RangerJoe
Posts: 13450
Joined: 11/16/2015 From: My Mother, although my Father had some small part. Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Ian R If you hit a carrier, that is already "bottomed" in harbour, and only has a (relatively easily repairable) largely wooden structure above the strength deck, how much more damage is a 500 odd pound bomb going to do? It's obviously going to have some blast/skockwave effect going off under water, but short of fracturing the hull, if the carrier is already burned out, everything above (and lot of stuff below) the armour deck is going to most likely be replaced anyway. Incidentally, the USN even salvaged the Oklahoma (in 1943??), but determined that it wasn't worth repairing it - only because they had more than enough old BBs without it. If, say, the Lexington had been bottomed, you can see it coming back with the permanent list corrected, the 8" swapped for more 5"/38 in EBR mounts, the elevators re-built in more useful deck edge spots, etc. They would probably even re-boiler it and sort out the fuel consumption. I suppose that if your exit plan is to do enough damage to make it all too hard for your opponent to rebuild and come back at you, a little more incremental damage might help, but the exit plan was flawed ab initio. I was referring to what I read as far as the plan was. Either make the aircraft carriers unsalvageable or that much more damage to repair.
_____________________________
Seek peace but keep your gun handy. I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! “Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).” ― Julia Child
|