Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  62 63 [64] 65 66   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/29/2021 12:36:02 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Pliny

I think this shows that in a stock game, even with a good Japanese player, an equally competent Allied played can more than hold his own in '41 and '42 and prevent AV. Even after reading the whole thing, I'm not sure what Japan's strategy was. For everything he passed over in the early phase, the forces in Australia don't seem too overwhelming.


I haven't avoided AV yet!

(in reply to Pliny)
Post #: 1891
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/29/2021 12:37:11 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Bleeding Japanese planes still.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1892
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/29/2021 1:31:40 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Pliny

I think this shows that in a stock game, even with a good Japanese player, an equally competent Allied played can more than hold his own in '41 and '42 and prevent AV. Even after reading the whole thing, I'm not sure what Japan's strategy was. For everything he passed over in the early phase, the forces in Australia don't seem too overwhelming.


I haven't avoided AV yet!


Part of it is the fairly constant Japanese shock attacks for no good reason. Better play on Java would also have helped take the mountain base a lot quicker.0


_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1893
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/29/2021 11:19:39 PM   
T Rav

 

Posts: 387
Joined: 5/29/2004
Status: offline 		As mentioned on the NJP72, I'm reading both so have no comment other than Thanks!

Very entertaining,
T Rav

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1894
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/29/2021 11:20:24 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Too bad that you can't chase a Japanese unit below Brisbane . . .


I seem to recall Wargamr getting the Aussie emergency reinforcements, and not seeing an impact from them.

Another sentai of fighters has shown up in eastern Australia...total now over 75.



(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1895
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 2:57:07 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Too bad that you can't chase a Japanese unit below Brisbane . . .


I seem to recall Wargamr getting the Aussie emergency reinforcements, and not seeing an impact from them.

Another sentai of fighters has shown up in eastern Australia...total now over 75.



The Aussie reinforcements turn up mostly in Cape Town and Aden. It takes a while to get them to Oz.


_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1896
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 11:48:05 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Too bad that you can't chase a Japanese unit below Brisbane . . .


I seem to recall Wargamr getting the Aussie emergency reinforcements, and not seeing an impact from them.

Another sentai of fighters has shown up in eastern Australia...total now over 75.



The Aussie reinforcements turn up mostly in Cape Town and Aden. It takes a while to get them to Oz.



Oops, that is Japanese front line fighter strength.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 1897
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 12:19:54 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		March 24, 1942

Task Force Pillsbury attempts to intercept IJN invasion fleets but gets a small squadron instead, just enough damage is done, to form an escort squadron which then is promptly sunk by Vals. Scratch two destroyers...still these guys have done excellent work over the course of the war.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1898
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 12:29:32 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Over in India, Dacca continues to see a buildup, now 19 enemy units there...our bombers actually sortie and inflict some decent damage on the IJA leading (or flank protection) tank units.

My goal here is to really slow down Japan's advance and get them worried about having AA with advance offensive spearheads and potentially to save Ledo. I am hamstrung a bit by so very few runways able to handle bombers. I also need to be careful, as Japan if stymied on the ground will resort to amphibious operations. There are now 2 IJA divisions on Ceylon and one Regiment.

I have formed the big 5th Chinese Corp, they are at Diamond Harbor and will now move to Calcutta to continue filling out as fast as they can. Currently they are up to 644 AV. I have flown out over 50% of the 6th Corp with some at Calcutta and Ledo, while the rest at Lashio. I really would like to get them all out too giving the Allies some really nice defensive units.








Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1899
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 12:35:01 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Liking the Chinese Front...a lot of strongholds have created level 4 fortifications, we are in excellent terrain, and although we will suffer a bit from bombardments, Japan will really need to send a lot of assets here to create anymore forward progress.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1900
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 12:50:43 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		A better look at China...

Certainly the opportunity for Japan taking China is not lost, yet, but it will require a radical change in operations. Japan moving off road really benefits China currently. The Japanese bombers have not been used much, but that will change as it will become the only safe area for them to operate in. PDU off of course helps China too.

