Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Defending the Rodina - A Soviet WiTE2 AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> After Action Reports >> Defending the Rodina - A Soviet WiTE2 AAR Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Defending the Rodina - A Soviet WiTE2 AAR - 1/14/2021 2:33:42 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline 		This series of game reports is designed to give you some idea how WiTE2 plays and an insight into some of the new game mechanics.

It is played vs the Axis AI and is currently in early 1945 (you've already seen one screen shot from that phase of the game). The layout of the updates will follow a fairly standard pattern of setting the scene in the actual game and then a discussion of a particular game mechanism.

There will be other AARs, including at least one MP tussle, so with this one we are going to move fairly quickly. The goal is to give you an overview of how the game comes together rather a detailed turn by turn report.

Setting up the Game

For those of you used to the WiTx series, at first glance the game set up screen is familiar.



There are 2 completely new controls though and note that, for these, both sides will play by the same rules depending on the options chosen.

The 'Automate AI Air Assist' will be discussed below as its a major topic.

The other new option concerns the concept of Theatre Boxes. If you have played WiTW then you will know that game had an 'Eastern Front' box that gave the Axis player some control over the flow of formations to and from the east. Well WiTE2 has the complete Axis and Soviet war commitment including Soviet forces in the Far East, the Axis war with the allies in North Africa (and later in Europe).

The war between the Soviet Northern Front and the Finnish and German armies is handled in a Theatre box as is the partisan war.

If you tick that box, you have substantial control over the allocation of forces.

Over-commit and you gain bonus victory points (again a topic for later) and can delay the Allied advance, potentially stopping or slowing their invasion of Europe. Under-commit and the reverse happens, you lose VP and maybe see the Allies in Italy in very early 1943.

For this game, I have left the Theatres out of my control. The only thing I can do is to voluntarily send additional formations to one or other of the theatres. I can't return these to the map so need to be very sure I'll never need them again.

Before going on, the AI is far better in WiTE2 than in any of the earlier games. It will shift strategic direction as well as make better operational choices. At the start, I strongly suggest do not give it any bonuses till you understand the main game mechanisms. After a while set the Soviet AI to at least 110 (if you are playing the Axis) and the Axis AI to at least 120. As ever, in a game with the AI you can adjust these but at those levels the AI gains substantial benefits that will ensure a much better game.

Even experienced testers are struggling against the Soviet AI at 110 morale, above that it is a fearsome opponent and you quite simply can't afford to make any mistakes or sub-optimal moves.


_____________________________
Post #: 1
Events up to Turn 7 - 1/14/2021 2:38:59 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline 		3 August 1941

This update is based on the on-map situation at the end of turn 7.

Background

By the 29 June 1941 [1], the Germans were over the Daugava and outside Riga. AGC had taken Minsk, crossed the Berezina and was 50 miles from Vitebsk. AGS had had faced stiffer resistance [2] but have taken Lvov and was within 20 miles of Rovno.

By the 5 July, AGN had secured Riga and was half way from Daugavipils to Pskov. AGC was over the Dnepr at Orsha as the bypassed Soviet Western Front was slowly destroyed in the Bialystok pocket. AGS made slower progress but had captured Tarnopol. To the south, the German 11 Army and Rumanian forces had almost reached Kishinev.

By 12 July, AGN had reached Pskov and was pressing the Soviet 8 Army back in Estonia. AGC was at the outskirts of Smolensk and 50 miles from Gomel. AGS was making slower progress due to substantial Soviet resistance.

By 19 July,AGN had taken Pskov and was moving towards the Luga defensive line. AGC had captured Smolensk and the Soviet defenders had abandoned Vitebsk to escape encirclement. Stavka was allocating most of the immediately available formations to defend Vyazma and build up the Leningrad defences. AGS was making slow gains but 11 Army was over the Dnestr as Southern Front fell apart under pressure [3].

By 26 July, AGN had reached the Luga line but was facing strong resistance [4]. Fortunately AGC's advance slowed after the Smolensk battles as it resupplied but Gomel fell. AGS finally took Vinnitsa and Zhitomir as SW Front weakened. A major Soviet counter-attack pushed the Romanians back from Odessa.

Start of August

Leningrad Front had been substantially reinforced and briefly stalled AGN on the Luga line. NW Front was abandoning Estonia and defending Staraya Russa. From there to Velikie Luki the front was wide open [5]




If you are used to WiTE1 most of that will be clear but there are 5 map features worth noting. 1 – is Finland (off map and axis controlled) while 2 is Soviet controlled but also off map (and will become Finnish controlled when they capture the Isthmus). 3 are examples of dual and single track rail lines. Single track rails can only carry 40% of the freight as a dual track. 4 is a hex with an 'average' road (most the Soviet Union has poor roads but there are some good roads). In clear weather this is only marginally important but once it starts to rain you will really notice the difference. 5 are the fixed on-map airbases.

AGC has slowed due to supply problems and the need for the infantry to reach the front. Also a major Soviet build up has stalled them for a while.



AGS has stated to make quicker gains as SW and S Fronts weaken after 6 weeks of fighting. In the north, the Germans are only 20 miles from Kiev, in the south Odessa is surrounded.



Not that Odessa will fall easily. A new concept in WiTE2 is the 'city fort' that allows over-stacking in urban hexes. This is especially useful in ports but can also turn urban centres in near impregnable fortresses. So Odessa is defended by 5 divisions (56,000 men).

Both sides have committed air assets to try and control the sea lanes but that is going to demand a significant effort by the axis to capture.



And to put all this in context, here are the losses so far:



The OOB screen shows the forces of both sides in three key aeas. On-map is fairly obvious. In addition to the theatres that represent real locations, both sides have an abstract strategic reserve. This is used to rebuild units, train fresh formations or to hold forces that you see as your ultimate reserve. At this stage, the Soviets lack the equipment to properly equip and reinforce most of the units in the reserve. The final column shows the total strength of both sides in all the possible locations.




[1] Unlike in WiTE1, the first turn is a full week

[2] The special Turn 1 rules are different in the Ukraine to reflect that SW Front was better prepared. Forget all about 'Lvov' pockets - you can do something like that but it is not the best use of your assets

[3] Units that are weak on ToE and/or low morale/experience can collapse badly. The result, for the Soviets, is a fresh formation can often hold up the Axis for a week or so and then will fall apart under sustained pressure. Pockets are not the only way to destroy the Red Army in 1941/2.

