Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  65 66 [67] 68 69   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/8/2021 2:29:35 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

End of the Japanese Amphibious bonus is here....

ok, you AFBs -- how have I done weathering the storm? Are the Allies in good shape, or will the other shoe drop?

I have learned a lot...lots of optimizations I missed.


Maybe but maybe not. If you missed an optimization, then that set up other ones. If you would have done something different, then your opponent would then have done something different so the game would not be the same. Maybe your opponent would have done something and managed to hurt you more or you may have been able to hurt him more. But that would be for another game . . .

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1981
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/8/2021 5:01:25 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: apbarog


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

End of the Japanese Amphibious bonus is here....



At the risk of sounding uninformed, I can say that I'm not sure when the Japanese Amphibious bonus really ends. I thought it was 31 Mar 42. But in my current game, I performed a landing in early April 42 and did not incur the high disruption that I expected for being completely unprepped for the target. Unloading was very fast using merchant shipping. I changed my theory, and thought that maybe the bonus lasted until 7 Apr 42, as the manual says that it lasts "4 months". However, later in April, I did a divisional landing at Ambon with troops completely unprepped, and did not incur the drastic penalties expected. Now my theory is that it ends at 30 Apr 42. I haven't done a landing in early May yet to see the penalties.

I realize that I should know by now when it really ends. I thought I did. I'm judging my theory on my observations, which doesn't prove anything, but certainly changed my mind. My Ambon division should have been wrecked on landing, in my opinion, if the bonus had expired.

This is a long discussed topic, and one that I thought was settled, but it is not for me at the moment.


It might last until the 7th, never really checked that. But I have certainly felts its impact in supplies and especially motorized support unload rates....

You should be able to easily check this thru the unloading of supplies...a big difference between 250 and 1200. I will drop a message to NJP and get him to unload some supply somewhere and measure the unload rate before the 7th.

Depending upon your units experience, forts and terrain, the supply, disruption level and composition of the defenders, invasions with very little to 0 prep can be done with few adverse effects.

Although I don't think it mentions it in the rulebook, naval support in the hex being amphibously unloaded to is horrendously strong. Most people only see this when trying to unload large caliber guns at level 1 ports. In addition the dedicated amphib ships once empty help unload too.

Japanese units are generally really well suited to amphibious operations.

(in reply to apbarog)
Post #: 1982
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/8/2021 5:15:19 PM   
GetAssista

 

Posts: 2732
Joined: 9/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe
Although I don't think it mentions it in the rulebook, naval support in the hex being amphibously unloaded to is horrendously strong. Most people only see this when trying to unload large caliber guns at level 1 ports. In addition the dedicated amphib ships once empty help unload too.

I always try to accompany amphibious operations of any half-significant scale with a prepped naval support unit. HQn, port units or other types of naval engineers, whichever is available, help immensely to get troops and supply off the ships and onto beaches. Another necessary support element is a prepped HQa/c of course.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1983
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/8/2021 8:08:16 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Encircled

Naval losses look heavy, but they always are in the Japanese player goes for it


+1

Three blunders: Boise, 2 CAs north of Perth, and British south of Ceylon blundering into KB.

Saved a lot of the high value Thundering Herd, but lost way too many Dutch ships around the early attack on Java.

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 1984
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/8/2021 8:19:28 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Encircled

Naval losses look heavy, but they always are in the Japanese player goes for it


+1

Three blunders: Boise, 2 CAs north of Perth, and British south of Ceylon blundering into KB.

Saved a lot of the high value Thundering Herd, but lost way too many Dutch ships around the early attack on Java.


But contrast those with the IJN losses. How about posting a listing of DD and higher ships lost?

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1985
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/8/2021 9:33:35 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		April 1, 1942

Our destroyers raid Koggala, sinking one destroyer, but losing one to a long lance in a follow up fight with 4 IJN destroyers.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1986
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/8/2021 9:34:39 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
We spotted these tankers yesterday, and tried to intercept with some slow boats with a single 6 pound gun...no joy, but it was fun!




