mind_messing
Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel Right, but most people do go. They go if they have a broken toe or a high fever or gunshot wound or a laceration. I see no reason the great majority wouldn't go if having serious coronavirus symptoms. Cap Mandrake and others are more likely to know for certain, but that's my experience here in Georgia and vicinity and anecdotally around the country. Regarding post-mortem testing there has been one case that I know of. More importantly, as noted above coroners and others have a duty to assign an accurate cause of death. If in NYC emergency conditions prevail so that testing can't be done yet it will be done later - from the bodies or preserved specimens, I'd guess. Most places are not that overwhelmed, however, so likely have the capacity to handle things as they occur. It wouldn't be surprising if they're temporarily having to let standards slide in NYC but it would be a surprise in most other places - North Carolina, for instance. As stated previously, technically correct. However, your experience in Georgia and anecdotal evidence does not seem to be representative. https://news.gallup.com/poll/269138/americans-delaying-medical-treatment-due-cost.aspx quote:
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna quote:
ORIGINAL: Canoerebel Sammy, given the level of scrutiny in place in the US, anyone who dies under any circumstances is likely being tested and counted. That is true whether they die in a hospital or at home or in a hotel. Coroners and other officials strive to assign an accurate cause of death in the US. I don't think that's changed. In fact, it's probably more likely given the spotlight on the coronavirus. I don't share your confidence in this conjecture. Agreed. Accurate determination of cause of death is not as simple as would appear, and there's often a considerable time lag in order to reconcile the medical and government records.
|