Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: BTS Play-Testing

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: BTS Play-Testing Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/13/2020 3:50:53 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline 		USN - CVEs only: no errors found, only one comment:

- AV Kenneth Whiting, St George, Hamlin & Cumberland Sound (AV Tangier Class) are made available with the 3/43 refit, which is correct for the date, but which does not allow conversion to CVE Bogue-class. If the possibility is to be available, the Tangier 3/43 refit could perhaps be a FROM in Bind 412?


< Message edited by Kitakami -- 4/13/2020 4:26:23 PM >

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 91
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/13/2020 4:37:50 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kitakami

USN - CVEs only: no errors found, only one comment:

- AV Kenneth Whiting, St George, Hamlin & Cumberland Sound (AV Tangier Class) are made available with the 3/43 refit, which is correct for the date, but which does not allow conversion to CVE Bogue-class. If the possibility is to be available, the Tangier 3/43 refit could perhaps be a FROM in Bind 412?



Should also include #924 as TO class in bind 412, I think. That would let them upgrade to the proper version.

_____________________________


(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 92
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/13/2020 4:53:30 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Will look into those possibilities. Like continuing the continuity of the conversions.

Cleaning up Stock and DBB is a funny idea that can easily be done.

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 93
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/13/2020 5:36:08 PM   
AdmNelson


Posts: 554
Joined: 5/14/2001
From: New Mexico
Status: offline 		John

Found this on G3M2.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Very Proud Marine Dad

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 94
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/13/2020 5:48:44 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		It looks like both aircraft #669 and #676 need some work.

#669 is a recon aircraft with only a camera for normal range, but has guns, bombs and no camera for extended range
probably should have only a camera for extended range.

#676 is a level bomber with 20mm guns, radar, mad, camera and bombs for normal range.
but has 7.7mm mg, radar mad and bombs for extended range. And the bombs for extended range are larger that those for normal range. I have no idea how it should be configured.

< Message edited by Nomad -- 4/13/2020 5:50:18 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to AdmNelson)
Post #: 95
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/14/2020 3:23:57 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Will do another clean-up tomorrow with any notes between now and then as well as those posted above this.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 96
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/14/2020 6:52:49 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		more work for you John

Japan aircraft
#601 has wpn 1 1990 and wpn 11 as 183 both should be 1990
#655 does not have MAD for extended range
#656 does not have MAD for extended range
#695 has wpn 4 and 5 as 187 and wpn 14 and 15 as 182 should probably all be 187
#698 has wpn 2 as 193 and wpn 12 as 192 wpn 12 should be 193
#725 has wpn 2 as 191 and wpn 12 as 188 both should be 191
#759 has wpn 1 as 1990 and wpn 11 as 183 both shoule be 1990
#760 has wpn 1 as 1990 and wpn 11 as 183 both should be 1990
#761 has wpn 1 as 1991 and wpn 11 as 187 both should be 1991
#762 has wpn 1 as 1991 and wpn 11 as 187 both should be 1991
#763 has wpn 1 as 1991 and wpn 11 as 187 both should be 1991
#766 has wpn 1 as 188 and wpn 11 as 187 both should be 188
#767 has wpn 1 as 188 and wpn 11 as 187 both should be 188
#811 has wpn 2 as 191 and wpn 12 as 166 both should be 191
#824 has wpn 2 as 193 and wpn 12 as 192 both should be 193


_____________________________


(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 97
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/14/2020 8:37:19 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		Please double check to ensure this was changed....

quote:

US Mark 14 Torpedo: USN Mark 14 torpedo performance has been thoroughly researched, game tested, and subsequently modified (Using the JANAC resource of real maritime losses of Japanese ships in WW2).
The stock profile is %80 dud rate from Dec 1941 through Dec 1942, dropping to %60 dud rate in Jan 1943 to Sep 1943, then becoming the standard (for all torpedoes) %10 dud rate thereafter.
This has been found to be grossly overstated (and mathematically impossible). Research has shown key changes taking place Mar/April1942, and again in 1943.
The new profile is:

Dec 1941-Mar 1942: %80 dud rate
April – Dec 1942: %50 dud rate
Jan – Sep 1943: %30 dud rate
Sep 1943 on : %10 dud rate.
This much more accurately conforms to historical USN Fleet boat performance, (although will still not actually reach historical Mark 14 Torpedo performance) and in-game performance has proven to be closely approximate to historical performance.
Prolonged play-testing has shown that 'in-game' results now vastly more reflect historical results and outcomes
.


(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 98
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/14/2020 8:38:07 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		This should have been done, too.

quote:

Japanese Aircraft: All Japanese two machine gun fighters (A5M4, KI-27b, KI-43 series) have been given a firepower bonus (Double stock Firepower).

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 99
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/14/2020 9:08:15 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants_MatrixForum

This should have been done, too.

quote:

Japanese Aircraft: All Japanese two machine gun fighters (A5M4, KI-27b, KI-43 series) have been given a firepower bonus (Double stock Firepower).



