Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Mar 7, 1943

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Mar 7, 1943 Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Mar 7, 1943 - 1/24/2022 3:12:34 PM   
BananaConvention


Posts: 58
Joined: 1/19/2022
Status: offline
I am excited to see your large scale Carrier operation in the coming days. I’ll bet it throws him completely off balance.

_____________________________

Oberleutnant Joachim "Jochen" Heiden
3./JG51 "Mölders"

Currently looking for Allied PBEM opponents

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 91
RE: Mar 5, 1943 - 1/24/2022 5:56:31 PM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Xargun

On other topics. Operation Kipper is not going well - I am trying to recon some far away bases with Naval Search planes (Emilies) and just not getting much intel. Not sure if its because they have no skill in Recon or because of the plane type. If I cannot recon my targets my next couple operations will have to go in blind which is never good.

Xargun



You only get one intel point for a patrol on recon IF it passes the die roll. With pilots having good recon skill you are most likely getting a pass with every sortie over the target. As your unit only flies one aircraft each phase you get two points intel at best, one is lost each day again. So either you use way more aircraft to recon your targets or recon aircraft which give you three intel points if they pass the die roll but I guess you are out of range for your recons otherwhise you would have used them anyways.


_____________________________


(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 92
RE: Mar 7, 1943 - 1/25/2022 4:11:21 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BananaConvention

I am excited to see your large scale Carrier operation in the coming days. I’ll bet it throws him completely off balance.


I do not expect any large scale CV action (unless something unplanned happens) for roughly 6 months. When the allies move on Truk or the Marianas he will have to have CV support and I will be there.. Hopefully its 6 months or more, then I can have another 5 fleet CVs up and running :) Another 300 aircraft would be nice.

Xargun

(in reply to BananaConvention)
Post #: 93
RE: Mar 5, 1943 - 1/25/2022 4:12:48 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Xargun

On other topics. Operation Kipper is not going well - I am trying to recon some far away bases with Naval Search planes (Emilies) and just not getting much intel. Not sure if its because they have no skill in Recon or because of the plane type. If I cannot recon my targets my next couple operations will have to go in blind which is never good.

Xargun



You only get one intel point for a patrol on recon IF it passes the die roll. With pilots having good recon skill you are most likely getting a pass with every sortie over the target. As your unit only flies one aircraft each phase you get two points intel at best, one is lost each day again. So either you use way more aircraft to recon your targets or recon aircraft which give you three intel points if they pass the die roll but I guess you are out of range for your recons otherwhise you would have used them anyways.



Yeah - but guess what ?? I just got the Dinah III and she has enough range to recon what I want, so I upgraded a unit and moved them into position. Not getting 9s and 10s like I do with shorter range targets, but I think I am getting what I need now :) Thanks for the reminder of how recon works.

Xargun

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 94
RE: Mar 5, 1943 - 1/25/2022 4:32:04 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
Something strange happened a few turns past - a ton of SBD-3s showed up as lost to ops - Intel showed 99 of them in one turn. I didn't sink any ships that turn (that I know) or I am wondering what could have happened? If an allied transport sunk from collision or hitting a reef I don't think one of them can carry that many SBDs; can they?

Xargun

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 95
RE: Mar 5, 1943 - 1/25/2022 9:55:07 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Xargun

Something strange happened a few turns past - a ton of SBD-3s showed up as lost to ops - Intel showed 99 of them in one turn. I didn't sink any ships that turn (that I know) or I am wondering what could have happened? If an allied transport sunk from collision or hitting a reef I don't think one of them can carry that many SBDs; can they?

Xargun


No, one squadron per ship.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 96
Mar 16, 1943 - 1/26/2022 8:02:22 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
More slow turns - even the bombing in Burma has stopped !! Did his air units get withdrawn? or is he waiting for something? The only good news is I am still pumping out ships and Saipan just turned into a level 7 fort - on its way to level 9.

