OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent - 8/21/2020 6:25:17 PM

tolsdorff

Posts: 204
Joined: 12/12/2016
Status: offline

I find, all things regarding the US Navy interesting, and how they plan on keeping the edge on the rest of the world. but thisCFR would be astonishing, even for the US armed forces. I do not know of any reliable sources.
But I highly regard the knowledge of most people here, it far surpasses most.

Wondering if this is real? It would give an edge to the navy for the next 100 years i guess

< Message edited by Admiral DadMan -- 8/21/2020 7:27:52 PM >

Post #: 1

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent - 8/21/2020 10:25:54 PM

BBfanboy

Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tolsdorff

I find, all things regarding the US Navy interesting, and how they plan on keeping the edge on the rest of the world. but thisCFR would be astonishing, even for the US armed forces. I do not know of any reliable sources.
But I highly regard the knowledge of most people here, it far surpasses most.

Wondering if this is real? It would give an edge to the navy for the next 100 years i guess

Aren't all current reactors based on fission? Fusion requires the introduction of Hydrogen which makes a much harder to control reaction. I would expect such a breakthrough to be headline news throughout the world because it would provide a way to get small power plants all over the place. If it is a secret, it should never have been featured in an article in a business magazine. IOW, I have my doubts.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to tolsdorff)

Post #: 2

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent - 8/22/2020 8:49:42 AM

Ian R

Posts: 3420
Joined: 8/1/2000
From: Cammeraygal Country
Status: offline

If those could be built at reasonable cost (and were safe), I suspect GE or one of the big German or Japanese energy plant companies would be bringing them to market, covid notwithstanding.

Ergo, it isn't safe (yet) or is unable to be built at reasonable cost.

_____________________________

"I am Alfred"

(in reply to BBfanboy)

Post #: 3

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent - 8/22/2020 9:14:57 AM

StasSche

Posts: 62
Joined: 5/23/2020
Status: offline

The fact of granting a patent proves only the uniqueness of the idea.

The patent claim review doesn't involve any feasibility and/or economical study of the invention.

Only 5% of granted patents are commercialized (and not all of them are successful at the end).

Therefore for now it is just an idea, waiting for implementation. There is quite a number of physicist who believe that the a stable nuclear fusion reaction in not possible in the nearest 150 years, and most likely the reaction can be implemented in space only.

(in reply to Ian R)

Post #: 4

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent - 8/26/2020 7:50:02 PM

Lokasenna

Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

To my knowledge, practically speaking all viable fusion reactors right now are endothermic - meaning they require more energy input than you are able to harvest from them. They do not meet the Lawson criterion (yet).

(in reply to StasSche)

Post #: 5

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent - 8/26/2020 8:26:01 PM

RangerJoe

Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

To my knowledge, practically speaking all viable fusion reactors right now are endothermic - meaning they require more energy input than you are able to harvest from them. They do not meet the Lawson criterion (yet).

Except for the big ones in the sky, that is true.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

�Illegitemus non carborundum est (�Don�t let the bastards grind you down�).�
― Julia Child

(in reply to Lokasenna)

Post #: 6

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent - 9/14/2020 6:28:53 AM

Yaab

Posts: 4552
Joined: 11/8/2011
From: Poland
Status: offline

Isnt't this CFR an iteration of ITER?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER

(in reply to RangerJoe)

Post #: 7

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent - 9/14/2020 3:26:31 PM

geofflambert

Posts: 14863
Joined: 12/23/2010
From: St. Louis
Status: offline

The Navy doesn't get patents for secrets, they'd rather keep them secret.

_____________________________

(in reply to Yaab)

Post #: 8

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent - 9/14/2020 3:28:22 PM

geofflambert

Posts: 14863
Joined: 12/23/2010
From: St. Louis
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: StasSche

The fact of granting a patent proves only the uniqueness of the idea.

The patent claim review doesn't involve any feasibility and/or economical study of the invention.

Only 5% of granted patents are commercialized (and not all of them are successful at the end).

Therefore for now it is just an idea, waiting for implementation. There is quite a number of physicist who believe that the a stable nuclear fusion reaction in not possible in the nearest 150 years, and most likely the reaction can be implemented in space only.

So why didn't the "Space Force" get the patent instead of the Navy?

_____________________________

(in reply to StasSche)

Post #: 9

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent - 9/14/2020 11:43:08 PM

BBfanboy

Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: geofflambert

quote:

ORIGINAL: StasSche

The fact of granting a patent proves only the uniqueness of the idea.

The patent claim review doesn't involve any feasibility and/or economical study of the invention.

Only 5% of granted patents are commercialized (and not all of them are successful at the end).

Therefore for now it is just an idea, waiting for implementation. There is quite a number of physicist who believe that the a stable nuclear fusion reaction in not possible in the nearest 150 years, and most likely the reaction can be implemented in space only.

So why didn't the "Space Force" get the patent instead of the Navy?

They were too spaced out to think about it. Maybe they are trying to implement that new fantastic nuclear weapon that was recently blabbed by someone in the administration.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to geofflambert)

Post #: 10

RE: OT: compact fusion reactor us navy patent - 9/15/2020 5:12:26 AM

Zorch

Posts: 7087
Joined: 3/7/2010
Status: offline

I know just the person to run it.