Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  21 22 [23] 24 25   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/3/2020 1:16:14 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		Not just bombers on those tanks, strafers as well.

Prepare a unit to move in to open an escape route if you can, move in right behind the tanks.

One time, playing the AI, I moved a unit from Bataan to Clark airfield after my units retreated. That unit got to Clark and captured it because the AI sent all the units from Clark to Bataan. His units were then trapped and eventually destroyed.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 661
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/3/2020 1:42:34 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

He is likely racing those tanks without any AA cover to get to Perth, but once in Perth there may be AA there for them. Nothing wrong with bombing them uncovered in the open!

Be careful trying to fire your 37mm ammo from those 36mm guns... stand well back!


Damn grognards...it was at typo this time.


There is only one infantry division at Perth for Japan...but 45 fighters at Geraldton.

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 11/3/2020 1:43:26 PM >

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 662
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/3/2020 1:50:56 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		Well, the Germans fired a 28mm shell and it came out as a 20mm!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2.8_cm_sPzB_41

You could probably use strafing fighters one time, especially if the bombers tended to fly higher.

Do so at least 3 hexes away from any enemy fighter base to increase ops losses. Don't forget a 10% LRCAP over the enemy base to increase ops losses as well.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 663
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/3/2020 3:34:04 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		That is the role of the Dinah Fighter for Japan...LRCAP enemy bases. One of its best uses....do the Allies have a similar plane? My P40s definitely don't have the legs for it in this case.


(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 664
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/3/2020 9:31:02 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		Nothing with good legs until the P-38E arrives. Even when drop tanks are available the P-40s only get one extra hex of range IIRC.

I vaguely recall one of the fighters available to the Chinese having a range 6-7 - the Lancer I think. The F2A Buffalo also has some range.

EDIT: I just remembered that the British have a fighter version of the Blenheim I. One Squadron in Malaya at start uses it. The plane has range but is a dog not fit for a dogfight.

< Message edited by BBfanboy -- 11/3/2020 9:32:36 PM >

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 665
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 12:49:41 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Jan 3, 1942

Trapped like rats the Australia and Perth and Patterson attempt an escape....in a bold move the steam towards the KB's known position, and then past them heading for islands...

Australia and Patterson make it for now, but are short fuel.

Perth doesn't make it...too much damage from the previous day's torpedo strikes.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 666
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 1:18:19 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Countering the Perth Invasion...

Main supply line I think is secured for now...it might get cut for a couple of days, but there is sufficient force to make 2 IJA tank regiments flee I think...those US 105mm howitzers are game changers here.

I might get my first Stuart tanks here tomorrow too depending upon the rng gods...

The IJA will have to heavily reinforce here...which no doubt they can do. The southern ports are at risk to fast transport invasion or paratroop landings...but we will use the accumulating Naval forces to counter that hopefully, or at least make it expensive.

We badly need more AA here...just a few guns at Perth. The US 205th Coastal AA is at Sydney boarding trains...this unit is definitely strong enough to prevent an IJAAF bombing campaign at one location, probably Perth.

So the point here is not to keep Perth indefinitely, but to force Japan to waste time and troops to take it while keeping an valid retreat path which is the tricky part. Allied forces are definitely vulnerable to a sweeping envelopment.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 11/10/2020 1:25:25 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 667
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 1:39:12 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline 		He can't have AKEs at Geraldton can he this early?

So if he uses the BBs to bombard, then he can't use them as SCTF, and he must know you'll have naval forces around

He's going to struggle there without significant reinforcements, but it all depends on how good his supply/air support situation is, and it can't be that good as its still early.

I don't think you can force him out, but you can certainly hold him

But I have to ask, with 3 Aus Divs and a 4th on its way, doesn't that leave you a bit weak on the east coast?

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 668
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 1:46:41 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Townsville Theatre

Cloncurry has such a force defending it primarily because of the resources there, we don't want to make harvesting VP too easy. Might even be able to get some fighters there, too eventually.

Hindsight, I had sufficient naval forces several days ago to really challenge here now that the KB has moved away...the lone IJN BB is moving away too....they can't rearm I think.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 669
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 1:48:15 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Encircled


But I have to ask, with 3 Aus Divs and a 4th on its way, doesn't that leave you a bit weak on the east coast?


See the above post...he hasn't landed here yet in strength, so I have plenty present for the east coast. Plus so much is on the way from both east and west.

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 670
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 1:52:41 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Encircled

He can't have AKEs at Geraldton can he this early?

I don't think you can force him out, but you can certainly hold him

But I have to ask, with 3 Aus Divs and a 4th on its way, doesn't that leave you a bit weak on the east coast?


He might have AD? Likely, there are 5 ships disbanded into port, and lots of destroyers in this thrust.

The Perth CD guns gave him a nasty surprise here, and overall I believe three of Japan's battleships have to seek repairs between here and the Thundering Herd trap.

