Issues with supply

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Issues with supply

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> Issues with supply

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Issues with supply - 11/27/2020 9:05:15 PM

lugor3

Posts: 1
Joined: 11/27/2020
Status: offline

I've just started playing ATG and have been loving it so far, but I have a (probably stupid) question about how supply works.

The problem is my supreme HQ is only sending out a small portion of the total supply produced, leaving the subordinate HQ's and their units undersupplied. The supreme HQ gets a request of 4861 supply out but only sends 1559, while I produce over 7000 supply per turn in my cities. Because of this, my units at the front are not effective. What's keeping the HQ from sending out all of the requested supplies?

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by lugor3 -- 11/27/2020 9:06:20 PM >

_____________________________

Post #: 1

RE: Issues with supply - 11/28/2020 5:01:16 AM

ernieschwitz

Posts: 3893
Joined: 9/15/2009
From: Denmark
Status: offline

Most likely you are not taking account of that units in HQs (including the one you have as Main HQ) also has supply needs. Or you have units that are on the edge of the HQs supply range.

There are of course other problems you could be running into, but these I found are the most likely.

(in reply to lugor3)

Post #: 2

RE: Issues with supply - 11/29/2020 5:29:53 AM

Queenswu66

Posts: 11
Joined: 11/29/2020
Status: offline

Web telephone service providers have actually come to be much more popular than traditional telephony companies. All thanks to the current breakthroughs in Internet modern technology. These advancements have resulted in cheaper telephone service and more feature-rich solutions.

(in reply to ernieschwitz)

Post #: 3