Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 12:54:03 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Impressive DL. Have to assume every base has an enemy sub in it.


ASW attack near Baker Island at 149,136

Japanese Ships
SS RO-67

Allied Ships
DD Dale
DD Monaghan

SS RO-67 is sighted by escort
RO-67 bottoming out ....
DD Dale fails to find sub and abandons search
DD Monaghan fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Monaghan fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub


---------------------------------------------

ASW attack near Baker Island at 149,136

Japanese Ships
SS RO-67

Allied Ships
CL Phoenix
DD Downes
DD Tucker
DD Reid

SS RO-67 is sighted by escort
DD Tucker fails to find sub and abandons search
DD Reid attacking submerged sub ....
DD Reid loses contact with SS RO-67
DD Reid cannot establish contact with SS RO-67
Escort abandons search for sub


---------------------------------------------

ASW attack near Baker Island at 149,136

Japanese Ships
SS RO-67

Allied Ships
DD Phelps

SS RO-67 is sighted by escort
DD Phelps fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Phelps fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Phelps fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Phelps fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Phelps fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub


---------------------------------------------

ASW attack near Baker Island at 149,136

Japanese Ships
SS RO-67

Allied Ships
DD Phelps

SS RO-67 is sighted by escort
RO-67 bottoming out ....
DD Phelps fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Phelps fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Phelps fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Phelps fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Phelps fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub


---------------------------------------------

ASW attack near Baker Island at 149,136

Japanese Ships
SS RO-67, hits 4

Allied Ships
DD Hull
DD Dewey

SS RO-67 is sighted by escort
DD Hull fails to find sub and abandons search
DD Dewey attacking submerged sub ....
DD Dewey loses contact with SS RO-67
DD Dewey loses contact with SS RO-67
DD Dewey fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Dewey fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Dewey fails to find sub, continues to search...
Escort abandons search for sub




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 9/16/2020 12:56:15 AM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 181
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 1:01:50 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Fiji Area




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 182
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 1:14:23 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Really not comfortable at all about turning on replacements for these troops. I think I should stockpile some, but things like engineers look real good to me.

I probably will switch the infantry that has engineers and bulldozers to combat to get them working at building forts.

I really hope I don't lose all of India to back here, but best plan on it.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 183
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 1:21:01 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Evoken


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Dec 12th 1941

For some reason POW didn't disband into port before the air strikes and ate a torpedo from a Mavis...


I am fairly sure auto-disband feature happens at the end of the replay , after all the combat phases , at least in my tests it was like that.


You can do it, you need to use less than 1/2 a move (arrive at night), not refuel, and set disband into port with at least 1 point of movement left and no ops points expended. Even a sub attack might throw you off. So direct absolute.






(in reply to Evoken)
Post #: 184
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 1:22:08 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		Look ahead a couple of months at the special convoys that arrive at CT as LCUs. I think one of them brings a nice batch of 25 pounders. Not sure if this mod altered the makeup of those pool additions.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 185
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 1:35:44 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I really like using reserve no pursuit...it can get you out of tricky positions, lets you pick which units really get nailed during a retreat, etc. Very useful.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 186
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 1:46:52 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Southern China




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 187
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 1:52:26 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Look ahead a couple of months at the special convoys that arrive at CT as LCUs. I think one of them brings a nice batch of 25 pounders. Not sure if this mod altered the makeup of those pool additions.


Sweet...first convoy is supply and fuel only, but then the Matildas start rolling in, and the 25 pounders, and infantry, lots of goodness.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 188
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 2:00:43 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		16-17 hexes from Iba...a long way for a Cat strike.

Once again Japan has very strong DLs...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 189
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 2:11:06 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Is it doable? Might have to watch the replay again.

Boise, Marblehead, and 6 Destroyers...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 190
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 3:02:40 AM   
Jorge_Stanbury


Posts: 4320
Joined: 2/29/2012
From: Toronto and Lima
Status: offline 		I would say go for it, you will probably find no LBAs on day 1 and 2... then things will get more complicated after he reacts

t



_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 191
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 1:37:42 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jorge_Stanbury

I would say go for it, you will probably find no LBAs on day 1 and 2... then things will get more complicated after he reacts

t




I highly suspect some air against them, in the end I decide to send only Boise and a destroyer, saving Marblehead and her destroyers for later...

Sending the CV 8 hexes from Saipan...could be very dangerous. All cap set very low and at a very high percentage.

POW will end her turn in the ocean, with lots of LRCAP...hopefully she can survive it.

Mauritius is making a full speed escape run from Medan...Iboats are her main worry.

Really impressed at how strong Japanese naval search is.