I think this is in my corrections above, not all of the extended weapons were changed, just the normal range ones.
These are supposed to use the 1990 and 1991 MGs, but the effect of these have not been doubled, they are the same
as the stock ones.

< Message edited by Nomad -- 4/14/2020 9:11:20 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 100
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/14/2020 9:17:53 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants_MatrixForum

Please double check to ensure this was changed....

quote:

US Mark 14 Torpedo: USN Mark 14 torpedo performance has been thoroughly researched, game tested, and subsequently modified (Using the JANAC resource of real maritime losses of Japanese ships in WW2).
The stock profile is %80 dud rate from Dec 1941 through Dec 1942, dropping to %60 dud rate in Jan 1943 to Sep 1943, then becoming the standard (for all torpedoes) %10 dud rate thereafter.
This has been found to be grossly overstated (and mathematically impossible). Research has shown key changes taking place Mar/April1942, and again in 1943.
The new profile is:

Dec 1941-Mar 1942: %80 dud rate
April – Dec 1942: %50 dud rate
Jan – Sep 1943: %30 dud rate
Sep 1943 on : %10 dud rate.
This much more accurately conforms to historical USN Fleet boat performance, (although will still not actually reach historical Mark 14 Torpedo performance) and in-game performance has proven to be closely approximate to historical performance.
Prolonged play-testing has shown that 'in-game' results now vastly more reflect historical results and outcomes
.




This has not been implemented

_____________________________


(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 101
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/14/2020 10:48:09 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline 		- BB Mississippi begins the game in the (315) 1/42 configuration. Is that correct? If so, perhaps the date should be changed to 12/41?
- BB Idaho & New Mexico begin the game in the (317) 1/42 configuration. Is that correct? If so, perhaps the date should be changed to 12/41?
- Bind 501 (BB New Mexico-class) has 319 as a FROM class, but no ship ever upgrades to it.
- Bind 502 (BB New Mexico-class) has 322 & 324 as FROM classes, and 329 as TO class, but no ship ever upgrades to any of them.
- Bind 503 (BB Colorado-class) has 338 as a FROM class, but no ship ever upgrades to it. The other parts of the bind don't make sense either.

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 102
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/15/2020 3:06:56 AM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		I'll have time to do everything tomorrow. If you spot anything between now and when I Post next get it on here and I'll add it to the list.

Once the above has been done, do you guys think we are about ready to try and take the Mods for a spin?


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 103
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/15/2020 3:27:52 AM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		I think so, but I need a dance partner.

_____________________________


(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 104
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/15/2020 3:17:06 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nomad

I think so, but I need a dance partner.

If you don't mind playing the Empire of the Rising Sun, I am game. I can't gather the strength to do a Japanese turn 1 right now.

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 105
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/15/2020 3:24:12 PM   
btd64


Posts: 9973
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in Lancaster, OHIO
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kitakami


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nomad

I think so, but I need a dance partner.

If you don't mind playing the Empire of the Rising Sun, I am game. I can't gather the strength to do a Japanese turn 1 right now.

Hey, you two among some others, did a great job finding stuff. I on the other hand did not. I was very sick the last couple of weeks and was able to just do the little I did. Now that I'm on the correct meds I shall endevor to do my best in testing.
I do have a partner at least.
Happy testing....GP

_____________________________

Intel i7 4.3GHz 10th Gen,16GB Ram,Nvidia GeForce MX330

AKA General Patton

WPO,WITP,WITPAE-Mod Designer/Tester
DWU-Beta Tester
TOAW4-Alpha/Beta Tester

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 106
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/15/2020 5:01:45 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		Am headed to work for a short 3-4 hour shift and will then do the update. Last chance to run thru stuff and see if you catch anything more.

Who are your pairings? We should have enough testers for four matches.

Things to consider---
1. Japanese or Allies? DUH!
2. Between the Storms Lite OR Heavy? Need both Mods to run...

How do we want to do the AARs? Do one big one with commentary from everyone? Divide them up? What do you think?

Everyone jump in and lets get ready to rumble!!!



< Message edited by John 3rd -- 4/15/2020 5:02:06 PM >

_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to btd64)
Post #: 107
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/15/2020 5:10:11 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline 		I don't think I have played any of you. I am but of midling ability. I would like to try the Allies for a change, and don't mind either Heavy orr Light.

Will take a look at USN cruisers now. Will post whether I find something or not.

