Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? Page: <<   < prev  243 244 245 [246] 247   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/14/2022 11:02:25 AM   
dadizonline


Posts: 45
Joined: 7/30/2020
Status: offline
<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Prithvi Defence Vehicle (PDV) Exoatmospheric Anti-ballistic missile </summary>
<detail>
Specifications
Detonation mechanism: Hit-to-kill interception
Engine Two stage rocket motor
Propellant Solid fuel
Operational range 5,000 km (3,100 mi)
Flight altitude 180 km (110 mi)>
Guidance system:
Mid-course: Ring laser gyro based inertial navigation system and redundant micro navigation system,
Terminal: Imaging infrared homing
</detail>
<evidence>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Ballistic_Missile_Defence_Programme
https://thediplomat.com/2017/02/india-successfully-tests-prithvi-defense-vehicle-a-new-missile-killer-system/
https://www.strategicfront.org/forums/threads/indian-ballistic-missile-defence-programme-updates-and-discussions.616/
https://www.army-technology.com/projects/drdo-bmd/
https://theprint.in/defence/indias-ballistic-missile-shield-ready-iaf-drdo-to-seek-govt-nod-to-protect-delhi/345853/
</evidence>

(in reply to dadizonline)
Post #: 7351
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/14/2022 11:07:30 AM   
dadizonline


Posts: 45
Joined: 7/30/2020
Status: offline
<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Prithvi Defence Vehicle Mark 2 (ASAT: Anti Satellite Missile) </summary>
<detail>
Specifications
Mass 18.87 t
Length 13.2 metres (43 ft)
Diameter 1.4 metres (4.6 ft)
Detonation mechanism: Hit-to-kill interception
Engine Two-stage rocket motor with third stage kinetic kill vehicle
Propellant: Solid fuel
Flight altitude: 1,200 km (750 mi)>
Guidance system: Mid-course: Ring laser gyro-based inertial navigation system and redundant micro navigation system,
Terminal: Imaging infrared homing
Accuracy >10 cm
Transport Transporter erector launcher (TEL) system
</detail>
<evidence>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Ballistic_Missile_Defence_Programme
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mission_Shakti
https://delhidefencereview.com/2019/04/03/all-you-need-to-know-about-the-pdv-mk-ii-indias-satellite-killer/
https://www.drdo.gov.in/mission-shakti
https://theprint.in/defence/india-has-no-plans-for-another-anti-satellite-missile-test-but-will-improve-tech/330831/
</evidence>

(in reply to dadizonline)
Post #: 7352
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/14/2022 11:13:42 AM   
dadizonline


Posts: 45
Joined: 7/30/2020
Status: offline
<type>ADD</type>
<summary>INS Dhruv (Ocean surveillance and missile tracking ship) </summary>
<detail>
General characteristics
Type Ocean surveillance and missile tracking ship
Displacement 15,000 t (15,000 long tons; 17,000 short tons)
Length 175 m (574 ft)
Beam 22 m (72 ft)
Draught 6 m (20 ft)
Propulsion
2 × diesel engines in CODAD, 9,000 kW (12,000 hp) each
3 × auxiliary generators 1,200 kW (1,600 hp) each
Total 15 MW power
Speed: 21 kn (39 km/h; 24 mph)
Complement: 300
Sensors and processing systems
X-Band AESA Radar
S-Band AESA Radar
Aircraft carried: 1 × Medium helicopter (Sea King, Kamov-27, MH-60)
</detail>
<evidence>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INS_Dhruv
https://www.wionews.com/india-news/ins-dhruv-india-all-set-to-launch-nuclear-missile-tracking-ship-412139
https://navalpost.com/india-commissions-ins-dhruv/
https://www.marineinsight.com/shipping-news/india-to-introduce-its-first-nuclear-missile-tracking-ship-ins-dhruv/
</evidence>

(in reply to dadizonline)
Post #: 7353
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/14/2022 11:23:34 AM   
dadizonline