[4] The terrain here is very different to the WiTE1 map, the few decent roads become a focus for both sides.

[5] The terrain effects are very different, it is safe not to defend a sector with poor roads and heavy woods as any movement there is slow and resupply very tricky.


< Message edited by Erik Rutins -- 1/14/2021 8:53:39 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 2
Game Concepts: The Air War - 1/14/2021 2:41:52 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline 		Managing the Air War

Those of you who have played WiTW will recognise the air mechanics as a distant cousin to that game. Some concepts remain, there is an air phase where some of the air action takes place but missions such as ground support, air transport and paratroop operations all take place in the ground phase.

Most air missions take place in one or another 'air directive'. In WiTE2 probably the main ones are reconnaisance missions, ground support and some tactical bombing for interdiction or to damage depots.

But there are large differences. Some come from the scale of the game, while the capacity to wage strategic bombing is present, in reality it is something that neither side can sustain. Most missions are directly connected to ground combat operations. Air groups are organised into Air Operational Groups (from 1-5 air groups) and these are the basis for moving air units between air bases and setting up air directives.

In WiTW you could wholly or partially automate the air war. At one level, you could hand it all over to the AI, at another you could set priorities and the AI would then generate the air directives. If you wanted you could then manually adjust these.

In WiTE2 there is a very useful AI-assistance but it requires some manual input as well. There are two variants. In one, when you start the air phase (or end the ground phase), the AI will generate air directives, carry them out and redeploy your air groups. In the other, when you invoke the assistant, the AI will carry out these actions but you can then manually alter some aspects if you want.

In both modes, the AI will rotate depleted or weak air groups to the reserve to refit, train new pilots etc. This function, when managing the Soviets in the early turns is a huge saving in player effort. It will also try to replace units sent to the reserve with similar planes (so fighters for fighters).

As a player you need to set the relative priority of each air command (this determines how your planes are distributed on the map) and which ground HQ you want it to support. This will influence the type of air directives and also how the AI moves your air groups around. Linked to this, you give the air command a 'stance'. If you set this to retreat, it will seek to pull your planes away from the front line towards the location of its linked ground HQ. Finally you can order certain air commands to carry out naval patrol missions (and set the port they will concentrate on).

Once all this is set up, you may only need to review the priorities and stances as the game develops.

You will still need to build or expand air bases. The locations of your various air operational groups and air commands are indicated on the map with lables as shown below.

Air commands will take on the colours of the ground HQ they are assigned to.

The information on the label changes according to how you are viewing the map. At closer zoom levels you can see the numbers and types of planes, the AOG orders and other useful information.



The air war can be managed with a few clicks. So the 44 IAD, we can order supply for its airbases (the fighters may be on more than one), bring fresh air units from the reserve, change the controlling air command or alter its stance from 'retreat'.



The WiTE2 UI has lots of these little pop-up boxes that make carrying out actions or accessing information very easy.


_____________________________


(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 3
RE: Game Concepts: The Air War - 1/14/2021 4:40:15 PM   
Kronolog

 

Posts: 139
Joined: 3/23/2011
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		Is there some sort of incentive for the Soviet player to use his airborne forces primarily as infantry? In confess that I'm not knowledgeble in the historic circumstances regarding Soviet airborne doctrine and capabilities, other than that thay had many Guards airborne dvisions and conducted very few airborne assaults. Also, regarding the Germans: are they allowed to use their few airborne troops in the East for air assault operations despite the military views of Hitler after the battle of Crete?

< Message edited by Kronolog -- 1/14/2021 4:44:29 PM >

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 4
RE: Game Concepts: The Air War - 1/14/2021 4:57:14 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kronolog

Is there some sort of incentive for the Soviet player to use his airborne forces primarily as infantry? In confess that I'm not knowledgeble in the historic circumstances regarding Soviet airborne doctrine and capabilities, other than that thay had many Guards airborne dvisions and conducted very few airborne assaults. Also, regarding the Germans: are they allowed to use their few airborne troops in the East for air assault operations despite the military views of Hitler after the battle of Crete?


You can only drop at the sub-divisional level (so regiments/brigades) and in theory both sides can do so. The underlying mechanics are similar to WiTW where sub-divisional drops are a less than stellar choice.

The big constraint is transport aircraft and viable targets. For the Axis player in 1941 I can think of many better uses for my limited transport assets than paradrops (not least the FJ formations are rather useful in combat) and would struggle to think of sensible targets. For the Soviets, again you lack transport assets till later in 1941, you could try the historic pattern of drops around AGC (& probably end up with the same failures). Late war a variant of the Kanev operation is feasible but you'd need an important, but weakly held, sector for it to generate much impact. By definition that combination is going to be rare.

In this game, I did 2 sets of drops, one failed badly, one happened to coincide with where my spearheads were.

Remember also (again as in WiTW), you have to set up the mission a couple of turns before executing it.

Or ... as a shorter answer, the value to airborne operations is extremely limited but you may find it useful once in a blue moon.


_____________________________


(in reply to Kronolog)
Post #: 5
RE: Game Concepts: The Air War - 1/14/2021 6:02:36 PM   
Kronolog

 

Posts: 139
Joined: 3/23/2011
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		Thank you for the answer. That seems reasonable. In WitW division-level drops could generate a quite a bit of interdiction but brigade/regiment-level drops were always a throw of the dice.

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 6
RE: Defending the Rodina - A Soviet WiTE2 AAR - 1/15/2021 3:26:17 PM   
dwesolick


Posts: 593
Joined: 6/24/2002
From: Colorado
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

Before going on, the AI is far better in WiTE2 than in any of the earlier games. It will shift strategic direction as well as make better operational choices. At the start, I strongly suggest do not give it any bonuses till you understand the main game mechanisms. After a while set the Soviet AI to at least 110 (if you are playing the Axis) and the Axis AI to at least 120. As ever, in a game with the AI you can adjust these but at those levels the AI gains substantial benefits that will ensure a much better game.

Even experienced testers are struggling against the Soviet AI at 110 morale, above that it is a fearsome opponent and you quite simply can't afford to make any mistakes or sub-optimal moves.





_____________________________

"The Navy has a moth-eaten tradition that the captain who loses his ship is disgraced. What do they have all those ships for, if not to hurl them at the enemy?" --Douglas MacArthur

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 7
RE: Defending the Rodina - A Soviet WiTE2 AAR - 1/16/2021 5:21:41 AM   
vinnie71

 

Posts: 964
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline 		Thanks for the information. I am really happy that a stronger AI is in the works as I am unable to commit to games as much as I wish...