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1987
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/8/2021 9:35:35 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		These planes are pretty good naval attackers...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1988
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/8/2021 9:36:45 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Our artillery is pretty good...Japan swept a hex we don't have troops in, and yesterday they marched troops south out of Bundaberg, they don't know we are on the way to Rockhampton.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1989
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/8/2021 9:44:06 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Rockhampton...hoping our tanks can shatter the IJA defenders of Rockhampton quickly.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 6/8/2021 9:47:43 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1990
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/8/2021 10:11:32 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Plane losses. Claude? Any ideas?






Attachment (1)

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1991
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/8/2021 10:24:22 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Plane losses. Claude? Any ideas?







If you captured a base where they were located, then they show up as OPs losses.

Did you see any in a combat situation?

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1992
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/8/2021 10:28:35 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Can somebody tell me about dive bomber upgrades and uses...

I notice that the -3 Vindicator has a 44 hex relocation range! What other things should I be careful about?






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1993
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/8/2021 10:29:43 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Plane losses. Claude? Any ideas?







If you captured a base where they were located, then they show up as OPs losses.

Did you see any in a combat situation?


Nope. It is a baffle. Perhaps he disbanded a unit on an island somewhere for some reason. Likely for a withdrawing squadron.

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 6/8/2021 10:30:16 PM >

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1994
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/8/2021 10:43:55 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Can somebody tell me about dive bomber upgrades and uses...

I notice that the -3 Vindicator has a 44 hex relocation range! What other things should I be careful about?






Maybe look at the service ratings and whether they can get drop tanks when they become available.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1995
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/8/2021 11:19:33 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Can somebody tell me about dive bomber upgrades and uses...

I notice that the -3 Vindicator has a 44 hex relocation range! What other things should I be careful about?






Maybe look at the service ratings and whether they can get drop tanks when they become available.


There are some of those air units which either do not withdraw or withdraw in 1945. Find those and keep those as your training squadrons with the old airplanes. When I withdrew a squadron with 2 old airplanes, I saw it coming back with 18 new SBD-3s.

There is also a Marine DB squadron that changes to a TB squadron.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 1996
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/9/2021 12:23:56 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		April 1st 1942

VP ratio stands at 1.667 to 1.

Forgot to take a picture of the scorecard. Tomorrow.


(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 1997
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/9/2021 10:39:09 AM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Encircled

Naval losses look heavy, but they always are in the Japanese player goes for it


+1

Three blunders: Boise, 2 CAs north of Perth, and British south of Ceylon blundering into KB.

Saved a lot of the high value Thundering Herd, but lost way too many Dutch ships around the early attack on Java.



Not a criticism I hasn't to add btw!

Every allied player when faced with a Japanese expansion that really goes for it knows that he is going to take heavy naval losses because he can't ignore it.

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 1998
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/9/2021 11:57:29 AM   
HansBolter


Posts: 7704
Joined: 7/6/2006
From: United States
Status: offline 		The Vindicators are slow and ponderous, but have a great range, better than any other later model dive bomber.

I typically keep one or two operational squadrons of Vindicators until the pool runs dry.

Allied pools are so low in '42 that it has always made sense to me to get as much mileage as possible out of the 'obsolete' aircraft.

_____________________________

Hans


(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 1999
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/9/2021 2:08:33 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

The Vindicators are slow and ponderous, but have a great range, better than any other later model dive bomber.

I typically keep one or two operational squadrons of Vindicators until the pool runs dry.

Allied pools are so low in '42 that it has always made sense to me to get as much mileage as possible out of the 'obsolete' aircraft.


+ 1

Their range is great for transferring them between bases as well



_____________________________


(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 2000
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/9/2021 2:26:29 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		April 2, 1942

Quiet day again...

The siege of Maryborough is broken!

It would be nice to pocket and destroy this IJA Army, but I doubt that will be the outcome...which is ok as the offensive has more important goals in the short term...Rockhampton will be cut off tomorrow by rail from the north and west...too bad I can't cut the southern rail line.