Posts: 45
Joined: 7/30/2020
Status: offline
<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Arudhra (MEDIUM POWER AESA RADAR (MPR)) </summary>
<detail>
MPR indigenous rotating active phased array multifunction 4D radar capable of automatic detection and
tracking of aerial targets ranging from fighter aircrafts to slow moving targets. The system has an
instrumented range of 400 Km and is able to detect 2sqm RCS targets as far as 300 Km in range with the
altitude coverage from 100 meters to 30 Kms. The radar operates either in Staring or Rotation Mode. In
rotation mode, the antenna rotates at 7.5 / 15 rpm with surveillance coverage of 360o
in azimuth and 30o
in
elevation. In staring mode of operation, the antenna stares in specified azimuth with surveillance coverage
of ±60 o
in azimuth and 30 o
in elevation. The Radar is based on a solid-state active aperture phased array
with Digital Beam Forming and has electronic scanning capability in both azimuth and elevation. The
coverage is attained using wide transmit beam and multiple receive beams in both azimuth and elevation.

The following are the technologies established as part of ARUDHRA radar and it has spin-off for all future
similar class of radar projects of LRDE
• Rotating Active Phased Array
• Time synchronization of multiple receivers
• 2D Digital Beam-forming
• DBF based active array calibration
• Multi-Beam processing
• Critical real-time software and firmware
• Independently rotating IFF radar.
• Mechanical Packaging (Engineering, Thermal, etc.,)

</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.drdo.gov.in/sites/default/files/inline-files/mpr.pdf
http://fullafterburner.weebly.com/next-gen-weapons/drdobel-arudhra-medium-power-radar-the-sacred-wave
https://twitter.com/KesariDhwaj/status/1341768631462477824?s=20
https://www.mod.gov.in/sites/default/files/MoDAR2018.pdf (Page 53)
</evidence>

(in reply to dadizonline)
Post #: 7354
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/15/2022 2:26:45 PM   
Blast33


Posts: 404
Joined: 12/31/2018
From: Above and beyond
Status: offline
<type>UPDATE</type>
<summary>Please update Israeli HAWK SAM phase-2 and 3 TV sensor range and max alt engagement range of the missiles </summary>
<detail>
Phase 2 HPIs had an optical tracking system added for operation in an ECM environment. This device, called the Tracking Adjunct System (TAS), was positioned on top and between the two radar dishes.

The Israelis have upgraded the Phase 2 standard with the addition of a Super Eye electro-optical TV system (DB sensor #503) for detection of aircraft at 30 to 40 km and identification at 17 to 25 km. They have also modified their system for engagements at altitudes up to 24,000 m

At present, for example an Alpha Jet, is sometimes detected only at 17 km, but more often when it is flying above the SAM site.. And not by the Super Eye sensor but the MK1 Eyeball.. This was tested at altitudes of FL360 and FL120.

Next to the TV sensor range, the missile max engagement altitude is presently set at FL580, but can be adjusted to max FL787 (24.000m)
(so it will be able to engage a Syrian MiG-25 at FL60 )
</detail>
<evidence>
https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/776038
https://www.seniorennet.be/forum/viewtopic.php?p=2341767&sid=80aaf6cf319d9ec5008593949234342b
</evidence>




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Blast33 -- 1/15/2022 2:30:12 PM >

(in reply to dadizonline)
Post #: 7355
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/15/2022 7:30:49 PM   
WillpowerDisturbance

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 1/15/2022
Status: offline
<type>Update</type>
<summary>Please update all M270 PrSM to include two (2) missiles per launch cell </summary>
<detail>PrSM missiles are smaller than ATACMS which allows for two missiles per cell instead of one. The DB currently has the M270 only containing two PrSM missiles instead of four as it should. </detail>
<evidence>
Lockheed Martin website
</evidence>

(in reply to Blast33)
Post #: 7356
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/16/2022 10:11:54 AM   
TempestII


Posts: 42
Joined: 10/10/2020
Status: offline
<type>UPDATE</type>
<summary>Please add AIM-120D to RAAF F-35As, F/A-18Fs and EA-18Gs</summary>
<detail>Australia is slated to purchase 450 AIM-120D advanced medium-range air-to-air missiles (AMRAAMs) following an April 25 (2016) approval by the U.S. Department of State...This proposed sale is in support of the Royal Australian Air Force’s (RAAF) F/A-18, E/A-18G, and F-35 aircraft. This proposed sale will provide the RAAF additional air-to-air intercept capability and increase interoperability with the U.S. Air Force. Australia will have no difficulty absorbing these missiles into its armed forces.</detail>
<evidence>
https://thediplomat.com/2016/04/australia-to-buy-450-advanced-us-made-air-to-air-missiles/
https://www.flightglobal.com/australia-seeks-dods-newest-air-to-air-missile-the-aim-120d/120383.article
</evidence>

