Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Urban terrain combat balance

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> RE: Urban terrain combat balance Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 8:53:15 AM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline
It would be nice to get some response from the Matrix staff if they will look into this or it is the same topic as German allies (which are useless, IMHO) and it will stay as it is.

_____________________________


(in reply to xhoel)
Post #: 61
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 9:40:56 AM   
ShaggyHiK

 

Posts: 166
Joined: 10/10/2021
Status: offline
You cannot place your artillery in a city while defending a city, the buildings will block your fire sectors.

When placing artillery outside the city, these same buildings will interfere with the effective fire of your artillery, there will be inaccessible zones, and there will be windows of opportunity for enemy infantry inside the city, some side of the street will not be shot through, some buildings will interfere with the fire of your artillery due to the fact that they have your own troops..
Soviet infantry, due to its armament, is much better suited for urban battles. PPSh is a good solution, the lack of MP38 / 40 is a disadvantage of German industry, 120-160mm mortars are good, Germany had no such solutions. (This is also true if you look more broadly at the question of the efficiency in close combat of the Soviet side in the city).

For three or four million people in Berlin, 80 thousand defenders were not enough, a fairly clear example of the fact that if the city is occupied by an insufficient number of troops, then an offensive in it will be more effective than in swamps. Due to at least motorways available, while in the swamps each such road can be of great value.

The city itself is not a difficult terrain for warfare. It is not the ability to occupy buildings that plays a big role here, but the number of "combat bayonets".
In the German division, out of 16,000 combat personnel, there are only 8,000 people. The rest are rear services that do not carry combat value in the city.

< Message edited by ShaggyHiK -- 1/26/2022 9:42:20 AM >

(in reply to Stamb)
Post #: 62
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 10:38:18 AM   
xhoel


Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaggyHiK

You cannot place your artillery in a city while defending a city, the buildings will block your fire sectors. When placing artillery outside the city, these same buildings will interfere with the effective fire of your artillery, there will be inaccessible zones, and there will be windows of opportunity for enemy infantry inside the city, some side of the street will not be shot through, some buildings will interfere with the fire of your artillery due to the fact that they have your own troops.



You dont place the artillery in the city center. We are talking about cities that are not surrounded here. So one can expect the artillery to be placed in position from which they can fire effectively. And the same conditions that affect the defender, will affect the attacker too. Once you commit your infantry in the city, your artillery wont be able to fire without the risk of hitting your own men.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaggyHiK
Soviet infantry, due to its armament, is much better suited for urban battles. PPSh is a good solution, the lack of MP38 / 40 is a disadvantage of German industry, 120-160mm mortars are good, Germany had no such solutions. (This is also true if you look more broadly at the question of the efficiency in close combat of the Soviet side in the city).



No. Stop with your insane Soviet bias. German troops in the late war were more than capable of conducting defensive operations inside cities. MP40 was not lacking and engineer troops/assault groups were armed properly when it came to defensive city fighting. Not to mention that the use of Panzerfausts by your standard rifleman made AFVs in such close quarter combat a lot more vulnerable. If you want to talk guns, the Germans had a far superior MG in the form of MG 34 and later MG 42. By the late war the Germans had the much more superior StG 44, the Soviets had nothing like it.

The Germans have 50mm, 80mm and 120mm mortars as well. Your point on efficiency is moot and based on pure Soviet propaganda.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaggyHiK
For three or four million people in Berlin, 80 thousand defenders were not enough, a fairly clear example of the fact that if the city is occupied by an insufficient number of troops, then an offensive in it will be more effective than in swamps. Due to at least motorways available, while in the swamps each such road can be of great value.



What are you talking about? Berlin was surrounded and the Reich was in complete chaos. Everything had broken down and there was no proper organized defense of the city. It was just a bunch of rag tag units trying to improvise a defense against an enemy that was superior to them in every possible way.

And even in such conditions, with the odds stacked so heavy against them, the Berlin garrison inflicted a lot of casualties on the attacking Soviets. Your point that attacking a swamp hex is more difficult that taking a fortified, properly defended city is ridiculous.

The fact that you believe that Berlin fell simply because there wasnt enough troops in the city shows your lack of understanding of that battle and the reason why the battle ended the way it did.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaggyHiK

The city itself is not a difficult terrain for warfare.


