforce as the Japanese. Start sniffing around Hollandia on P/NG too-MacArthur's capture of it was a real nail in the coffin for Rabaul. If you can get a defensible line Kavieng-Manus-Hollandia, that will cut off the Japanese in SoPac substantially.

Green Island or Gasmata may be good ancillary bases to help hem in Rabaul. Of course you will have to build these-a good use of your construction battalions.

_____________________________


(in reply to Scott_USN)
Post #: 19
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/23/2020 1:10:34 AM   
Scott_USN

 

Posts: 715
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: Eagle River, Alaska USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Scott_USN


quote:

ORIGINAL: Macclan5

Excellent question Scott

Verses the AI

Rabul is taken more easily than Truk - depending upon time frame. Rabul lacks coastal artillery (at least in my experience) and you can take it successfully - quickly - with about 3 Infantry Divisions / Armor / Artillery support. It develops to a size 9 Airstrip and a good harbor for large ships including an AR / ARD allowing solid damage repair / support.

Is it worth the investment though ?

1) It allows you a great airbase - with Liberators - to suppress Truk.
2) It allows you a great airbase - with all bombers - to suppress Hollandia / Northern New Guinea et al
3) It allows you a good port with an AR ARD to support significant ship repairs to a point if operating off the Philippines Sea
4) You can isolate a significant garrison in the jungle and "play bomber practice" with American Airframes building up significant experience with minimal risk.

However all of the above can actually be accomplished by taking Kaveign / Admiralty Islands as well - with significantly less troop concentration - disruption - amphibious shipping deployment - Carrier support - etc

However you will also have to suppress Rabul as an airbase (likely in addition to Truk)

I think it is mostly a personal choice dependent on your "timing in the game" and resource deployment.

Historically of course it was bypassed.

There is no one answer fits all.

In a PBEM game ? No idea.






So tasty for that harbor so few in the area! I should go read up on Rabaul and what happened to it after bypassed. So much to read so little time!


US troops landed on the western end of New Britain (Rabaul's island) and took all of the island up to Rabaul. They then established a quarantine line to keep the 100K or so troops at Rabaul in their tiny perimeter. Not sure if the port was ever taken - I recall seeing pictures on this site of an ammunition ship exploding and I thought the caption said it was at Rabaul.


Interesting. I bet they bombed and ran fighter sweeps alot. Still lots of books to catch up on.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 20
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/23/2020 1:12:08 AM   
Scott_USN

 

Posts: 715
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: Eagle River, Alaska USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Scott_USN

Yes PM is held by me, Guadalcanal area is held and landing at Kevieg(sp again)north of Rabaul. Every thing else in New Guinea is owned by Japanese, Milne Bay all the way across the north. Lost several ships at Kevieg and units. Including damage carriers and lost CVE, those things are magnets for attack.

Thanks for the suggestions. It just seems it is one of the most important points of the war.



With your investment of Kavieng and your cordoning of Rabaul already underway, it sounds like you're pointing in the direction of 'cordon and starve' for Rabaul. Manus (Admiralty islands) is the next logical choice if it's reasonably attained. That's why it's one of the first defensive cordons that I reinforce as the Japanese. Start sniffing around Hollandia on P/NG too-MacArthur's capture of it was a real nail in the coffin for Rabaul. If you can get a defensible line Kavieng-Manus-Hollandia, that will cut off the Japanese in SoPac substantially.

Green Island or Gasmata may be good ancillary bases to help hem in Rabaul. Of course you will have to build these-a good use of your construction battalions.


Sounds good, gasmata will be easy to crack and as BB stated above they just hemmed them in for year or two.

(in reply to Chickenboy)
Post #: 21
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/23/2020 1:15:30 AM   
Scott_USN

 

Posts: 715
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: Eagle River, Alaska USA
Status: offline
Thanks for the info that great leap with CenCom and SoCom after the major battles of 42 are far reaching it seems. Would love to listen in on Command deciding those issues. Of course Nimitz doesn't care about PI but MacArthur is all in on that which I imagine caused some major conflicts.

(in reply to Scott_USN)
Post #: 22
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/23/2020 1:16:42 AM   
Scott_USN

 

Posts: 715
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: Eagle River, Alaska USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

Get Manus. More useful than Rabaul.


Will check that out not familiar with it.

