Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Drachinifel Videos

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Drachinifel Videos Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Drachinifel Videos - 12/16/2021 1:00:52 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline
I'm sure many of you have run into Drachinifel's videos on Youtube, but if you haven't, take a look! I found them only recently. He's a naval historian that dives very deep into technical naval topics; lots of WW2, but not all WW2. Here is a link to one on Interwar Carriers:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_DEHvLvMak

The videos are sometimes long; I often don't have time to devote 90 minutes to the Black Sea U-Boat flotilla, for example, and they can get in the weeds. The production quality is so-so. But the photos are great, and he's very knowledgeable

Am I the only one who didn't know this guy?



_____________________________

Post #: 1
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/16/2021 1:31:27 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Here is another interesting movie...on the Yamoto.

The Great War of Archimedes

It is the early 1930s and the command of the Japanese Imperial Navy determines to construct the world's biggest and most formidable battleship, Yamato. One of the admirals, Yamamoto Isoroku, disagrees. He recruits the upstart and mathematics' expert Tadashi Kai who discovers there are discrepancies between the official cost estimates and the actual figures. They soon find out that they have stumbled upon a conspiracy

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8708802/

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 12/16/2021 1:32:36 PM >

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 2
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/16/2021 1:42:10 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline
Drachinifel's stuff is awesome, information and insight dense! I think it would not be over stating things to refer to him as among the world's most expert on the subjects.

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/16/2021 2:06:56 PM   
mind_messing

 

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Drachinifel's stuff is awesome, information and insight dense! I think it would not be over stating things to refer to him as among the world's most expert on the subjects.


While I'm a regular watcher of Drachinifel's content, I think even he would disagree with this.

IIRC his background and career is in engineering.

In my mind there's a distinction (blurred, but extant nonetheless) between someone exceptionally knowledgeable in the amateur space versus someone who operates in the space in a professional capacity - engaging with the academic element etc. Lots of overlap between the two, but producing a video on YouTube from synthesising existing sources is quite a different space from engaging on a topic in the academic space.

Drachinifel, to my impression seems very salient of this, if you consider his conduct in the excellent settings where he has guest academics on (strong recommendation on the session he has with Jon Parshall on Midway).

Open to challenge on this though, my usual contrarian streak is showing through again.

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 4
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/16/2021 2:21:51 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing


quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Drachinifel's stuff is awesome, information and insight dense! I think it would not be over stating things to refer to him as among the world's most expert on the subjects.


While I'm a regular watcher of Drachinifel's content, I think even he would disagree with this.

IIRC his background and career is in engineering.

In my mind there's a distinction (blurred, but extant nonetheless) between someone exceptionally knowledgeable in the amateur space versus someone who operates in the space in a professional capacity - engaging with the academic element etc. Lots of overlap between the two, but producing a video on YouTube from synthesising existing sources is quite a different space from engaging on a topic in the academic space.

Drachinifel, to my impression seems very salient of this, if you consider his conduct in the excellent settings where he has guest academics on (strong recommendation on the session he has with Jon Parshall on Midway).

Open to challenge on this though, my usual contrarian streak is showing through again.

I suggest that the overall knowledge and insight he provides would exceed that of the vast majority of those with relevant engineering expertise on the subjects. I don't presume to suggest he is an engineer in ship design, or ballistics, or ancient seaborne warfare, etc., etc., but he does synthesize enough knowledge and information across so many areas that I think he would be a good addition to any discussion panel. Quite substantial breadth of knowledge.

_____________________________


(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 5
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/16/2021 2:45:02 PM   
mind_messing

 

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs


quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing


quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Drachinifel's stuff is awesome, information and insight dense! I think it would not be over stating things to refer to him as among the world's most expert on the subjects.


While I'm a regular watcher of Drachinifel's content, I think even he would disagree with this.

IIRC his background and career is in engineering.

In my mind there's a distinction (blurred, but extant nonetheless) between someone exceptionally knowledgeable in the amateur space versus someone who operates in the space in a professional capacity - engaging with the academic element etc. Lots of overlap between the two, but producing a video on YouTube from synthesising existing sources is quite a different space from engaging on a topic in the academic space.