Yes it is. EvK listed a number of ways that the defender can obstruct advancing paths and take a toll on the attacker. Like everything else you have said, this is just things you pull out of thin air and are not based on any proof or evidence.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaggyHiK

It is not the ability to occupy buildings that plays a big role here, but the number of "combat bayonets".
In the German division, out of 16,000 combat personnel, there are only 8,000 people. The rest are rear services that do not carry combat value in the city.


What does this have to do with anything??? Out of the 32.000 men in a Soviet Rifle Corps, 10.500 of them are part of rear services. So what now?

< Message edited by xhoel -- 1/26/2022 10:46:33 AM >


_____________________________

AAR WITW: Gotterdammerung 43-45
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4490035
AAR WITE: A Clash of Titans 41-45
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4488465
WitE 2 Tester and Test Coordinator

(in reply to ShaggyHiK)
Post #: 63
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 10:51:18 AM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
Xhoel

as far as I can see, Breslau is the outlier, ie an urban hex the Germans turned into a re-enaction of Stalingrad. All the others it seems that the Soviets clerared the city in 4-10 days (as ever a bit hard to sort out the preparatory fighting from the actual assault), so I'm not sure that carefully curating the historical record proves your case - all it shows is these battles were bloody and by mid-43 the Red Army was pretty well configured to conduct them.

As another direct assault, Vitebsk fell in days as part of Bagration, despite having been well prepared as a defensive bastion.

Your cited eg is a VG division and a cavalry division with 10,000 men, so about 1/3 is not combat elements, lacking heavy weapons and so on. Is the precise trade of losses unrealistic enough to sustain a wider argument - I can't see it.

Where the problem lies is that a successful defence triggers a rout due to disrupted (or worse) elements, this seems to be triggered by the number of defenders (something that is hard for the Germans to generate - but then till the late war city battles I'm not sure they ever did?), relative Soviet commitment (which has to be substantial) and the way the revised combat rules intersect with the way the combat routine works out in urban etc hexes. As in my eg above, in a city hex, it seems to play out exactly as we'd expect - I got bounced, I inflicted a lot of losses on the way out and my division is still in a reasonably decent state

_____________________________


(in reply to xhoel)
Post #: 64
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 11:51:23 AM   
xhoel


Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

Xhoel

as far as I can see, Breslau is the outlier, ie an urban hex the Germans turned into a re-enaction of Stalingrad. All the others it seems that the Soviets clerared the city in 4-10 days (as ever a bit hard to sort out the preparatory fighting from the actual assault), so I'm not sure that carefully curating the historical record proves your case - all it shows is these battles were bloody and by mid-43 the Red Army was pretty well configured to conduct them.



But its not though. If you completely ignore the sieges of the cities and the build up of forces needed to prepare for such attacks and only take the proper battle into account, then yes it is an outlier. But you cant simply reduce the battle to just that. If it took the Soviets till April to take Koenigsberg, you cant just say that the battle only took x days and compare that to a player taking the city by direct assault in game.

Here are other examples:

Königsberg
Posen
Danzig
Gdynia
Breslau
Küstrin
Kolberg

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100
Your cited eg is a VG division and a cavalry division with 10,000 men, so about 1/3 is not combat elements, lacking heavy weapons and so on. Is the precise trade of losses unrealistic enough to sustain a wider argument - I can't see it.


The designation VG has nothing to do with the quality of the unit. I gave you its stats as well as the stats of the commander. They barely inflicted 2k losses on the Soviets, lost the hex and were both depleted by the combat. That is just an unrealistic trade off.

At the end of the day, there are a lot of better examples in the thread that you can pick apart if you wish to do so. I am providing an example that you usually dont find here or on the forums in general. Urban battle in 1945.

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100
Where the problem lies is that a successful defence triggers a rout due to disrupted (or worse) elements, this seems to be triggered by the number of defenders (something that is hard for the Germans to generate - but then till the late war city battles I'm not sure they ever did?), relative Soviet commitment (which has to be substantial) and the way the revised combat rules intersect with the way the combat routine works out in urban etc hexes. As in my eg above, in a city hex, it seems to play out exactly as we'd expect - I got bounced, I inflicted a lot of losses on the way out and my division is still in a reasonably decent state


They didnt need to generate a high number of defenders, because urban combat is not simply a numbers game. The fact that this plays such a big role in the game is just wrong. And yes I agree with you, the unit getting routed should not be happening, they should conduct a fighting withdrawal and be done with it.