Xargun

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 97
RE: Mar 5, 1943 - 1/26/2022 8:03:41 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Xargun

Something strange happened a few turns past - a ton of SBD-3s showed up as lost to ops - Intel showed 99 of them in one turn. I didn't sink any ships that turn (that I know) or I am wondering what could have happened? If an allied transport sunk from collision or hitting a reef I don't think one of them can carry that many SBDs; can they?

Xargun


No, one squadron per ship.


I asked Nomad what happened and he said some of his DB squadrons disbanded while the ships were at sea. Strange - would think they would just disappear not push the aircraft over the sides of the CVs.

Xargun

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 98
RE: Mar 5, 1943 - 1/26/2022 10:28:03 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Xargun


quote:

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: Xargun

Something strange happened a few turns past - a ton of SBD-3s showed up as lost to ops - Intel showed 99 of them in one turn. I didn't sink any ships that turn (that I know) or I am wondering what could have happened? If an allied transport sunk from collision or hitting a reef I don't think one of them can carry that many SBDs; can they?

Xargun


No, one squadron per ship.


I asked Nomad what happened and he said some of his DB squadrons disbanded while the ships were at sea. Strange - would think they would just disappear not push the aircraft over the sides of the CVs.

Xargun


If that was a required withdrawal of aircraft, don't the rules require a base of sufficient size and supply to prevent loss of the aircraft? I'm guessing it was a withdrawal that happened when the carriers came in range of an eligible base that was not sufficient in size or supply.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 99
RE: Mar 5, 1943 - 1/27/2022 4:19:40 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
Can you not run Sweep missions over your own bases ?

Xargun

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 100
Mar 23, 1943 - 1/28/2022 2:19:11 AM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
Well it may be heating up... Last turn the KB was patrolling east of Rabaul and luckily avoided an allied sub. As the turn progressed, my Kates located a good 10 allied subs in a wall blocking off Rabaul 3 hexes thick.

Sub attack near Lihir at 111,122

Japanese Ships
CV Zuikaku
BB Kirishima
BB Hiei
CA Chokai
CA Takao
DD Isokaze
DD Akigumo
DD Hatsuzuki
DD Susuzuki
DD Teruzuki
DD Akizuki
DD Kasumi
DD Tanikaze
DD Urakaze
DD Shiranui

Allied Ships
SS S-31

SS S-31 launches 4 torpedoes at CV Zuikaku



So I moved NorthWest near Kavieng this turn and my escorts attacked another sub damaging it. Kates once more located a good 10 or so allied subs forming a 3 hex deep perimeter around Rabaul. Nells from Truk sunk an allied AM at Rabaul, and the KB followed that up with an afternoon strike sinking 3 more.

ASW attack near Emirau Island at 106,119

Japanese Ships
DD Teruzuki
BB Kirishima
BB Hiei
CA Chokai
CA Takao
DD Susuzuki
DD Akizuki
DD Kasumi
DD Tanikaze
DD Uraaze
DD Shiranui

Allied Ships
SS Grayback, hits 2

====
Morning Air attack on TF, near Rabaul at 106,125

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid spotted at 20 NM, estimated altitude 16,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Japanese aircraft
G3M3 Nell x 6

No Japanese losses

Allied Ships
AM Castlemaine, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk

====
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Rabaul at 106,125

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid spotted at 18 NM, estimated altitude 18,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M3a Zero x 36
D3A1 Val x 25

Japanese aircraft losses
D3A1 Val: 2 damaged

Allied Ships
AM Cairns, Bomb hits 2, and is sunk
AM Tamworth, Bomb hits 3, and is sunk
AM Horsham, Bomb hits 2, and is sunk
====

Also during the afternoon air phase B-25D1s attempted a naval strike. I do not think he realized KB was that close. My 112 zeros on CAP decimated the incoming B-25s downing them all.

Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Emirau Island at 106,119

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid detected at 73 NM, estimated altitude 8,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 20 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M3a Zero x 55
A6M5c Zero x 72

Allied aircraft
B-25D1 Mitchell x 16

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
B-25D1 Mitchell: 10 destroyed



I checked the mines at Rabaul and it does not look like the AMs had a chance to sweep many (if any) before my air strikes sunk them all. I have also picked up another allied TF moving North along the Solomons. I think it may be time for the allies to attempt to grab Rabaul and the air fields there. Rabaul is lightly defended by troops and the facilities are moderately damaged by allied heavy bombers. But the heavies haven't visited Rabaul for a while - concentrating on Kavieng lately.

KB is heading west - up and around the allied subs to try to find an approach near Manus. If his ships retreat then KB can easily escape back to Truk for refuelling and resupply. But should he move forward with an invasion, KB will still be nearby - close enough to swoop in and hammer any invasion force. I do not believe I can hold Rabaul against a heavy allied invasion, but I hope to hammer the invasion ships to delay future invasions. I may try to sneak down some BBs to hit the airfields at Torokina should I have time.

I am surprised he didn't provide any air cover for those AMs - he had to know (he knows for sure now) that I have Nells sitting at Truk. He may not guess how many -- 3 units - over 100 - all armed with torpedoes and manned by 70+ skills pilots. The next few turns may be very interesting or very boring for the South Pacific.

The turn has been sent back to Nomad and tomorrow morning will show the results.

Xargun


(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 101
RE: Mar 23, 1943 - 1/28/2022 1:40:55 PM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline
127 fighters on CAP over KB looks really light to me. Any decent alpha strike from Allied carriers in moderate weather would annihilate most of your carrier force. Even if a return strike would most likely also damage/sink Allied carriers that wouldn't matter much if KB's carriers are gone.

_____________________________


(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 102
Mar 24, 1943 - 1/28/2022 1:50:00 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
Well the allied subs caught up with me... again. KB was moving to its position NW of Manus and it ran over an allied sub, who popped up and put a pair of torpedoes into Hiryu

Sub attack near Manus at 101,117

Japanese Ships
CV Hiryu, Torpedo hits 2, heavy damage
BB Kirishima
BB Hiei
CA Chokai
CA Takao
DD Isokaze
DD Teruzuki
DD Akizuki
DD Kasumi
DD Tanikaze
DD Urakaze
DD Shiranui

Allied Ships
SS Permit


The sub fired two torpedoes and they both hit doing considerable damage.




Its enough to put the Hiryu in the repair yards for 6-8 weeks but she should survive.

Not much else happened other than my troops in Burma beating on a Chinese unit who got a little to full of itself and wandered a bit to far south into my lands.

Ground combat at Kachin Hills (61,45)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 18733 troops, 154 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 666

Defending force 9986 troops, 71 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 295

Japanese adjusted assault: 345

Allied adjusted defense: 121

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), disruption(-), preparation(-)
experience(-)
Attacker: fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
380 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 41 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 1 disabled

Allied ground losses:
3331 casualties reported
Squads: 39 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 47 destroyed, 19 disabled
Engineers: 7 destroyed, 10 disabled
Guns lost 12 (7 destroyed, 5 disabled)
Units retreated 1

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!


Xargun


(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 103
RE: Mar 23, 1943 - 1/28/2022 1:51:38 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy

127 fighters on CAP over KB looks really light to me. Any decent alpha strike from Allied carriers in moderate weather would annihilate most of your carrier force. Even if a return strike would most likely also damage/sink Allied carriers that wouldn't matter much if KB's carriers are gone.


It probably is a bit low, but I had 90 fighters sitting on escort missions.

Xargun

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 104
Mar 30, 1943 - 1/30/2022 3:55:57 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
A week of slow turns has gone by.. The only action has been some bombing of chinese units in Burma by my Helens other than all of the action in the South Pacific around Rabaul.

Rabaul is definitely in the allied crosshairs as allied heavy bombers are smashing the airfields at Rabaul, Kavieng and Manus back and forth keeping them suppressed. With his curtain of subs around the area it is very dangerous for any IJN ships to play in the area. I did drop off some troops at Madang to prevent the allied creep north (empty bases flipping sides according to whoever has the most troops nearby) to protect my tenuous supply line along the coast of Borneo.