Drachinifel, to my impression seems very salient of this, if you consider his conduct in the excellent settings where he has guest academics on (strong recommendation on the session he has with Jon Parshall on Midway).

Open to challenge on this though, my usual contrarian streak is showing through again.

I suggest that the overall knowledge and insight he provides would exceed that of the vast majority of those with relevant engineering expertise on the subjects. I don't presume to suggest he is an engineer in ship design, or ballistics, or ancient seaborne warfare, etc., etc., but he does synthesize enough knowledge and information across so many areas that I think he would be a good addition to any discussion panel. Quite substantial breadth of knowledge.


I want to say civil engineering, but I feel on thinner ice here.

I agree with you overall, but there's a distinction in my mind between information synthesis versus that of an expert.

That's not to say that one can lead to the other, but a large part of becoming expert in any particular field is knowing what you don't know.

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 6
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/16/2021 2:57:19 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing


quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs


quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing


quote:

ORIGINAL: witpqs

Drachinifel's stuff is awesome, information and insight dense! I think it would not be over stating things to refer to him as among the world's most expert on the subjects.


While I'm a regular watcher of Drachinifel's content, I think even he would disagree with this.

IIRC his background and career is in engineering.

In my mind there's a distinction (blurred, but extant nonetheless) between someone exceptionally knowledgeable in the amateur space versus someone who operates in the space in a professional capacity - engaging with the academic element etc. Lots of overlap between the two, but producing a video on YouTube from synthesising existing sources is quite a different space from engaging on a topic in the academic space.

Drachinifel, to my impression seems very salient of this, if you consider his conduct in the excellent settings where he has guest academics on (strong recommendation on the session he has with Jon Parshall on Midway).

Open to challenge on this though, my usual contrarian streak is showing through again.

I suggest that the overall knowledge and insight he provides would exceed that of the vast majority of those with relevant engineering expertise on the subjects. I don't presume to suggest he is an engineer in ship design, or ballistics, or ancient seaborne warfare, etc., etc., but he does synthesize enough knowledge and information across so many areas that I think he would be a good addition to any discussion panel. Quite substantial breadth of knowledge.


I want to say civil engineering, but I feel on thinner ice here. I'm sure it wouldn't be civil engineering, but I know what you mean. Part of my point is that the relevant engineering is actually plural to the point where few, if any, engineering disciplines would cover what he covers partly because it would entail multiple engineering specialties and partly because it entails other areas of significant knowledge outside of engineering.

I agree with you overall, but there's a distinction in my mind between information synthesis versus that of an expert. In my lexicon the word expert does not only apply to engineers. Historians are not engineers, but are often experts on certain subjects, for example. And even then they do not know all details (nor do most claim to).

That's not to say that one can lead to the other, but a large part of becoming expert in any particular field is knowing what you don't know. Having seen a good deal of Drach's work: he is quite respectful of what he doesn't know and the varying degrees of certainty of what he does say. The latter, I think, is a very good sign.



_____________________________


(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 7
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/16/2021 3:23:40 PM   
mind_messing

 

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline
quote:

I'm sure it wouldn't be civil engineering, but I know what you mean. Part of my point is that the relevant engineering is actually plural to the point where few, if any, engineering disciplines would cover what he covers partly because it would entail multiple engineering specialties and partly because it entails other areas of significant knowledge outside of engineering.


Exactly, and I think when you're covering a topic this vast, you're well in to the social sciences (as has been touched on in some of his content).

quote:

In my lexicon the word expert does not only apply to engineers. Historians are not engineers, but are often experts on certain subjects, for example. And even then they do not know all details (nor do most claim to).


My thinking was more along the lines of the weight and presentation of what you produce differs.

Take, for example, the recent biography on Admiral Lee. If that was presented as an expert opinion in a suitable format (as say journal publication or published book), there may well be some scope for critique as being slightly hagiographic in nature. The expected standards are for something quite detached and clinical.