Your city example is nice. Now Im wondering why we cant have similar results for these Urban Hexes, but we see units getting completely decimated while not doing anything to the attacking forces. If Urban Combat was being resolved the way your city combat is, then I think 90% of the posters in this thread would be happy with the result.


< Message edited by xhoel -- 1/26/2022 11:57:17 AM >


_____________________________

AAR WITW: Gotterdammerung 43-45
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4490035
AAR WITE: A Clash of Titans 41-45
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4488465
WitE 2 Tester and Test Coordinator

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 65
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 11:59:07 AM   
ShaggyHiK

 

Posts: 166
Joined: 10/10/2021
Status: offline
That is, you want to argue about how many PPSh were in the infantry department of the Red Army and how many MP38 / 40 were in the German?

Maybe we can immediately exclude the dispute about the fire of machine guns? As in a call of duty machine guns do not fire from a bunker.

In urban combat, it is the attacker who has the advantage in artillery firepower, due to the fact that the defender is tied to his position, which limits his firepower. In general, the trend of the Second World War and the main difference from the First World War is that the effectiveness of the offensive and counter-offensive have become much more effective than defensive actions, and even more so passive defense.

Based on the experience of WWII, there are now many military regulations that prescribe how to act. It all has some rules, I hope no need to explain why 1 to 3 is a win ratio?

Well, speaking of 120mm mortars - the Germans were actually forced to use Soviet captured ones, and so work out the production of their own. In urban conditions, the Soviet 120mm mortar made it possible to throw powerful mines almost to the next street through the house.

But these are all particulars, globally the Soviet army in urban battles was much better adapted. Both in relation to the personal armament of the infantryman, and in the armament of the squad. MG, the actual fact is that at least somehow the advantage of the Soviet branch over the German one did not.

And at the expense of the STG, at least take an interest in how and where and according to what principle they were sent to the troops.
I doubt that a reasonable decision was made on the German side to send most of the STG production to the northern sectors of the front, concentrating them in certain divisions.

(in reply to xhoel)
Post #: 66
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 12:01:33 PM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100


quote:

ORIGINAL: Stamb

Temporary fix - replace all urban/heavy urban with a cities?


doesn't then affect any ongoing game - the map is fixed when the scenario starts.

there is no quick fix around this so it will take time and supplied saves to balance again

what about changing urban/heavy urban (if it is affected by this) fighting intensity or whatever is causing such issues to the same as in cities?
It will not require new game and will affect ongoing saves.

_____________________________


(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 67
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 12:03:35 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline
I believe the main difference is that Stalingrad has never been truly cut off from reinforcements, while in general German 'bastions' were (or otherwise reinforcements were not exactly available).

The late war Soviet might was insane as well, they just had overwhelming numbers. So it's kind of normal that where they've an interest, they just invest and storm the place.
I am not sure the game mechanics have the Soviets bleed adequately if so - I only know of Germans and they surely suffer heavily in urban terrain when they attack, even against isolated Urban cities.

But frontal assaults should be plenty doable and even winnable. I consider Stalingrad a frontal assault and over time vs a constant flow of reinforcements the Germans seized the City.

I think the problem may be more related to stacking - when the Soviets are attacking - the 3 corps stack in 1 hex, multiplied by X hexes attacking an Urban hex - that may be game shattering.


(in reply to xhoel)
Post #: 68
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 12:06:18 PM   
xhoel


Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaggyHiK

Maybe we can immediately exclude the dispute about the fire of machine guns? As in a call of duty machine guns do not fire from a bunker.



What are you even talking about? Half of the things you say is incoherent gibberish.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaggyHiK
But these are all particulars, globally the Soviet army in urban battles was much better adapted.



This is the conclusion to all your arguments, no matter the thread or the topic. Soviet Army is always the best at everything according to you. You literally spit out pure Soviet propaganda and cannot tell reality from fiction.

It is pointless to talk to you and I wont waste my time with back and forth arguments. Keep being a die hard believer that the Soviets were perfect at everything!