Having said that, I have a few questions.

There were a number of airfields that were created at the beginning of the scenario. Will players be able to create airfields in appropriate hexes?

Am I understanding well that air commands have a counter on the map but use the surrounding airfields?

Will Air Divisions or Air Groups on the Axis side contain a mix of aircraft (ex fighters and ground attack) or will they be using one type of aircraft according to their mission profile?

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 8
RE: Defending the Rodina - A Soviet WiTE2 AAR - 1/16/2021 10:04:34 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vinnie71

Thanks for the information. I am really happy that a stronger AI is in the works as I am unable to commit to games as much as I wish...

Having said that, I have a few questions.

There were a number of airfields that were created at the beginning of the scenario. Will players be able to create airfields in appropriate hexes?

Am I understanding well that air commands have a counter on the map but use the surrounding airfields?

Will Air Divisions or Air Groups on the Axis side contain a mix of aircraft (ex fighters and ground attack) or will they be using one type of aircraft according to their mission profile?


we'll do a detailed post on the air war systems by Red Lancer. But briefly:

a) yes you can build more - in fact you need to (esp as the Soviet player). If you have decent supply, creating a level 1 airfield is relatively painless, but the bigger ones take some pre-plannning (supplies, engineering assets and starting them in better weather)

b) There is no direct relationship between air commands and bases, you can have a mix of commands using the same base. For the allocation of support squads an airbase is notionally linked to the air HQ with the most planes present (so this can shift during a turn). The on-map counter basically holds the leader and sets the range for support allocation. Since this is 90 hexes (as in WiTE1 and WiTW) they can be deployed well to the rear.

The label you see in the image indicates where the relevant air groups are based with the label as much at the centre of gravity as possible. You can do all sorts of game control functions from that but it has no actual on-map presence.

c) The AOG system is based on the concept of profiles. So for the Soviets, only fighters can go into an IAD, bombers a BAD etc. Similar on the axis side. Its all pretty intuitive and the controls are imposed automatically. You then build up a higher level air command using a mix of these (as you wish), so you can for eg commit a fairly balanced group of escorts and bombers to the same mission.

So, again, from the shown image, the Western Air Command contains fighter, bomber, mixed (SAD) and recon AOGs. So when putting together the missions I can draw off these assets as I need (the actual process for this is related to the approach in WiTW).

_____________________________


(in reply to vinnie71)
Post #: 9
RE: Defending the Rodina - A Soviet WiTE2 AAR - 1/16/2021 6:08:20 PM   
vinnie71

 

Posts: 964
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline 		Thanks! Looking forward to other posts like this

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 10
RE: Defending the Rodina - A Soviet WiTE2 AAR - 1/16/2021 11:02:28 PM   
Kronolog

 

Posts: 139
Joined: 3/23/2011
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		One thing I alway's felt was missing in WitW was the ability to order air groups to avoid heavy concentrations of AA in their "operational square". In that game one could, for example, mark a 4x4 square for interdiction, and in a couple of hexes in that square there would be very heavy AA presensce. The aircraft would sooner or later try to interdict those heavily defended hexes, get mauled and then that particular directive would end badly or prematurely because of losess to aircraft and group morale. It would be nice if the player could deselect certain hexes in the operational square, or perhaps have the ability to set a limit for AA tolerance in the directive set up - "avoid hexes with light AA >X, heavy AA >Y". Of course FoW would still pose a risk.

(in reply to vinnie71)
Post #: 11
T15 - 1/17/2021 2:26:34 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline 		4 October 1941

This update is based on the on-map situation at the end of turn 15.

Background

By 10 August, AGN had destroyed the Soviet Luga Operation Group holding the line north of Novgorod and had almost cut the main Leningrad-Moscow railway. AGC launched a major offensive towards Moscow breaking through across a 90 mile front. Fortunately, poor terrain and sustained Soviet resistance limited their gains but by the end of the week over 15 Soviet divisions had been shattered. In the Ukraine 5 Army held Kiev but the Soviet position was threatened as German panzers pushed past Chernigov and tried to cross the Dnepr at Cherkassy [1].

By 17 August, the threat to Leningrad increased as the Germans pushed along the Volkhov. In addition the situation at Moscow worsened as German troops captured Vyazma in heavy fighting against 24 Army. A second German drive made steady gains towards Kaluga. In the Ukraine, Stavka authorised Soviet forces at Kiev to fall back as the two German pincers threatened an encirclement [2]. Odessa fell at heavy costs to the axis forces, especially the Romanians who had lost over 25,000 men trying to capture the city.

The 24 August saw the increasing isolation of Leningrad as it became dependent on a one single track rail line for reinforcements and supply. Elements of NW Front contested every German gain along the Volkhov while Leningrad Front prepared to defend the city itself. AGC’s onslaught slowed as supply problems started to affect their spearheads and Stavka committed almost every available formation to a line from Rzhev to Kaluga. Lacking combat ready formations [3], the Soviet forces in the Ukraine steadily retreated.

By 31 August, a massive German offensive had cut off Leningrad, despite the crisis at Moscow, Stavka pulled an entire army from the reserve to reinforce NW Front and to hold Tikhvin and the Lake Ladoga ports. At Moscow, the Germans were briefly checked and had to divert some forces to clear out a Soviet salient near Yartsevo that was threatening their lines of communication. In the Ukraine, Axis forces captured Kherson and crossed the Dnepr. Elsewhere, all semblance of a front line was lost as Soviet rearguards tried to cling to vital rail junctions to slow the German advance.

September brought some respite at Leningrad. Using the fresh divisions, the German siege was briefly lifted as Soviet troops regained Mga. Briefly, the threat to Moscow also lifted and the main German offensive was an attempt to cut off Bryansk from the south.

14 September saw the Germans seal off land connections to Leningrad again, but a major Soviet offensive regained the west bank of the Volkhov. Soviet cavalry pushed deep into the rear of AGN (4). At Moscow, the Germans hit Reserve Front, capturing Rzhev. The Soviet position at Bryansk was now threatened by 2 pincers as elements of AGC attacked towards Orel. In the Ukraine, the Germans over-ran the last coherent Soviet defensive line and reached the outskirts of Kharkov.

