Comunist china kingdom

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

Comunist china kingdom

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Strategic Command Series >> Strategic Command WWII: World at War >> Comunist china kingdom

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

Comunist china kingdom - 9/16/2021 8:20:53 AM

Zeckke

Posts: 95
Joined: 8/6/2021
Status: offline

This game has everything that you need, after surrender china and first Mao; then PENG

is imposible to attack them also they dont show in the diplomatic as country so i must leave them

Attachment (1)

Post #: 1

RE: Comunist china kingdom - 9/16/2021 8:59:02 AM

BillRunacre

Posts: 4945
Joined: 7/22/2013
Status: offline

Did Communist China happen to join the Allies after China surrendered?

_____________________________

(in reply to Zeckke)

Post #: 2

RE: Comunist china kingdom - 9/16/2021 11:38:49 AM

Zeckke

Posts: 95
Joined: 8/6/2021
Status: offline

yes there are allys now as always but; before surrender china i took the capital of communist china and destroy one unit but when surrender china after take communist china the HQ Mao change to PENG when surrended the china in the same turn

am afraid they can move outside of his kingdom but am not able to fight them in his kingdom, so if they expand they get more territory safe

(in reply to BillRunacre)

Post #: 3

RE: Comunist china kingdom - 9/17/2021 4:46:51 PM

jackharry

Posts: 27
Joined: 10/21/2016
Status: offline

I had a game where Communist China surrendered and then sometime later China also surrendered. However in one of the cities in the far west of China near the USSR border there was a Communist China HQ that could not be attacked. It was only once Japan declared war on USSR that the Communist China HQ could be destroyed.

(in reply to BillRunacre)

Post #: 4