(in reply to Dide)
Post #: 7357
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/16/2022 10:17:28 AM   
TempestII


Posts: 42
Joined: 10/10/2020
Status: offline
<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Please add hypothetical / possible RAF F-35A</summary>
<detail>It is possible that the UK could turn some its F-35B order into the cheaper F-35A model. Loadouts would be identical to the F-35B, minus the gunpods.</detail>

(in reply to TempestII)
Post #: 7358
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/17/2022 2:25:24 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline
<type>Add</type>
<summary>Add Pakistani 271 Yarmook[Damen OPV 1900] 2021 </summary>
<detail>Pakistan took deliver of 2 Damen 1900 OPV starting in 2020. 271 Yarmook and 272 Tabuk. 1 medium Helo/UAV pad and 2 RHIB. Aft Phalanx Mk 15 CIWS likely off the retired Amazons. Radar seems to be civ nav radars, Aselan ALPER LPI Radar, EW and EO/IR likely Turkish as well. Deck gun not installed yet. Doesn't look like chaff and flare launchers either.</detail>
<evidence>
https://twitter.com/CavasShips/status/1459030422164287490/photo/1
https://twitter.com/YorukIsik/status/1234133093872754688/photo/1
https://twitter.com/US5thFleet/status/1459060986434965505/photo/2
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/pakistan-navy-inducts-first-yarmook-class-corvette
https://www.aselsan.com.tr/en/capabilities/radar-systems/reconnaissance-surveillance-radars/alper-naval-lpi-radar
https://quwa.org/2020/05/27/pakistan-navy-ships-yarmook-class-corvette/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yarmook-class_corvette
</evidence>

_____________________________

Don't call it a comeback...

(in reply to TempestII)
Post #: 7359
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/18/2022 6:01:59 AM   
dadizonline


Posts: 45
Joined: 7/30/2020
Status: offline
<type>ADD</type>
<summary> 1st S-400 regiment (2022), 2nd to 5th by 2023-24 </summary>
<detail>
1. During the BRICS Summit, India and Russia signed an Inter-governmental Agreement (IGA) for the supply of five S-400 regiments.
2. Russia starts supplying S-400 air defense systems to India:

S-400 India Thread..
Deal Cost: $5.4 bn, 5 Regiments
1 Full scale Regiment= 4 battalion
1 Battalion= 9 launcher + 120 missile (mix of 380 km(40N6E missile) 250 km (48N6) 120 km (9M96E2) 40 km(9M96E) + 1 command post
So, 5 full scale Regiments: 4100 + Missile(RTF + reloads + spare)
</detail>
<evidence>
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/russia-preparing-to-supply-s-400-missile-systems-to-india-dmitry-rogozin/articleshow/58959022.cms (1)
https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1558148 (1)
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/87694995.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst (2)
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/russia-begins-s-400-deliveries-to-india (2)
https://armstrade.sipri.org/armstrade/page/trade_register.php
</evidence>

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 7360
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/18/2022 9:09:54 PM   
CV60


Posts: 992
Joined: 10/1/2012
Status: offline
<type>Correction to Submarine_287 and _319 Whiskey V</type>
<summary> Max depth is given as -170m. This was the operating depth, with max depth at -200m </summary>
<detail>
<Evidence>Polmar, Norman, and Kenneth J. Moore. Cold War Submarines: The Design and Construction of U.S. and Soviet Submarines. Lincoln: Potomac Books, 2004, page 26






Attachment (1)

(in reply to dadizonline)
Post #: 7361
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/19/2022 6:40:03 AM   
dadizonline


Posts: 45
Joined: 7/30/2020
Status: offline
<type>UPDATE</type>
<summary>Please update range of Brahmos </summary>
<detail>Range limitation by software during early 2016 but in mid 2016 india joined MTCR and limitation was removed range increased to 450km (242nm) production variants are 500km+ nowadays and 1500km range version in development export version to non-MTCR nations are 290km range capable
also in db489 two versions of Su-30MKI can fire brahmos-A (400km+ range since testing and production) but only land attack variant, please include ASM version</detail>
<evidence>
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/upgraded-brahmos-with-500-km-range-ready-ceo-of-brahmos-aerospace/articleshow/70117273.cms
https://missilethreat.csis.org/missile/brahmos/
https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/brahmos-outreach/
https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=173744 (Brahmos-A official press release by government site)
</evidence>

