Wuffer
Posts: 402
Joined: 6/16/2011 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel Rob, Do you have any feel whether the lagging case reports are reflected in the U. Washington model/projection? Attached is the U. Wash. projection for Michigan, as of today. Pardon me if you're already 100x ahead of me on this, but my experience with the Wash. projections over the past week is that it predominantly overestimates mortality (sometimes considerably) and much more rarely underestimates (but not in my experience considerably). From what I've seen, I'd expect the model to incorporate lagging data and other things behind the curtain, so that the projections continue consistently. Or do you find something that leads you to believe U. Wash. projection will likely seriously underreport, as we'll see in coming days. I'm anxious to know, because the site has a good record (from where I sit). If it is subject to mistakes, I'd want to know (and presumably they would too!). Thanks for posting. Good luck to the Wolverine State. quote:
ORIGINAL: Cad908 According to the U of Washington COVID-19 projection, Michigan, my home state, is today at its peak in projected deaths. Just for reference, here is a summary of the results to date in Michigan. Just a couple of comments/observations: The numbers are the official state totals. The reporting lags as Michigan has experienced erratic data flows from the county and hospital level. The use of "Confirmed Case" and "Reported Death" are subject to the same interpretation "bias" as has been discussed at length in this forum. The regional differences are stark. The experience of S.E. Michigan (Metro Detroit) is tragic. 1 in 280 of its people have tested positive, while its 1 in 3,482 in Western Michigan (Grand Rapids-Kentwood-Muskegon). I do not know if the west side of the state will start to"catch up", but it is hard to imagine the economic, social, political, ect., ramifications of this disparity going forward. Michigan is not the only state which will have this COVID-19 legacy, and I am hopeful it brings out the "better angels of our nature". But the pragmatic side of my nature observes quicksand all around. -Rob I think you should include the next rows in worldometer regarding the numbers of tests.What is of concern is the relation between the total number of tests and positive cases. Compare for example NJ and Michigan @ worldometer. NJ every second test positive? Hope that's a mistake! The total test numbers of same states are unfortuneately still lacking, e.g. nearly third world niveau, sorry, which makes any prediction quite difficult.
|