Neilster
Posts: 2890
Joined: 10/27/2003 From: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Grognerd_INC Ha! Took us a day to install a pair of engines on the Titan II or the Titan IV, stage one - A lot of sponge counts when you open up a liquid propellant system! Look what no bureaucracy can do! (other than the FAA types). We used to have 2 to 4 techs, 2 inspectors, 1 Quality Engineer, 1 Aerojet representative, 1 Air Force Representative occasionally an Air Force QA type. A lot of folks just standing around watching! (I was the Quality Engineer) Were the nasty Aerozine 50/Dinitrogen tetroxide propellants anything to do with that though? Had there been propellants in the tanks? In principle I agree that old space had too much bureaucracy but there was basically no commercial imperative then and, as I said above, I don't think these engines were fully connected. No doubt, however, that SpaceX will come up with a fast way to do the latter. They want to stamp these things out like Khrushchev's "sausages" Also, design for ease of maintenance has improved with time. An engine could be replaced on an F-18 in, from memory, about an hour. The first jet I worked on, the mighty Aermacchi MB-326, required a field break to remove its Rolls-Royce Viper. That meant splitting the jet in half, rolling away the rear fuselage, removing the tailpipe and then the engine before doing all that in reverse. That took a team of about five a full day. If you've ever maintained an old Italian sports car, you'll get the idea.
_____________________________
Cheers, Neilster
|