Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  97 98 [99] 100 101   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/22/2021 9:55:50 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		On the homefront, lots of heavy rains last Thursday and today. Downed trees, flooding, power interruptions...going slow on doing my turns and keeping up the AAR. Sorry.



< Message edited by Lowpe -- 8/22/2021 9:56:08 AM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2941
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/22/2021 11:47:21 AM   
JohnDillworth


Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

June 19th, 1942

Finished off a previously damaged Iboat...

Clark AFB falls...but most of the troops had evacuated to Bataan. Not sure if this was the right move, but I thought I would experiment a bit.

Finally got Japan enticed into attacking the Rboat at Cochin again, an aerial strike...will see if we can surprise him this turn with something unexpected.







Coincidentally, IRL, the I-4 was sunk by a submarine: from Wikipedia :

"The submarine USS Seadragon (SS-194), alerted to I-4′s presence by Ultra intelligence information, sighted I-4 at the southern entrance to St. George's Channel off New Ireland, heading north on the surface at 14 knots (26 km/h; 16 mph), at 06:21 on 21 December 1942.[2] Misidentifying I-4 as an I-168-class submarine, Seadragon described her as painted black and with the number "4" painted on her conning tower.[2] At 06:37, Seadragon fired three Mark 10 Mod 3 torpedoes at a range of 850 yards (780 m).[2] I-4′s lookouts apparently sighted the approaching torpedoes because I-4 turned in an apparent attempt to comb their wakes.[2] Seadragon′s first torpedo suffered a gyroscope failure and missed ahead and her second torpedo detonated prematurely after running for only 18 seconds.[2] Her third torpedo struck I-4′s stern, resulting in a ball of flames and much smoke.[2] Seadragon saw I-4′s bow rise vertically as she sank by the stern at 05°02′S 152°33′E with the loss of all 90 men on board.[2]

On 5 January 1943, the Imperial Japanese Navy officially declared I-4 to be presumed lost with all hands off Rabaul.[2] She was stricken from the Navy list on 1 March 1943.[2] "

_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2942
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/22/2021 4:00:53 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		The Seadragon fired Mark 10s? I thought that they fired the Mark 14s . . .

Don't tell me that Wikipedia is WRONG!

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to JohnDillworth)
Post #: 2943
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/22/2021 5:45:15 PM   
JohnDillworth


Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline 		Wikipedia is often wrong because it's only as good as what people put into it. As for the Seadragon, it was a Sargo class sub so it was a post S-boat, pre Gato class sub. The torpedo exploded, so that lends credence to the Mark 10 theory Anyway, the Sargo class sub served throughout the war so presume they would use the latest and greatest torpedoes. I don't know much about subs. Were the Mark 10 and Mark 14 torpedoes interchangeable or were boats locked into a certain type?

< Message edited by JohnDillworth -- 8/22/2021 5:55:39 PM >

_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 2944
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/22/2021 10:08:06 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		The boats were locked into type, at least as far as the S-boats were concerned. The length was different. I never heard of any fleet boats using the Mark 10.

As for the Mark 14, one veered off due to a gyroscope failure, one premature, and one hit. The gyroscope failure may have lead to the circular runs . . .

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to JohnDillworth)
Post #: 2945
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/23/2021 5:51:15 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		June 20th, 1942

Boring day...expecting the IJA tank juggernaut to cross the river out of Ankang today...they will run into 31 or so Stuarts, that actually have full ammo, and about 80K troops without that much ammo (twice the stacking limit). It will be a bit less since some of the troops will leave the hex hopefully.

Chinese supply starting to climb...had to pull 8 B17s off supply drops to remove them from the game...






Up to 2k supply in Burma, from a low 3 weeks or so ago of 219.

Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2946
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/23/2021 11:19:48 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		June 21, 1942

And the tanks cross the river....our forces did well I think, since only one Corp and the Armor had more than 0 supplies.


Ground combat at 81,42 (near Ankang)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 21776 troops, 140 guns, 499 vehicles, Assault Value = 791

Defending force 53473 troops, 214 guns, 44 vehicles, Assault Value = 1126

Japanese adjusted assault: 628

Allied adjusted defense: 805

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), fatigue(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: shock(+), disruption(-)

Japanese ground losses:
1272 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 57 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 73 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Vehicles lost 182 (14 destroyed, 168 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1585 casualties reported
Squads: 21 destroyed, 132 disabled
Non Combat: 7 destroyed, 17 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 10 disabled
Guns lost 18 (4 destroyed, 14 disabled)







Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 8/23/2021 11:20:00 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2947
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/23/2021 11:26:17 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		She showed up today.

