Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  52 53 [54] 55 56   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/17/2021 12:53:10 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		The AP Wharton takes a torpedo off San Diego, returns to port...minor fires, 3, will dock and then disband next turn.

We return the favor torpedoing a small tanker of Sakhalin, sinking her.

Brisbane theater...looking strong, over 300 AV at Toowoomba plus 10 Matildas and 10 Stuarts...Maryborough strong and the road south from Maryborough seems secure. Yesterday bombarded the IJA troops at Maryborough with a cruiser and some destroyers.

34th Regiment at Sydney, recovering from their valiant stand, has recovered 50% of their disablements.








Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1591
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/17/2021 12:54:59 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		As expected the IJA tank spearhead shows up... which route will they take?

Guessing the main road/railroad line...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1592
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/17/2021 2:05:35 PM   
Ambassador

 

Posts: 1674
Joined: 1/11/2008
From: Brussels, Belgium
Status: offline 		An AP damaged in exchange of sinking a TK, this is not a bad rate of exchange.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1593
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/19/2021 3:41:39 AM   
Capt. Harlock


Posts: 5358
Joined: 9/15/2001
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ambassador

An AP damaged in exchange of sinking a TK, this is not a bad rate of exchange.


well, yes -- but a small TK.

_____________________________

Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo

(in reply to Ambassador)
Post #: 1594
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/19/2021 12:20:14 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock


quote:

ORIGINAL: Ambassador

An AP damaged in exchange of sinking a TK, this is not a bad rate of exchange.


well, yes -- but a small TK.


Yep, Capt, you could make the argument that more damage would be done by excess fuel consumption by letting the tanker live and continue its run for the duration of the war...might have been a decoy/warning system.

another 12 inches or so of snow, followed by sleet and freezing rain...

(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 1595
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/19/2021 1:34:47 PM   
T Rav

 

Posts: 387
Joined: 5/29/2004
Status: offline 		Can't stand freezing rain. 7 years in Omaha, and they would just send us home before it started and tell us not to come back to work until it melted. Hope it ends for you soon.

T Rav

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1596
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/19/2021 1:53:52 PM   
Ambassador

 

Posts: 1674
Joined: 1/11/2008
From: Brussels, Belgium
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

quote:

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock


quote:

ORIGINAL: Ambassador

An AP damaged in exchange of sinking a TK, this is not a bad rate of exchange.


well, yes -- but a small TK.


Yep, Capt, you could make the argument that more damage would be done by excess fuel consumption by letting the tanker live and continue its run for the duration of the war...might have been a decoy/warning system.

another 12 inches or so of snow, followed by sleet and freezing rain...


Well, a Type-1 sure is not a Tonan Whaler, but still they can be useful for smaller ports (like Miri or Balikpapan, or Shikuka).

Also, isn’t DaIronBabes a mod with reduced load capacity ? I have never played this one, but reduced capacity may change the experience, and usefulness of various classes.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1597
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/19/2021 2:14:42 PM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock
well, yes -- but a small TK.


Don't underestimate the small TK, it is indispensable conversation starter!

(in reply to Capt. Harlock)
Post #: 1598
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/19/2021 2:35:09 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		At least you get the snow first, then the sleet and freezing rain on top of that. Wolves actually like that combination, it makes hunting deer easier.

Sinking any tanker is useful, more useful if they are loaded . . .

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to GetAssista)
Post #: 1599
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/20/2021 2:23:09 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Finished the turn, and didn't do a single offensive action...a sure sign of snow fatigue.


(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1600
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/20/2021 2:41:16 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Finished the turn, and didn't do a single offensive action...a sure sign of snow fatigue.



Hard to fight from a Cold Zone base in winter months ...




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1601
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/21/2021 12:51:00 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Feb 13, 1942

The Dutch hold out one more time! If Japan holds true to course, they will shock again tomorrow...but we managed to get forts up to one overnight. Perhaps we will be able to hold again?






