boogabooga
Posts: 457
Joined: 7/18/2018 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Randomizer Except that there are several examples (see Blair's Silent Service) of WW2 Fleet Boats running for prolonged stretches at "Four-Engine Speed", presumably flank, ~20 knots and yet no mention of flat batteries at the end of the run. In fact, long surface runs at fleet speed, 21-knots, was a design requirement for the fleet boats before the War. If it is the case than did this characteristic extend to the GUPPY conversions? Anecdotally I questioned a friend who served as a stoker on the GUPPY HMCS Rainbow and as he recalls, once the batteries were fully charged, the boat could run at full speed for days, as long as the diesel fuel held out. He did mention that on high-speed runs they would run the fifth, small "donkey" engine a couple of hours a day just to keep the batteries fully charged. The battery drain at speed also happens with the German Type VII, IX and XXI boats in the CWDB and yet these all had the diesels drive the prop shafts directly and so one would think capable of maximum speed without affecting the battery charge. It seems probable that the Soviet Type XXI derivatives also used direct drives at least as far as the Foxtrots if the anecdotes in Peter Hutchhausen's October Fury are to be believed. I suspect that the battery characteristic in CMO may be more a function of modern boats, which are not intended to operate on the surface for long transits at all. I suspect that there is wiggle room to finesse this aspect of the CMO diesel-electric submarine modelling and am not sure that propulsion differentiation would be worth the actual developmental efforts necessary to change the current situation. It may be as simple as adding a drain-batteries yes/no flag to the DB's but then everything becomes simple if you don't actually have to do it. Certainly scenarios like The Enemy Below from the Silent Service DLC become easier if the Player's boat can run at speed on the surface. -C Just going to drop this here for the fleet boats, but if you have an engine hooked up to a DC generator, then you theoretically SHOULD have the capability to run the electric motor 'directly' off of that current OR use that current to charge the batteries (or some combination of both). I consider the direct drive shaft argument to be a red herring; that saft is not a requirement for-let's say- propulsion without using batteries. That seems to be the fleet boat approach: https://usscod.org/forwardengine.html I get that "modern" DE submarines usually have relatively anemic diesel engines relative to what the electric motor is capable of putting out, but one could think of more general/flexible CMO modeling approaches, for those of us that spend most of our time in the CWDB. ;)
|