(in reply to CV60)
Post #: 7362
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/19/2022 7:56:35 AM   
dadizonline


Posts: 45
Joined: 7/30/2020
Status: offline
<type>UPDATE</type>
<summary>Please update range of Barak 8</summary>
<detail>1. Range limitation to 70km in initial version increased to 100km in 2015 on existing missiles (maybe some modifications)
2. Barak-8 ER (150km range, 30km in climb) also ABM capable (Speculated users P-15B (Visakhapatnam class), P-17A (Nilgiri class)
</detail>
<evidence>
https://web.archive.org/web/20160123044942/http://www.janes.com/article/54950/india-commissions-second-kolkata-class-destroyer
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Gen-Next-missile-defence-shield-built-by-Israel-and-India-clears-first-hurdle/articleshow/49955127.cms?from=mdr
https://www.iai.co.il/p/barak-er
</evidence>

(in reply to dadizonline)
Post #: 7363
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/19/2022 12:53:20 PM   
tylerblakebrandon

 

Posts: 173
Joined: 5/11/2020
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gratch1111

<type>ADD</type>
<summary>Ta Chiang, Taiwanese Catamaran Corvette</summary>
<detail>
AAW version of Tuo Chiang Corvette with ASW torpedoes removed and 16xTC-2N added.
11 ships planned first one commisioned 2021
</detail>
<evidence>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuo_Chiang-class_corvette
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2021/09/taiwan-commissions-first-upgraded-catamaran-corvette-ta-chiang-%E5%A1%94%E6%B1%9F/
https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2021/05/taiwans-first-upgraded-and-modified-catamaran-corvette-started-sea-trial/
https://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/naval-news/naval-news-archive/2021/december/11085-taiwanese-corvette-ta-chiang-fires-sea-sword-ii-missile.html
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/taiwanese-navy-receives-first-improved-tuo-chiang-class-corvette
https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2021/09/10/2003764120
</evidence>



Might want to make this a modify as Ta Chiang was added for (I think) dbv491 but it still has torps in the db.

https://cmano-db.com/ship/3441/

(in reply to Gratch1111)
Post #: 7364
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/20/2022 4:32:34 AM   
Slitherdude2120

 

Posts: 1
Joined: 5/28/2021
Status: offline
<type>Update</type>
<summary>New loadouts, and HMD ability to all three F-14E Tomcat variants</summary>
<detail> Since 2005, U.S. Navy F/A-18 Hornets (Both legacy and "Superhornet" versions), have had the JHMCS system available to use.
As such, if the Navy decided to keep the ST-21/AST-21/"Quickstrike" Tomcats around for as long as the Hornets have been around,
then it would be reasonable to assume that F-14E's would also gain the same capability.

-Add a HMD ability to the "properties" section of all three F-14E variants since 2005.

The newest entries of the F-14E's in the database (Current version: DB3000 v491), also lack the following weapons:
--GBU-134 and GBU-136 "Superfrag" munitions (Only applies to the year 2020 and beyond).
--GBU-56(V)2/B and GBU-56(V)4/B LJDAMS
--AIM-9X-2 Sidewinder Blk II and Blk III (Only applies to the year 2020 and beyond).
--AIM-260 JATM (Only applies to the year 2020 and beyond).
--AGM-88E AARGM-ER (Only applies to the year 2020 and beyond).
--AGM-154 JSOW-ER (Only applies to the year 2020 and beyond).

Reasoning for adding these weapons are relatively reasonable, being that if the weapons are already used by U.S. Hornet platforms,
then there would be no major reason why they wouldn't be able to be used on the F-14E variants; since most, if not all of the weapons listed are in similar size and weight to weapons that are already included for the F-14E's by default.
So there would be no reason why there would be physical restrictions. At most, the weapons would probably require software-based upgrades in order to be compatible. The F-14E's are also hypothetical platforms in the first place, which gives even more room to take liberties.