Positioned as something from an "interested, well-informed amateur" then there's a different set of standards.

quote:

Having seen a good deal of Drach's work: he is quite respectful of what he doesn't know and the varying degrees of certainty of what he does say. The latter, I think, is a very good sign.


Yes, absolutely agree here. A large part of why I enjoy the content from that channel is that there's a willingness to clarify sources and qualified and unqualified views.


That said, I do have a bee in my bonnet over a response he gave on a recent question regarding the lifeboats on the Titanic, to the effect that a sufficient number of lifeboats would have avoided the tragedy altogether.

A sufficient number of lifeboats installed on the double davits would not have prevented the tragedy. The limiting factor was not actually the number of lifeboats, but the time and human resource (which was being depleted constantly be the need to provide boat crew) required to launch them before the ship sank (indeed, two of the collapsible boats were not able to be launched at all, and it was cutting it close with the wooden hulled boats as hastily loaded as they had been).

Now, that's a real niche topic in the grand scheme, but it did send a little sand in my gears.

I think that's the core of my issue, actually - when you produce content and look to provide commentary on such varied topics, there's evidently gaps in knowledge, hence my aversion to the "expert" tag. I suppose it's the same with your popular science communicators vis a vis a working physicist and CERN.

Totally agree on the addition to any discussion panel, as often it's that wider but less deep perspective that can be the most interesting.

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 8
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/16/2021 4:19:32 PM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mind_messing

Totally agree on the addition to any discussion panel, as often it's that wider but less deep perspective that can be the most interesting.

Also can stimulate perspectives from the deeper-narrower panelists which they might not have considered.

_____________________________


(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 9
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/16/2021 7:21:54 PM   
Voltreffer


Posts: 32
Joined: 2/13/2020
From: Los Angeles
Status: offline
This thread inspired me to share content creators (including Drach) who complement AE:
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=5117038

I would have done it here, but I didn't want to derail the discussion by adding so many other channels into the mix.

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 10
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/16/2021 8:04:27 PM   
Erik Rutins

 

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball
I'm sure many of you have run into Drachinifel's videos on Youtube, but if you haven't, take a look! I found them only recently. He's a naval historian that dives very deep into technical naval topics; lots of WW2, but not all WW2. Here is a link to one on Interwar Carriers:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_DEHvLvMak

The videos are sometimes long; I often don't have time to devote 90 minutes to the Black Sea U-Boat flotilla, for example, and they can get in the weeds. The production quality is so-so. But the photos are great, and he's very knowledgeable

Am I the only one who didn't know this guy?


I love that channel, glad you all have found him too.


_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC




For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 11
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/16/2021 9:46:43 PM   
Maallon


Posts: 196
Joined: 12/27/2020
From: Germany
Status: offline
Just to clarify:
1) I am fairly sure that he mentioned in one of his streams that he works as Civil Engineer.

2) As far as I know, he is a hobby historian much like a lot of us are and doesn't do this professionally.
Though he has a strong background in engineering, reads a lot of books about history and is knowledgeable about scientific methods.
So what he basically does is to pick a topic and research the topic through reading books or other relevant sources and then make a video about it.

Given his vast knowledge about the subject I would also consider him an expert on the broad topic of naval warfare and naval engineering.
But I would also agree with mind_messing that what he mainly does is information synthesis on a "interested, well-informed amateur" level, though I would place him on a very high tier on that level.


After all that said: I also enjoy watching his videos a lot, he is one of my favorite youtubers and I can very much recommend his videos to anyone who is interested in naval stuff.

(in reply to Erik Rutins)
Post #: 12
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/17/2021 1:19:06 AM   
witpqs


Posts: 26087
Joined: 10/4/2004
From: Argleton
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Maallon

Just to clarify:
1) I am fairly sure that he mentioned in one of his streams that he works as Civil Engineer.
I may have misunderstood what mind_messing meant about that. I thought he was searching for the name of the engineering specialty that would deal with ships and such.

2) As far as I know, he is a hobby historian much like a lot of us are and doesn't do this professionally.
Though he has a strong background in engineering, reads a lot of books about history and is knowledgeable about scientific methods.
So what he basically does is to pick a topic and research the topic through reading books or other relevant sources and then make a video about it.