The DDs avoided two sub attacks on their trip to Manus and managed to sink or cripple the SS Pollack at Manus - hitting the sub with 3 Depth charges (if reports are correct) along with a couple near misses.

ASW attack near Manus at 101,119

Japanese Ships
DD Oite
DD Hayate

Allied Ships
SS Pollack, hits 5, heavy damage


Allied AMs have been clearing mines at Rabaul under fire from some CD guns belonging to the 10th Special Base Force stationed there.

TF 313 encounters mine field at Rabaul (106,125) - Coastal Guns Fire Back! (3/29/43)

9 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Allied Ships
AM Wallaroo, Shell hits 3
AM Latrobe, Shell hits 2, on fire
SC-703, Mine hits 1, heavy damage
===
TF 313 encounters mine field at Rabaul (106,125) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

15 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Allied Ships
AM Wallaroo, Shell hits 3, on fire
AM Latrobe, Shell hits 5, on fire
SC-703

TF 313 encounters mine field at Rabaul (106,125) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

9 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Allied Ships
AM Wallaroo, Shell hits 3
AM Latrobe, Shell hits 2, on fire
SC-703, Mine hits 1, heavy damage

The first combat report is from last turn and the others are from this turn. I also heard sinking noises from at least 1 ship after that last exchange - pretty sure that SC was blown apart when it hit that mine.

Possibly unknown to Nomad is that he has cleared all the mines from Rabaul now - opening the way for his invasion forces -- probably preceded by at least 1 BB dominated bombardment TF.

My Nells at Truk have not attacked the AM fleets so I am guessing he is now running LR CAP over them from either one of the nearby allied airfields (Bika, Torokina, Gasmata) or from his CVs that are in the area.

I am moving several subs in the immediate area around Rabaul - including one in the harbor itself in the hopes of putting a torpedo into a capital ship or a fully loaded transport. I am also sending a wave of minelaying subs to replace the mine field at Rabaul - it won't be as heavy, but some is better than none.

Rabaul has roughly 100 Assault Strength there and 16k supplies so they should hold out a day or two at least against whatever he drops off - unless he goes really crazy on the bombardments - which he may. I only have a level 3 (halfway built to level 4) forts so I don't expect Rabaul to last long under seige. The port is heavily damaged (88%) as are the runways (77%) so it will take him a few days to get the base back into operating capacity.

I am beginning to evacuate excess ships from Truk in small 4-8 ship TFs to avoid any attention. I tired to evac the ARD but a sub off the coast of Truk found it and sunk it
Not saying I use that, but it was a nice asset I would have like to evacced from the area. There are still a bunch of non critical ships at Truk which will be removed over the course of the next half dozen or so turns.

CV Hiryu successfully made it to Babeldaob and disbanded in port. Her 44 flt damage (36 major) will be tended by the repair yard there. While the Hiryu cannot enter the repair yard the extra points generated will increase the repair rate. Once the System and access flt damage is repaired, the Hiryu will head to a repair yard large enough to accommodate her for final repairs.

In other good news, 11 days til the Taiho arrives in port. She will gather some escorts and head to the South Pacific to replace the damaged Hiryu.

Xargun

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 105
Mar 31, 1943 - 1/31/2022 12:17:10 AM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
As expected the US bombarded Rabaul with what I believe was a 3 BB TF. SS RO-64 was waiting. The allied escorts sent RO-64 to the bottom, but the brave crew put 2 torpedoes into BB Mississippi before sinking !!

Submarine attack near Rabaul at 106,125

Japanese Ships
SS RO-64, hits 12, and is sunk

Allied Ships
DD Conyngham
DD Case
BB Mississippi, Torpedo hits 2



BBs New Mexico and Idaho went on to bombard Rabaul inflicting some casualties.

