Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/7/2020 2:42:45 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		The Flight Controllers have been sacked...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 31
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/7/2020 2:45:41 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Well after three waves draw the CAP away...some stringbeans hit...2 hits on Hiryu




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 32
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/7/2020 2:49:37 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		No invasions that I see...

Pearl Harbor had one battleship eat a midget sub...the Iboats there have dispersed according to naval search.


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 33
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/7/2020 4:53:00 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline 		2 x 500 llbs bomb hits on the Hiryu is not to be sniffed at.

Flight deck penetration I presume, and maybe even fires?

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 34
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 10:46:49 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		They live! (for now)






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 9/8/2020 10:47:23 AM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 35
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 11:02:28 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Today, I learned that if you set a base to stockpile supplies, they show up blue in the industry screen. Kind of handy.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 36
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 11:04:46 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Pretty quiet here...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 37
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 11:15:02 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		These boys can get to Luzon in three days, at least the ones that don't break down.

My guess is that NJP ignores Luzon for a bit and focuses on Palembang and Singers...there are torpedoes in Luzon.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 38
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 11:23:34 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Houston, Boise, Marblehead and DD untouched...

3 Squadrons of B17s are 100% ready, the fourth has 10 disabled planes (it is the headquarters squadron, size 3...I wonder if this is to get some more planes at start?).






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 39
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 11:28:56 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		First turn is always funny, Thracian made it quite far...Scout and Thanet stayed in Hong Kong, and poor Scout got blown out of the water by Mabels.

Our Chinese bombing force did fly recon, the bombers set to hit Shanghai didn't fly. DL is low...and there is 3000+ supplies at Wenchow.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 40
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 11:32:34 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		With an average recon skill of 19, the Chinese bomber pilots did a great job of gathering intel over Shanghai.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 41
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 11:48:24 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		The Queen is going to Panama Canal, and from there to East Coast USA...and will make off map runs to Cape Town. I wonder what her transit times will be?

Edit, rethinking this, with the Grace Liners and the Matson Liners heading for East Coast from San Diego and LA...she probably isn't needed there...but rather for a quick run to San Diego and back to Oz. Or I could send her to Cape Town...




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 9/8/2020 12:14:06 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 42
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 11:55:53 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Japan could go Australia or India....

I have to revisit Babes website and relearn what a Pioneer squad does...








Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 43
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 2:41:36 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		What to do with Clemsons?

My basic instinct is to form 8 size 3 or 6 size 4 Destroyer Squadrons. They pack a nice torpedo spread...aren't really good with CVs.

Or to eventually put six of them with a slow battleship. Since I have all my slow battleships, the demand for destroyers will be really high come 1943.

There is basically 0 chance Japan pulls some stupid west coast stunt, but you still have to cover your bases. Destroyers and local minesweepers will aid in detecting any task forces coming in and will give time for the CD guns to respond better.








Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 44
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 2:47:47 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Rather than get both battlewagons finished quickly, we are going to concentrate on Warspite. Colorado just goes into refit for radar anyhow...

Warspite will be able to form up with some American destroyers and forma a strong stand off force near Midway/Wake.

Since the KB is at Singers, we will will focus on holding Wake...won't bother with Marcus this game as that pony is out...but perhaps a Kurile expedition before runways are built up? I bet Japan puts an HQa on Hokkaido asap. It would be nice to get some strategic vp early...but is it doable?










Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 45
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 3:37:42 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		Everything is doable, you just have to figure out how.

I like to use the 4 pipers converted to APDs. They can make a decent Fast Transport, or haul supplies for an invasion convoy. Their ASW value goes up to 6 earlier than other US escorts.

Without looking things up, I do believe that the USMC Pioneers are like combat engineers but I don't know if they work construction.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 46
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 4:16:25 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		In stock games, Pioneer Bns are engineers with some AV and AA and a little support. They are not all combat engineers - the AV comes from embedded infantry too.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by BBfanboy -- 9/8/2020 4:31:46 PM >

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 47
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 4:22:06 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Rather than get both battlewagons finished quickly, we are going to concentrate on Warspite. Colorado just goes into refit for radar anyhow...

