Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Entrench?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Decisive Battles: Korsun Pocket >> Entrench? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Entrench? - 8/14/2003 7:44:22 AM   
PeterF

 

Posts: 62
Joined: 8/10/2003
Status: offline 		Maybe, I'm dense :p but the entrenching command doesn't make much sense. A unit can consume all its OPs then entrench. It's cost free, if I'm not mistaken. The following turn it can spring out of its sand-bagged state, tanned and fit, and resume moving and/or attacking. And that's cost free, as well. Thus, there seems to be no penalty for entering or exiting an entrenched state.

In that case, wouldn't every unit capable of entrenching do so at the end of every move? (Talk about micromanagement) Please tell me I'm wrong.
Post #: 1
- 8/14/2003 7:58:57 AM   
Fred98


Posts: 4430
Joined: 1/5/2001
From: Wollondilly, Sydney
Status: offline 		They would be neither tanned nor fit (sorry - couldn't help it ) :)

(in reply to PeterF)
Post #: 2
- 8/14/2003 8:15:16 AM   
PeterF

 

Posts: 62
Joined: 8/10/2003
Status: offline 		Joe, you're [B]gainsaying[/B] me again! Sheesh.

(in reply to PeterF)
Post #: 3
- 8/14/2003 8:23:27 AM   
e_barkmann


Posts: 1307
Joined: 4/18/2000
From: Adelaide, Australia
Status: offline 		Peter, there are most definitely penalties for entrenching.

1. You burn a bullet (thus it's not free). Can be a critical move if you are out of supply at the beginning of your next turn and you only have 1 bullet when you entrench ...

2. You can only entrench in friendly held territory. So if you are planning on an aggressive move, be wary of where the front line is...I have been caught out a few times because I wasn't paying attention!

3. Not all units have entrenching capabilites, set by the scenario designer.


Cheers Chris

(in reply to PeterF)
Post #: 4
- 8/14/2003 8:30:16 AM   
PeterF

 

Posts: 62
Joined: 8/10/2003
Status: offline 		I see. But then every elegible unit that ends its turn in supply and inside friendly lines should auto-entrench. Since it recovers the spent bullet the following turn it makes zero sense not to.

(in reply to PeterF)
Post #: 5
- 8/14/2003 8:35:53 AM   
e_barkmann


Posts: 1307
Joined: 4/18/2000
From: Adelaide, Australia
Status: offline 		But supply is re-determined at the beginning of each friendly turn.

Hence, a smart player will recognise situations where enemy units could be trapped out of supply with clever placement of interdiction and ZOC's.

There is a movement for an all-entrench button, but I feel it could lead to issues that aren't necessarily recognised until its too late!

Note that if you have more than one bullet up your sleeve before you entrench ...you have less to worry about :-)

Cheers Chris

(in reply to PeterF)
Post #: 6
- 8/14/2003 8:50:39 AM   
Fred98


Posts: 4430
Joined: 1/5/2001
From: Wollondilly, Sydney
Status: offline 		In most cases I would like to auto entrench.

But each turn, there might be a very small number of units where I don’t want to auto entrench. So the solution:

If you don’t want a unit to auto entrench click on that unit and give the order “do not auto entrench”

Then, when the player is about to complete the turn, the player has an option to press another button called “auto entrench”. Which entrenches all units except those ordered not to ( and of course those who cannot due to other factors).

(in reply to PeterF)
Post #: 7
- 8/14/2003 10:32:27 AM   
PeterF

 

Posts: 62
Joined: 8/10/2003
Status: offline 		IMHO, it would be better if units expended OPs instead of supplies to entrench. After all, what is the material cost of building a defensive line? We're talking about digging foxholes, throwing up some camouflage, siting guns, etc. Barbed wire and mines show up when the front line line has reamined static for awhile.

(in reply to PeterF)
Post #: 8
- 8/14/2003 3:02:17 PM   
BrubakerII


Posts: 538
Joined: 9/15/2002
From: Adelaide Australia
Status: offline 		Actually Peter this is a very good suggestion for by expending OP's a unit is essentially expending 'time' which is more realistic. Out of interest if you watch the computer turn closley you will notice that the very last thing it does is 'auto-entrench' any unit that it is logical (or viable) to.I tend to entrench all units at the end of a turn if possible unless I am feeling lazy. I am for an autoentrench button.

Brubaker

(in reply to PeterF)
Post #: 9
- 8/14/2003 7:46:16 PM   
Henri

 

Posts: 146
Joined: 4/26/2002
Status: offline 		Would not the easy solution be for units to auto-entrench if they are in friendly territory and NOT to if they are not in supply?

Or as suggested to have an auto-entrench button so one could turn it off for units that are at risk of not being in supply the next turn?

Or to be able to drag-select an area and then give the command to auto-entrench all the units within the selected area?

Doing it one by one is a bit much micro-management...

