Slitherine

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ambassador

I’m not sure someone who can’t be bothered enough to do a simple search on the forum is the kind of player ready to play for a whole game... wga8888, the manual is out of date on certain things, the developers have improved/tweaked the game for years, to fix problems and enhance gameplay, but the manual really is mandatory reading for someone wanting to play the game.

If you do a search on the forum (preferably with google), you’ll get the answer on your « what’s LowG/LowN ceiling » in a couple minutes. Hint : Alfred addressed it not too long ago.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ambassador

I’m not sure someone who can’t be bothered enough to do a simple search on the forum is the kind of player ready to play for a whole game... wga8888, the manual is out of date on certain things, the developers have improved/tweaked the game for years, to fix problems and enhance gameplay, but the manual really is mandatory reading for someone wanting to play the game.

If you do a search on the forum (preferably with google), you’ll get the answer on your « what’s LowG/LowN ceiling » in a couple minutes. Hint : Alfred addressed it not too long ago.

Believe me, it is even worse and why I'm fed up with this individual.

On 4 July 2020, in this very same sub-forum ie the War Room, wga8888 opened one of his typical threads whose rambling covered altitudes, torpedoes/bombs et al. After several respondents had posted, on 10 July I posted a definitive answer on the low/non low altitude settings for level bombers which are the aircraft type with the most complicated variations. Other aircraft types follow the rules much more simply. After 3 failed attempts to get the formatting right, but with the data still readable, Shellshock kindly converted successfully on 11 July the data I provided into an easily read chart.

Bottom line. Although I already knew the answer, it took me quite a few hours of work to research the issue so that I did not provide incorrect information, and of course to format it into a chart (which lost it's formatting when transferred to the forum). I don't know how long it took Shellshock to tidy up the format but even if it took him only a couple of minutes his time and effort is also not to be overlooked. It is obvious that even when already answered in his own threads, wga8888 is incapable of understanding answers. I have no intention of participating in his Groundhog Day.

Alfred

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nomad

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ambassador

I’m not sure someone who can’t be bothered enough to do a simple search on the forum is the kind of player ready to play for a whole game... wga8888, the manual is out of date on certain things, the developers have improved/tweaked the game for years, to fix problems and enhance gameplay, but the manual really is mandatory reading for someone wanting to play the game.

If you do a search on the forum (preferably with google), you’ll get the answer on your « what’s LowG/LowN ceiling » in a couple minutes. Hint : Alfred addressed it not too long ago.

Believe me, it is even worse and why I'm fed up with this individual.

On 4 July 2020, in this very same sub-forum ie the War Room, wga8888 opened one of his typical threads whose rambling covered altitudes, torpedoes/bombs et al. After several respondents had posted, on 10 July I posted a definitive answer on the low/non low altitude settings for level bombers which are the aircraft type with the most complicated variations. Other aircraft types follow the rules much more simply. After 3 failed attempts to get the formatting right, but with the data still readable, Shellshock kindly converted successfully on 11 July the data I provided into an easily read chart.

Bottom line. Although I already knew the answer, it took me quite a few hours of work to research the issue so that I did not provide incorrect information, and of course to format it into a chart (which lost it's formatting when transferred to the forum). I don't know how long it took Shellshock to tidy up the format but even if it took him only a couple of minutes his time and effort is also not to be overlooked. It is obvious that even when already answered in his own threads, wga8888 is incapable of understanding answers. I have no intention of participating in his Groundhog Day.

Alfred

And I appreciate it, I have it copied to my info file.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alfred

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ambassador

I’m not sure someone who can’t be bothered enough to do a simple search on the forum is the kind of player ready to play for a whole game... wga8888, the manual is out of date on certain things, the developers have improved/tweaked the game for years, to fix problems and enhance gameplay, but the manual really is mandatory reading for someone wanting to play the game.

If you do a search on the forum (preferably with google), you’ll get the answer on your « what’s LowG/LowN ceiling » in a couple minutes. Hint : Alfred addressed it not too long ago.

Believe me, it is even worse and why I'm fed up with this individual.

On 4 July 2020, in this very same sub-forum ie the War Room, wga8888 opened one of his typical threads whose rambling covered altitudes, torpedoes/bombs et al. After several respondents had posted, on 10 July I posted a definitive answer on the low/non low altitude settings for level bombers which are the aircraft type with the most complicated variations. Other aircraft types follow the rules much more simply. After 3 failed attempts to get the formatting right, but with the data still readable, Shellshock kindly converted successfully on 11 July the data I provided into an easily read chart.

Bottom line. Although I already knew the answer, it took me quite a few hours of work to research the issue so that I did not provide incorrect information, and of course to format it into a chart (which lost it's formatting when transferred to the forum). I don't know how long it took Shellshock to tidy up the format but even if it took him only a couple of minutes his time and effort is also not to be overlooked. It is obvious that even when already answered in his own threads, wga8888 is incapable of understanding answers. I have no intention of participating in his Groundhog Day.

Alfred