21 September saw a reversal of fortunes at Leningrad. The Soviet Volkhov offensive made more gains while elements of Leningrad Front attacked eastwards, by the end of the week only a narrow 10 mile corridor kept the city isolated. However, the Germans renewed their drive on Moscow inflicting heavy losses on Reserve Front. Further gains north of Bryansk led to the Soviets abandoning the city to avoid encirclement. In the Ukraine, supply shortages rather than Soviet resistance were the main constraint on German advances.

Early-October

Before considering the details, a part of the new UI is the turn summary (you can turn this off if you want) that opens every time you start the game or open a new turn. How much use you make of this will vary according to your focus but it presents a useful overview and gives access to several other screens. I am transferring roughly 3 rifle divisions per turn from refitting in the reserve to the map.

But if you look at the bottom ‘combat unit alerts’ you can see the basic problem I have. About one unit in six is deemed ‘understrength’, 124 units are ‘unready’, 7 depleted and 35 cut off. I actually had only 162 combat ready rifle divisions (and 50 of those had a TOE below 60%). In effect, the Red Army is on the point of collapse.



Which makes the weather very important. Next turn it is estimated it will rain over most of the front. This is very welcome, but will only have a marginal effect on operations. Most of the front will have light mud which increases MP costs and lowers attacking CV but not enough to bring offensive operations to a halt (and has relatively little impact if there are average or good roads in the hex).



Leningrad

Here, last turn’s Soviet gains brought a robust response. The city is still only isolated by 10 miles, but now that gap is strongly held. NW Front has largely been driven back to its starting position. This makes it increasingly unable to attack again till it has had chance to recover its CPP. One key issue for the Soviets on this sector is it is incredibly hard to bring in substantial reinforcements meaning your front line units weaken over time.

Leningrad itself is strongly held with city forts at Oranienbaum and Leningrad itself. But the current defensive commitment is a finite resource. Again, it is nearly impossible to bring in normal replacements. The only feasible strategy is to allocate Rifle Brigades, convert them to on-map formations and merge them into the existing Rifle Divisions.




Moscow

Here the Soviets have a decent defensive line. The terrain from the current front line to the city itself is terrible, especially the heavily wooded belt. Here the Minsk-Moscow motor road becomes key for both sides – it significantly speeds movement so if the Soviets lose control of it then the Panzers suddenly regain their mobility.

Overall, on this sector, it is easier to pull back weakened units to refit (Moscow itself is a National Supply Source) and return to the front lines so to some extent you can absorb serious losses.

Not shown on the map, but Tula is threatened and that can be an effective route for the Axis to take. Clear terrain and the chance to outflank all that good defensive terrain, and the Oka is likely to have frozen by late November.



The Ukraine

The Germans have reached Kursk and Kharkov, Dnepropetrovsk and Zaporezhye are besieged. The appearance of a defensive line is an illusion, most of those units are going to rout if attacked. The only bright spot is the Germans have not attacked into the Crimea and Sevastopol has been turned into another massive fortress.



Soviet losses are already over 2.2 million with 1.4 million of those as permanent losses [5].



The air war has actually been less disastrous. If the VVS avoids direct engagement with the LW then it can be fairly effective (as it was historically) in 1941. The LW can’t cover everywhere, but the problem is it will be present at the key sectors. For the Soviets it’s a case of take your losses for the occasional reward.

To understand the logic of the phase from now to December 1941 it is useful to review how you win the game, and how actions now can influence the results in May 1945. So the next post will consider winning and losing.

[1] What can be called a bad turn. The loss of the equivalent of 2 armies from Western and Reserve fronts can easily happen when low morale/experience formations are caught in sustained fighting.

[2] Not ideal – this is discussed in the second post about winning the game.

[3] This becomes a major problem for the Soviet player at this phase. Simply being in combat weakens your formations and it is very hard to bring them back to strength.

[4] As the Axis player, be aware of the mobility of the Soviet cavalry, tank and mechanized divisions in this phase, they are mostly fragile but can exploit any gaps in the lines.

[5] Expect to lose over 3 million in 1941 alone.



< Message edited by loki100 -- 1/17/2021 2:28:23 PM >

_____________________________


(in reply to Kronolog)
Post #: 12
Winning and Losing the game - 1/17/2021 2:31:16 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline 		Winning and Losing

We have already discussed the victory mechanics so the purpose here is to place that discussion in context.

So, for the current turn, here is where we are:



So, at this moment, the Axis player is going to lose on 1 January 1942 as their High Water Mark score (513) is below the threshold for the game to carry on (525). Clearly the AI will pass that threshold as 4 major cities in the Ukraine are going to fall in the next turn or two (Kursk, Kharkov, Dnepropetrovsk and Zapororozhye) but it means a German player cannot be too cautious in planning their 1941 offensive.

The VP system has an impact on game play. The axis player can’t adopt what could be seen as a rational approach of complete their offensive over the next few turns and dig into a defensive line to see out the winter. Equally, they don’t need to hold onto everything – note their current VP is actually below the HWM (if I recall I retook a city and gained some VP from events). So winning and losing brings some political aspects into the game, the Germans can’t just stick to a 2 year war winning timetable – they have to over-extend in 1941.

Which brings me to the second way this game can end. If the Axis matches the victory level on a specific turn (so not their HWM but their current score), they win outright. Given a game that isn’t a mismatch, it’s unlikely for this to happen before April 1942 but the July and October 1942 checks can be very close – as an aside the Germans start the Stalingrad-Berlin scenario with 674 VP. So political decisions affect the Soviets too, they simply cannot give up too many turn bonuses (+6 if the city falls 3 turns early) or these checks become too close to call. So my early loss of Kiev really hurts, as that was another +6.

If we come to end of 1942 with the game undecided, the HWM comes back into play. At the moment, the Axis player has the ‘initiative’, they lose this if the actual VP is 10% below the HWM, so again both sides have incentives in late 1942 and early 1943 to hasten or delay this change.

Once it changes, the Soviet player can win a sudden death but it is not all over for the Axis. If the Soviet VP (reset to 0 and now gained from when the initiative changes) is below the HWM in December 1944, the Axis player wins. So again, a real incentive to push the HWM up as a high as possible, to contest Soviet gains in 1943 and 1944 and for the Soviet player to feel pressure to over-extend.

To put that in context, this test game was in June 1944 when this was written. The VP chart was:



So the axis pushed their HWM up another 100 in 1942 (critically Stalingrad was held), the HWM is clearly going to be over-taken but a Soviet sudden victory is very unlikely. But all is not lost for the Axis, in this case victory is going to be defined by when Berlin falls.

