March Mode too prohibitive?

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

March Mode too prohibitive?

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Decisive Campaigns: Ardennes Offensive >> March Mode too prohibitive?

Page: [1]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

March Mode too prohibitive? - 12/31/2021 11:35:08 PM

FelixCulpa

Posts: 110
Joined: 8/17/2015
Status: offline

Most of us appreciate the road situation in the Ardennes Offensive and it is an important factor to implement in a game of this battle. But is March Mode as implemented at the moment too prohibitive in the game?

. Movement action point cost is halved, but only on roads.
. Readiness cost for movement is doubled.
. Traffic footprint of movement is doubled.
. If a unit finds itself under fire it suffers serious penalties. See the
combat section.
. If a unit finds itself under fire it will switch to combat move
mode automatically.

It seems to me that most movement in the battle was by march mode, i.e., following the roads, particularly through the forests - where the actual difference between march and combat mode would be minimal due to lack of maneuvering room. Yet the game makes march mode so prohibitive most German player's would wonder why bother using this mode? Which in turn degrades the utility of ambush for the Americans.

I think the balance is not quite right here. The German player should be encouraged to use march mode as speed is a major consideration for this player. Perhaps through forests, march mode only.

Perhaps I have missed some detail in the rules that makes march mode viable and would be keen to hear your ideas on this subject.

thx

Post #: 1

RE: March Mode too prohibitive? - 1/1/2022 9:26:23 AM

billios65

Posts: 147
Joined: 1/15/2010
Status: offline

I agree, this mechanism needs refining. Like you say, most movement through dense forest was confined to roads as speed was essential for success of this operation. Perhaps the use of roads in game should be only possible when in march mode.

(in reply to FelixCulpa)

Post #: 2

RE: March Mode too prohibitive? - 1/1/2022 3:22:52 PM

Jagger2002

Posts: 674
Joined: 5/20/2002
Status: offline

Are you using the beta patch? There has been significant tweaking to the march mode. I personally think the march mode version within the patch is good.

(in reply to billios65)

Post #: 3

RE: March Mode too prohibitive? - 1/1/2022 9:53:04 PM

billios65

Posts: 147
Joined: 1/15/2010
Status: offline

I will load the Beta patch tomorrow thanks.

(in reply to Jagger2002)

Post #: 4

RE: March Mode too prohibitive? - 1/2/2022 1:20:32 AM

FelixCulpa

Posts: 110
Joined: 8/17/2015
Status: offline

I do have the latest beta patch.

When you consider the effect of Intercept Fire and Ambush plus the Road Damage penalty on March Mode it makes it a no-brainer for the German player to assess this feature as a non-starter. It seems so prohibitive I think it has been designed this way to be ineffective for the German player. Maybe as the American player it is useful to mimic the Red Ball Express in the large scenario.

(in reply to billios65)

Post #: 5

RE: March Mode too prohibitive? - 1/2/2022 1:42:45 AM

Jagger2002

Posts: 674
Joined: 5/20/2002
Status: offline

I use march mode only in secure rear areas. If I feel there is even a chance of artillery hitting the column, I get out of march mode. Of course, you never know when you are going to run into a Grief team or some recently dropped paratroopers and that can be a mess.

(in reply to FelixCulpa)

Post #: 6

RE: March Mode too prohibitive? - 1/9/2022 2:57:12 PM

FlyingEagle

Posts: 18
Joined: 12/28/2014
Status: offline

I see it completely different. At least for the German side. There is a main reason to use march mode for movement to and behind the frontline: It saves those precious fuel reserves!

Of course in some smaller scenarios that doesn't really matters.

(in reply to Jagger2002)

Post #: 7