Potential loadout's for the F-14E's(Meant as examples):
--4-8x 500lbs bombs (GBU-134 JDAM), 2x AIM-9X (Blk II/Blk III), 2x BVR missiles (AIM-260 or AIM-120D), external fuel tanks, Targeting Pod
--4x 1000lbs GBU-136 or GBU-56 JDAMS, 2x AIM-9X (Blk II/Blk III), 2x BVR missiles (AIM-260 or AIM-120D), external fuel tanks, Targeting Pod
--6-8x AIM-260 JATM, 2-4x AIM-9X (Blk II/Blk III), external fuel tanks, Targeting Pod
--4-6x AGM-88E AARGM-ER, 2x AIM-9X (Blk II/Blk III), 2x BVR missiles (AIM-260 or AIM-120D), external fuel tanks, Targeting Pod
--4x AGM-154 JSOW-ER, 2x AIM-9X (Blk II/Blk III), 2x BVR missiles (AIM-260 or AIM-120D), external fuel tanks, Targeting Pod
</detail>

<evidence></evidence>



_____________________________


(in reply to tylerblakebrandon)
Post #: 7365
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/20/2022 8:28:20 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline
<type>Add</type>
<summary>Add Italian D 570 Impavido x2 (1962-1992)</summary>
<detail>Italy retained these ships until 1991. A version exists in CWDB #1924 which can be copied over. Add SCLAR ODLS launcher (chaff and flares) and 650 tons of oil fuel Jane's FS 88-89</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.seaforces.org/marint/Italian-Navy/Destroyer/Impavido-class.htm
https://i.redd.it/0g6op5wy1fc81.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impavido-class_destroyer
Jane's fighting ships 88-89 p.290
</evidence>

_____________________________

Don't call it a comeback...

(in reply to Slitherdude2120)
Post #: 7366
RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? - 1/20/2022 11:57:02 PM   
FifthDomain

 

Posts: 82
Joined: 8/5/2020
Status: offline
A 136 Tidespring [MARS Tide Class], UK, (Royal Navy), 2017

Ship should be able to carry 19,000 tons of fuel for refuelling currently does seem to have any fuel for refuelling.

https://www.navylookout.com/supporting-the-royal-navy-at-sea-in-focus-the-tide-class-tankers/

Thanks for your time

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 7367
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/23/2022 7:58:31 AM   
Matharox

 

Posts: 2
Joined: 1/23/2022
Status: offline
JF-17 A/B Thunder Blk 3 (Pakistan) can not fire PL-15E. It says " Unable to connect to firing unit with mandatory datalink".

(in reply to Temple)
Post #: 7368
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/23/2022 6:29:00 PM   
gosnold

 

Posts: 233
Joined: 7/10/2013
Status: offline
That might not be the best place to post it but in B1225 there is


Admiral Ronarc'h [FDI] -- France (Navy), 2024, FTI, Belharra, 16x Aster 15, 16x SCALP
Admiral Ronarc'h [FDI] -- France (Navy), 2024, FTI, Belharra, 32x Aster 15

The French FDI are sadly with only 16 Aster 15/30 cells (It's 2 SYlver A50 modules). It's the Greek ones that have 32 cells (for Aster 30).

(in reply to Matharox)
Post #: 7369
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/25/2022 7:50:28 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline
<type>Update</type>
<summary>#3237 Talash is broke</summary>
<detail>#3237 Talash Sayyad SAM doesn't work at all.

Illuminator and Search radars need to be updated. They are most definitely not Fan Song and Spoon Rest.

Illuminator not linked to missile and range isn't matching. It looks like they use a FCR similar to Mersad (MPQ-50/60 or Ofoogh 3). Google calls the MPQ-50 Copy Kavosh. Search radar is Hafez which is in the DB (check newest Mersad variant).

Googles says..Sayad 2 a copy of RIM-66. Range in DB now is very optimistic. Its likely close to the RIM-66 (60km). Sayad-3 is the follow on that seems like much greater range (120Km).

There isn't likely to be many of this. Khordad-15 (4 tube launcher) seems to have superceded it.</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/iranian-made-sams.16864/
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iran/15th-khordad.htm
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/iran-uses-new-sam-with-indigenous-hawks
https://defense-arab.com/vb/proxy.php?image=https:%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FEk3FYItXEAASNOa%3Fformat%3Djpg%26name%3D900x900&hash=74507c05d7128889da5851f37aab0cbc
</evidence>



< Message edited by BDukes -- 1/25/2022 8:06:10 PM >


_____________________________

Don't call it a comeback...