(in reply to Sardaukar)
Post #: 23
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/23/2020 2:05:24 AM   
Ian R

 

Posts: 3420
Joined: 8/1/2000
From: Cammeraygal Country
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Scott_USN

So tasty for that harbor so few in the area! I should go read up on Rabaul and what happened to it after bypassed. So much to read so little time!




Adding to BB's summary-

Some marines landed at Cape Gloucester at the other end of the island; maybe some cavalry also landed, and after they pushed the IJA back down to the Rabaul end, 40th division put the 100k plus IJ there under siege; eventually the US troops were replaced by 5th Australian division (or parts thereof) who watched them trying to grow food on the Gazelle peninsula and generally starve to death. They did close the perimeter to the base of the peninsula, but stopped there. It basically became a self administered POW camp. At the end, only 69,000 IJ survived.

If you bypass it, your bombers in training can keep the runway shut easily - no supplies = no flak.


< Message edited by Ian R -- 3/23/2020 2:10:33 AM >


_____________________________

"I am Alfred"

(in reply to Scott_USN)
Post #: 24
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/23/2020 2:06:47 AM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Scott_USN


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

Get Manus. More useful than Rabaul.


Will check that out not familiar with it.


That is where the USN set up a major base.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Scott_USN)
Post #: 25
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/23/2020 3:02:19 AM   
Scott_USN

 

Posts: 715
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: Eagle River, Alaska USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ian R

quote:

ORIGINAL: Scott_USN

So tasty for that harbor so few in the area! I should go read up on Rabaul and what happened to it after bypassed. So much to read so little time!




Adding to BB's summary-

Some marines landed at Cape Gloucester at the other end of the island; maybe some cavalry also landed, and after they pushed the IJA back down to the Rabaul end, 40th division put the 100k plus IJ there under siege; eventually the US troops were replaced by 5th Australian division (or parts thereof) who watched them trying to grow food on the Gazelle peninsula and generally starve to death. They did close the perimeter to the base of the peninsula, but stopped there. It basically became a self administered POW camp. At the end, only 69,000 IJ survived.

If you bypass it, your bombers in training can keep the runway shut easily - no supplies = no flak.




Damn that is almost insane, well it is insane. The point of losing 31k for really crazy reason.

(in reply to Ian R)
Post #: 26
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/23/2020 3:03:20 AM   
Scott_USN

 

Posts: 715
Joined: 6/2/2004
From: Eagle River, Alaska USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Scott_USN


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

Get Manus. More useful than Rabaul.


Will check that out not familiar with it.


That is where the USN set up a major base.


Yep will find it and use it. Honestly never heard of that one.

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 27
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/23/2020 3:11:27 AM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
The Admiralty Islands, NW of Rabaul.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Scott_USN)
Post #: 28
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/23/2020 8:06:33 AM   
Sardaukar


Posts: 9847
Joined: 11/28/2001
From: Finland/Israel
Status: offline
With Manus and Kavieng, you can completely isolate Rabaul.

Then you can mop up Rabaul later when it's out of supply.

_____________________________

"To meaningless French Idealism, Liberty, Fraternity and Equality...we answer with German Realism, Infantry, Cavalry and Artillery" -Prince von Bülov, 1870-


(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 29
RE: South Pacific Strategy - 3/23/2020 12:58:55 PM   
Macclan5


Posts: 1065
Joined: 3/24/2016
From: Toronto Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

With Manus and Kavieng, you can completely isolate Rabaul.

Then you can mop up Rabaul later when it's out of supply.


+1

Concur

However you can also take Rabul and mop up Manus and Kevieng when they are out of supplies later as well

I think the key here is it is situational.

What is the capacity (shipping / supplies) and troops allocated in theater. Rabul takes a fair degree of concentration where as Kevieng and Manus are more easily managed on slim resources - I acknowledge

In either event - Rabul as an Airbase (and Port) will need to be suppressed as part of the isolation.

An Rabul or Kevieng will likely be needed as a proper platform to suppress Truk as an airbase when the Mariana's become targeted.

< Message edited by Macclan5 -- 3/23/2020 1:00:16 PM >


_____________________________

A People that values its privileges above it's principles will soon loose both. Dwight D Eisenhower.

(in reply to Sardaukar)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> South Pacific Strategy Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.109