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 108
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/15/2020 5:37:01 PM   
btd64


Posts: 9973
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in Lancaster, OHIO
Status: offline 		Larry and I will do BTSL. As far as reporting goes, Can't we use this thread? It's the title of course....GP

_____________________________

Intel i7 4.3GHz 10th Gen,16GB Ram,Nvidia GeForce MX330

AKA General Patton

WPO,WITP,WITPAE-Mod Designer/Tester
DWU-Beta Tester
TOAW4-Alpha/Beta Tester

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 109
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/15/2020 6:19:04 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline 		USN Heavy Cruisers:

- Being somewhat obnoxious, if the New Orleans-class was originally named the Astoria-class, and the name was changed only after the Astoria was sunk at Savo Island, perhaps the class name should be Astoria?
- Just confirming that CA Oregon City is the only one of the Oregon City-class heavy cruisers that is present in the game?

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to btd64)
Post #: 110
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/15/2020 6:29:17 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kitakami


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nomad

I think so, but I need a dance partner.

If you don't mind playing the Empire of the Rising Sun, I am game. I can't gather the strength to do a Japanese turn 1 right now.


The problem is that I have not played Japan for over 8 years. I do not think I would be a good play tester for Japan.

_____________________________


(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 111
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/15/2020 6:33:15 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nomad


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kitakami


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nomad

I think so, but I need a dance partner.

If you don't mind playing the Empire of the Rising Sun, I am game. I can't gather the strength to do a Japanese turn 1 right now.


The problem is that I have not played Japan for over 8 years. I do not think I would be a good play tester for Japan.


Understood. No problem. We both need Japanese opponents then :)

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 112
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/15/2020 7:05:30 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline 		USN Light Cruisers:

- Bind 410 (CL Omaha -> CLAA Omaha) has FROM class 407, and TO class 926. Perhaps it should also have 408 class as FROM, so CL Richmond can also be converted to a CLAA?
- CL Atlanta II, Duluth, Topeka, Oklahoma City enter on April '44 with the 4/44 refit. Perhaps it should be the 4/45 refit?

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 113
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/15/2020 8:08:00 PM   
Kitakami


Posts: 1302
Joined: 5/3/2002
From: The bridge of the DNTK Kitakami
Status: offline 		USN Anti-Aircraft Cruisers:

- CLAA Atlanta enters on Apr 15 '42, in the 12/41 configuration. Should it be the 4/42 refit?
- CLAA Tucson enters on Apr 4 '45, in the 5/45 refit. Should it be the 1/44 refit?

USN Cruisers finished.

_____________________________

Tenno Heika Banzai!

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 114
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/15/2020 9:42:51 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		I'll play against one of you as Japanese. Michael is pretty fiendish as a Japanese possibility. Michael--what say you?

Gonna have dinner then go thru everything.

Expect files tonight.

GP is a smart ass! OK. We keep everything here for commentary.


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 115
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/15/2020 9:44:22 PM   
larryfulkerson


Posts: 39932
Joined: 4/17/2005
From: Tucson, AZ
Status: offline 		Brian and I are going to start a game tonight and when the finished scenario finally arrives we will restart.

_____________________________

If we're all created in the image of god then why aren't we all invisible?

(in reply to Kitakami)
Post #: 116
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/15/2020 10:00:13 PM   
btd64


Posts: 9973
Joined: 1/23/2010
From: Mass. USA. now in Lancaster, OHIO
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

I'll play against one of you as Japanese. Michael is pretty fiendish as a Japanese possibility. Michael--what say you?

Gonna have dinner then go thru everything.

Expect files tonight.

GP is a smart ass! OK. We keep everything here for commentary.



What???....GP

_____________________________

Intel i7 4.3GHz 10th Gen,16GB Ram,Nvidia GeForce MX330

AKA General Patton

WPO,WITP,WITPAE-Mod Designer/Tester
DWU-Beta Tester
TOAW4-Alpha/Beta Tester

"Do everything you ask of those you command"....Gen. George S. Patton

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 117
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/15/2020 11:28:21 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

I'll play against one of you as Japanese. Michael is pretty fiendish as a Japanese possibility. Michael--what say you?

Gonna have dinner then go thru everything.

Expect files tonight.

GP is a smart ass! OK. We keep everything here for commentary.



I will let Kitakami make his choice and I will take who is left.

_____________________________


(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 118
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/15/2020 11:57:55 PM   
John 3rd


Posts: 17178
Joined: 9/8/2005
From: La Salle, Colorado
Status: offline 		NorthCarolinaDidNothingWrong--What about you?


_____________________________



Member: Treaty, Reluctant Admiral and Between the Storms Mod Team.

Reluctant Admiral Mod:
https://sites.google.com/site/reluctantadmiral/

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 119
RE: BTS Play-Testing - 4/16/2020 1:29:49 AM   
AdmNelson


Posts: 554
Joined: 5/14/2001
From: New Mexico
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John 3rd

NorthCarolinaDidNothingWrong--What about you?




Will check with him tonight, when I send my turn for our game. Either for me I am IJN maybe heavy. Will let you know.

_____________________________

Very Proud Marine Dad

(in reply to John 3rd)
Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Scenario Design and Modding >> RE: BTS Play-Testing Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

4.609