But – pesky political constraints again – neither side can just focus on Berlin. If the Soviets over-run Rumania, Hungary and Austria early, there are enough VP for an early win. So both sides need to divert forces to the Balkan theatre as an insurance policy. If the HWM value was still in dispute, it is likely the VP for Rumania (60 plus any time bonuses) would become the critical sector to determine the December 1944 VP check.

Now there is another source of VP, by sending excess forces to the other Theatres. We’ll come back to this later but it’s worth noting these can make all the difference. In this game the Soviets have more VP for sending extra forces to other theatres than they have for taking cities early. So while the temptation may be to reduce your commitment to the wider war, there is a powerful incentive to take the opposite approach – of course divert too much and you will lose this war much earlier.







_____________________________


(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 13
RE: Winning and Losing the game - 1/17/2021 6:40:18 PM   
Sammy5IsAlive

 

Posts: 514
Joined: 8/4/2014
Status: offline 		Really positive about the VP system. For all of the other improvements/refinements in terms of turn to turn game mechanics from WITE I really do think this is the biggest step forward in terms of improving the game at the most fundamental level.

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 14
RE: Winning and Losing the game - 1/17/2021 8:42:23 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sammy5IsAlive

Really positive about the VP system. For all of the other improvements/refinements in terms of turn to turn game mechanics from WITE I really do think this is the biggest step forward in terms of improving the game at the most fundamental level.


it has that neat effect of creating a choice between less favourable options. As the Axis player, you need to overextend, but how much is in doubt, as the Soviet player you need to contest a set of cities that in terms of force preservation you might simply write off.

So it brings in the political/regime goal level that is missing from WiTE1 but in a manner that retains a lot of player agency and choice

_____________________________


(in reply to Sammy5IsAlive)
Post #: 15
RE: Winning and Losing the game - 1/17/2021 9:14:22 PM   
CapAndGown


Posts: 3206
Joined: 3/6/2001
From: Virginia, USA
Status: offline 		I hope there is a "bitter end" scenario. I'm not sure I like this VP system. Berlin by May 45 or bust!!

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 16
RE: Winning and Losing the game - 1/18/2021 6:32:42 AM   
VigaBrand

 

Posts: 303
Joined: 12/19/2014
From: Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sammy5IsAlive

Really positive about the VP system. For all of the other improvements/refinements in terms of turn to turn game mechanics from WITE I really do think this is the biggest step forward in terms of improving the game at the most fundamental level.


it has that neat effect of creating a choice between less favourable options. As the Axis player, you need to overextend, but how much is in doubt, as the Soviet player you need to contest a set of cities that in terms of force preservation you might simply write off.

So it brings in the political/regime goal level that is missing from WiTE1 but in a manner that retains a lot of player agency and choice

Sound very nice.
Did you have a city list with the dates?
So that every player could see, how long he must hold a city?
Will the german player get a negativ points, if kiev hold longer than in history? Are there events, which will randomly give you a political goal (the opponent doesn't know).


_____________________________




(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 17
RE: Winning and Losing the game - 1/18/2021 6:49:29 AM   
821Bobo


Posts: 2311
Joined: 2/8/2011
From: Slovakia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: VigaBrand

Sound very nice.
Did you have a city list with the dates?
So that every player could see, how long he must hold a city?
Will the german player get a negativ points, if kiev hold longer than in history? Are there events, which will randomly give you a political goal (the opponent doesn't know).



If you look at the screenshots you will see there column Turn Ax/Turn So. These are the turns(dates) city were historically occupied. To get the bonus you need to take it before that turn.
No, you don't get negative points if you get city later or not at all.

(in reply to VigaBrand)
Post #: 18
RE: Winning and Losing the game - 1/18/2021 3:56:29 PM   
dwesolick


Posts: 593
Joined: 6/24/2002
From: Colorado
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CapAndGown

I hope there is a "bitter end" scenario. I'm not sure I like this VP system. Berlin by May 45 or bust!!


+1

_____________________________

"The Navy has a moth-eaten tradition that the captain who loses his ship is disgraced. What do they have all those ships for, if not to hurl them at the enemy?" --Douglas MacArthur

(in reply to CapAndGown)
Post #: 19
RE: Winning and Losing the game - 1/18/2021 4:22:37 PM   
Headshotkill

 

Posts: 5
Joined: 1/18/2021
Status: offline 		The new VP-system looks like a very elegant way to represent the pressure generals felt to perform. Underperform Barbarossa HWM by being too careful and Hitler dismisses you, same thing with soviets. I would like to hear some more info about the player/opponent initiative system and how it affects the dynamic of a game.
From what I understand from the text you say it switches sides whenever someone drops 10% VP below their HWM meaning they got pushed back from their furthest extend.

1. Is this only checked at predefined initiative check dates(In the VP-screen picture 1-okt-1942 - 1-july-1943), or can initiative change at any turn when one side loses 10% VP?)

2. I'm a bit confused with quote below:
quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100If we come to end of 1942 with the game undecided, the HWM comes back into play. At the moment, the Axis player has the ‘initiative’, they lose this if the actual VP is 10% below the HWM, so again both sides have incentives in late 1942 and early 1943 to hasten or delay this change.

What exactly is the incentive the hasten or delay the initiative switch, off cours at some point you have to attack your enemy to win the game which would automatically result in an initiative switch at some point, but is their an actual change in mechanics when it switches or is it more a status report of the front thing?

3. In case initiative doesn't get checked every turn but only at a couple predetermined turns, can you win sudden death if you don't have the initiative according to the system but do manage to reach enough VPs at a given date?(only case this could happen in from my understanding is, Axis overshoot a sudden death VP before the sudden death date, but get pushed back 10% and lose initiative, however they resist fiercely and maintain enough VPs to stay above the sudden death VP minimum)
quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100If Once it changes, the Soviet player can win a sudden death but it is not all over for the Axis. If the Soviet VP (reset to 0 and now gained from when the initiative changes) is below the HWM in December 1944, the Axis player wins. So again, a real incentive to push the HWM up as a high as possible, to contest Soviet gains in 1943 and 1944 and for the Soviet player to feel pressure to over-extend.
From quote it seems VPs are nulified at initiative switch except for the axis HWM or am I wrong?

