FIC Territorial

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

FIC Territorial

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> Tech Support >> NetPlay Tech Support >> FIC Territorial

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

FIC Territorial - 7/18/2021 2:23:11 AM

ssiviour

Posts: 495
Joined: 8/8/2014
From: Australia
Status: offline

In the previous turn French Indo-China was Occupied by the Japanese. FIC Territorial Unit was not on the Map at the time of Action event.

JP was surprised during Production that FIC Territorial was not in the force Pool available for building.

On investigation unit appears to be in Conquered Pool.

Attachment (1)

Post #: 1

RE: FIC Territorial - 7/18/2021 2:25:19 AM

ssiviour

Posts: 495
Joined: 8/8/2014
From: Australia
Status: offline

I do not believe this is correct

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ssiviour)

Post #: 2

RE: FIC Territorial - 7/18/2021 2:28:50 AM

ssiviour

Posts: 495
Joined: 8/8/2014
From: Australia
Status: offline

Latest game save if anyone is capable of relocating the unit.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to ssiviour)

Post #: 3

RE: FIC Territorial - 7/19/2021 9:59:32 PM

paulderynck

Posts: 8201
Joined: 3/24/2007
From: Canada
Status: offline

I got it to relocate to "Force Pool" but it is still listed as a French Indo China unit although it does say "controlled by Japan".

So I am not sure it will show up as buildable but you can give this file a try. Since it is NetPlay, both players will need to use this file.

Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Paul

(in reply to ssiviour)

Post #: 4

RE: FIC Territorial - 7/20/2021 7:08:35 PM

ssiviour

Posts: 495
Joined: 8/8/2014
From: Australia
Status: offline

Thanks Paul.

It does appear in JP Force Pool during review game. My opponent is travelling at the moment so we will see on his return and let you know if it works.

Thanks Again!

(in reply to paulderynck)

Post #: 5