Night Naval bombardment of Rabaul at 106,125

Allied Ships
BB New Mexico
BB Idaho

Japanese ground losses:
369 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 8 destroyed, 29 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 3 disabled

Airbase hits 6
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 16
Port hits 1
Port fuel hits 1


Xargun



(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 106
Apr 1, 1943 - 1/31/2022 12:21:21 AM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
Allies land on Rabaul - but none appeared on the map, so not sure how many were landed...

Pre-Invasion action off Rabaul (106,125)
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force

17 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Allied Ships
xAKL Luzon
xAKL Mauban
xAKL Silindoeng

Invasion Support action off Rabaul (106,125)
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force

10 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Allied Ships
xAKL Luzon
xAKL Legazpi
xAKL Compagnia Filipinas
xAKL Mauban
xAKL Silindoeng


Not much else is happening. April 43 is here and all of my CVs are up for upgrades. Problem is do I do the upgrades and push back my plans for a month? if I take the CVs offline in the South Pacific I won't have any real counter punch to the allies advance for 6 weeks -- 1 week to get to a yard large enough for the upgrade, the upgrade, and then 1 week back. Not sure I can afford that.

Xargun

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 107
Economy Update - 1/31/2022 12:38:51 AM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
Thought I would give you all an update on my economy and R&D situation.

Empire Score: 22,472
Allied Score: 11,383

HI Points: 1,271,191
Manpower: 1,435,246
Armaments: 395,591
Naval Points: 1,366
Merch Points: 1,800
Vehicle Points: 10,403


Total Supply in Empire: 7,636,176
Total Resources in Empire: 27,283,395
Total Oil in Empire: 1,254,616
Total Fuel in Empire: 7,829,954


Total Oil in Japan: 867,514 (110 days worth)
Total Fuel in Japan: 2,531,628 (208 days worth)
Total Resources in Japan: 6,304,170 (79 days worth)

I have been working hard to increase the amount of resources in Japan over the past few months - originally I only had 18 days of Resources. I am having trouble hauling resources from Hokkaido - not enough ships / to small of ports. Hokkaido has another 6 million resources sitting there if only I can haul it out faster than its produced and so far I have not been able to. I do have some engineers working on bases there finally and am sort of letting Hokkaido build up as sort of a reserve stockpile.

Oil is decreasing empire wide due to an issue with repairing damage wells at Palembang and Miri. For some reason the allies are not bombing the oil at Magwe which is surprising me - He could easily cost me 2000ish oil a day if he were to bomb it flat. So against either him flattening Magwe or losing control of it, I have been repairing the oil at Palembang and Miri that I havent repaired yet.



Aircraft R&D:

N1K5-J George: Currently 9/45 (ETA Aug or Sept 1943 due to R&D)
A7M2 Sam: Currently 11/44 (Unknown at this point)
Ki-84a Frank: Currently 12/43 (Unknown at this point)
Ki-84r Frank: Currently 7/44 (Unknown at this point)
D4Y4 Judy: Currently 12/43 (ETA June 1943)
B6N2a Jill: Currently 3/44 (ETA July 1943)


Xargun

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 108
Apr 2, 1943 - 1/31/2022 1:59:31 AM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
More American troops land on Rabaul. My troops performed the required Artillery bombardment revealing the vast American troops arrayed on Rabaul.

Ground combat at Rabaul (106,125)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 3133 troops, 22 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 177

Defending force 29380 troops, 429 guns, 791 vehicles, Assault Value = 937

Japanese ground losses:
47 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
8 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Assaulting units:
82nd Naval Guard Unit
83rd Naval Guard Unit
64th Naval Guard Unit
10th Special Base Force

Defending units:
763rd Tank Battalion
762nd Tank Battalion
37th Infantry Division
110th Combat Engineer Battalion
43rd Infantry Division
III US Corps

Nice gathering of troops. I expect Rabaul to fall this turn when they attack.

My subs deployed their mines in Rabaul harbor and fled - one of them got caught by the invasion fleet's escorts and sunk.