(in reply to gosnold)
Post #: 7370
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/27/2022 2:28:37 PM   
Celicaas

 

Posts: 1
Joined: 9/3/2020
Status: offline
<type>Add</type>
<summary>Add Kuwait. F-18E/F Superhornet(2020-)Loadout A-A 4x AIM-7 , 4x AIM9X

A-G 6x AGM-65F , 2x AIM-9X


<Summary> Add Kuwait. Facility. M1A2 Abrams Weapons 120MM Gun , 1x 50 Cal. 1× 7.62 MG (1994- )

< Message edited by Celicaas -- 1/27/2022 2:35:37 PM >

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 7371
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/29/2022 11:46:33 AM   
14yellow14

 

Posts: 117
Joined: 12/8/2019
Status: offline
<type>ADD</type>
<summary>ADD Iskander M nuclear capable ballistic missile</summary>
<detail>

The R-500 carries a conventional 500 kg warhead, or nuclear warhead with a yield of around 10-50 kT.


</detail>
<evidence>
http://www.military-today.com/missiles/iskander_k.htm
https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/SIPRIYB17c11sII.pdf

</evidence>

Thanks! :)

(in reply to Celicaas)
Post #: 7372
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 1/30/2022 8:28:48 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline
Sorry for being that guy today.

<type>Update</type>
<summary>F-15I and F-16I having a hard time with Amraam shots</summary>
<detail>
I can't shoot Amraam's off Sufa's or F-15I's. I end up getting into dogfight range with Pythons. Played with altitudes but getting a consistent message in the manual firing allocation window that they must be illuminated by own radar or CEC capable radar. Seems like it should be. Putting a report as I'm not sure exactly what it is (radar modes?)
</detail>
<evidence>
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/fb.asp?m=5138157
</evidence>






< Message edited by BDukes -- 1/30/2022 8:38:33 PM >


_____________________________

Don't call it a comeback...

(in reply to 14yellow14)
Post #: 7373
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 2/1/2022 1:08:31 PM   
KLAB


Posts: 355
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline
<type>AMENDMENT</type>
<summary>The arcs for the optical sensors and laser systems on all Frogfoots are incorrect.
</summary>
<detail>DB entries for the following Russian / Soviet but will also effect all the export SU-25K models:
#307 - Su-25 Frogfoot A (Soviet Union [-1991] - 1984)
#2378 - Su-25 Frogfoot A (Russia [1992-] - 1992)
#2371 - Su-25SM Frogfoot A (Russia [1992-] - 2009)
#4230 - Su-25SM2 Frogfoot A (Russia [1992-] - 2013)

All have 1x Laser Designator [Klen-PS] with an arc of 360' for the above entries.
The Klen has a much narrower field of view. More like PB1, SB1 at most.

Also:
#4231 - Su-25SM3 Frogfoot A (Russia [1992-] - 2016)
1x IR Camera [SOLT-25]
1x TV Camera [SOLT-25]
1x Laser Designator [SOLT-25]
SOLT has a much narrower field of view, circa PB/1 PB/2 TO SB/1 SB/2.

Also:

#4445 - Su-25TM Frogfoot C [Su-39] (Russia [1992-] - 1998) -- HYPOTHETICAL UNIT
#2513 - Su-25T Frogfoot A (Russia [1992-] - 1994)
Both have 1x I-251 Shkval [Laser Designator] with 360' arc, it is more like PB1/SB1 possible up to PB2/SB2 being very optimistic and generous.
</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.airliners.net/photo/Russia-Air-Force/Sukhoi-Su-25/2209525 Head on image clearly shows laser designator window and emphasises relatively narrow field of view.
https://www.airplane-pictures.net/photo/1233220/14-russia-air-force-sukhoi-su-25sm3/ The aperture on the SM3 is only marginally bigger with a wider field of view than the KLEN but again suffers from a comparatively narrow field of view, the FLIR element of SOLT is mounted in an equally fixed narrow field of view position in the nose. It is definitely not capable of 360 rotation or designation in the manner of a typical western pod such as Lightning etc.
https://www.airliners.net/photo/Russia-Air-Force/Sukhoi-Su-25T/1153555 the Shvkal system aperture is obviously bigger and has a wider field of view but is still not a 360 system.
</evidence>

