mind_messing
Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: HansBolter quote:
ORIGINAL: RFalvo69 quote:
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy quote:
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe quote:
ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn Trump calls for halt to US funding for World Health Organization amid coronavirus outbreak 23 mins ago https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-calls-for-halt-to-us-funding-for-world-health-organization-amid-coronavirus-outbreak/ar-BB12D4Vp?li=BBnb7Kz "The Trump administration will halt funding to the World Health Organization as it evaluates the agency’s “role in severely mismanaging” the coronavirus pandemic, President Donald Trump announced Tuesday. “Today I’m instructing my administration to halt funding of the World Health Organization while a review is conducted to assess the World Health Organization’s role in severely mismanaging and covering up the spread of the coronavirus,” Trump said at a White House press conference." Good. When WHO is unable to stop the next Ebola outbreak because of lack of funds and the re-opened economy brings it to the US again, will you still think that was the right choice? Granted their performance early in the outbreak was not stellar, but WHO was getting contradictory info just like the rest of us. It took a few weeks of careful observations to determine which info was correct and which was not. That doesn't amount to being useless overall IMO. BTW, if the US stop funding the W.H.O., the next in line (as major funder) is... China. Which is the strategy China employed in the last decade - it doesn't matter if reacting to global political decisions or inaction by the West in some area of the World: "Don't worry. We are here (omitted: to stay). We will help!" And, no, the objection that China contributes a fraction of the money the US gave to the W.H.O. doesn't hold. There is a void, and they will move to fill it. And many other countries will cooperate, both because they are already looking at China as the epicenter of a new trade block and out of spite for (political sentence detected!... bzzzz... Exterminate! Exterminate! zap!). Stop funding the W.H.O. in the middle of a pandemic... Great move. No, really It's the smartest thing we could have possibly done. Either they can react by cleaning up their act, replacing the leadership stooges in the pocket of China and thereby restore themselves to the good graces of the US and restore their funding source, or they can go running into the arms of China, completely undermining what little credibility they have left and destroying themselves as an organization. The US has no use for them if they are simply going to be an arm of China. p.s. Clive is one of my favorite actors and your use of his image is seriously undermining how I view him. Funny how that seems to work. That's not how this particular game works. The US withdrawing funding removes most of the influence it has over the organisation, and as RFalvo69 says, if there's a void, it will be filled. There's a clear line that can be drawn here between the Chinese expanding their influence in Africa, the WHO top leadership and recent events. Granted, the US can take an isolationist approach, but is the loss of soft power acceptable? Unlikely. quote:
ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake Google and Apple are working together on an automated smart phone infectious contact technology. The way it would work is the user would have to "opt in" (supposedly) and then their smart phone would record the wifi "chirps" of all the nearby smart phones throughout the day. When a person was found to be positive for COVID-19, the system would query their phone and pull up all the chirp contacts during their contagious period and then "public health authorities" would use that to do contact tracing. It's seriously creepy with tremendous 4th Amendment abuse potential. Note: This is NOT GPS tracing or even cell tower tracing> If I understand it is the technology used by the phone to find wifi networks Seems much the same in practice as cell phone tracing, maybe just with increased resolution?
|