Submarine attack near Rabaul at 106,125

Japanese Ships
SS I-168, hits 19, and is sunk

Allied Ships
DD Perkins
BB Colorado
BB Maryland
CL Concord
CL Marblehead
CL Raleigh
AM Matai
AM Chignecto
AM Ungava
AM Tui
AM Moa
AM Junee
APA Crescent City
APA President Adams
APA President Jackson
APA U.S. Grant
APA George F. Elliot
APA Heywood
APA Hunter Liggett
APA Henry T. Allen
APA Wharton
AK Mercury
AK Electra
AK Alcyon
AK Titania
AK Algorab
AK Alchiba
AK Alhena
LST-459
LST-456
LST-451
LST-449
LST-19
LST-18
LCI-24
LCI-23
xAKL Sibolga
xAKL Siaoe
xAKL Bintoehan
xAKL Mauban
xAKL Luzon
xAKL Legazpi
xAKL Compagnia Filipinas
DD Tucker
DD Flusser
DD Smith


What I wouldn't give to catch that TF with KB and sink it all. That would be a huge blow to the allies ability to invade my islands. Better luck next time I guess. I don't go away empty handed - even though they swept all the sub-layed mines I did get lucky with one...

TF 108 encounters mine field at Rabaul (106,125)

Allied Ships
AM Matai
AM Chignecto
AM Ungava
AM Tui
AM Moa
AM Junee
DD Flusser
DD Perkins
BB Colorado, Mine hits 1


While not a huge hit to the BB, it should have put a good sized hole in the Colorado's hull - maybe 15-20 flt damage. Enough to slow it down and maybe send it home for a few months for repairs.

I have another wave of subs laying another mine field at Rabaul so maybe I will get lucky again.

In other words, I am beginning the refit of 3 CVEs at Singapore. These will only take 15 days but add radar and 200+ AA to the ships. After my currently planned operations I will refit all the CVs assigned to the Indian Ocean. I am not sure when to pull back the KB for their upgrades. Perhaps they will all wait until all my new CVs come online and then swap them out at the same time. We will have to see.


Xargun


< Message edited by Xargun -- 1/31/2022 2:00:54 AM >

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 109
RE: Mar 23, 1943 - 1/31/2022 4:11:59 PM   
castor troy


Posts: 14330
Joined: 8/23/2004
From: Austria
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Xargun


quote:

ORIGINAL: castor troy

127 fighters on CAP over KB looks really light to me. Any decent alpha strike from Allied carriers in moderate weather would annihilate most of your carrier force. Even if a return strike would most likely also damage/sink Allied carriers that wouldn't matter much if KB's carriers are gone.


It probably is a bit low, but I had 90 fighters sitting on escort missions.

Xargun




I would not challenge the USN with KB in early/mid 43 without having 400 fighters for CAP. This of course depends on how many carriers the Allied have available but even if there are only a few, 120-200 fighters on CAP are nowhere enough to fend off a strike and if 50-70% of the bombers get through say goodbye to your carriers. Of course a lot depends on weather too when it comes to hit rates but hoping for thunderstorms is usually something I try to avoid.

_____________________________


(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 110
Apr 3, 1943 - 1/31/2022 4:32:57 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
The battle for Rabaul continues with the allies bombarding the base and clearing out my sub laid mines.

Night Naval bombardment of Rabaul at 106,125 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

5 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Allied Ships
CA Australia
CA Vincennes
CA San Francisco
CA Minneapolis
CA Astoria
CA New Orleans
DD Mugford
DD Helm
DD Blue
DD Bagley
DD Morris
DD Sims
DD Grayson
DD Gwin

Japanese ground losses:
523 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 6 destroyed, 66 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Light Industry hits 2
Resources hits 1
Airbase hits 5
Airbase supply hits 4
Runway hits 68
Port hits 15
Port fuel hits 3
Port supply hits 3


TF 8 encounters mine field at Rabaul (106,125)

Allied Ships
AM Bengal
AM Punjab
AM Madras
AM Bombay
AM Kiwi
AM Swallow, Mine hits 1, heavy damage
AM Starling
AM Skylark

I heard some sinking noises later in the turn and am assuming that AM Swallow sunk due to the mine encounter.