Hopefully you can help me out, it wasn't easy for me to describe exactly what I'd like to hear about this new system so questions 2/3 may sound a bit confusing.
Perhaps a more detailed run down of what initiative is/does would be very appreciated.


Side questions:
-Is Rumania/Hungary/Austria a theatre box or fully playable terrain on map?
-If the player has full control of theatre boxes and unit allocation, is it possible to completely neglect a theatre box and lose the game that way?(example: completely ignoring Italy theatre box in 1943)


Thanks for reading!

< Message edited by Headshotkill -- 1/18/2021 4:24:15 PM >

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 20
RE: Winning and Losing the game - 1/18/2021 4:54:32 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline 		Hi

Switch is checked every turn Oct 42-July43, if the current VP score is 10% under HWM it flips to the Soviets (permanently). If this hasn't happened by July 43 then it is done automatically.

At the switch, the City VP scores are cleared and then recreated using held cities at that point (& any earlier time bonuses are regained). You're right at one level it doesn't matter too much when this occurs but the Soviets can lose some potential bonus if they don't have the initiative (esp for cities that have never been lost but were historically). The reality, as you note, is you want to advance/delay this more as an indicator of relative performance.

Only the initiative player can win via sudden death so even if the Soviets could have say 450 VP on 1 October that is irrelevant till they gain the initiative.

So at the switch, the HWM is frozen for the rest of the game. The German VP score (for cities) is cleared and replaced by a Soviet score. The Germans keep their VP for time bonus and other theatres as that is now deducted off the Soviet score (in the same way that the Soviet values are deducted off the German score at this stage of the game).

I guess the key difference is that the initiative player can feasibly win at any check date and is the one with the positive VP score for cities held. Both sides have VP for time or theatre bonus with these added or deducted accordingly.

We'll come back to Theatres and their rules in the next game post by Red Lancer. But all of Rumania-Hungary and Austria are fully playable. E Serbia starts as a theatre box and comes onto the map after the Soviets knock Rumania out of the war.. This allows 4 Ukr to take its historical route into Hungary after the liberation of Belgrade. It also changes the dynamics of the actual campaign in Hungary making Lake Balaton quite important.

_____________________________


(in reply to Headshotkill)
Post #: 21
RE: Winning and Losing the game - 1/18/2021 6:29:13 PM   
Headshotkill

 

Posts: 5
Joined: 1/18/2021
Status: offline 		Thanks Loki100 for the quick reply!

It's alot clearer for me now knowing the initiative system can only switch once to the soviets. Otherwise multiple switches would potentially reset either side's VPs over and over probably resulting in very weird situations.
So the biggest penalty of losing the initiative as axis player is losing any chance of a sudden death victory, while allowing the soviet to now potentially win a sudden death victory.

The fact it can only switch starting from 1-okt-1942 means the axis player is protected from losing initiative during the 1941 winter counter-offensive of the soviets, this was one of the things that confused me at first because during this time the soviets certainly had the initiative so I figured it had to switch to soviet and then back to axis after second battle of kharkov. But this way bypasses that problem with I guess minimal effect on the campaign. It might look weird seeing the soviets penetrate your lines and still read it as axis having the initiative but I guess it only means the soviets can't quickly win if they demolish the germans in winter 1941 and push them back to poland but have to wait till 1-okt-1942 for initiative to switch allowing them to instantly win at their earliest date possible.

< Message edited by Headshotkill -- 1/18/2021 6:30:56 PM >

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 22
RE: Winning and Losing the game - 1/20/2021 9:16:59 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline 		you're welcome. Its one of those rules/concepts that are a bit hard to describe in the abstract but very intuitive in practice. I guess it frames the game as the Soviet winter offensive is a temporary shift in operational balance while the post-Stalingrad Soviet offensive marked a fundamental shift (in that the Soviet Union was going to 'win' the war, all that now remains is to sort out the price and when).

Anyway, mentioning the winter offensive very conveniently brings us to the next post

_____________________________


(in reply to Headshotkill)
Post #: 23
T24 - 1/20/2021 9:23:10 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline 		6 December 1941

This update is based on the on-map situation at the end of turn 24

Background

By 5 October the Soviet position at Leningrad rapidly deteriorated. Not only had the Germans regained control of the west bank of the Volkhov but a massive attack had breached the Neva with German motorised troops across the river. Soviet resistance prevented any attempt to reinforce this bridgehead as Leningrad Front prepared to strike back. Equally the Germans made steady progress towards Moscow reaching a line from Kaluga to Borodino. In the Ukraine, Kharkov and the Dnepr bend all fell to the Germans as their spearheads approached Stalino.

12 October brought heavy rains [1] and some slowing of the German offensive. Leningrad Front managed to regain the line of the Neva after heavy reinforcements [2]. However, Western Front was thrown back all along its defensive line with Kaluga and Borodino lost [3]. Despite the crisis in the Ukraine (where Kursk and Stalino were lost) Stavka pulled the few reserves from SW Front to help defend Moscow [4].

19 October saw ground conditions worsen and the German offensive stall with their spearheads 60 miles from Moscow. This respite continued in the next week and Kalinin Front managed a limited offensive around Torzhok to force the Germans to redeploy mobile units to back up their infantry on that sector.

2 November saw the first snows of winter across most of the front apart from at Leningrad where the rains persisted. The Torzhok offensive and a steady build of Western Front stopped the direct German offensive towards Moscow but to the south the Soviet defences collapsed. Byransk Front sought to defend Tula with a scattering of weak formations and a combination of Central and SW Fronts held a line from Lipetsk to Voronezh as German troops approached Rostov. In the Crimea the Germans pushed back the Soviet screen and advanced towards the well defended Sevastopol.

9 November saw the first direct assault on Leningrad but the situation at Moscow improved. The need to eliminate the salient created by Kalinin Front diverted at least one Panzer Group even as Western Front rapidly built up. To the south of the Oka, the Germans renewed their attacks towards Tula while they advanced at will on the southern sector.

16 November saw the first blizzards of winter. At Moscow German troops maintained their offensive, surrounding Kalinin, capturing Tula and pushing along the north bank of the Oka. However, Stavka was finally able to start mustering a reserve [5] on this sector rather than commit the freshly arriving Siberian forces into the battle. In the south, logistics rather than Soviet resistance limited the German advance but both Rostov and Sevastopol fought off initial assaults.

