Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

AI/Scenarios vs PBEM/online

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> AI/Scenarios vs PBEM/online Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
AI/Scenarios vs PBEM/online - 7/16/2001 12:32:00 AM   
Alby


Posts: 4855
Joined: 4/29/2000
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Status: offline 		I was just wondering how many people out there play against the AI exclusively and how many others never play vs the AI. I myself vay rarely play scenarios or play against the AI. how about the rest of you warriors? Just curious, theres always talk about how changing the oobs would screw up the scenarios, just wondering how many people actually play scenarios/campaigns ect ect....

_____________________________
Post #: 1
- 7/16/2001 1:22:00 AM   
Drex

 

Posts: 2524
Joined: 9/13/2000
From: Chico,california
Status: offline 		Whenever I get tired of being beat by my pbem opponents I go play a scenario or campaign to recharge myself. When the AI beats me nobody knows but me. But I prefer pbem by far. I am looking forward to getting my Mega-campaign though.

_____________________________

quote:

Col Saito: "Don't speak to me of rules! This is war! It is not a game of cricket!"

(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 2
- 7/16/2001 1:22:00 AM   
Drex

 

Posts: 2524
Joined: 9/13/2000
From: Chico,california
Status: offline 		Whenever I get tired of being beat by my pbem opponents I go play a scenario or campaign to recharge myself. When the AI beats me nobody knows but me. But I prefer pbem by far. I am looking forward to getting my Mega-campaign though.

_____________________________

quote:

Col Saito: "Don't speak to me of rules! This is war! It is not a game of cricket!"

(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 3
- 7/16/2001 1:32:00 AM   
bchapman


Posts: 302
Joined: 3/30/2000
From: Oklahoma
Status: offline 		90% Pbem, 10% scenerios or campaigns. One good thing about playing the AI is that if you are short on time, it doesn't care how long you take between turns. But it is so much more exciting playing against a human opponent. :)

_____________________________

"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have."<br />- Gerald Ford

(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 4
- 7/16/2001 2:44:00 AM   
Warrior


Posts: 1808
Joined: 11/2/2000
From: West Palm Beach, FL USA
Status: offline 		I played against the AI for about 9 months. When I felt I wouldn't get totally stomped into the ground, I found PBEM opponents. I still get stomped, of course, but at least I have a fighting chance. :D I rarely play the AI anymore unless I'm testing scenarios. [ July 15, 2001: Message edited by: Warrior ]

_____________________________

Retreat is NOT an option.



(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 5
- 7/17/2001 6:17:00 AM   
Alby


Posts: 4855
Joined: 4/29/2000
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Status: offline 		Bumpo

_____________________________



(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 6
- 7/17/2001 6:48:00 AM   
Jack

 

Posts: 309
Joined: 5/25/2000
From: Canada
Status: offline 		Humans it the way to go. Much more challenging. The best part of the game is the ability to play against another opponent. I like the Big battles.

_____________________________


(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 7
- 7/17/2001 7:04:00 AM   
Possum

 

Posts: 349
Joined: 3/27/2000
From: Adelaide, SA, Australia
Status: offline 		Hello all. Well, I'm the oppostite, I play exclusivly vs the computer. My main reason is I dislike playing generic battles. I'm much more of a roleplayer than a wargamer; So I find that playing campaigns is much more interesting/satisfying than a one off battle. I will occasionally play a designed scenario based on a real life battle, Just to see what it's like. (Usually in conjunction with me reading about that battle in a millitary history book.)

_____________________________

"We're having a war, and we want you to come!"
So the pig began to whistle and to pound on a drum.
"We'll give you a gun, and we'll give you a hat!"
And the pig began to whistle when they told the piggies that.