< Message edited by xhoel -- 1/26/2022 12:08:52 PM >


_____________________________

AAR WITW: Gotterdammerung 43-45
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4490035
AAR WITE: A Clash of Titans 41-45
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4488465
WitE 2 Tester and Test Coordinator

(in reply to ShaggyHiK)
Post #: 69
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 12:08:05 PM   
ShaggyHiK

 

Posts: 166
Joined: 10/10/2021
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AlbertN

I believe the main difference is that Stalingrad has never been truly cut off from reinforcements, while in general German 'bastions' were (or otherwise reinforcements were not exactly available).

The late war Soviet might was insane as well, they just had overwhelming numbers. So it's kind of normal that where they've an interest, they just invest and storm the place.
I am not sure the game mechanics have the Soviets bleed adequately if so - I only know of Germans and they surely suffer heavily in urban terrain when they attack, even against isolated Urban cities.

But frontal assaults should be plenty doable and even winnable. I consider Stalingrad a frontal assault and over time vs a constant flow of reinforcements the Germans seized the City.

I think the problem may be more related to stacking - when the Soviets are attacking - the 3 corps stack in 1 hex, multiplied by X hexes attacking an Urban hex - that may be game shattering.



I want to see how you take a fortified city, without 9-12 Soviet corps, limited to only 6-9-12 Soviet divisions. :)

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 70
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 12:12:49 PM   
ShaggyHiK

 

Posts: 166
Joined: 10/10/2021
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: xhoel


If the German army was well equipped to storm the city, then why did Sevastopol hold out until the age of 42?
Why did the Romanians wash themselves with blood in Odessa?
Why did Hitler, after Smolensk, prohibit a frontal assault on large cities? :)

Can you stop accusing me of Soviet propaganda and understand that the German army was not an ideal? And that their soldiers in their squads were disgustingly armed?

(in reply to xhoel)
Post #: 71
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 12:12:57 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline
I've not said either to limit stacking to Divisions.

I'd not mind a game that has a stacking value for things as many paperboard games.
It is not different from the Command Capacity truly. A division can be worth 2, a corp can be worth 3, brigades / regiment 1 (That includes SU ones); battallions and HQs 0.
A hex can have 6 as stacking limit.

Also Shaggy - but that's just a matter of strategy. If a stronghold is too mighty, one encircles it or switches target.
Germans are not that many to be able to be strong -everywhere-.

(in reply to ShaggyHiK)
Post #: 72
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 12:15:37 PM   
Zovs


Posts: 6668
Joined: 2/23/2009
From: United States
Status: offline
Budapest is also a good example, the siege lasted 50 days or 7 game turns and was costly to both sides (note I only have my ASL Festung Budapest and Panzer Campaigns Budapest to go off of).

_____________________________


Beta Tester for:
Flashpoint Campaigns: Sudden Storm
War in the East 1 & 2
WarPlan & WarPlan Pacific
Valor & Victory
DG CWIE 2
SPWW2 & SPMBT scenario creator

(in reply to Stamb)
Post #: 73
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 12:17:42 PM   
xhoel


Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaggyHiK

If the German army was well equipped to storm the city, then why did Sevastopol hold out until the age of 42?



If you actually read about the Siege of Sevastopol you would understand why they held out till 42´. Its because of other external factors that forced the 11th Army to engage Soviet forces elsewhere.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaggyHiK
Why did the Romanians wash themselves with blood in Odessa?



So the Romanians are the same as the Wehrmacht now? You are a joke.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaggyHiK

Why did Hitler, after Smolensk, prohibit a frontal assault on large cities? :)



Citation needed.


quote:

ORIGINAL: ShaggyHiK
Can you stop accusing me of Soviet propaganda and understand that the German army was not an ideal?


I wont, because every single argument you make reflects that you have as much to do with history as a 4th grader.

I never said the German Army was ideal. I know and accept their weaknesses and mistakes whenever there is a thread. But when you throw accusations such as this: "And that their soldiers in their squads were disgustingly armed?" it shows me that you have no clue what you are talking about and only know what Soviet history teaches.

Keep believing your fairy tales.


_____________________________

AAR WITW: Gotterdammerung 43-45
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4490035
AAR WITE: A Clash of Titans 41-45
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4488465
WitE 2 Tester and Test Coordinator

(in reply to ShaggyHiK)
Post #: 74
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 12:19:19 PM   
ShaggyHiK

 

Posts: 166
Joined: 10/10/2021
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AlbertN


I have not yet seen that a German player would not give up if everything starts to crumble with him.

Whereas victory in the game for Germany can be not only in winning in 41-42 years, but also in dragging out the game to 46 years.