I disagree, US Artillery is such a game changer here, there is no way he can stick around contesting anything. He has to bring up artillery which isn't anywhere in theatre. Until then he really does have to retreat. If he does stick around in Perth, I bet I can force his division there and tank support to retreat from a deliberate attack in 3 days time barring another division landing at Perth which I think is doubtful. More likely he will seek to envelop.

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 11/10/2020 1:54:06 PM >

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 671
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 1:59:46 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Encircled

He can't have AKEs at Geraldton can he this early?

I don't think you can force him out, but you can certainly hold him

But I have to ask, with 3 Aus Divs and a 4th on its way, doesn't that leave you a bit weak on the east coast?


Yup, should have waited till you'd put the other post up! He's trying to do too much, too early


quote:

He might have AD? Likely, there are 5 ships disbanded into port, and lots of destroyers in this thrust.

The Perth CD guns gave him a nasty surprise here, and overall I believe three of Japan's battleships have to seek repairs between here and the Thundering Herd trap.

I disagree, US Artillery is such a game changer here, there is no way he can stick around contesting anything. He has to bring up artillery which isn't anywhere in theatre. Until then he really does have to retreat. If he does stick around in Perth, I bet I can force his division there and tank support to retreat from a deliberate attack in 3 days time barring another division landing at Perth which I think is doubtful. More likely he will seek to envelop.


Look forward to seeing it!


_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 672
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 2:04:37 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		China

Still increasing supply here in China, up to 133K.

Chinese forces evacuated Sian prior to the 600 AFVs blitzing the city...we should be able to set up strong position in WR and Mtn hexes...but countering those tanks is darn tough. I will send the 57th AT Rgt, and hopefully it will have time to dig in. Also a base force will be present, and the AA it has might also help a bit (although this isn't proven). We simply don't have enough AT capability.

On the Sian road we force an IJA mixed bde to retreat...now a lot of those troops will traverse cross country while others continue to dig in just to be a roadblock. On the road west of Nanyang we continue to dig in and block the road leading to Ankang.








Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 673
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 2:21:42 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		I think that an AD and an AKE start in Indochina. The AKEs can convert faster than the ADs. While he might have AKEs from conversions, I doubt if they can make it to Australia yet. The ADs would not be finished yet.

This shows just how important those IJN CAs really are if the BBs can hardly be used while burning lots of fuel.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 674
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 2:22:10 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		16th Indian Bde will be able to hold Rangoon long enough to allow the 88th Chinese Div and 1st Burma/A Div to flee Rangoon and head north. The 1st Burma A will go to Lashio in a long march, while the 88th Chinese will retreat up towards Akayb. Both were shattered at the Pegu landings.

The goal here is to retreat most elements towards Lashio, which will become a festung and blocking position securing the western approaches to China.

Our days of unloading supply at Ramree Island are coming to an end...it is getting super dangerous there.

Commonwealth armor is leaving Prome for Lashio and then China....it will be months before they are upgraded to decent tanks though I bet, with the demand for tanks in Oz taking immediate priority.

The British Navy might make an appearance here...






That invasion force could very well be heading for India.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 11/10/2020 2:49:41 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 675
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 2:39:39 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		The Philippines are pristine...they could use supply. I haven't taken any land reinforcements here...

Only 100 P40s, the other 20 are P35A's.

Dutch boats and Sboats are working aggressively on hunting IJN shipping. Coordinating with PBY searches. 3600 supplies at Wenchow, so that base can keep being used as a search base for quite a while. No DL on it.

Laog will get an HQa...we could base some P40s in a naval attack role here if something is spotted, and certainly put some PBYs here to search.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 11/10/2020 2:44:56 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 676
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 2:54:54 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Japan drives their planes hard.

Trying to figure out where that Babs got shot down at...have to admit rl was so hectic didn't have time to really watch the replay, and didn't take any screen pics from it either.

Singapore has over 1000AV, 50K supply, forts 3 30%. Will stop building forts at 4. All Philippines in Allied hands.

Of major concern: IJA Tank thrust from Sian; Invasion India coming? One is a big threat for China, the other this early is an opportunity. Got another Chinese Division flown out they are boarding trains at Ledo for rear area in India.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 11/10/2020 2:57:54 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 677
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 3:02:26 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Ship repairs

Colorado has four more days and already has the radar upgrade, but we won't be using her...just allowing here to go on shakedown cruises.

The only currently active battleship is Warspite...location top secret.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 678
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 3:09:47 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Will probably pull back a lot of the support shipping that is at Wake now, back around Midway. They are too valuable to risk longer here they did great work! ...

It will take a pretty concentrated effort now to take Wake...buying time for the Allies. 6 Sboats here will refuel and head for Luzon.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 11/10/2020 3:13:58 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 679
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 3:11:13 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I got this note from Japan -- I am inside his ooda loop!

You are still managing to surprise me every turn :-)

Great game.