Given his vast knowledge about the subject I would also consider him an expert on the broad topic of naval warfare and naval engineering.
But I would also agree with mind_messing that what he mainly does is information synthesis on a "interested, well-informed amateur" level, though I would place him on a very high tier on that level.


After all that said: I also enjoy watching his videos a lot, he is one of my favorite youtubers and I can very much recommend his videos to anyone who is interested in naval stuff.



_____________________________


(in reply to Maallon)
Post #: 13
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/17/2021 3:56:24 AM   
Ian R

 

Posts: 3420
Joined: 8/1/2000
From: Cammeraygal Country
Status: offline
If Drach had merchandising, I'd buy a T-shirt.

The long dry-docks are excellent listening (and maybe some still photos to view) on long hot summer nights when you can't sleep.

His video on the armoured carrier v open hanger carrier debate was informative, and amusing. The point about needing to strike all aircraft below deck in Atlantic weather is often lost in less detailed appreciations.

_____________________________

"I am Alfred"

(in reply to witpqs)
Post #: 14
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/17/2021 9:24:38 AM   
LargeSlowTarget


Posts: 4443
Joined: 9/23/2000
From: Hessen, Germany - now living in France
Status: offline
Whatever Drach's background and expert or hobby historian level, his videos are fun to listen to just for the glorious dry British humo(u)r!

_____________________________


(in reply to Ian R)
Post #: 15
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/17/2021 3:27:24 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Ian R

His video on the armoured carrier v open hanger carrier debate was informative, and amusing. The point about needing to strike all aircraft below deck in Atlantic weather is often lost in less detailed appreciations.


Yes, he made excellent points on the Armored Deck vs. Larger Hanger debate. Everyone tries to declare a victor, that one is clearly better than the other.

The reality is that an Armored Deck is a better fit in Europe, where the RN's opponent was going to be land-based air. Survivability was key, and in fact on a couple occasions RN CVs took damage from LBA that likely would've sunk a USN CV.

The enclosed, armored hanger box on RN CVs also makes sense in the rough weather of the North Sea and other climates. The RN also did not incorporate deck parks into it's doctrine because in the North Sea planes parked on deck might end up overboard. All of these factors meant smaller airgroups.

In the calmer waters of the Pacific, though, deck parks make sense, and because the opponent was likely to be another CV, it makes sense to pack maximum strike power on the ship.

In the end, both the the USN and RN adopted a hybrid; armoerd flight decks, but with open hangers that USN favored, so that burning stuff could be pushed overboard easily.

He did universally praise USN damage control training and doctrine, which was the gold standard

< Message edited by Q-Ball -- 12/17/2021 3:28:42 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Ian R)
Post #: 16
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/17/2021 4:06:33 PM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget

Whatever Drach's background and expert or hobby historian level, his videos are fun to listen to just for the glorious dry British humo(u)r!
warspite1

Indeed, I really enjoy his work without getting hot and bothered about his background or his amateur/professional status.




_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to LargeSlowTarget)
Post #: 17
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/17/2021 10:44:23 PM   
Ian R

 

Posts: 3420
Joined: 8/1/2000
From: Cammeraygal Country
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ian R

His video on the armoured carrier v open hanger carrier debate was informative, and amusing. The point about needing to strike all aircraft below deck in Atlantic weather is often lost in less detailed appreciations.


Yes, he made excellent points on the Armored Deck vs. Larger Hanger debate. Everyone tries to declare a victor, that one is clearly better than the other.

The reality is that an Armored Deck is a better fit in Europe, where the RN's opponent was going to be land-based air. Survivability was key, and in fact on a couple occasions RN CVs took damage from LBA that likely would've sunk a USN CV.

The enclosed, armored hanger box on RN CVs also makes sense in the rough weather of the North Sea and other climates. The RN also did not incorporate deck parks into it's doctrine because in the North Sea planes parked on deck might end up overboard. All of these factors meant smaller airgroups.

In the calmer waters of the Pacific, though, deck parks make sense, and because the opponent was likely to be another CV, it makes sense to pack maximum strike power on the ship.