And in this vein, I am an adherent of the fact that the German player is able to win due to the inability of the Soviet player to go to Berlin fast enough.

While the German players each time offer ways and mechanics that will allow them to spend this time as efficiently as possible, regardless of the real state of affairs, they want to see the Soviet Union as a wave of corpses that wash the Germans into Berlin.

(in reply to AlbertN)
Post #: 75
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 12:40:21 PM   
Jango32

 

Posts: 307
Joined: 3/15/2021
Status: offline
Surely we can discuss this without going for personal attacks/insults.

(in reply to ShaggyHiK)
Post #: 76
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 12:41:55 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jango32

Surely we can discuss this without going for personal attacks/insults.


exactly, with the type of comments above, this thread is better locked before someone goes too far (& I think there are too many insults already from people who really should know better)

_____________________________


(in reply to Jango32)
Post #: 77
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 12:46:19 PM   
xhoel


Posts: 3219
Joined: 6/24/2017
From: Germany
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100


exactly, with the type of comments above, this thread is better locked before someone goes too far (& I think there are too many insults already from people who really should know better)


Dont fall off your high horse ;)

Thread doesnt need to be locked as it kills the discussion that was productive before certain people chipped in. I wont be commenting anymore so no need to worry.

_____________________________

AAR WITW: Gotterdammerung 43-45
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4490035
AAR WITE: A Clash of Titans 41-45
http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4488465
WitE 2 Tester and Test Coordinator

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 78
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 1:00:07 PM   
cameron88

 

Posts: 43
Joined: 10/14/2020
Status: offline
You realize in virtually every battle on the Eastern front the Soviets took significantly more casualties compared to the Germans, especially when they were attacking. Urban battles are no different, yes the PPsH was a good sub machine gun, but do you know what is more effective then a sub machine gun? Coordination, training, and tactics, and the ability to inflict significantly more casualties in a fighting withdrawal, something that does not happen ingame in urban battles for Germany as it should.

I truly find it laughable reading through your posts that you actually believe the results ingame currently are how they should be, as if the Soviets were superior in urban combat, and because of equipment at that.

(in reply to ShaggyHiK)
Post #: 79
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 1:29:05 PM   
EwaldvonKleist


Posts: 2038
Joined: 4/14/2016
From: Berlin, Germany
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

if you want a direct example, the Soviet assault on Zaporozhye in October 43 took 5 days of direct combat (as ever there is a lot of related fighting but trying to pin down the city assault phase), it wasn't surrounded so can be seen as a frontal assault

I'm not suggesting the current situation is right - see my post above. I think this is recent and is keying off the patch that altered the impact of indirect fire etc, that in turn seems to have set off this problem that is specific to urban hexes - all I am (strongly) suggesting is the solution is not a mass of special rules, its giving time to dig through the code with supplied examples to see if there is a more organic/natural solution - I realise thats less fun than chucking out random examples where two weak divisions are outnumbered 15-1 as the example?


I agree with you that there should not be a special solution. It needs to be fixed in the combat engine, but thats a task for the tests. The reason why we are constantly repeating us is because Joels comment was that it is WAD, but if so there is a design problem.

There are two issues:
1) The defenders rout too quickly even though final CV and the force ratio would result in them holding according to the final CV ratio.
In addition the same combination of defenders, attackers and fortifications would lead to a defensive success elsewhere even though urban terrain should favour the defender more than most others.

2) Loss ratios are too favourable for the attacker, both compared to history and to ingame combat in other terrain types.

Only the devs can fix this, ideally without special rules and by a fix of the combat engine and its parameters.
I also suggest that a unit should not rout due to turning unready during combat. WitE1 has the rule that unready units that have some CV left (and in the examples the units do, as they win the final CV contest) can't attack, but may stand next to enemy hexagons. Not sure why this has been changed here.

@Xhoel: Thanks. I hope one of the devs/producers reads this.



< Message edited by EwaldvonKleist -- 1/26/2022 2:52:15 PM >


_____________________________


(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 80
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 1:40:26 PM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline
as I wrote in post #67, I don't think there is a better and quick solution, unless devs are already working on a changes to an urban combat. It would give better and expected results while adjustments to a combat in an urban areas can be polished later on.

