BBfanboy
Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010 From: Winnipeg, MB Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Chris21wen quote:
ORIGINAL: PaxMondo Alfred is the absolute pro at using the site search engine. I'm just ok with it, but he is quite good. I also use google search as well and I am pretty familiar with that as well. He sure is. How I don't know because everthing negative said here is true for use mere mortals. However this has been going on for a long time and the search routines should have been looked at years ago. As I understand it from discussion years ago, the Forum software is not a Matrix product - it is an off-the shelf product used on many sites and its features are rarely updated. Since most Forum sites have very limited discussion of posts over six months old, the need for a search engine that goes back farther is not pressing for the Forum software designers. Consider that most commercial sites with a large amount of data probably still use tape silos to retain old data. Robots can retrieve the tapes fairly quickly and transfer data quickly but they need really good search parameters to find it on the tape. I have no idea how the tapes are indexed for content, other than a timeline. This Forum does not seem to be able to find posts with two separate words, each put in quotes and joined by a + sign as a search parameter. It may be that my formatting is not correct, but I can find nothing to guide me on how to format a search on the site. Probably I am not looking in the right place, just like trying to find stuff in the manual that puts info in different sections than I would have chosen.
_____________________________
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth
|