23 November saw a fresh crisis at Leningrad as the Germans forced the line of the Neva again and pushed back NW Front both on the Volkhov and around Lake Ilmen. At Moscow, the strengthening Soviet lines were enough to slow the Germans to a crawl as the blizzards produced deep snow drifts. In the south, Rostov fell and Axis troops pushed over the lower Don.

Early December

Apart from some final gains at Leningrad, it was clear the German offensive was over for 1941. I’ll discuss the winter rules (and the more general weather rules) in the usual second post, here the focus is on the options. The weather this turn mostly changed to snow rather than blizzards.

Clearly, for the first time in the game, I choose the tempo and location of operations. But I don’t have much to do this with. The more I managed to keep out of combat in November (so those units built up their CPP), the more useful units I have to hand. I need high CPP in part for the obvious combat bonus but also for the secondary MP rules. Essentially in determining MP, high CPP can help offset the often low admin scores of many Soviet commanders. Given that deep snow costs more MP than most other conditions, I need high MP if I am to sustain any sort of offensive. That in turn means an attacking army will become exhausted after 2-3 weeks of action.

Now so far, I’ve been living hand to mouth with manpower reserves and administrative point allocations. I’ve just received a large (if untrained) cadre of manpower and that will help refit the numerous rifle divisions destroyed so far. In a few turns, I will receive an allocation of extra administrative points.




That will allow me to start reshaping my army. I gain the ability to build two Guards Rifle Corps and a number of Cavalry Corps in the next turn. Unlike in WiTE1, tank brigades are an off-map Support Unit so ideal to allocate to the Cavalry formations. Rifle brigades can be on or off-map, allocating 3 to a Gds Rifle Corp can transform a powerful unit into something that can break down a defensive strong point (and then needs to refit). There are plenty of other changes to WiTE1 but its worth noting I have two NKPS rail repair HQs which gives me a bit of flexibility over rail repair (or – probably better – they can help with my logistics).

To put this into context, I have 325 on map divisions (2 are Guards, one of which is unready). 3 of these are depleted and 44 unready. The 30 unready or depleted rifle divisions average 5,000 men and 70 guns each. The 189 that are ready average 9,000 men and 140 guns each. So at a crude estimate, to bring them up to their TOE would need 350,000 men and 55,000 guns (i.e. take most of my recent reinforcements). An artillery shortage is going to be a problem well into 1943.




So time to plan what is feasible.

If I can, I want to ease the pressure on Leningrad as ideally I want a land connection which will mean I can replace the worn down divisions now defending the city. Linked to that I want to regain the dual track rail and Kalinin-Rzhev. Kalinin Front itself is too strung out to achieve much.

However, being pragmatic, I am not going to do much around Leningrad itself unless the AI weakens its forces:



Which makes attacking along the Kalinin Front critical, not just for the local gains but to dislocate the wider German defensive lines.

One of Western Front's more decent armies (24) is well placed to help. Western Front is particularly important as it is the only Assault Front I have (which increases the speed at which I gain CPP).



Not that impressive but its as good as I have. 13 and 30 A (West) and 43 A (Bryansk) have some capacity (and 43 A will get at least 2 cavalry corps). Basically I want Borodino-Kaluga-Tula mainly to give me depth for the summer of 1942.



Central and SW Fronts have some capacity but there is no real target, anything I take I'll lose. So my goals are to force the Germans into an open retreat, see if I can win a few battles.



To the south, Southern Front and Stalingrad MD should make some gains it is going to be ephemeral. I want Rostov back, I can't see any encirclement, so again its going to be opportunistic. The arrivals from Iran will help build up here.



Finally the Crimea. The AI did not push towards Kerch and Sevastopol is safe till the Spring.



And the VP situation. Well the AI is safe from a Sudden Loss.



[1] but due to the new weather rules, only light mud

[2] This takes at least 3 turns to manage but I sent almost all my available rifle brigades to reinforce the local Rifle Divisions and my few effective artillery formations – as it turned out, just in time.

[3] As ever, its not just being forced to retreat, this reduced about 15 divisions to unready or depleted status.

[4] Basically I have no combat ready formations left in the Ukraine. Notionally there are 193 Rifle Divisions on map and of these 55 are depleted or unready, of the rest, they average 8,500 men and 110 guns each.

[5] The Siberian formations arrive with nil CPP but a much better TOE. I finally found the spare admin pts to place Western Front on 'assault' status so this radically improves their CPP gain (if they stay out of combat). As already stressed, high CPP is not just an offensive combat tool, it feeds into better movement capability (so the ability to move and attack in deep snow for example).


_____________________________


(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 24
Weather Rules (esp for the first winter) - 1/20/2021 9:31:00 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline 		Winter Weather

We’ve already discussed how the weather system works in WiTE2, here I’ll focus on how it affects the next period of game play. The first thing to note is it will be variable between games but careful use of the forecasting table will give the Soviet player a good feel for which turns will see snowfall and which blizzards. This distinction matters in terms of the effect on the game. The second thing to note is that for the Soviets, there are no direct bonuses connected to the winter rules, the impact is all about modelling the relative lack of German preparations.

There are plenty of other interesting rules including the Lake Ladoga ice-road and the climatic oddities for the Sea of Azov., but here I’ll keep to the big picture.

Soviet perspective

Oddly this takes us back to Assault Fronts and CPP retention and recovery. As you can see from the OOB chart in the main post, I only have one of these (feasibly I could have two but can’t afford the 20 Admin Pts that could cost – this will improve in mid-December and I’ll allocate a second one). Now assault fronts have a problem in that their component units (any combat unit reporting to one of the assigned armies) can’t create fortifications better than level 1 but critically they double the rate at which units regain their CPP. If their component units are well placed they can gain up to 50 CPP per turn so units that have been in heavy combat can recover in a couple of weeks.

Now one way the CPP matters is obvious, it boosts the attack strength making it easier to break down the German defensive lines. But it also helps keep MP values high and this is especially useful for the Soviets with a lot of low initiative/low administration value leaders. Basically, 100 CPP means these checks are automatically passed when calculating MP so the adverse effects can only come from fatigue, supply/fuel or truck shortages (not leadership failures).

This improvement to MP matters as the ground conditions are going to be mostly deep snow and this can make the difference between being able to move into contact and attack as opposed to just following up a German retreat. In this game, I am looking to Western Front to deliver the opening blows and sustain its offensive in the hope of regaining some depth at Moscow for 1942.

