Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  46 47 [48] 49 50   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/27/2021 6:32:17 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


Buildup of enough supply and fuel in Oz/NZ is why the Allies usually do not start their comeback until Fall 1942. In your case I am guessing Spring 1942!


Why? It doesn't seem to me I am doing anything original here.


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 1411
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/27/2021 6:32:46 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Bass Strait and the Melbourne approaches are easy to patrol with air and naval assets if there is little risk of Japanese air activity. Then it becomes just air searches. They are also shallow waters which is makes it easier to kill subs.


Being patrolled now...night and day.



(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1412
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/27/2021 7:23:59 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		West Coast work....

Battleship row is moving to Alameda...subs would have to penetrate the mines and ASW at San Francisco to get to them.

Pearl Harbor could be raided...and is not safe.

The US battleships simply aren't ready for war yet. AAA is anemic, and crew training, especially at night when Iboats are most active, is very low.

The pilots in the floatplanes are training at recon...for it is anticipated they will become a major shore bombardment factor later in the war.





In less than a week there will be 7 battleships there.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 1/27/2021 7:25:59 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1413
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/27/2021 7:28:39 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		KB

Lots of low hanging fruit here.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1414
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/27/2021 8:00:56 PM   
Ambassador

 

Posts: 1674
Joined: 1/11/2008
From: Brussels, Belgium
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

West Coast work....

Battleship row is moving to Alameda...subs would have to penetrate the mines and ASW at San Francisco to get to them.

Pearl Harbor could be raided...and is not safe.

The US battleships simply aren't ready for war yet. AAA is anemic, and crew training, especially at night when Iboats are most active, is very low.

The pilots in the floatplanes are training at recon...for it is anticipated they will become a major shore bombardment factor later in the war.





In less than a week there will be 7 battleships there.




They’re several months from war ready. Does the mod start them at a lower XP than stock ? Some of them look like they haven’t progressed a bit in six weeks, even counting the fact some might have had an upgrade in January. Or maybe you didn’t let them leave Pearl Harbor when there were enemy subs around ?

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1415
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/27/2021 9:02:29 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

KB

Lots of low hanging fruit here.




Santa Maria!

_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1416
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 1:02:28 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


Buildup of enough supply and fuel in Oz/NZ is why the Allies usually do not start their comeback until Fall 1942. In your case I am guessing Spring 1942!


Why? It doesn't seem to me I am doing anything original here.



Your aggressive defence is having far more impact on the Japanese expansion and bleeding their best assets faster than any other Sir Robin phase I have seen!
I am learning a lot.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1417
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 2:12:17 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Your aggressive defence is having far more impact on the Japanese expansion and bleeding their best assets faster than any other Sir Robin phase I have seen!
I am learning a lot.





Thanks, but part of it is reading your opponent. I don't think I would have success using this tactic against myself for example.


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 1418
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 12:52:15 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Feb 1, 1942

Submarine success again! I thought these torpedoes don't work.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1419
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 12:53:12 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Our forward base doesn't surprise the IJN...we were hoping the 6" guns would be a surprise and the mines are still on the Dutch sub in transit. No hits.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 1/28/2021 12:56:59 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1420
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 12:55:35 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Spoke to soon, with daylight, the gunners had good aim! Would have been nice to put one or two hits on the AV.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 1/28/2021 12:56:20 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1421
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 1:03:06 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		His Zeroes brushed aside our tiny 2 P40 LRCAP, and then he bombed our tanks, our Hudsons snuck in under his LRCAP, and bombed him in the morning. Uh, oh...there is a full regiment here plus the SNLF.



Then in the afternoon, as planned, the P40s swept and got revenge.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 1/28/2021 1:22:05 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1422
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 1:05:39 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		The Dutch have survived to shock attacks since we reinforced them for three days...inflicting nice losses, but also buying time where those troops are tied down on Java.

1-1 attack.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1423
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 1:17:43 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		That is a lot of engineers gone for the Japanese and he lost one more device destroyed than you did.

Yes, sometimes the Mark 14s work but you don't see how many were fired on the combat report.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1424
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 1:20:27 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Our Banshees get caught over Geraldton, by Oscars...bad timing on my part.

Our P40 Sweep does great against the Zeroes...high altitude sweep gets dive.

Morning Air attack on 148th Infantry Regiment, at 94,157 , near Maryborough

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid spotted at 20 NM, estimated altitude 34,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 20

Allied aircraft
P-40E Warhawk x 18

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 3 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-40E Warhawk: 1 destroyed

CAP engaged:
Yamada Det S-1 with A6M2 Zero (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 5 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 24000 , scrambling fighters to 16080.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 2 minutes
3rd Ku S-1 Det A with A6M2 Zero (2 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
2 plane(s) intercepting now.
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 3 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 23000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 23000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 2 minutes
13th Ku S-1 with A6M2 Zero (5 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
5 plane(s) intercepting now.
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 2 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 23000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 23000.
Raid is overhead
13th Ku S-1 Det A with A6M2 Zero (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 0 scrambling)
0 plane(s) not yet engaged, 3 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 23000 , scrambling fighters between 0 and 23000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 1 minutes





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1425
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 1:23:46 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Incredible success on the seas today.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1426
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 1:32:29 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		We will risk a night time encounter in waves of small task forces...the best experience ships first, and the last will hopefully be a bombardment.