Warspite will be able to form up with some American destroyers and forma a strong stand off force near Midway/Wake.

Since the KB is at Singers, we will will focus on holding Wake...won't bother with Marcus this game as that pony is out...but perhaps a Kurile expedition before runways are built up? I bet Japan puts an HQa on Hokkaido asap. It would be nice to get some strategic vp early...but is it doable?






I thought ships undergoing refit/upgrade could not accelerate repairs under any circumstances? In that case. leaving both BBs on normal repairs would be the best option.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 48
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 4:31:52 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


I thought ships undergoing refit/upgrade could not accelerate repairs under any circumstances? In that case. leaving both BBs on normal repairs would be the best option.


These two girls are being repaired now...you can get both of them repaired in under 30 days by jiggering with the settings...but I want Warspite out there.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 49
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 4:33:33 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Everything is doable, you just have to figure out how.

I like to use the 4 pipers converted to APDs. They can make a decent Fast Transport, or haul supplies for an invasion convoy. Their ASW value goes up to 6 earlier than other US escorts.

Without looking things up, I do believe that the USMC Pioneers are like combat engineers but I don't know if they work construction.


Not going to convert them to APDs. Ever.

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 50
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 4:41:01 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Just a ton of free engineers at start...plus lots more naval squads than stock, it seems to me...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 51
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 4:41:41 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

In stock games, Pioneer Bns are engineers with some AV and AA and a little support. They are not all combat engineers - the AV comes from embedded infantry too.





Those are Australian units, he is referring to US Marine Pioneer units.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 52
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 4:44:58 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

In stock games, Pioneer Bns are engineers with some AV and AA and a little support. They are not all combat engineers - the AV comes from embedded infantry too.





Those are Australian units, he is referring to US Marine Pioneer units.

I don't recall ever having seen a US Pioneer unit, so I said what I have seen. So many wrinkles in this mod!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 53
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 5:01:11 PM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline 		lots on engineers at start?
wait until you reach early 43... I don't know what too do with so many construction LCUs!!

_____________________________


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 54
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 5:06:39 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		We need to get AD's and AE's and AGPs here to rearm CLs and DDs and PT boats. Disbanding the PT boats at Pearl will give us a jump start as soon as they cycle thru.

Usually Japan has a tough time getting troops here quickly, and normally it is Naval Guard type units. We might have a chance at defending Rabaul with small ships and perhaps cause Japan to fall off their timetable a bit during the amphibious phase.

The sad fact is that Japan pretty much can go anywhere and take anything...so real care needs to be exercised at what the Allies are willing to use to throw the Japanese off their game early.

The Louisville is too large, but is the only ship close so she has to go...but hopefully she will be replaced by hordes of destroyers and a few light cruisers.

There are four squadrons of 18 Kingfishers that arrive quickly this month...one is already here at LA. They will be set to naval attack low, and will be sent here. They can fly from dot bases and really savage shipping that has no fighter cover. I know that most AFBs use them for training, but PDU off, screw that.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 9/8/2020 5:13:44 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 55
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 5:10:24 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

I don't recall ever having seen a US Pioneer unit, so I said what I have seen. So many wrinkles in this mod!



Pioneer Squads...they seem to add to shore party strength too, which is loading and unloading I think. Plus combat (18 soft, no anti armor).







Attachment (1)

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 56
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 5:12:17 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

lots on engineers at start?
wait until you reach early 43... I don't know what too do with so many construction LCUs!!


I have heard tell of 2000+ engineers on a base

(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 57
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 5:41:44 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Only now looking at the SRA...missed these guys from the replay.

Deep SRA invasion...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 58
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 5:48:16 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		What sank:






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 59
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/8/2020 11:58:52 PM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


I thought ships undergoing refit/upgrade could not accelerate repairs under any circumstances? In that case. leaving both BBs on normal repairs would be the best option.


These two girls are being repaired now...you can get both of them repaired in under 30 days by jiggering with the settings...but I want Warspite out there.

The Colorado still goes into upgrade at the end of the 30 days ... unless you want to use her without the radar upgrade...


_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.938