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 680
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 3:54:33 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

I got this note from Japan -- I am inside his ooda loop!

You are still managing to surprise me every turn :-)

Great game.




A better surprise would be when his gun captain for a 25mm AAA gun would suddenly point to the sky and yell "Helldivers!" But in Japanese.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 681
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 7:11:11 PM   
jdsrae


Posts: 2716
Joined: 3/1/2010
From: Gandangara Country
Status: offline 		The Nullarbor Handicap, a 2388km sprint from Port Augusta to Perth.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Countering the Perth Invasion...






< Message edited by jdsrae -- 11/10/2020 7:18:43 PM >

_____________________________

Currently playing my first PBEM, no house rules Scenario 1 as IJ.
AAR link (no SolInvictus): https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4684655

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 682
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 10:33:42 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

China

Still increasing supply here in China, up to 133K.

Chinese forces evacuated Sian prior to the 600 AFVs blitzing the city...we should be able to set up strong position in WR and Mtn hexes...but countering those tanks is darn tough. I will send the 57th AT Rgt, and hopefully it will have time to dig in. Also a base force will be present, and the AA it has might also help a bit (although this isn't proven). We simply don't have enough AT capability.

On the Sian road we force an IJA mixed bde to retreat...now a lot of those troops will traverse cross country while others continue to dig in just to be a roadblock. On the road west of Nanyang we continue to dig in and block the road leading to Ankang.


C-47s can airlift 37mm/2 pounder A/T guns. Do the British have any to spare in India?

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 683
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 10:49:58 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

China

Still increasing supply here in China, up to 133K.

Chinese forces evacuated Sian prior to the 600 AFVs blitzing the city...we should be able to set up strong position in WR and Mtn hexes...but countering those tanks is darn tough. I will send the 57th AT Rgt, and hopefully it will have time to dig in. Also a base force will be present, and the AA it has might also help a bit (although this isn't proven). We simply don't have enough AT capability.

On the Sian road we force an IJA mixed bde to retreat...now a lot of those troops will traverse cross country while others continue to dig in just to be a roadblock. On the road west of Nanyang we continue to dig in and block the road leading to Ankang.


C-47s can airlift 37mm/2 pounder A/T guns. Do the British have any to spare in India?


SWPAC gets a 37mm AT gun unit.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 684
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 10:57:48 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

China

Still increasing supply here in China, up to 133K.

Chinese forces evacuated Sian prior to the 600 AFVs blitzing the city...we should be able to set up strong position in WR and Mtn hexes...but countering those tanks is darn tough. I will send the 57th AT Rgt, and hopefully it will have time to dig in. Also a base force will be present, and the AA it has might also help a bit (although this isn't proven). We simply don't have enough AT capability.

On the Sian road we force an IJA mixed bde to retreat...now a lot of those troops will traverse cross country while others continue to dig in just to be a roadblock. On the road west of Nanyang we continue to dig in and block the road leading to Ankang.


C-47s can airlift 37mm/2 pounder A/T guns. Do the British have any to spare in India?


SWPAC gets a 37mm AT gun unit.

Yes, but that would likely go to Australia. For China, bringing in British units seems easier.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 685
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 11:18:19 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Currently flying in some Jungle Guns -- 20th Indian Mountain Gun Rgt….16 guns to Chengtu (3.7 inch). I have 5-6 of these regiments at Ledo, but they are half strength, and the replacement rate is really poor.

The 85th British AT Rgt (36 guns 2pounders) is boarding trains at Cochin and heading for Ledo now.

In 40 days Sydney gets a SW Pacific AT unit but they are staying in Oz...if I still control Oz by then.







< Message edited by Lowpe -- 11/10/2020 11:19:07 PM >

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 686
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 11:35:39 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Quick question, which Aussies use the 60#?

I couldn't find any...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 687
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/10/2020 11:58:38 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		The 2 pounder AT gun is 40mm but with no HE rounds.

I thought that the US AT unit for SWPAC comes in somewhere in the United States.

The 60 pounder is an WWI anti-que gun that some later units reserve. It upgrades to something else but use them up first.

< Message edited by RangerJoe -- 11/10/2020 11:59:48 PM >

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 688
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/11/2020 12:57:58 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		60 pounder was withdrawn from active service in 1941 but remained in training use until 1944. It was replaced by the BL 4.5 inch Gun Mk 2 on Carriage 4.5 inch and 5.5 inch Guns.

A 60 pounder in use during 1938...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 689
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 11/11/2020 1:03:16 AM   
Alfred

 

Posts: 6685
Joined: 9/28/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Quick question, which Aussies use the 60#?

I couldn't find any...







It isn't an Australian weapon in the official scenarios. A limited number of British units use it.

You need to check up on the DaBabes changelog to see if it was an intentional change.

Alfred

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 690
Page:   <<   < prev  21 22 [23] 24 25   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  21 22 [23] 24 25   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.969