(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 8
- 7/17/2001 10:20:00 AM   
ectizen

 

Posts: 139
Joined: 2/24/2001
From: melbourne, australia
Status: offline 		Exclusively AI, at the moment, for two reasons: 1 - I'm still enough of a novice to find the AI challenging 2 - I can play at my own pace. The AI doesn't mind if it takes me two weeks to complete a turn :)

_____________________________


ectizen's SP:WaW Tools - Map Thing (1.0a), Scenario W

(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 9
- 7/17/2001 12:02:00 PM   
KG Erwin


Posts: 8981
Joined: 7/25/2000
From: Cross Lanes WV USA
Status: offline 		I play exclusively vs the AI, though sometimes it gets tedious when I'm playing the defensive role and simply padding my score. I prefer the convenience of playing at my own pace, plus I enjoy the long campaigns. I can restart it until I get a force mix I'm happy with. The role playing aspect is a part of all this, too. Also, learning the capabilities of the various nationalities is enlightening, in that it gives me some insights that simply reading about the war can't provide. I've always thought that wargames (at least the best ones), teach you about the wars they portray as well as providing an entertaining gaming experience. I still think that the biggest improvement that could be made in SPWaW is to make the AI player able to use historical tactical doctrine for the different armies, but that's another topic.

_____________________________


(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 10
- 7/17/2001 3:34:00 PM   
Krec


Posts: 548
Joined: 3/9/2001
From: SF Bay Area
Status: offline 		I play ip/email/AI/Campaign...........latley ive been looking for scenarios that can be played ip or email vs human . i enjoy a good scenario .. the Prokhorovka one is very good against human.....always looking for a good fight............ ;)

_____________________________

"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country." Patton


(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 11
- 7/18/2001 6:35:00 AM   
Alby


Posts: 4855
Joined: 4/29/2000
From: Greenwood, Indiana
Status: offline 		Hmmm seems playing the AI is winning the poll so far! problem i have playing scenarios vs humans...how many times has the other guy already played it?!, and knows when and where evrything is and happens?? heheh ;)

_____________________________



(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 12
- 7/18/2001 8:16:00 AM   
Alexandra


Posts: 546
Joined: 12/7/2000
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

Originally posted by Alby: Hmmm seems playing the AI is winning the poll so far! problem i have playing scenarios vs humans...how many times has the other guy already played it?!, and knows when and where evrything is and happens?? heheh ;)
Interesting PoV Ably. Of course, the same can be said, in other ways, for random battles :) After all, how many times have we heard about the German players using 'wurfs and ammo dumps' as a baseline tactic. Even I have begun to plan for those when I play against the Germans, and I have a lot less PBeM games than many people. Overall, I think that playing people is better with a random battle, and, for set battles, the AI is better. One, because in that situation both sides are set up plausibly, and also because it's hard to get people to agree to play anything other than random meeting engagement PBeMly. I'd like to see more people using scen's in PBeM play myself. Alex

_____________________________

"Tonight a dynasty is born." Ricky Proehl, then of the Saint Louis Rams. He was right! Go Pats! Winners of Super Bowls 36, 38 and 39.

(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 13
- 7/18/2001 10:35:00 AM   
Joe Osborne

 

Posts: 126
Joined: 3/29/2000
From: Somewhere on a beach
Status: offline 		I can't remember the last time I played the AI....once I found PBEM in 1995 I was hooked. Only because I used to beat the bejeezus out of the AI and once I played another human...different story! Man, I got beat up, kicked around, and then I finally got a draw....Alleuia! :D From then on it was the only way to play. Yeah, it can be a pain in the butt to negotiate PBEM (and it always will...), but the thrill of playing another human is so akin to actual warfare (without the actual blood, gore, etc...). My personal take on this question is not enough players have tried (yeah, grit your teeth and try... :)) playing other humans in PBEM or TCP/IP.....to me the best players of this game are the best PBEM/TCP/IP players...(no, I'm not one of em :)) Anybody can "learn" a computer...but it's a different story when you square off against someone you don't know and cannot predict. Try it you'll like it! :D Joe "Joss" Osborne

_____________________________


(in reply to Alby)
Post #: 14
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns >> AI/Scenarios vs PBEM/online Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.500