In looking at the devices and placements, I think the game engine really favors her. It is difficult to get rear turrets to fire.

Her AA gets stronger and stronger. 20 five inch guns to start with...

Have to be careful with her while the crew experience is so low.










Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2948
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/23/2021 11:45:30 PM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline 		She needs a new captain with better Inspiration and then some 'milk runs' of bombarding some by passed Japanese island or one where Ms Nell and Betty are not.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2949
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/24/2021 1:21:08 AM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline 		Wait until she gets her 40mm guns . . .

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 2950
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/24/2021 12:14:16 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Sometimes, I could just hit myself.

The 43rd put up a really good fight, for the first time during the war. Climbing experience and enemy disruption helped, mostly enemy disruption.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2951
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/25/2021 3:15:40 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline 		Good luck with that Northern Marianas adventure. I'm guessing in '42 the garrisons will be light. You'd know better as an avid IJ player, but I'd expect Saipan and Tinian would be lightly held as well.

One thing I noticed is that naval support doesn't help re-arming at zero-level ports, even after they've been built up to 1, 2 or 3 (there's a thread somewhere on this known issue). I had a fun tussle with the AI in that area and found it was quite hard to top up my AKEs until I had Tinian or Saipan in hand. Just something to keep in mind.

Cheers,
CB

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2952
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/27/2021 2:24:13 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		June 21, 1942

Nail a DMS at Canton...

IJA attacks on the mountain road north of Sian and is repulsed in a 1-4 even without supplies.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2953
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/27/2021 3:20:44 PM   
JohnDillworth


Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

June 21, 1942

Nail a DMS at Canton...

IJA attacks on the mountain road north of Sian and is repulsed in a 1-4 even without supplies.






I don't suppose that TF was there to evacuate the garrison? So, what is he bringing in? Supplies, troops or engineers? Can't see risking an engineer group here

_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2954
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/27/2021 10:01:36 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		He has three units there now...will try for a sub raid today, and maybe SAG raid tomorrow.

Up to 29k+ supplies in China...the air lift is working...but the supplies still need to get to the front lines which isn't happening yet.


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2955
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/27/2021 10:26:41 PM   
RangerJoe


Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015
From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part.
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Up to 29k+ supplies in China...the air lift is working...but the supplies still need to get to the front lines which isn't happening yet.


Maybe some of the supplies are getting to the front lines but not enough to the point where the units can build up reserves.

_____________________________

Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
― Julia Child


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2956
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/27/2021 10:55:08 PM   
jdsrae


Posts: 2716
Joined: 3/1/2010
From: Gandangara Country
Status: offline 		I’ve got a front line base that didn’t look like it was getting supply, but now i think the supply is just being loaded straight off the trucks into the AA guns!

_____________________________

Currently playing my first PBEM, no house rules Scenario 1 as IJ.
AAR link (no SolInvictus): https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4684655

(in reply to RangerJoe)
Post #: 2957
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/28/2021 11:54:00 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jdsrae

I’ve got a front line base that didn’t look like it was getting supply, but now i think the supply is just being loaded straight off the trucks into the AA guns!

That says a lot for keeping up the pressure with air strikes.

_____________________________

Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home

(in reply to jdsrae)
Post #: 2958
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/29/2021 1:57:23 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		June 23, 1942

Another fight on the Ankang road...I forgot to put our armor in reserve, no pursuit mode and they got demolished again.

Also, I should have had two corp dug in here with forts 4...my bad.

Supply not moving toward the front...dropped 1k overall in China.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2959
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/30/2021 3:00:31 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		We are marching on Broome and Darwin, and as I crank thru the turn a growing sense of slowness/delay is happening.

I feel a huge need to move forward, supplies, fuel, troops and planes. The need to pressure Japan across the entire perimeter is a daunting task given my current level of assets. Prep is needed for opposed landings...all leading to delays.