I would like to use some Navy to bombard, but I have lost track of the KB and there are 60 Betties/Nells at Rockhampton.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 6/9/2021 2:28:32 PM >

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 2001
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/9/2021 4:13:14 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: HansBolter

The Vindicators are slow and ponderous, but have a great range, better than any other later model dive bomber.

I typically keep one or two operational squadrons of Vindicators until the pool runs dry.

Allied pools are so low in '42 that it has always made sense to me to get as much mileage as possible out of the 'obsolete' aircraft.


Thank you!

(in reply to HansBolter)
Post #: 2002
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/9/2021 4:48:11 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Scorecard






Attachment (1)

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 2003
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/9/2021 6:02:58 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I get two squadrons of Wellington Ic in the next few days...with their range and SR they will make a great night time bomber of Magwe.

Also, they can carry 2 supply into China...

Wish I got more of them.

Not pictured below, I start getting Lancers for China, I converted one fighter squadron with 1 plane, and will fly them out to Ledo once repaired.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 2004
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/9/2021 6:08:19 PM   
821Bobo


Posts: 2311
Joined: 2/8/2011
From: Slovakia
Status: offline 		I did try night campaign with the British 2Es against Magve without success. Tried again with Liberators in 43 with the same poor results. It seems Oil fields are "immune" from night attacks.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2005
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/9/2021 6:40:10 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline 		I love the Wellington but it is fragile - little defensive armament and seems easy for flak to shoot down too. Find a place where there is no fighter opposition and only light flak (that you can fly above) if you want to bomb something. Bomb merchant ships too.
To give them the best survival rate I can, I bring in some veteran pilots with Defensive skill in the high 60s or more.



_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2006
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/9/2021 8:07:58 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: 821Bobo

I did try night campaign with the British 2Es against Magve without success. Tried again with Liberators in 43 with the same poor results. It seems Oil fields are "immune" from night attacks.


Having been on the receiving end in previous Japanese games, night bombing can be horrendously successful. Although it is not easy, and you need to really work the system.

In this game, I have had good success with night bombing industry. Not great, well considering the pilot quality and DL levels, that is to be expected.



(in reply to 821Bobo)
Post #: 2007
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/9/2021 8:14:06 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

I love the Wellington but it is fragile - little defensive armament and seems easy for flak to shoot down too. Find a place where there is no fighter opposition and only light flak (that you can fly above) if you want to bomb something. Bomb merchant ships too.
To give them the best survival rate I can, I bring in some veteran pilots with Defensive skill in the high 60s or more.




Used to Japanese bombers I am, it is not fragile!

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 2008
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/9/2021 8:17:19 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Sweeping attacks:

Given the Allies horrendous advantage in AA and Japanese paucity, it leaves a lot of the fighter force available for sweeping attacks, strafing attacks, and 1000' foot bombing runs.

I plan to give them all a workout, have already used them. The P38J and the D25 Jugs are especially attractive although their common role is high altitude sweepers I have other plans for some (most) of them.

Curious to see what effect the camera has with the Fulmar!

Also, I continue testing the 100' and 1000' sweeping attack. I think as a stand alone offensive mission, the effectiveness isn't great, but rather used in conjunction with other offensive missions, could be very strong indeed, as RangerJoe has alluded to in previous posts.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 6/9/2021 8:20:23 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2009
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/9/2021 8:20:40 PM   
821Bobo


Posts: 2311
Joined: 2/8/2011
From: Slovakia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


Having been on the receiving end in previous Japanese games, night bombing can be horrendously successful. Although it is not easy, and you need to really work the system.

In this game, I have had good success with night bombing industry. Not great, well considering the pilot quality and DL levels, that is to be expected.



I have had great success in airfield night bombing as well, in such extend that we had to put limits on it. But when I targeted oil, no hits.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2010
Page:   <<   < prev  65 66 [67] 68 69   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  65 66 [67] 68 69   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.875