May not be worth the effort of changing it given how many SU-25 entries are out there but the limitations of the Russian/Soviet designators arcs are one of the key weaknesses of these systems and identified as such by Russian studies of their Syrian involvement.
Thanks
K

< Message edited by KLAB -- 2/1/2022 1:35:53 PM >

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 7374
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 2/1/2022 1:26:43 PM   
KLAB


Posts: 355
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline
<type>AMENDMENT</type>
<summary>#463 - Mi-28N Havoc (Russia [1992-] - 2011) 1x N-025 Arbalet mast mounted radar not used?.
</summary>
<detail>
The N-025 Arbalet radar has not been routinely fitted or equipped to in service Mi-28N, it would be more accurate to delete it,
or mark the existing entry as "with Radar" and create a more accurate second entry without the radar?
</detail>
<evidence>The image used in the DB shows the Mi-28N in service and has no radar fitted.
The second image in the DB3K article shows how obvious the radar is when it is fitted, big round blob on top of the rotors.
A cursory search for the MI28N will show how few images there are with the radar fitted and most if not all are of test aircraft or air show manufacturers P/R.
</evidence>
For consideration as ever.
K

< Message edited by KLAB -- 2/1/2022 1:36:02 PM >

(in reply to KLAB)
Post #: 7375
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 2/1/2022 1:34:55 PM   
KLAB


Posts: 355
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline
<type>AMENDMENT</type>
<summary>#2102 - F-5EM Tiger II [F-5BR] (Brazil - 2007)
</summary>
<detail>#2102 - F-5EM Tiger II [F-5BR] (Brazil - 2007)

Appears to have a duplicated on board radar having both
1x EL/M-2032B and a
1x Grifo F-BR

It uses just the Grifo.
</detail>
<evidence>
See entry in DB3K 492.
</evidence>

K






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by KLAB -- 2/1/2022 1:36:52 PM >

(in reply to KLAB)
Post #: 7376
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 2/1/2022 7:39:52 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline
<type>Add</type>
<summary>Add Chilean E-3D Sentry x3 2022</summary>
<detail>
Chileans bought 3 ex UK Sentries to replace Condors. Copy #587
</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.scramble.nl/military-news/awacs-for-chilean-air-force
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/43960/chile-has-bought-a-trio-of-retired-e-3d-sentry-radar-planes-from-britain-reports
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/chile-buys-three-boeing-e-3d-sentry-aircraft-from-uk
</evidence>

_____________________________

Don't call it a comeback...

(in reply to KLAB)
Post #: 7377
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 2/2/2022 1:16:21 PM   
KLAB


Posts: 355
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline
<type>AMMENDMENT</type>
<summary>#4842 - Apache Guardian AH.Mk.2 [AH-64E] (United Kingdom - 2023) Service Entry name and load outs are inaccurate!
</summary>
<detail>#4842 - Apache Guardian AH.Mk.2 [AH-64E] First air frame was delivered in November 2020 and began flight testing as of July 2021. In an entry level configuration it will be ready for service as of 2022 not 2023.

It is very unlikely to be called the Apache Guardian in UK service and all current official references are to the Apache AH-64E so likely to be AH.Mk.2 Apache [AH-64E].

There are no plans to integrate Brimstone (2) and the UK has placed substantial orders for AGM-114R and AGM-114-N4/P4 HELLFIRE and would use existing inventories.

Stinger ATAS is unlikely for the vast majority of missions and should be omitted. No sign of UK ever having anything but tiny stock of Stingers for SF use?

The UK does not use 2.75" Hydra rockets it has retained the CRV-7 and will continue to use these with AH-64E.
Weapons and load outs wise in the near term UK AH-64E will use the same AGM-114 CRV-7 combo's as the AH-64D

There is a possibility of JAGM in the mid term?