Conversely Japan is amazed that the AA guns are still firing over Bataan...and Singapore still holds out.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2960
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/30/2021 3:14:55 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Now, given the Canton news buildup, I am tempted to land on the friendly islands in the southern Gilberts and take the dot bases around Baker and Canton, supported with akes I should be able to mount a pretty strong shore bombardment softening process while we have a fairly strong forward base for naval search...given that Arorae can already do that.

Ellice Islands can be occupied by troops from Tahiti area...

Definitely don't want to travel outside of our naval search umbrella...

I wonder if this will trigger a cv clash...I have six to put up against the KB. Then again, this is small potatoes for the grab on Marcus...so we will attempt to do this on the cheap...








Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2961
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/31/2021 3:51:45 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		June 24, 1942

Another day, another attack on the Ankang road. We hold...while the Stuarts race to retreat out before we are forced to.


Ground combat at 81,42 (near Ankang)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 27908 troops, 269 guns, 593 vehicles, Assault Value = 738

Defending force 25525 troops, 97 guns, 29 vehicles, Assault Value = 594

Japanese adjusted assault: 290

Allied adjusted defense: 190

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
669 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 71 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 13 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
777 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 123 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 7 disabled





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2962
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/31/2021 3:59:35 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Big convoy at Baker...our subs miss.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2963
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 8/31/2021 4:35:57 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline 		That potentially going to change your plans?

A big convoy at Baker does rather suggest reinforcements

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2964
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/1/2021 2:57:56 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Will just change the tactics involved....

I like drawing forces to the extreme edge of IJ perimeter.



< Message edited by Lowpe -- 9/1/2021 2:58:26 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2965
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/2/2021 2:41:57 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		June 25th, 1942

Our CLAA SAG does some damage...

Night Naval bombardment of Canton Island at 153,143

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
H6K4 Mavis: 1 damaged
G4M1 Betty: 1 damaged

Allied Ships
CLAA San Juan
CLAA San Diego
CLAA Atlanta

Japanese ground losses:
25 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 8
Port hits 3
Port fuel hits 1
Port supply hits 2

CLAA San Juan firing at Canton Island
CLAA San Diego firing at Canton Island
CLAA Atlanta firing at Canton Island

While our DD SAG decides to hold off on rushing Baker...sub intel swayed them

Sub attack near Baker Island at 149,136

Japanese Ships
CL Tenryu
DD Kisaragi
DD Tawakaze

Allied Ships
SS S-27, hits 6

SS S-27 launches 4 torpedoes at CL Tenryu
S-27 bottoming out ....
DD Tawakaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Tawakaze attacking submerged sub ....
DD Tawakaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Tawakaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Tawakaze attacking submerged sub ....
Escort abandons search for sub






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2966
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/2/2021 2:43:02 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Obligatory attack on Ankang road...

Ground combat at 81,42 (near Ankang)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 27415 troops, 269 guns, 592 vehicles, Assault Value = 683

Defending force 24466 troops, 91 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 498

Japanese adjusted assault: 218

Allied adjusted defense: 151

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), supply(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
273 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 44 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 13 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Vehicles lost 38 (2 destroyed, 36 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
432 casualties reported
Squads: 7 destroyed, 90 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 9/2/2021 2:45:51 AM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2967
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/2/2021 2:46:23 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Probing towards Lanchow...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2968
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/2/2021 2:47:02 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Attack at Bataan...


Ground combat at Bataan (78,77)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 24864 troops, 450 guns, 795 vehicles, Assault Value = 744

Defending force 32719 troops, 427 guns, 287 vehicles, Assault Value = 766

Japanese adjusted assault: 557

Allied adjusted defense: 1013

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 2)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
719 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 90 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 3 disabled
Vehicles lost 44 (3 destroyed, 41 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
714 casualties reported
Squads: 25 destroyed, 24 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 25 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 14 disabled
Guns lost 7 (3 destroyed, 4 disabled)
Vehicles lost 4 (1 destroyed, 3 disabled)



(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2969
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 9/2/2021 1:35:53 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Another bout of major flooding here...river crests in 5 hours....






View from an apartment complex near me...along the Schuylkill River.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 9/2/2021 1:36:55 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 2970
Page:   <<   < prev  97 98 [99] 100 101   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  97 98 [99] 100 101   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.078