In addition, the OOB in WiTE2 is very different. First I have two NKPS formations available. These can be used to repair rail links or, perhaps more usefully, to create key (‘super’) depots behind the most important sectors – we’ve covered logistics and I’ll come back to this in a later post.



Second, I will be able to build 8 Cavalry Corps (and more at the start of 1942) and tank brigades are only off-map Support Units. The combination can be very effective, especially if used in conjunction with any remaining Tank Divisions (fragile but very mobile). Third I can build 2 Guards Rifle Corps and again, attach support units (Rifle brigades by choice at this stage of the war). This gives me the ability to stack considerable combat power in a hex (till they run down their CPP).


[1]

It may take a while before you can have both in operation but combined (and using attached brigades) they effectively stack the equivalent of 9 divisions (you can add one more division/brigade combination) in a hex. Keep the CPP as high as you can and that has real combat power.

In effect, the Soviets can hit hard, have the assets to take any hex but lack the means to sustain this. CPP loss from combat and high MP costs combine to wear down rapidly attacking formations (and that is before any German counter-attacks).

German perspective

First their logistics have already been hampered all through 1941, that is now going to become worse. Second in any hex with blizzard conditions, or snow level 6 or higher will trigger more vehicle breakdowns, extra fatigue and more damaged elements (unless they are in a level 2 fort or city or urban hex).

As we will see, this will reduce the number of combat ready tanks to under 1,000 across the front (as in the main post they already have a serious problem in this regard) and see the combat formations steadily weaken. The good news is most of these extra losses will be recovered in the spring.

In combination this creates an interesting dilemma. As we saw, when discussing VP, there is a real incentive (possibly a real need) for a German November offensive, but they also benefit from a well prepared defensive line.

[1] We'll come back to discuss that 'W' next to the unit name in one of Red Lancer's post - its a really neat addition to the game


_____________________________


(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 25
RE: Weather Rules (esp for the first winter) - 1/20/2021 8:06:34 PM   
dwesolick


Posts: 593
Joined: 6/24/2002
From: Colorado
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

Winter Weather

The second thing to note is that for the Soviets, there are no direct bonuses connected to the winter rules, the impact is all about modelling the relative lack of German preparations.

There are plenty of other interesting rules including the Lake Ladoga ice-road and the climatic oddities for the Sea of Azov., but here I’ll keep to the big picture.



Would love more info on the above items when you get a chance. Thanks for the detailed updates!


_____________________________

"The Navy has a moth-eaten tradition that the captain who loses his ship is disgraced. What do they have all those ships for, if not to hurl them at the enemy?" --Douglas MacArthur

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 26
RE: Weather Rules (esp for the first winter) - 1/20/2021 9:23:57 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dwesolick


quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

Winter Weather

The second thing to note is that for the Soviets, there are no direct bonuses connected to the winter rules, the impact is all about modelling the relative lack of German preparations.

There are plenty of other interesting rules including the Lake Ladoga ice-road and the climatic oddities for the Sea of Azov., but here I’ll keep to the big picture.



Would love more info on the above items when you get a chance. Thanks for the detailed updates!



glad they are useful.

For Lake Ladoga, you get easier supply into Leningrad when the lake is frozen but the situation is really dire in those turms with enough ice to disrupt shipping but not enough to support trucks. You can't move combat units over the lake (which is why I really want a land connection to the city) in either state.

Sea of Azov is very shallow (& largely fresh water) so it freezes more readily than the Black Sea. This can really make a mess of cross sea supply but has little other effect. So it really depends on the geography of the front but units that need to draw supply off a port that is connected to the Sea will suffer in winter.

So in this game, for this winter the Azov rules have no practical impact this winter. I'm firmly on the SE shore and the Germans along the Ukrainian side.

_____________________________


(in reply to dwesolick)
Post #: 27
RE: Weather Rules (esp for the first winter) - 1/21/2021 12:38:29 AM   
robinsa


Posts: 183
Joined: 7/24/2013
From: North Carolina
Status: offline 		No questions so far, but I have to say I really appreciate these updates. Cant wait to get my hands on the final game. Keep up the good work!

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 28
RE: Defending the Rodina - A Soviet WiTE2 AAR - 1/21/2021 2:01:41 PM   
EddyBear81

 

Posts: 153
Joined: 2/10/2012
From: Lille, France
Status: offline 		From the AAR, I have the feeling that with the "preparation points" system, we will actually see 1941 soviet counter attacks : is it something that you have experienced ?

By preparing in advance, the "defending side" can have the opportunity to strike back significantly. In a WITW setting for example, this would make room for an Adrennes offensive that is mostly out of the equation in the current game. If this becomes a reality in WITE 2, it's a big step forward to reconcile historical perspective and wargame mechanics.

Can't wait for the release date !

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 29
RE: Defending the Rodina - A Soviet WiTE2 AAR - 1/21/2021 2:22:29 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: EddyBear81

From the AAR, I have the feeling that with the "preparation points" system, we will actually see 1941 soviet counter attacks : is it something that you have experienced ?

By preparing in advance, the "defending side" can have the opportunity to strike back significantly. In a WITW setting for example, this would make room for an Adrennes offensive that is mostly out of the equation in the current game. If this becomes a reality in WITE 2, it's a big step forward to reconcile historical perspective and wargame mechanics.

Can't wait for the release date !


yes, spoiling attacks etc are now very much part of the game. If you push back a formation it sheds all its CPP, so if you spot a build up a well timed counter-stroke can really gain an advantage (also, as in WiTW, units that are attacked lose MP for the next phase). In the context of the Summer of 1941 its likely you risk the attacking force (from a Soviet POV) but it may also blunt one part of a planned major encirclement.

One critical turn for this sort of thing is the transition in November from rains to snow. As historically that can be a good time for a German offensive (& they may well need it due to the VP situation), if they leave Pzrs in the front line its an open invitation for the Soviets to hit them ... now of course in turn that could well be a planned trap (such are the joys and perils of MP games).

Also, it allows the notionally weaker side to horde a reserve that they keep out of immediate combat and then attack when your opponent is over-extended, you may well have 2-3 turns when a relatively weak force is dominant on a given sector as a result.

In general, I'd say that CPP is the core currency in WiTE2. There is plenty else that matters but given they influence combat (obv for the attacker, indirect for the defender), MPs and the supply system then getting used to building them up and when to expend is a key skill.

_____________________________


(in reply to EddyBear81)
Post #: 30
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> After Action Reports >> Defending the Rodina - A Soviet WiTE2 AAR Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.891