That is the 1st Burma Division marching to Paoshan...there are I think 3 Indian mountain gun units, 1 cavalry unit in China so far. The 254th Armor is just outside of Lashio. The mountain gun units have seen some good combat and the cavlary unit fought once and is now digging in and recovering. They are primarily a fire brigade.

Japan's assault on China frustrated at every turn where I chose to fight: the move on the Ankang road, the thrust into the mountains above Sian, east from Ichang to Changteh, on the road towards Tuyun, the western approach from Lashio, and now the road to Chikiang.

The war in China has played out pretty much as I planned, doing a bit better than I planned actually.

One tactic, I am developing is the use of Chinese artillery in a reserve, no pursuit mode on the frontlines where Japan has concentrated their Artillery. Not sure how this will work out, but I want to keep the Chinese artillery as an anti tank threat, and not lose them in artillery duels where I am outgunned by Japan. Also conserves a bit of supplies.










Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 5/30/2021 12:54:02 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1901
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 12:55:24 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Working on causing op losses to Japanese planes while doing milk runs for the Allies.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1902
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 1:00:02 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		The Laida, which brought emergency supplies to Luzon, got sunk on her return trip, but her sacrifice allowed the AVD Childs to avoid combat for the day...perhaps she will escape Luzon?

Of the three merchants sent to Luzon with emergency supplies, one was sunk by an Iboat, another got cold feet and diverted to Aleutians, but the Laida made the run...kudos to her!




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1903
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 1:47:48 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

A better look at China...

Certainly the opportunity for Japan taking China is not lost, yet, but it will require a radical change in operations. Japan moving off road really benefits China currently. The Japanese bombers have not been used much, but that will change as it will become the only safe area for them to operate in. PDU off of course helps China too.

That is the 1st Burma Division marching to Paoshan...there are I think 3 Indian mountain gun units, 1 cavalry unit in China so far. The 254th Armor is just outside of Lashio. The mountain gun units have seen some good combat and the cavlary unit fought once and is now digging in and recovering. They are primarily a fire brigade.

Japan's assault on China frustrated at every turn where I chose to fight: the move on the Ankang road, the thrust into the mountains above Sian, east from Ichang to Changteh, on the road towards Tuyun, the western approach from Lashio, and now the road to Chikiang.

The war in China has played out pretty much as I planned, doing a bit better than I planned actually.

One tactic, I am developing is the use of Chinese artillery in a reserve, no pursuit mode on the frontlines where Japan has concentrated their Artillery. Not sure how this will work out, but I want to keep the Chinese artillery as an anti tank threat, and not lose them in artillery duels where I am outgunned by Japan. Also conserves a bit of supplies.



Did you march those Indian Mountain Gun units to China or fly them in? Just wondering about the feasibility of the latter.

BTW, Changteh is West of Ichang, if that comment was about the Japanese unit currently stuck in Changteh having come from Ichang?


_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1904
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 1:49:51 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Working on causing op losses to Japanese planes while doing milk runs for the Allies.






Almost the same number of daily sorties and you win 10-0! That's doing something right!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1905
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 1:52:29 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


Did you march those Indian Mountain Gun units to China or fly them in? Just wondering about the feasibility of the latter.

BTW, Changteh is West of Ichang, if that comment was about the Japanese unit currently stuck in Changteh having come from Ichang?



yeah, meant west from Ichang to Changteh.

Flew in the Indian gun units, and forgot to mention a British AT gun unit also flown in sans motorized support and they saw combat versus the IJA tank spearhead too!

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 1906
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 2:09:58 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Looking ahead to April, there are a ton of upgrades...lots and lots of radar installations. Subs, Destroyers, Cruisers, AM, AVD, DMS etc...the list goes on and on and on.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1907
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 2:16:28 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Upcoming new planes...

May is a very good month with C47s, P38, B26b Avengers. Really need those transports!

I suspect soon I will have some Tojo IIa to deal with.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1908
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 2:21:28 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I rescued this unit from Ceylon, after the invasion happened. Incredibly strong AA unit...Allied AA is a competitive advantage over Japan. It allows so much flexibility both offensively and defensively!






