Interesting: TOAW "WE'RE NUMBER EIGHT!! WE'RE NUMBER EIGHT!!"

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Interesting: TOAW "WE'RE NUMBER EIGHT!! WE'RE NUMBER EIGHT!!"

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> The Operational Art of War IV >> Interesting: TOAW "WE'RE NUMBER EIGHT!! WE'RE NUMBER EIGHT!!"

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Interesting: TOAW "WE'RE NUMBER EIGHT!! WE'RE NUMB... - 6/17/2021 3:13:09 PM

Hellen_slith

Posts: 1990
Joined: 10/10/2005
Status: offline

Forum views shown by list of forum, here the Top 10 today (note TOAW III on there :)

WitP:AE 908K (!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
WitE 216K
WiF 169K
Command : Modern Operations 137K
Distant Worlds 126K
Strategic Command 74K
TOAW3 71K !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Advanced Tactics 67K
TOAW4 49K <<<< <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
WarPlan 34K

Post #: 1

RE: Interesting: TOAW "WE'RE NUMBER EIGHT!! WE'RE ... - 6/17/2021 3:50:22 PM

76mm

Posts: 4688
Joined: 5/2/2004
From: Washington, DC
Status: offline

It's kind of incredible that TOAW III's views are almost 50% greater than IV's especially since I can't even find III's forum on Matrix list of forums...

(in reply to Hellen_slith)

Post #: 2

RE: Interesting: TOAW "WE'RE NUMBER EIGHT!! WE'RE ... - 6/17/2021 4:19:10 PM

cathar1244

Posts: 1003
Joined: 9/5/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 76mm

It's kind of incredible that TOAW III's views are almost 50% greater than IV's especially since I can't even find III's forum on Matrix list of forums...

https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tt.asp?forumid=225 if you're interested.

Cheers

(in reply to 76mm)

Post #: 3

RE: Interesting: TOAW "WE'RE NUMBER EIGHT!! WE'RE ... - 6/17/2021 4:33:28 PM

76mm

Posts: 4688
Joined: 5/2/2004
From: Washington, DC
Status: offline

Thanks, bookmarked. I thought that those post numbers were "current", but they must be the "all time" number of posts, which makes more sense.

< Message edited by 76mm -- 6/17/2021 4:35:32 PM >

(in reply to cathar1244)

Post #: 4