Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) Page: <<   < prev  51 52 [53] 54 55   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 4/23/2020 10:46:30 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		My spidey sense was tingling because Scott was paying too much attention to Chinae (sp?) and the coast of Korea. For example, he seemed very interested in bombing the airfields there and in mining the straits between my fleet and Korea. So, I stared moving units there a few turns ago (see above posts) and it looks like it paid off. At least for now. He landed a provision armored regiment that took heavy losses landing and then was destroyed by my bombardment because if it's a gun tube, and its in the Manchukuo army it's either at Fusan or Chinae. We'll see if there is any follow up.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1561
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 4/24/2020 12:10:53 AM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		I think that at 2:1 losses, you are winning in the sense that he has to have at least that level of total points for victory. You are probably not losing as many pilots as he is. His OPs and his flak losses also count and some of them may be 4Es. If you want to increase his OPs losses, if you can LRCAP his bases, his OPs losses should increase. It does not take much, even 10% and they don't have to be the best planes either.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1562
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 4/24/2020 12:21:14 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		Hey Ranger Joe, you're correct. Assuming I get no more VP he still needs about 77,000 VP to win and, if the game ends at the end of August 45 that's tough to do. If it ends in December 45 then he has an easier path. The manual seems say that I have to hold out to December but Alfred had a post awhile ago saying you just had to make it to Sept.1st.

He loses a lot of 4e bombers to flak. It works to his advantage when he strat bombs me as he nets more VP, that's why I'm happy to shot down his planes when he bombs my airfields. :) My biggest fear right now is that he goes after the NK-45 engine plants. That would basically stop the production of my best fighters.

Sadly, I'm not 100% sure of where he flies the 4es out of and it's likely that he is out of range of my LRCAP. As for airfields that are closer in, when I have planes close to him he obliterates the airbase so I wind up losing more than I get. But, when I can do it I try to pull it off.

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1563
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 4/26/2020 7:49:53 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		Another day of Scott bombing my airfields. This time he included Shanghai. Frankly, I'm leaving bad planes on the ground in places with high AA values just to see if he continues to attack them. I get points for 4es shot down and he's not strat bombing me. :)




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1564
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 4/26/2020 7:52:13 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		But, Scott does seem to be making some kind of play for Korea. He pulled out of his invasion on the southern coast and then landed with fast transports up north and in more force in the southwest corner. At the very least it is giving the army in Manchuria something to do. I've got divisions set up in the non-clear terrain and other units that had already headed down this way in Pusan and next door. Not sure if this is a feint to draw me away from the clear coast of china proper or the start of a two pronged effort to take me out of China. time will tell.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1565
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 4/26/2020 7:53:06 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		One minor success at Chingae (next door to Pusan). MTBs took out several LSTs. Not a big victory, but just about anything helps Japanese morale.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1566
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 4/26/2020 7:55:41 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		He might be trying to activate the Soviets early but the Korean garrison also counts, if I am not mistaken.

Leaving broken and out dated aircraft for him to bomb works good for you if he is losing a 4E for every one of yours. But it looks like he is losing well over 2 aircraft for every one of yours. If he is not scoring any other points with his aircraft, he is losing the air war points wise.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1567
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 4/27/2020 2:19:32 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		Sadly, he won the airwar battle this time because I sent unescorted bombers into the teeth of his CAP. I was trying to be cute but it did not work out the way I had hoped. I'm sure the pixel widows and orphans will forgive me. :) Still, it was not all terrible. He did lose a number of 4e planes (including 5-6 B-29s) so it was not an outrageous disaster and my bombers are pretty much useless these days anyway. Sadly, he finished off two BBs and several DDs that were in the repair yard at Hiroshima.

The Korean troops do appear to count towards the Manchukuo garrison so I'm taking troops out of Manchuria and sending them south. So far, this appears to be more of an attempt to take Korea on the cheap than a major invasion. He has the NZ brigade up north, he landed an armored brigade near Pusan that was destroyed and he has a few units in the south west.





