Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

4.2.3.2 Low odds attack

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> Tech Support >> 4.2.3.2 Low odds attack Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
4.2.3.2 Low odds attack - 1/29/2022 11:56:09 AM   
Angeldust2

 

Posts: 236
Joined: 4/28/2020
Status: offline 		Please see the combat results attached.
If combat values of 7:7 would yield a +2, then 6:7 should yield a +1,2 , but not 5:7. What am I missing?
And why is the failed fractional odds shown as -1, instead of 0?
And even if the fractional odds = -1 would be correct, why is the net drm then not -2, instead of -1?






Attachment (1)
Post #: 1
RE: 4.2.3.2 Low odds attack - 1/29/2022 1:35:44 PM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		Assuming the odds modifier is correct in giving the attack to +1.2 then it follows to me:

+1.2 in odds
-2 in ARM bonus
Gives -0.8 as final odds
-0.8 is rounded to -1
With a fractional odds roll that if it succeeds would change the attack to +0
And since the fractional odds roll failed the attack is at -1

Does that make it any clearer?

Making another post about the fractional odds.

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to Angeldust2)
Post #: 2
RE: 4.2.3.2 Low odds attack - 1/29/2022 1:39:53 PM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		It does however seem inconsistent with how the fractional odds is displayed with higher odds. It should, in my humble opinion, be shown as +1 is the fractional roll is a success, or a +0 if it is a failure.

Graphic bug maybe?

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 3
RE: 4.2.3.2 Low odds attack - 1/29/2022 1:43:20 PM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		I have trouble calculating fractional odds below 1:1 with the 2d10 table because 2:3 gives a +1 modifier, and 1:2 gives +0. The modifier is not linear here.

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 4
RE: 4.2.3.2 Low odds attack - 1/29/2022 1:57:59 PM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		5:7 rounds to 2:3 in odds which gives +1. The attacker then has 0.33 in spare factors. Attack Factors needed for reaching 1:1 (or 7:7) is 2.33.

So shouldn't the fractional odds be 0.33:2.33 which is 0.14?

0.14 is not that far from 0.2 shown as fractional odds. Wonder if it is some rounding error somewhere?

_____________________________

Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often students, for heaven's sake. - Terry Pratchett

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 5
RE: 4.2.3.2 Low odds attack - 1/29/2022 6:02:41 PM   
paulderynck


Posts: 8201
Joined: 3/24/2007
From: Canada
Status: offline 		2D10 DRMs are linear from odds of 1:6 on up. You have to take into account that each half odds increment is a difference of 1 DRM.

1:2 gives 0
2:3 = 1:1.5 gives +1
1:1 gives +2
1.5:1 gives +3 etc.

so 1:2.5 gives -1
1:3 gives -2
1:3.5 gives -3 etc.

People disagree on how to interpolate between the DRMs to produce the "chance" (i.e. the fractional probability) of going up by one DRM from the one you are at if there were no fractional odds in play.

< Message edited by paulderynck -- 1/29/2022 6:03:42 PM >

_____________________________

Paul

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 6
RE: 4.2.3.2 Low odds attack - 1/29/2022 9:15:06 PM   
ACMW

 

Posts: 62
Joined: 11/25/2006
From: Norway
Status: offline 		This is also my calculation. I would therefore agree with your implication that the Fractional Odds should be 0.1 not 0.2. If it was the case that 1:1 was +O, you could kind of imagine that fractional rounding below that might go the other way: rounding towards the '0' both positive and negative. I wonder if, in the implementation, Shannon might have done the calculations that way and then added +2 to correct for that offset. Not sure how he'd deal with the non-linearities with that schema, but maybe.

Cheers

Adrian

_____________________________

The louder he talked of his honor, the faster we counted our spoons. (Emerson)

(in reply to Orm)
Post #: 7
RE: 4.2.3.2 Low odds attack - 1/30/2022 3:21:31 AM   
paulderynck


Posts: 8201
Joined: 3/24/2007
From: Canada
Status: offline 		The mathematically correct calculation is this:

To get 1:1.5 odds against 7 requires 4.66667 factors. So base DRM before fractions and mods (since rounding is always in favor of the defender) is +1. With fractional odds, there is some chance to get the attack to a DRM of +2. The attacker has 5 minus 4.66667 = 0.33333 "spare" factors to try to bridge the gap between 4.66667 and 7, which is 2.333333. Therefore the fraction is 0.33333/2.33333 = .1428

The armor mod makes the attack a -1 instead of a +1 and there should be a 14.28% chance of it being a straight up zero DRM.

You could also express the DRMs including fractionals as = 1.1428 - 2 = -0.8572 or an 85.72% chance of being a minus 1.

_____________________________

Paul

(in reply to ACMW)
Post #: 8
RE: 4.2.3.2 Low odds attack - 2/1/2022 2:04:55 AM   
Draconis


Posts: 18
Joined: 3/9/2008
From: USA
Status: offline 		Trying to figure out the derivation of the 1.20 combat ratio (0.200 fractional).

The half odds are the key I think. (Not considering the Armor modifier in the below analysis).

2:3 is 1:1.5 in half odds with a DRM of +1
1:1 is 1:1.0 in half odds with a DRM of +2

The reference battle is 5:7 which is 1:1.4 in half odds

Spread from the above DRM levels in half odds is 1.5 to 1.0 = 0.5
The battle is 0.1 on it way to the higher DRM or 0.1/0.5 or 20%

Is that how the 1.20 combat ratio and 20% fractional is derived?
That’s the only thing I could figure that yields the fractional.

_____________________________

“The longer you can look back, the farther you can look forward.”
-Winston Churchill

(in reply to paulderynck)
Post #: 9
RE: 4.2.3.2 Low odds attack - 2/1/2022 7:10:11 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Draconis

Trying to figure out the derivation of the 1.20 combat ratio (0.200 fractional).

The half odds are the key I think. (Not considering the Armor modifier in the below analysis).

2:3 is 1:1.5 in half odds with a DRM of +1
1:1 is 1:1.0 in half odds with a DRM of +2

The reference battle is 5:7 which is 1:1.4 in half odds

Spread from the above DRM levels in half odds is 1.5 to 1.0 = 0.5
The battle is 0.1 on it way to the higher DRM or 0.1/0.5 or 20%

Is that how the 1.20 combat ratio and 20% fractional is derived?
That’s the only thing I could figure that yields the fractional.

Without looking at the code, that seems right to me.

The key element is to determine how many more points are needed to reach the next odds level. That value is then divided into how far towards achieving that amount the current odds have. The resulting fraction is the probability of the fractional odds die roll succeeding.

I know I did something comparable for negative odds - but that was many years ago and it was a pain to figure out.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Draconis)
Post #: 10
RE: 4.2.3.2 Low odds attack - 2/3/2022 2:42:00 AM   
paulderynck


Posts: 8201
Joined: 3/24/2007
From: Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: paulderynck

People disagree on how to interpolate between the DRMs to produce the "chance" (i.e. the fractional probability) of going up by one DRM from the one you are at if there were no fractional odds in play.



_____________________________

Paul

(in reply to paulderynck)
Post #: 11
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> Tech Support >> 4.2.3.2 Low odds attack Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.671