The 11 Jan 2022 article gives the impression the UK order of JAGM is in flux but still appears BRIMSTONE is NOT on the agenda due to integration costs. A case of Brimstone (2) being too expensive and not offering enough bang for the buck.
As an aside the term Brimstone 2 is a bit dated as MBDA don't make the original MM wave Brimstone anymore and production is now all the dual mode version trialled as Brimstone DMS and evolved into Brimstone 2, in production it is now just referred to as Brimstone.</detail>
<evidence>
https://www.army.mod.uk/news-and-events/news/2020/11/new-apache-helicopter/ November 2020 arrival.
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/new-version-of-apache-attack-helicopter-enters-service/ 23 January 2022 in service.
https://www.army.mod.uk/equipment/aircraft/ Note refers to Apache AH-64E NOT Apache Guardian. In service as of 2022.
https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/major-arms-sales/united-kingdom-ah-64e-apache-guardian-attack-helicopters Full details of the order and equipment spares and EW kit.
https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/major-arms-sales/united-kingdom-hellfire-missiles-1 FOR 1k x AGM-114-R1/R2 Hellfire II
https://www.dsca.mil/press-media/major-arms-sales/united-kingdom-hellfire-missiles For 500 x AGM-114-N4/P4 HELLFIRE
https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/uk-signs-up-for-jagm-missile#:~:text=The%20United%20Kingdom%20has%20placed%20its%20first%20order,air-to-surface%20mission%20set%2C%20including%20the%20Apache%20attack%20helicopter. JAGM order.
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-yet-to-purchase-jagm-missiles-for-apache-helicopters/ JAGM issues but only references to HELLFIRE NOT Brimstone!
https://www.dsca.mil/node/1379 Bought more AGM-114R2 in August 2020
https://www.mbda-systems.com/product/brimstone/ MBDA Page refers to just Brimstone but the dual seeker and spec relates to what is called Brimstone 2 in the DB3K.
</evidence>

Any how all a bit picky I know but its not as if the UK's primary attack helicopter shouldn't it be represented with some degree of precision.
For consideration anyway.

Thanks
K

< Message edited by KLAB -- 2/2/2022 4:46:48 PM >

(in reply to BDukes)
Post #: 7378
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 2/2/2022 5:02:01 PM   
KLAB


Posts: 355
Joined: 2/27/2007
Status: offline
<type>ADD</type>
<summary>#2929 - Ka-52 Hokum B [Alligator] (Russia [1992-] - 2012)
Igla-V AAM is rarely used in operations and there is a double mount for the same 30mm gun with too few rounds.</summary>
<detail>#2929 - Ka-52 Hokum B [Alligator] (Russia [1992-] - 2012) Has Igla-V in all its load outs as an option.
Whilst it can carry the Igla/Verba these are rarely used (just review the images in any search), more realistically its standard load out is 12 x AT-9 Spiral-2 [9M120 Ataka-V] and 2 x 20 S-8 S-8KO 80mm Rocket [HEAT].
The aircraft as two entries for 6/6 30mm 2A42 Burst giving just 240 rnds, the real aircraft has 460 rounds.

As an aside the many Russian / Soviet load outs for the 57mm S-5 with the modern Russian aircraft and helicopters are erroneous, the S-5 fell out of favour as far back as the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan as it was found to be ineffective in payload effect and stand off range, the Su-30SM SU-35 Su-57 SU-25SM etc all are not likely to ever use it (unless the sanctions are really starting to bite!).
</detail>
<evidence>
Just Google KA-52 and see how many images there are of these operational aircraft with Igla/Verba? (not including airshows!)</evidence>

I am working only on the principle of keeping the DB accurate and if you don't ask you don't get etc, with no expectation that it will be a priority....

Regards

K




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by KLAB -- 2/2/2022 7:20:46 PM >

(in reply to KLAB)
Post #: 7379
RE: Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues - 2/2/2022 5:13:13 PM   
BDukes

 

Posts: 1695
Joined: 12/27/2017
Status: offline
<type>Update</type>
<summary>Replace Sparrows in Sufa AGM-142 Loadout #26623 with Amraams</summary>
<detail>
Current Popeye loadout of F-16I Sufa loadout carries Sparrow III which isn't correct. This was likely over a copy over error. Should be the equivalent Amraam for the generation of Sufa build. Sparrow Guidance and Popeye may not work well together and there is no other Sufa loadout that includes a Sparrow III.
</detail>
<evidence>

</evidence>

_____________________________

Don't call it a comeback...

(in reply to KLAB)
Post #: 7380
Page:   <<   < prev  243 244 245 [246] 247   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Stickied thread for minor database issues? Page: <<   < prev  243 244 245 [246] 247   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.344