Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  76 77 [78] 79 80   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/26/2021 4:28:04 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

It looks like that CV TF is vulnerable without a lot of fighters compared to bombers. Maybe even 4Es on Naval can reduce the fighter numbers some more.

Do you have any Cats available for night torpedo attacks? Or even with bombs?


Don't have strong enough night naval search to get a decent night DL on KB.


I understand but they might also be able to be used against SCTFs should they drop in for a visit. They could detach some ships to be swarmed by PTs and DDs.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2311
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/26/2021 4:45:45 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Bombs won't do it, and it will be several days before an HQa arrives at Marysborough with torpedoes.


(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 2312
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/26/2021 5:03:02 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Line Islands building up...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 2313
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/26/2021 5:04:02 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Pretty sure our first offensive will be aimed at Canton and Baker.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2314
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/26/2021 5:07:56 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I have 600 PP, I was thinking on buying out the last American fractional Division in Mombasa, but the priority isn't there yet, perhaps a NZ unit and some Americans. Can't decide, so for now we are simply accumulating points.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2315
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/26/2021 5:11:16 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Bering Sea






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2316
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/26/2021 5:12:47 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Deathstar is a Pearl, most slow Battleships at Mare Island.

Saratoga, and the light cruiser forces is at Melbourne, along with several heavy cruisers.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2317
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/26/2021 5:52:09 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Bombs won't do it, and it will be several days before an HQa arrives at Marysborough with torpedoes.


Bombs can do it. 500 pound bombs can wreck the topside of BBs, they can but do not always penetrate the CAs but the CLs and smaller are vulnerable. Enough bombs on a BB can leave it a flaming wreck which is a good use for the Devastators early on but Avengers are the better aircraft. Slow the ships down and/or detach them from the main task force and they are vulnerable. I sank a Japanese BB using Devastators with 21 or 23 topside 500 pound bomb hits. The Devastators and the Avengers on Low Naval set for torpedoes with none available will carry four 500 bombs each.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2318
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/26/2021 6:14:03 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		My goodness, the Dutch are coming in at Aden. I have pilots and air frames....they should add a lot of utility.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 2319
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/26/2021 7:21:38 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		The remains of Wenchow!




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2320
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/26/2021 7:23:41 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Colombo...the destruction continues. Zeroes on NF duty now.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2321
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/26/2021 11:45:28 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		April 22, 1942

The IJN sorties from Colombo, Ceylon all the way to Cochin...where they are rudely met.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 2322
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/26/2021 11:46:43 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Daytime...now, and it looks like the IJN has broken up their raiding task force...

Newcastle puts on a definitive show...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2323
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/26/2021 11:47:58 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		The the IJN Heavy Cruisers run into a light cruiser squadron around Triv...which just got a fresh minefield.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2324
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/26/2021 11:49:02 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		The IJN bombard Rockhampton twice, and then attack...oh my!




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2325
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/26/2021 11:51:30 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Pure nailbiting time! It looks bleak here, Japan will most likely shock attack today!

Ground combat at Rockhampton (95,152)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 29686 troops, 258 guns, 165 vehicles, Assault Value = 922

Defending force 23198 troops, 438 guns, 611 vehicles, Assault Value = 600

Japanese adjusted assault: 355

Allied adjusted defense: 234

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: preparation(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
2072 casualties reported
Squads: 17 destroyed, 123 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 18 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 44 disabled
Vehicles lost 25 (2 destroyed, 23 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
324 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 20 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 59 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 27 (3 destroyed, 24 disabled)
Vehicles lost 120 (50 destroyed, 70 disabled)

Assaulting units:
2nd Recon Regiment
2nd Engineer Regiment
65th Brigade
4th Brigade
21st Infantry Regiment
6th Tank Regiment
148th Infantry Regiment
21st Ind.Mixed Brigade
8th Tank Regiment
4th Div /1
45th Field AA Battalion
35th JNAF AF Unit
48th Field Artillery Regiment
48th Field AA Battalion
47th Field AA Battalion
22nd Air Flotilla
97th JAAF AF Bn

