Squad fired at non-adjacent AFV

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Squad fired at non-adjacent AFV

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Tigers on the Hunt >> Tech Support >> Squad fired at non-adjacent AFV

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Squad fired at non-adjacent AFV - 6/23/2020 7:33:09 PM

rmmwilg

Posts: 228
Joined: 5/2/2018
Status: offline

A US squad fired at a moving half-track using their inherent FP. While normally not capable of being buttoned up, the half-track had been previously stunned, so actually was button up. Squads should not, otherwise be able to fire inherent FP against AFV unless they're adjacent. Attack left residual FP in the hex. Maybe the game did not recognize the unusual buttoned up state for an open topped AFV? Both were on the same elevation. No screenshot for this.

Post #: 1

RE: Squad fired at non-adjacent AFV - 6/23/2020 8:22:24 PM

Paullus

Posts: 1058
Joined: 6/9/2015
From: Sweden
Status: offline

Added to bug list.

_____________________________

For my part, I shall do my duty as a general; I shall see to it that you are given the chance of a successful action. /Lucius Aemilius Paullus

(in reply to rmmwilg)

Post #: 2

RE: Squad fired at non-adjacent AFV - 9/1/2020 11:39:35 AM

Paullus

Posts: 1058
Joined: 6/9/2015
From: Sweden
Status: offline

I checked this and this works as intended. You can continue to fire att the Half Truck with the intent to leave Residual Fire Power in the location.

_____________________________

For my part, I shall do my duty as a general; I shall see to it that you are given the chance of a successful action. /Lucius Aemilius Paullus

(in reply to Paullus)

Post #: 3

RE: Squad fired at non-adjacent AFV - 9/2/2020 3:42:43 PM

rmmwilg

Posts: 228
Joined: 5/2/2018
Status: offline

Interesting. Hadn't thought of that tactic!

(in reply to Paullus)

Post #: 4