In the end, both the the USN and RN adopted a hybrid; armoerd flight decks, but with open hangers that USN favored, so that burning stuff could be pushed overboard easily.

He did universally praise USN damage control training and doctrine, which was the gold standard


I'm trying to remember if it was Drach, or the Clarke/Armoured carriers co-production (probably both) that pointed out that the Ark Royal was intended for the Pacific, but then Germany re-armed. The Illustrious design was completed before radar was invented, at at time when it wouldn't matter how many fighters you had, they were unlikely to climb to altitude and see off a determined dive bombing attack that appeared overhead with little warning (think Midway). So the RN intended to rely on armour, and armoured the design against the standard bomb of the time...

By the time the war came, radar was available, the RN developed the CIC, aircraft technology had jumped two generations, and the standard bomb had doubled in size. At that point the RN's problem was poorly performing aircraft in too few numbers - but the reliable old Swordfish showed what could be done. Once the USN worked out how to enlarge the flight deck on the "USS Robin" to take a deck park aboard, the armoured carriers working in a group became a useful asset in the Pacific as well.

As you say, convergent evolution eventually results in the Midways, and the unbuilt Malta design.

_____________________________

"I am Alfred"

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 18
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/18/2021 3:39:52 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
Shouldn't that be USS Sir Robin?

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Ian R)
Post #: 19
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/18/2021 9:35:17 AM   
Ian R

 

Posts: 3420
Joined: 8/1/2000
From: Cammeraygal Country
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

Shouldn't that be USS Sir Robin?


Not in 1943 when they took her in hand in ?? San Diego, and said, you know if we add some girders and sheet metal here and here and here, and straighten out the round downs, we can park about 20 extra aircraft on this real estate and make a useful carrier out of it.



_____________________________

"I am Alfred"

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 20
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/18/2021 11:11:19 PM   
Andy Mac

 

Posts: 15222
Joined: 5/12/2004
From: Alexandria, Scotland
Status: offline
I am an addict of Drachinfel's channel

He actually sank me in World Of Warships game !!!

(in reply to Ian R)
Post #: 21
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/19/2021 12:35:05 AM   
Ian R

 

Posts: 3420
Joined: 8/1/2000
From: Cammeraygal Country
Status: offline
Have you tried that "iron brew" stuff?

_____________________________

"I am Alfred"

(in reply to Andy Mac)
Post #: 22
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/19/2021 12:41:15 AM   
tolsdorff

 

Posts: 204
Joined: 12/12/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget

Whatever Drach's background and expert or hobby historian level, his videos are fun to listen to just for the glorious dry British humo(u)r!
warspite1

Indeed, I really enjoy his work without getting hot and bothered about his background or his amateur/professional status.






Here is theChieftain interviewing Drachinifel. The guy talks about his background. Nice to put a face to the excellent videos

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 23
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/19/2021 3:58:04 AM   
mind_messing

 

Posts: 3393
Joined: 10/28/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: LargeSlowTarget

Whatever Drach's background and expert or hobby historian level, his videos are fun to listen to just for the glorious dry British humo(u)r!
warspite1

Indeed, I really enjoy his work without getting hot and bothered about his background or his amateur/professional status.



You'll change your tune in short order if he makes a mistake with the number of 15 inch shells fired by Warspite on Nov 1st 1944!

On a more serious note, it's prudent to be circumspect with YouTube content. There's massive variability in terms of the quality of content, and the way the YouTube algorithm works often doesn't lead to accurate content being the most visible, amongst other things.

(in reply to warspite1)
Post #: 24
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/19/2021 1:03:06 PM   
LeeChard

 

Posts: 1099
Joined: 9/12/2007
From: Michigan
Status: offline
A huge Drach fan here

(in reply to mind_messing)
Post #: 25
RE: Drachinifel Videos - 12/20/2021 6:46:17 AM   
Tanaka


Posts: 4378
Joined: 4/8/2003
From: USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Andy Mac

I am an addict of Drachinfel's channel

He actually sank me in World Of Warships game !!!




_____________________________


(in reply to Andy Mac)
Post #: 26
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> Drachinifel Videos Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.187