_____________________________


(in reply to EwaldvonKleist)
Post #: 81
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 2:22:59 PM   
AlbertN

 

Posts: 3693
Joined: 10/5/2010
From: Italy
Status: offline
I surely do not remember losses favorable to Germans when they were attacking isolated cities.

Do not forget that the numbers shown on the battle report are proper dead personnel; a far larger chunk is 'damaged' and is pratically out of the equation for a while, often a long while!

(in reply to EwaldvonKleist)
Post #: 82
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 2:47:26 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EwaldvonKleist

...

I agree with you that there should be a special solution. It needs to be fixed in the combat engine, but thats a task for the tests. The reason why we are constantly repeating us is because Joels comment was that it is WAD, but if so there is a design problem.

There are two issues:
1) The defenders rout too quickly even though final CV and the force ratio would result in them holding according to the final CV ratio.
In addition the same combination of defenders, attackers and fortifications would lead to a defensive success elsewhere even though urban terrain should favour the defender more than most others.

...

Only the devs can fix this, ideally without special rules and by a fix of the combat engine and its parameters.
I also suggest that a unit should not rout due to turning unready during combat. WitE1 has the rule that unready units that have some CV left (and in the examples the units do, as they win the final CV contest) can't attack, but may stand next to enemy hexagons. Not sure why this has been changed here.

...



I think the problem is that each sub-set of this issue is indeed WAD, depleted units next to an enemy should indeed rout etc (& a depleted unit can have some residual cv). I'm assuming the units haven't just slipped to 'unready' as those can be next to an enemy (& in a very specific instance even attack - 23.8.8).

Urban combat is triggering close range interactions, again I think that is WAD. To some extent this favours the side with the most combat elements (probably WAD)

Its actually not easy for the Soviets to trigger, if they don't hit with numbers and decent CPP etc then they lose badly - in my AI game I had the AI attacking Leningrad and losing 10-15,000 men per attempt, so lose, you lose badly.

I can only speak for my current MP game, but none of the 3 urban areas I've lost this way went easily - in that each forced the Soviets to spend time creating a set piece assault - so again WAD.

Looking at the actual instances where the Soviets attacked the city (& we have to disregard the preparatory moves as this is comparing the actual assault on the urban core), I still think Breslau is the outlier - most of these battles were resolved in under a week - both siege and assault

The but is ... as Beethoven started this thread with (& I fully agree) the net effect is these locations become indefensible as anywhere else a sub 2-1 outcome will only trigger a win on this rule if the defenders were already really weakened (taking Riga on T1 is a good eg). So while they may force a degree of operational pause they are, perversely, a weak spot.


_____________________________


(in reply to EwaldvonKleist)
Post #: 83
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 2:57:31 PM   
Zovs


Posts: 6668
Joined: 2/23/2009
From: United States
Status: offline
Not game related.

I just pulled these from various Panzer Campaign games I have for reference.

Date: October 29th, 1944 - Size: Large - Location: Central Hungary

Scenario Briefing: The first Russian attempt to capture Budapest by storm began in late October, when Stalin ordered the Commander of the 2nd Ukrainian Front, Malinovsky, to capture Budapest in five days. Malinovsky replied that he could do the job but needed five days to prepare. Stalin ordered him to proceed immediately! Thus, on the morning of October 29th, prior to all necessary preparations being completed, the attack began. Initially successful, once the outskirts of Budapest were reached, the attack bogged down, due to supply shortages and Axis counterattacks. Another way in, to capture Budapest, would have to be found.

Date: November 27th, 1944

Scenario Briefing: On 27 Nov 44 the Russians launced a multi-pronged attack which ultimately resulted in the encirclement of Budapest. The 3rd Uk Front sent the 4th Gds and 46th Armies into the area between Balaton and the Danube Bend, while 2nd Uk Front sent the 6th Tank Army and Pliyev Groups trusting into the mountains North of the bend. By 26 Dec 44 the gap between the fronts had closed and within the encirclement, lay Budapest, about 80,000 troops and several hundred thousand civilians.

Date: December 31st, 1944 - Size: Very Large - Location: Budapest, Hungary

Scenario Briefing: The Hungarian capital city was encircled on 26 Dec 1944. Hitler order 4.SS.Pz.K to relocate from Poland to Hungary. By the evening of 31 Dec 44, the leading elements had detrained and a decision was made to launch an immediate attack. The goal of the SS troopers was to rescue their besieged SS brethren in Budapest. Hitler's goal on the other hand, was to re-establish the status-quo. Shades of Stalingrad all over again!