Defending units:
193rd Tank Battalion
2/7th Armoured Regiment
2/5th Armoured Regiment
182nd Infantry Regiment
754th Tank Battalion
2/6th Armoured Regiment
41st Infantry Division
13th Australian Brigade
97th Coast AA Regiment
2nd Medium Regiment
108th Anti Tank Regiment
I Australian Corps
21/22 Field Regiment


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2326
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/26/2021 11:52:11 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		American artillery bombarding to great effect!




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2327
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/26/2021 11:52:54 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Japan bringing in supplies...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2328
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/27/2021 12:12:34 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Looking messy!

Seems like a major withdraw from Bundaberg! On April 18th there was 38,900 troops spotted at Bundaberg. Bundaberg also now empty of planes...it is a size 3 runway slightly damaged.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 6/27/2021 1:16:10 AM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2329
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/27/2021 12:13:48 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Ceylon...




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2330
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/27/2021 12:18:31 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Butchers bill...

Ashigara was left with heavy fires, heavy damage, 1 torpedo hit, 68 shell hits. What a beast to still be afloat.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2331
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/27/2021 12:28:49 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Bloodbath...hard to see Ashigara surviving.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2332
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/27/2021 12:33:34 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Air losses sorted...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2333
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/27/2021 1:10:09 AM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Butchers bill...

Ashigara was left with heavy fires, heavy damage, 1 torpedo hit, 68 shell hits. What a beast to still be afloat.





The Ashigara may not be afloat if you consider the float plane ground losses. If she sank, you won the naval battles that turn.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2334
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/27/2021 1:15:31 AM   
ushakov

 

Posts: 46
Joined: 4/3/2017
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Daytime...now, and it looks like the IJN has broken up their raiding task force...

Newcastle puts on a definitive show...






Newcastle is one of my favorite ships, and in most long-running games i've followed she just gets unceremoniously sunk at one point. This is very nice to see (regardless of future events)!

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2335
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/27/2021 1:26:12 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

The Ashigara may not be afloat if you consider the float plane ground losses. If she sank, you won the naval battles that turn.


Very true. I think she may have been scuttled.

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 2336
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/27/2021 1:27:43 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ushakov


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Daytime...now, and it looks like the IJN has broken up their raiding task force...

Newcastle puts on a definitive show...






Newcastle is one of my favorite ships, and in most long-running games i've followed she just gets unceremoniously sunk at one point. This is very nice to see (regardless of future events)!


12 6" guns did good work!


(in reply to ushakov)
Post #: 2337
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/27/2021 4:27:08 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Air losses sorted...






A lot of interesting numbers there. Japanese total losses to date is about 33% higher than the Allies. A very good result this early in the war when Allied aircraft have performance problems.

And half of the Betty losses are to Ops - one of the drawbacks of using that long range too much!

Losses of Vals and both Kate models are good too!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2338
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/27/2021 4:28:21 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe


quote:

ORIGINAL: ushakov


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Daytime...now, and it looks like the IJN has broken up their raiding task force...

Newcastle puts on a definitive show...






Newcastle is one of my favorite ships, and in most long-running games i've followed she just gets unceremoniously sunk at one point. This is very nice to see (regardless of future events)!


12 6" guns did good work!



Like Mauritius, Newcastle comes with experience.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2339
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 6/27/2021 10:39:55 AM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		Many years ago when I spoke with John E (DBB developer) about the apparent lack of heavy artillery for the Allies, he told me the best units to use in that roll are the American CD units. I would ship 2 to 4 of them to Australia and use them for your push up the eastern coast. They will also be good at firing back of Nathan's bombardment TFs.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 2340
Page:   <<   < prev  76 77 [78] 79 80   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  76 77 [78] 79 80   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.859