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1602
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/21/2021 12:52:59 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Chinese forces hold here, but will be forced to retreat tomorrow no doubt.

Ground combat at 76,53 (near Kweilin)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 35767 troops, 233 guns, 717 vehicles, Assault Value = 1594

Defending force 26247 troops, 165 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 717

Japanese adjusted assault: 915

Allied adjusted defense: 1432

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
631 casualties reported
Squads: 28 destroyed, 107 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 18 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 31 (1 destroyed, 30 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
3062 casualties reported
Squads: 16 destroyed, 239 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 18 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 16 disabled
Guns lost 19 (1 destroyed, 18 disabled)




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1603
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/21/2021 12:55:13 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Japan continues to bomb Cloncurry at altitude and a few major bombing raids in China.

Those Bleheims were lost flying supplies to China...will need to look at the fatigue, etc. Worst day of op losses flying to China so far.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1604
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/21/2021 12:58:35 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Perth




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1605
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/21/2021 1:08:38 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Japan working on isolating Australia...will they invade New Zealand?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1606
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/21/2021 2:01:52 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		Raoul Island would be nice for a size 2 AF with Betty/Nells and Air HQ to make the trip to NZ more hazardous. The can almost reach the southern edge of the map.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1607
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/21/2021 2:14:05 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline 		Don't think he'll go for NZ

Raoul and the Cook Islands achieves his aims of cutting off without risking emergency reinforcements

Course, he might reckon that you've put all your troops into Oz, rather than NZ............

_____________________________


(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 1608
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/22/2021 7:32:56 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline 		Lemme guess: You have a CA TF ready to pounce at Eua?

Cheers,
CB

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 1609
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/22/2021 10:51:35 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Feb 14, 1942

Still being a pest around Soerabaja. Good intel...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1610
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/22/2021 10:55:17 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Repulse, sitting at 70+ damage, continues to soak up hits costing Japan planes. These came from a carrier though, normally it has been Sally/Betty.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1611
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/22/2021 11:01:11 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Brisbane: The Impact of a HQa at Tamworth coordinating the strikes is easily seen as the squadrons fly together.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 2/22/2021 11:05:14 AM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1612
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/22/2021 11:04:35 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Another invasion as expected...our transport and an AMc fled full speed prior to the invasion fleet showing up...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1613
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/22/2021 11:07:52 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		The Dutch hold one last time...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1614
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/22/2021 11:10:42 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		The Chinese hold again at 1-1, and more importantly looks like they disable quite a few vehicles...but the big fight versus the IJ tanks is yet to come, but any reduction in their fighting force is needed.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1615
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/22/2021 11:15:32 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		The Maryborough Line...

equal assault value, but we have better tubes. Forts are 3+ and building. The great fear is a flank invasion.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1616
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/22/2021 11:19:09 AM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		The 4th division could be in Reserve mode. But probably not as your opponent seems to want as much firepower shooting as is possible.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1617
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/22/2021 11:28:29 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		How about that.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1618
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/22/2021 11:46:18 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Japanese OP losses continue quite high.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1619
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/22/2021 12:02:13 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		China

Japan has a lot of forces just north of Kweilin...16 units, very tank heavy.


We are massing our best units for a big climatic tank battle in terrain of our choosing. Using our interior lines, and transports to meet him with our best.

43rd Cavalry with Stuarts
One Chinese Artillery unit with 105mms
2 Indian Mountain Gun units (3.7 inch)
1 British 2 pounder AT unit
1 Chinese 37mm AT unit
4 US TOE Chinese Corps with healthy AT pools, plus AA and 75mm guns prioritized to them.
1 Base force for AA

Regular Chinese Corps to fill out the stacking limit...




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 2/22/2021 12:05:29 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1620
Page:   <<   < prev  52 53 [54] 55 56   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  52 53 [54] 55 56   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.686