Date: January 3rd, 1945 - Size: Medium - Location: Budapest

Scenario Briefing: The city of Budapest was encircled on 26 Dec 1944. Like Stalingrad, Hitler ordered the city to hold at all cost as several relief attempts were hastily thrown together. But for the defenders, the noose tightened. The siege of Budapest was a long a bloody affiar where the ground was measured in metres, not Kilometers.

Designer Note:
This scenario is a historical setup which shows a desperate slugfest for Budapest. The fighting could have continued weeks longer and eventually result in the same outcome. The scale of the Panzer Campaign series was never designed to model street-fighting such as this, yet we feel it is necessary to include this scenario to illustrate the full story of the fighting in Hungary in the early part of the last year of the war.


Stalingrad, November 19th 1942: After several months of bloody house to house fighting, the
Soviet positions on the west bank of the Don had been reduced to pockets of stone and
rubble, that were as shallow as 300 meters, with many of the key positions in Germans
hands. But these last islets of resistance had been forged by fire. On the Nov 17th, Hitler
had wired von Paulus a message urging a quick resolution to the fighting in Stalingrad, a
message Von Paulus had read out to each divisional commander. The assault began in
driving rain and snow resulting in no air support. On that day, they gained yet another 50
meters in one place, 100 meters in another. One more day, two at the outside, would put
them in complete possession of "the Holy Grail", the complete city. But Soviet attacks on the
north flank put an end to this final push before noon on the Nov 19th. [Size, small] Designer’
s Note: This scenario is a historical setup which shows the desperate slugfest for Stalingrad
The fighting could have continued through the whole day, with the Germans capturing the
city had the Soviet offensive been delayed. The scale of the Panzer Campaign series was
never designed to model street-fighting over weeks, or months, where gains were measured
in meters. But this scenario is included to illustrate the desperate battle that occurred prior to
the Soviet attack on November 19th 1942 as I am sure had it not been included, people
would have asked for it..

Minsk, June 23rd 1944: After some small "recces in force" the day before, the
Soviets launched Operation "Bagration", an all-out offensive to crush the salient of
AG Center. The fortified cities of Vitebsk, Orsha, Mogilev, and Bobruysk, were all
encircled by pincer movements, then the Soviet armor and mechanized formations
swept on towards the west. Taken by surprise, the majority of the German 4th and
9th Armies were trapped between Minsk and the Berezina River. So complete was
the victory where the Soviets had amassed overwhelming superiority, particularly in
armor and aircraft, that five weeks later the Soviets were on the banks of the Vistula
and the borders of East Prussia. [Size, large]

Date: Feb 13th to 16th, 1943 - Size: Large - Location: Kharkov, Ukraine

Scenario Briefing: Voronezh Front launched its assault on the Ukrainian city of Kharkov on Feb 13th. The Soviet plan called for the 40th Army to thrust south and meet the northward attacking 6th Guard Cavalry Corp at Yubotin, thereby isolating the city. Concurrently, 3rd Tank Army and 69th Army were to assail the German defences east of the city, thereby holding the Germans in place while the other Soviet forces encircled them. The Germans determined that the Soviet cavalry south of the city were the most dangerous and attacked them with mobile troops from both Das Reich and Liebstandarte. This attack went in on the 13th and subsequently pushed the cavalry back. In the meantime the missing mobile troops weakened the remaining German positions and the Russians were approaching Kharkov's outskirts by the evening of the 14th. The situation quickly deteriorated and with the roads out of the city being progressively cut, SS General Hausser abandoned the city during the 16th. By nightfall the city was in Soviet hands.

Design Notes:
This scenario is recommended for HTH play but could be played against the AI for either side. The German player has a quandary. 6th Guards Cavalry Corp threatens the German deep flank. SS mobile troops in position could either eliminate the threat which will take time or screen the cavalry off tying up some troops. It will be up to the German player to decide if these forces are moved back to try and shore up east of Kharkov. For the Soviet player, 3rd Tank, 40th & 69th Army have very significant forces that can be used to pressure the German all along the line. In 40th Army sector in particular, weight of numbers should be able to push Korp Raus back. 4th Guards Tank Corp and the Ski Brigades manoeuvrability will be key here. Historically, the SS mobile forces were too late to relieve the pressure exerted by 3rd Tank Army in particular. There was initially very heavy fighting at Rogan on the road to Chuguev, but once that position was stormed, there was little distance to Kharkov.