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1909
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 2:24:00 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		Apparently the P-38Es need some better pilots and leaders to make use of the new plane. Players who threw it straight into battle found it "underwhelming".

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1910
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 2:27:37 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Looking down the road a bit...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1911
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 2:31:52 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Apparently the P-38Es need some better pilots and leaders to make use of the new plane. Players who threw it straight into battle found it "underwhelming".


I know I have savaged the P38Es with A6M2s in the past, also caught the P38 fleet on the ground on islands and destroyed them via naval bombardments in the past too.

I am not happy with my pilot training program, this game I haven't done as many leadership changes as I would like. But I am getting there.

PDU off presents a bit of leeway timing wise.



< Message edited by Lowpe -- 5/30/2021 2:32:05 PM >

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 1912
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 2:41:04 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I am not sure I will ever do this, but rather than throw away the Dutch bombers in fruitless low level attacks on IJN invasion fleets, I disbanded them. Part of the reason why I did this is because of the very early Java invasions by Japan not allowing any time to train the pilots.

If I ever retake Soerabaja, I will be able to use these guys in an ASW role, milk run bombing, or night time bombing role. Not great, but not bad either. Pools are ok.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 5/30/2021 2:42:21 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1913
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 2:51:07 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		British and Indian reinforcements flowing into India.

The 70th Div is crack, 80 exp.

Also India is getting the 40th American Division, elements arriving in Bombay in the next few days, remainder still being bought out at Mombasa.

The final regiment in the 2nd Marines arrives in San Diego in 3 days and will be targeted to India too.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1914
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 3:00:10 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

I am not sure I will ever do this, but rather than throw away the Dutch bombers in fruitless low level attacks on IJN invasion fleets, I disbanded them. Part of the reason why I did this is because of the very early Java invasions by Japan not allowing any time to train the pilots.

If I ever retake Soerabaja, I will be able to use these guys in an ASW role, milk run bombing, or night time bombing role. Not great, but not bad either. Pools are ok.







Pretty sure you will get some of them reforming in Aden in a couple of months.


_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1915
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 3:32:05 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Encircled

Pretty sure you will get some of them reforming in Aden in a couple of months.



That would be nice, but I don't understand how they would.

Current Dutch air force. Messed up not establishing a dot base flying boat base that was Dutch owned.









Attachment (1)

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 1916
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 3:34:34 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline 		Ex-pats. Think Polish Air Force in Britain. In this case ex-ex-pats.

_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1917
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 4:44:40 PM   
DesertWolf101

 

Posts: 1445
Joined: 11/26/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Looking down the road a bit...








Why are you waiting for size 4 airfields before transferring air groups to New Zealand?

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1918
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 5:47:51 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Upcoming new planes...

May is a very good month with C47s, P38, B26b Avengers. Really need those transports!

I suspect soon I will have some Tojo IIa to deal with.





Ahem.

The Avenger is a single engine, carrier capable, US Naval Torpedo bomber that was also used by some of the US Naval Infantry air infantry air units plus sent out as Lend Lease aid to many countries.

The B26B is a twin engine land based bomber known as the Marauder. Four Marauders did carry torpedoes and use them at Midway but not one of them stuck a target and exploded. Since the B25 had a slightly longer range, the B26 was then used in the ETO being replaced by the B25 among other bombers.



To help increase OPs losses, a small LRCAP over the enemy bases can help with that.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1919
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 5/30/2021 8:26:06 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Encircled

Pretty sure you will get some of them reforming in Aden in a couple of months.



That would be nice, but I don't understand how they would.

Current Dutch air force. Messed up not establishing a dot base flying boat base that was Dutch owned.





There is an alternate "national" base for each nationality to allow their reinforcements and arrivals to show up somewhere. If they do show up at Aden, that is a perfect place to train them to the limits, and in multi skills too.

You could always use PP to buy out a dot base for the Dutch Patrol aircraft - or are they all destroyed already? Should be able to buy the air units back as well when PP become more plentiful.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1920
Page:   <<   < prev  62 63 [64] 65 66   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  62 63 [64] 65 66   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.328