(in reply to Jorge_Stanbury)
Post #: 192
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 6:21:38 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Mildly optimistic here...for the first time all game I haven't gotten a lightning fast turnaround, or a replay. I know he watched the turn...

Lets highlight what could go right or wrong:

Cap Trap over Prince of Wales, pretty much every ABDA/British & Friends fighters at a 1 or 3 hex range....

Cap trap over the two American carriers 8 hexes off Siapan...which is a size three runway so all planes are layered down low, with the exception of 4 floatplanes at 15K.

Boise making a near suicidal run to just north of Cam Ranh Bay supported by four subs, and three flying boat squadrons...based off very strong intelligence.

Massed low level night bombing run on the only Japanese runway on Java...

Floatplane strikes near Miri...

Cat strikes near Rabaul…

Several CAP traps over southern Luzon and Mindanao...

Eight destroyers in two squadrons at Cagayan with an AD arriving and disbanding into port...

Four destroyer squadrons hunting enemy subs at Baker Island...

Chinese bombers hitting isolated lone IJA brigade...with troops moving in from three directions to corner it.

Dutch light cruisers and destroyers hunting the Japanese hunters off northwestern Australia.

Two minefields laid closing the straits of Malacca down low.

So something had to go right, right? Just as easily, things could have gone wrong too...







< Message edited by Lowpe -- 9/16/2020 6:24:59 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 193
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 10:15:04 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Dec 13, 1941

Looks promising for a Boise intercept...awfully long range though.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 194
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 10:17:40 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Daytime arrives and no Boise intercept...oh well. Dutch cruiser force off Oz missed too, despite lots of reactions in the area.

Kates doing NavS are shot down over the Lexington...hope they didn't go too far.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 9/16/2020 10:18:07 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 195
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 10:27:13 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Uh, oh! That is a lot...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 196
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 10:32:35 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Sure enough, POW takes another torpedo.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 197
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 10:34:43 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Well, the turn turned out pretty much how I thought...with most plots not materializing, but this sure does seem to put the nail into the coffin for the Prince of Wales. Now to do it all over again with the Repulse...

Mauritius got away with a bunch of high value luxury liners.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 9/16/2020 10:35:39 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 198
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 10:52:36 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Strikes out...

Fights off some Mabels…








Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 199
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/16/2020 10:54:01 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Down to less than one page of sunk shipping!






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 200
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/17/2020 12:27:31 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Down to less than one page of sunk shipping!








Gotta find glimmers of light where you can in the first few months as Allies.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 201
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/17/2020 2:24:47 AM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		Well, once you kill of the majority, then there is only stragglers.

But I guess that the KB in the DEI early can really put a hamper on ABDA!

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 202
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/17/2020 12:46:00 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Boise is giving it one more chance for an intercept, and then heading back to Manilla

Lexington group is flank speeding thru the Marianas...

Several other offensive moves...and preparation for more tomorrow

Probably the last day of the Prince of Wales...


(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 203
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/18/2020 11:39:46 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Dec 16th, 1941

Two days have progressed, Japan making progress...tied up irl, family wedding next week, my clan is coming home so the old homestead will be crowded with activities...

Boise went hunting, a risky move, skirmishes with destroyers, MTBs, and a SC SAG (sank 2) and then promptly ran out of fuel trying to leg it back to Luzon getting hit at range by some Mabels. There is an xakl that is headed to her to refuel...and got some fuel into them on the following day before being scared off by a MTB task force.

on the 2nd Day the Boise managed to evade a task force of several destroyers but has run out of fuel again. This time we will attempt to get the xakl to merge with the Boise.

So Boise is still in trouble...

Sboat hit a merchant off Tourane making some IJA troopers go for a swim..






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 9/18/2020 11:45:08 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 204
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/18/2020 11:44:24 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		This will be tricky...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 205
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/18/2020 11:47:57 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Sboats doing good work..






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 206
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/18/2020 11:50:37 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Prince of Wales eats 4 torpedoes over five attacks...we at least get some bombers.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 207
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/18/2020 11:58:49 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Japan is really picking up speed...

Marblehead dodge five aerial attacks...








Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 208
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/19/2020 12:02:21 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Falling fast...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 209
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/19/2020 12:09:21 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Blundered here, as the Paratroopers dropped yesterday wiping out three squadrons of depleted torpedo bombers (string beans and swords). I don't know why I flew them there rather than Tavoy where other parts of those squadrons were. I bought back the swords as I think that squadron sticks around for the game, but it hurts my future defense of India.

I took too long getting reinforcements to Port Blair...I will attempt to retake it, but I am not hopeful since prep is 0....but perhaps with shore bombardments by the cruisers we can get some effective AV onto the beach. Low odds I bet...should I just give up here?






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 210
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.734