Attachment (1)

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1568
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 4/29/2020 11:26:04 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		January 14th and the ground action continues to be focused on Korea. Scott has a number of units on the peninsula and I'm railing more in each turn. It's a maze of clear terrain hexes that I'm trying to stay out of and I hope I can bottle him up here for awhile as I've been able to do in China. But, Manchuria is going to be a total cake walk for the Soviets.

In the Naval report, I put two torpedoes into a Pearl BB. No reports of serious damage but it should be pretty much out for the war.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1569
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 4/29/2020 11:27:32 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		For some reason the picture is not loading so I'll wait to post the rest of the turn's news.

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1570
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 4/29/2020 11:55:00 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		Depending upon what he has in Korea, can you mass armour and quickly try to overwhelm him? Depending upon your air situation, when you do this try to sweep away any Allied fighter coverage even if you don't bomb there.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1571
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 4/30/2020 12:01:35 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		Hi Ranger Joe, my three armor divisions are on the other of the Hankow Changsha rail gap so it would be awhile before I could get them there. I need to protect the high VP locations of Chungking and Chengtu so I may leave the armor where it is.

And, Scott pretty much has total air superiority everywhere by now except for select turns where I can mass. But, it is something to keep an eye on as opportunities open up.

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1572
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 4/30/2020 12:04:40 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		But, speaking of temporary air superiority, Scott sent his heavies over Hiroshima last turn and either his sweeps did not go in or he neglected to send them because it was a 4e massacre. The B-24Js took it the hardest but there were losses throughout the board. Scott did get HI hit and knocked out bout half the George 2 factories but at a very heavy cost. I'm sure a lot of pilots were lost and many of the planes that made it back are damaged so hopefully it slows down the strat bombing just a little bit.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1573
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 4/30/2020 12:45:36 PM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: John B.
Hi Ranger Joe, my three armor divisions are on the other of the Hankow Changsha rail gap so it would be awhile before I could get them there. I need to protect the high VP locations of Chungking and Chengtu so I may leave the armor where it is.

Armor value is in its maneuverability. Leaving it in the backyard you miss out on having a mobile reserve where it counts - on the shores. Infantry divisions are just as good in static defense

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1574
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 4/30/2020 5:04:35 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		That's a good point. My thinking is that manchuria/korea are lost eventually to the Soviets anyway so I'll leave the armor to hold onto the Chungking complex if I can. The armor is very maneuverable but, you put it in a clear hex where it is most effective and it gets "hammered" by allied bombing. I may be a little scared by what has happened to my armor so far. :)

(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 1575
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 4/30/2020 5:05:19 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		Another turn and not much drama in the air.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1576
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 4/30/2020 5:08:55 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		But it does look like Scott is all in on Korea. I've identified about 20 more units there. I think I can keep the rail line to Keijo open for awhile and I'm putting divisions in the north to prevent him from cutting off the entire peninsula. Meanwhile, the is a new airbridge from Japan to Korea with every transport I can must flying supplies into Fusan. Probably about 300 supply points per turn which is better than nothing.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1577
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 5/6/2020 7:51:40 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		January 17 and overall not a bad turn. I lost too many planes on the ground but that was my own fault as I tried to rebase short range planes to Shanghai and they hopped on the RR thus showing up in need of reassembly. And the B-29s showed up before the reassembly took place. :) But, it's January 1945 and I'm still sort of winning!




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1578
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 5/7/2020 6:02:07 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		January 18th and not too much happened. Scott bombed Nagasaki without too much effect and lost several planes even though I've been taking AA out and putting in Fukokua and Hiroshima. A good turn to rebuild my fighters and convert more into Frank rs.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1579
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 5/7/2020 6:03:47 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		One sad note is that apparently the train swtichmen in Korea are on strike as they sent two groups in strat mode into hexes with Americans in them. It's almost as if the Koreans resent being part of the Glorious East Asia Japanese Prosperity Sphere. I can't imagine why? :)




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1580
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 5/9/2020 8:54:44 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		Not much to see this turn. Saigon fell which is why there is the big jump in VP for Scott. He bombed Fusan and lost planes to ops that always provide welcome VP for me. :)

Looks like he'll split Korea in two and should eventually be able to mop me up in the South. But, we're past mid January and I'm still in the lead.

