Malevolence
Posts: 1781
Joined: 4/3/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tucsonbandit how would you represent a formation of half soft covered trucks, half armored personnel carriers? or 1/3 armored recon, 1/3 soft covered trucks, 1/3 armored personnel carriers? or 1/4 armored recon vehicles, 1/4 mishmash of civilian transportation vehicles, 1/4 armored personnel carriers, 1/4 motorized infantry? is it really wrong to use mechanized infantry for any of these? It is not wrong. The symbols are not so definitive. They can contain much more data, modifiers, affiliations, operational condition, and might even include evaluation and reliability ratings for the information shown -- among many other available details. If you really want to play around, try this link-- (commercial product, made by a swiss company) https://www.map.army/symbol
< Message edited by Malevolence -- 6/4/2020 7:59:08 PM >
_____________________________
Nicht kleckern, sondern klotzen! *Please remember all posts are made by a malevolent, autocratic despot whose rule is marked by unjust severity and arbitrary behavior. Your experiences may vary.
|