_____________________________


Beta Tester for:
Flashpoint Campaigns: Sudden Storm
War in the East 1 & 2
WarPlan & WarPlan Pacific
Valor & Victory
DG CWIE 2
SPWW2 & SPMBT scenario creator

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 84
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 3:33:32 PM   
Beethoven1

 

Posts: 754
Joined: 3/25/2021
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

Its actually not easy for the Soviets to trigger, if they don't hit with numbers and decent CPP etc then they lose badly - in my AI game I had the AI attacking Leningrad and losing 10-15,000 men per attempt, so lose, you lose badly.


Keep in mind Leningrad is Heavy Urban rather than Urban, so it may be different. I think Jango (or maybe someone else) did a bit of testing and seemed to think that Heavy Urban might not have the same issue as regular Urban terrain.

(in reply to loki100)
Post #: 85
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/26/2022 5:01:18 PM   
loki100


Posts: 10920
Joined: 10/20/2012
From: Utlima Thule
Status: offline
which makes the whole thing even more quirky ... really this issue is only cropping up in Urban, clearly doesn't affect city and may not affect Heavy Urban.

I know that AI game is unreliable as the AI had 120 morale and that triggered the tactical nuke routines, so I regularly getting units bounce from the front line as a result of that routine alone

_____________________________


(in reply to Beethoven1)
Post #: 86
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/29/2022 4:01:28 PM   
malyhin1517


Posts: 1426
Joined: 9/20/2015
From: Ukraine Dnepropetrovsk
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cameron88

You realize in virtually every battle on the Eastern front the Soviets took significantly more casualties compared to the Germans, especially when they were attacking. Urban battles are no different, yes the PPsH was a good sub machine gun, but do you know what is more effective then a sub machine gun? Coordination, training, and tactics, and the ability to inflict significantly more casualties in a fighting withdrawal, something that does not happen ingame in urban battles for Germany as it should.

I found such information on the ratio of the losses of Germany and the USSR. By the end of the war, this ratio was approximately 1 to 1 due to a sharp drop in the experience of the German troops and an increase in the experience of the Soviet troops. Therefore, in the case of the storming of the city, I consider the ratio of losses to be normal.

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Потери_в_Великой_Отечественной_войне

Year and quarter Wehrmacht casualties Ratio to irretrievable losses
Red Army

By 1941 III quarter 185,198 11.5
1941 IV quarter 117,297 8.6
1942 I quarter 136,396 5.0
1942 II quarter 90,198 9.4
1942 III quarter 145,264 8.5
1942 IV quarter 134,957 3.9
1943 I quarter 294,706 2.5
1943 II quarter 48,132 4.0
1943 III quarter 187,858 4.3
1943 IV quarter 169,957 3.5
1944 I quarter 228,419 2.5
1944 II quarter 263,706 1.4
1944 III quarter 517,907 1.0
1944 IV quarter 222,914 1.6
Total 2,743,000 4.2

< Message edited by malyhin1517 -- 1/29/2022 4:06:53 PM >


_____________________________

Sorry, i use an online translator :(

(in reply to cameron88)
Post #: 87
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 1/31/2022 4:05:35 PM   
Cavalry Corp

 

Posts: 3107
Joined: 9/2/2003
From: Sampford Spiney Devon UK
Status: offline
Should constant fighting have a chance to produce some rubble style effects as seen in many games??

(in reply to malyhin1517)
Post #: 88
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 2/3/2022 6:33:49 PM   
Stamb

 

Posts: 1030
Joined: 10/26/2021
Status: offline
Applying heavy urban/cities combat mechanics, which seems to work as planned, to an Urban is a reasonable solution until a proper fix?

(in reply to Cavalry Corp)
Post #: 89
RE: Urban terrain combat balance - 2/3/2022 10:32:36 PM   
MechFO

 

Posts: 669
Joined: 6/1/2007
Status: offline
It might be helpful to know what an Urban hex is supposed to represent. Several square kilometers of multistory concrete/stone blocks? A core of multistory concrete blocks with the rest being suburban?

(in reply to Stamb)
Post #: 90
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East 2 >> RE: Urban terrain combat balance Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

3.500