I'm not sure if it makes a difference, but I'm trying to put one TRACOM pilot in each fighter squadron. I suppose that it can't hurt. I did make a mistake and released 20 pilots from the IJA fighter TRACOM pool and now they're nowhere to be found. Probably pretty happy to be sent home by accident. Let's hope the Kempatai find them and send them back




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1581
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 5/11/2020 3:30:50 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		Well, another day and I'm still in the lead. :) Shot down a few allied planes but only a few of them are 4e. Man, the B-29s can basically fly whereever they wish and not get shot down. They're super planes!




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1582
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 5/11/2020 3:34:21 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		Scott has cut Korea in half (no ominous feeling of impending doom here) and I have 6-7 divisions that will be trapped along the coast. In the circle are two divisions that may not make it out and so may be beseiged in that hex. It's not clear yet. This will be a bad result for me! There is a major airlift going on with both transports and my bomber fleet but I don't know how long they can be sustained. On the plus side, it should take Scott a little while to clear me out and Keijo will be a tough nut for him to crack.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1583
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 5/11/2020 3:36:42 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		But, before we get too glum, here is a tip of the Bushido spirit cap to the Captain of the I-48. It was forced to the surface, and then, under fire and with very heavy damage it put in 5 (!) torpedo hits and almost certainly sank those two AKs (14 VP each). And, he still lives! His sub is at 96% damage with 47% systems damage so the odds are against him getting home, but he's going to try!!

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1584
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 5/11/2020 3:37:07 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		Ooops, and here is his battle report.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1585
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 5/11/2020 5:08:06 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		Man, that sub crew deserves some saki!

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1586
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 5/11/2020 5:43:11 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		No fooling!

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1587
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 5/11/2020 5:58:01 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline 		I-48 is a newer sub.....so you've been building subs. I see differing opinions on whether the Empire should continue to build subs, since the efficacy goes down as the war goes on.

From my standpoint, I think the Glen-subs have value so I build some of those, but they are lower priority than warships, and only get the "leftover" NSY Points

What did you do with them? Was it worth it? You obviously got your money's worth on I-48

_____________________________


(in reply to John B.)
Post #: 1588
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 5/11/2020 6:19:15 PM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball
What did you do with them? Was it worth it? You obviously got your money's worth on I-48

I recall an exceptional lot of flattops going glug-glug in this AAR due to Japanese subs

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 1589
RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) - 5/11/2020 7:52:49 PM   
John B.


Posts: 3909
Joined: 9/25/2011
From: Virginia
Status: offline 		I stopped all warship construction (except DDs) and all merchant ship production awhile ago as I figured that was just building VP for the allied war machine. If I don't build the ships Scott can't sink them and get VP for them. :) But, I have kept my sub production up to normal speed. The allied ASW is terrible to behold but every now and again I get shots at his carriers (I had one two turns ago but missed). The way I view it, sinking a single carrier is worth about 340 VP. Scott needs 2-1 in VP or I win. So, one fleet carrier sinking means Scott needs 780 VP just to break even. If the subs cost me 14 VP each then he would need to sink 55 subs just to not fall behind. And, subs have other uses such as mine laying, getting shots in at other ships besides CVs, and, the intangible morale benefit of every now and again seeing a torpedo hit one of his ships.

(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 1590
Page:   <<   < prev  51 52 [53] 54 55   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Quisling! An AFB does Japan (No PanzerKat) Page: <<   < prev  51 52 [53] 54 55   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.766