Suggestion: Stance for Retreat

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Suggestion: Stance for Retreat

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> WarPlan >> Suggestion: Stance for Retreat

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Suggestion: Stance for Retreat - 6/19/2021 10:49:40 PM

sveint

Posts: 3556
Joined: 1/19/2001
From: Glorious Europe
Status: offline

We have a stance for "Hold at all costs".

I'd like to see a stance for "Retreat when attacked" ("Delay"?).

Post #: 1

RE: Suggestion: Stance for Retreat - 6/20/2021 12:00:16 AM

Nirosi

Posts: 1776
Joined: 9/17/2017
Status: offline

I would love that to. Alvaro said it was removed because of some exploit. But I do not know what that exploit was.

(in reply to sveint)

Post #: 2

RE: Suggestion: Stance for Retreat - 6/20/2021 11:25:54 AM

sillyflower

Posts: 3509
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Back in Blighty
Status: offline

Probably because it could be used en masse to soak up attacker's OPs without having a downside.

_____________________________

web exchange

Post: I am always fearful that when I put this game down on the table and people see the box-art they will think I am some kind of neo-Nazi

Reply: They already know you're a gamer. What other shame can possibly compare?

(in reply to Nirosi)

Post #: 3

RE: Suggestion: Stance for Retreat - 6/20/2021 1:57:43 PM

AlvaroSousa

Posts: 9927
Joined: 7/29/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sillyflower

Probably because it could be used en masse to soak up attacker's OPs without having a downside.

Pretty much yes.

_____________________________

Creator Kraken Studios
- WarPlan
- WarPlan Pacific

Designer Strategic Command
- Brute Force (mod) SC2
- Assault on Communism SC2
- Assault on Democracy SC2
- Map Image Importer SC3

(in reply to sillyflower)

Post #: 4