It is probably an ambush...but conditions are very good for the Allies. 100% Moonlight and clear skies forecast. We have resupply in port and ake's and he doesn't.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1427
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 1:42:04 PM   
bigred


Posts: 3599
Joined: 12/27/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ambassador


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

West Coast work....

Battleship row is moving to Alameda...subs would have to penetrate the mines and ASW at San Francisco to get to them.

Pearl Harbor could be raided...and is not safe.

The US battleships simply aren't ready for war yet. AAA is anemic, and crew training, especially at night when Iboats are most active, is very low.

The pilots in the floatplanes are training at recon...for it is anticipated they will become a major shore bombardment factor later in the war.





In less than a week there will be 7 battleships there.




They’re several months from war ready. Does the mod start them at a lower XP than stock ? Some of them look like they haven’t progressed a bit in six weeks, even counting the fact some might have had an upgrade in January. Or maybe you didn’t let them leave Pearl Harbor when there were enemy subs around ?

Hi Lowpe. I love your map graphics. Stunning.

_____________________________

---bigred---

IJ Production mistakes--
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=2597400

(in reply to Ambassador)
Post #: 1428
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 1:42:44 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Our troops aren't quite there yet to be so aggressive attacking.

Our subs are putting constant pressure on Townsville, arriving, patrolling and leaving to shed their dls. Waiting for the mines to be deployed.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1429
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 1:51:18 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		KB




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1430
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 2:05:34 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		We will have to keep up our recon here to determine IJ intentions...the flanking amphibious invasion is a big concern as is a daily pummeling of Chittagong by IJN Battleships.

Allied focus number 1...keeping eastern India and Ledo. 8th Marines are at Diamond Harbor, 2nd Marines are on trains at Bombay...Australians coming in now in good numbers.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 1/28/2021 2:20:26 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1431
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 2:15:45 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		China...will be able to start flying in the 37mm AT guns of the 56th AT Regiment tomorrow to Changsha. The British are already there...with a whopping experience rating of 20!

Can't believe the IJ haven't attack Changsha yet...or bombed it.








Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1432
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 2:17:05 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bigred

Hi Lowpe. I love your map graphics. Stunning.


Many thanks!

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1433
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 2:18:54 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ambassador

They’re several months from war ready. Does the mod start them at a lower XP than stock ? Some of them look like they haven’t progressed a bit in six weeks, even counting the fact some might have had an upgrade in January. Or maybe you didn’t let them leave Pearl Harbor when there were enemy subs around ?


Missed your question...some of the BBs have gotten their radar upgrades...and so couldn't train. There is still four in upgrade status at Pearl or maybe 5.

I don't think they start lower.

(in reply to bigred)
Post #: 1434
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 2:51:38 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

We will have to keep up our recon here to determine IJ intentions...

I can help you with that: "hostile".



_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1435
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 2:52:37 PM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe
China...

I don't see many Chinese LCUs sitting out there in the open building forts. Especially in the central region, where almost all of them seem to be moving from/to bases. Do you prefer them resting in the bases instead? I'd say the added value of WR terrain and 3+ field forts on a major road is worth some of the squads remaining disabled. Even more so behind a river. Or between Changsha and Changteh

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1436
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 3:24:26 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: GetAssista

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe
China...

I don't see many Chinese LCUs sitting out there in the open building forts. Especially in the central region, where almost all of them seem to be moving from/to bases. Do you prefer them resting in the bases instead? I'd say the added value of WR terrain and 3+ field forts on a major road is worth some of the squads remaining disabled. Even more so behind a river. Or between Changsha and Changteh


Stacking games limit...so defense in depth doesn't work as you get snowballed. I don't think defense in depth works anyhow in China.

I have strong festungs that can stop/stall IJA attacks favorably except for tank thrusts. Many units are forts 4 all ready. Plus just one moving unit shows the pip, while there are units under digging in.

The main problem is the Japanese tank spearhead, which I am sure is going to attack at Changsha. Even if all the AT gun units were there, it would only amount to 120 guns versus 600+ tanks. I really need those Stuarts to counter...I will be lucky if it is around Kweiyang.

There is an amazing difference in unit recovery based upon where they are...and in general I want the largest units recovering first, and the lighter units holding the line for now. Plus continue surging troops forward around the Japanese.




< Message edited by Lowpe -- 1/28/2021 3:27:29 PM >

(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 1437
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 3:25:46 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

We will have to keep up our recon here to determine IJ intentions...

I can help you with that: "hostile".




Idle speculation! What do you base your assumption on?

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 1438
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 3:49:15 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Ha, ha. Spotted.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1439
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 1/28/2021 5:24:41 PM   
Ambassador

 

Posts: 1674
Joined: 1/11/2008
From: Brussels, Belgium
Status: offline 		Will you proceed with the attack on the Home Islands ? With KB located so far south, and the strain on NJP’s air force during those first six weeks, risk should be limited, but you’re still over 20 hexes away.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe
Missed your question...some of the BBs have gotten their radar upgrades...and so couldn't train. There is still four in upgrade status at Pearl or maybe 5.

I don't think they start lower.

I don’t remember ever seeing as low a night XP as 32 on a BB, usually I have one 33 or 34, all the rest over 35.

The first upgrade is indeed crucial, not only for the radars, but also for the AA. Between the installation of the 20mm Oerlikons and the replacement of the last 3in/50 by more numerous 1.1in, the AA ratings surge.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1440
Page:   <<   < prev  46 47 [48] 49 50   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  46 47 [48] 49 50   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.797