abchambe
Posts: 69
Joined: 9/11/2013 From: Vancouver Island Status: offline
|
I just finished the China scenario as the Japanese at Historical levels. The final result was a Chinese major victory, with the comment that Japan was a Worse then Historical Result. I have some issue with that characterization. At August 1939, the Japanese held 3 VP cities - Peking, Sian and Shanghai. China continued to hold 5 VP cities. To see how this compared to other scenarios I looked at the situation at the start of the Pacific 1941 scenario (note that the China scenario finishes more than 2 years before this point). In Dec 41, Japan also holds just 3 VP cities in China - Peking, Shanghai and Canton (Sian is still Chinese controlled). If the China scenario allowed me to continue, I could easily take Canton in 2 years by amphib, and possibly take Changsha by land. On the face of this comparison, I don't understand why the scenario considers that I did worse than historical as I conquered Sian 2 years early, Canton is easily conquerable by amphib invasion with naval and carrier support, and an additional Chinese VP city is possible in the remaining 2 year timeframe. The initial plan for a China scenario in WPP was originally a 1937 - 1941 scenario. Is it possible the VP conditions for the China scenario are based on the initial 4 year timeframe, but were not adjusted when the scenario was shortened to 2 years? The margin in VPs was significant (389 to 67) so I do not see how I could make up 300+ points in a 2 year timeframe, given the distances involved. I am not claiming I am a great land player, but I feel I am competent. How are others doing in winning this scenario? Are you having better success than I am?
|