Henri

(in reply to PeterF)
Post #: 10
- 8/14/2003 9:12:07 PM   
Huskalator

 

Posts: 212
Joined: 5/17/2002
From: Kansas
Status: offline 		From a micromanagement standpoint its really not a big deal for me. As the Germans I have so few units that it takes maybe a minute to check things over and as the Russians I am almost always fighting or using extended movement that it only becomes bothersome for a few turns..

_____________________________

SW Episode 2:Good movie, bad love story

Happiness is the only good. The time to be happy is now. The place to be happy is here. The way to be happy is to make others so.

(in reply to PeterF)
Post #: 11
- 8/14/2003 9:48:12 PM   
Black Cat

 

Posts: 615
Joined: 7/4/2002
Status: offline 		[QUOTE]Originally posted by PeterF
[B]IMHO, it would be better if units expended OPs instead of supplies to entrench. After all, what is the material cost of building a defensive line? We're talking about digging foxholes, throwing up some camouflage, siting guns, etc. Barbed wire and mines show up when the front line line has reamined static for awhile. [/B][/QUOTE]

Absolutely better, although I wonder if thet can re-coded at this point.

The way it works in the field is units digging in actually gain Combat Power ( and fatigue ) at a slow but steady rate while losing mobility and cohesion.

(in reply to PeterF)
Post #: 12
- 8/15/2003 2:39:28 AM   
Snigbert

 

Posts: 2956
Joined: 1/27/2002
From: Worcester, MA. USA
Status: offline 		[B]Maybe, I'm dense but the entrenching command doesn't make much sense. A unit can consume all its OPs then entrench. It's cost free, if I'm not mistaken. The following turn it can spring out of its sand-bagged state, tanned and fit, and resume moving and/or attacking. And that's cost free, as well. Thus, there seems to be no penalty for entering or exiting an entrenched state.[/B]

Each unit can move and perform an action (attack, entrench, blow bridge, etc) on a given turn.

_____________________________

"Money doesnt talk, it swears. Obscenities, who really cares?" -Bob Dylan

"Habit is the balast that chains a dog to it's vomit." -Samuel Becket

"He has weapons of mass destruction- the world's deadliest weapons- which pose a direct threat to the

(in reply to PeterF)
Post #: 13
- 8/15/2003 12:41:05 PM   
willgamer


Posts: 902
Joined: 6/2/2002
From: Huntsville, Alabama
Status: offline 		As a practical matter, when I'm otherwise ready to hit next turn, I revisit all my units with the Leave Unit (and get next one) button. This allows me to catch units I've overlooked, units that fought and still have a small remaining movement to use, units I was going to think about then forgot, etc... This also allows me to also entrench (if desired, see CM's previous post) with little extra effort.

So if most folks want an auto-entrench toggle so be it. However the way it is now is fine if you take the above approach.

(in reply to PeterF)
Post #: 14
- 8/15/2003 10:40:33 PM   
PeterF

 

Posts: 62
Joined: 8/10/2003
Status: offline 		As it stands, KP models 'defense on the fly'. This should require units to expend labor but not supplies, I think. Deducting a bullet should be reserved for 'fortifying', IOW, building more elaborate defensive postions, with barbed wire, mines, ammo stockpiles, etc.

Chris Merchant posted:

[QUOTE]2. You can only entrench in friendly held territory. [/QUOTE]

Why? Is this commonsensical? One assumes troops are capable of digging foxholes in either friendly or hostile zones.

(in reply to PeterF)
Post #: 15
- 8/16/2003 5:15:22 AM   
Nickel

 

Posts: 124
Joined: 6/25/2003
From: WI- USA
Status: offline 		I think auto- entrench would be an okay option. I would hope that manual entrenching remains available due to the bullet cost and supply issues. Don't want to go out of supply accidentally.

_____________________________

never in driblets, but in mass

(in reply to PeterF)
Post #: 16
- 8/16/2003 1:19:49 PM   
Gregor_SSG


Posts: 681
Joined: 3/6/2003
Status: offline 		[QUOTE]Originally posted by PeterF
Why? Is this commonsensical? One assumes troops are capable of digging foxholes in either friendly or hostile zones. [/B][/QUOTE]

Troops are certainly capable of digging holes anywhere, but it takes time and organisation to it. In KP, when you occupy an enemy controlled hex, it becomes Contested. That is, your in the hex, but it's not totally yours yet. You haven't had time to consolidate, and there might still be pockets of enemy resistance.

When it's Contested, you can't entrench. At the start of your next turn, if the bad guys haven't got it back, it becomes yours, and you can entrench.

The practical result is that troops who have just conducted an attack cannot entrench, and are hence most vulnerable to an immediate counter-attack, which is how it should be.

Gregor

_____________________________

Vice President, Strategic Studies Group
See http://www.ssg.com.au and http://www.ssg.com.au/forums/
for info and free scenarios.

(in reply to PeterF)
Post #: 17
- 8/16/2003 1:53:14 PM   
BrubakerII


Posts: 538
Joined: 9/15/2002
From: Adelaide Australia
Status: offline 		Thanks for the insight Gregor.

Brubaker

(in reply to PeterF)
Post #: 18
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Decisive Battles: Korsun Pocket >> Entrench? Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.406