Xargun

(in reply to castor troy)
Post #: 111
Apr 4, 1943 - 1/31/2022 4:36:00 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
The fight continues...

TF 8 encounters mine field at Rabaul (106,125) - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

39 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Allied Ships
AM Bengal, Shell hits 6
AM Punjab, Shell hits 1
AM Madras, Shell hits 1
AM Bombay, Shell hits 2
AM Kiwi, Shell hits 4
AM Starling, Shell hits 3
AM Skylark, Shell hits 3, on fire


The allies finally attack and captured Rabaul - no real surprise there.

Ground combat at Rabaul (106,125)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 27145 troops, 429 guns, 731 vehicles, Assault Value = 939

Defending force 6897 troops, 42 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 172

Allied engineers reduce fortifications to 2

Allied adjusted assault: 1530

Japanese adjusted defense: 113

Allied assault odds: 13 to 1 (fort level 2)

Allied forces CAPTURE Rabaul !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1150 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 85 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 17 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 23 (12 destroyed, 11 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
145 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Vehicles lost 19 (1 destroyed, 18 disabled)

Assaulting units:
762nd Tank Battalion
110th Combat Engineer Battalion
37th Infantry Division
763rd Tank Battalion
43rd Infantry Division
III US Corps

Defending units:
83rd Naval Guard Unit
82nd Naval Guard Unit
64th Naval Guard Unit
10th Special Base Force




Elsewhere in the Empire a random event happened !!! Just mentioning this as these rarely happen and I was lucky enough to catch it..

Boiler Explosion aboard xAK Zuisyo Maru at 100 , 47

The xAK is alive and well with 36 eng damage and will limp into Port Arthur for repairs.


Xargun

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 112
Apr 15, 1943 - 2/3/2022 7:12:39 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
Bunch of slow turns heats up a bit with night raids on the oil wells at Magwe and Light Industry at other bases in Burma. Doesn't seem like he is concentrating on them, just maybe probing to see if I'm flying CAP there or not. I have pulled all of fighters back to Rangoon and am running day and night CAP over the base while I still bring in a few more units.

In the South Pacific the allied Deathstar is located - sitting between Nauru and Ocean Islands. I have vectored a few subs into the area - perhaps I can get a lucky hit on a CV. The US marines land on Ocean Island and destroy the small portion of a Naval Guard unit I had there. I expect them to do the same to Nauru in the next couple days.


While at Truk, I have reached level 9 forts so the base is completely maxed out. Roughly 100k supplies and 100k fuel sit there as well. I have evacuated most ships and am removing the last few LCUs that won't contribute to the defense of the base. These units are moving to the Marianas.

I have decided to send KB home for their 4/43 upgrades and it will arrive in a day or two to begin the upgrades. I believe this upgrade provides radar on all the CVs so its a useful upgrade. The Taiho has arrived and has upgraded its air groups to my current models and will join KB once they all upgrade. Another day or two and I will begin the launch of my latest offensive plans. I will post more once the ships are all at sea and approaching their targets.


Xargun



(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 113
Apr 26, 1943 - 2/7/2022 8:39:20 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
More slow turns go by. The allies land and take Lae after days of naval bombardment. I am beginning to air lift troops out of Finschhaven and Salamaua. He just landed troops at Kavieng and will probably lose it on the first real attack. I am airlifting as much of the Naval Guard portion that is there out.

Truk is evacuated - the last Fast Transport fleet of 6 DDs is loading the remnant of a Base Force and leaving. Over 700 AS remains on the island with 92k supplies and sheltering behind level 9 forts. Twenty subs are still operating out of the harbor - at least for now. Three units of Nells, one transport unit of Sallies, Two Tojo units and two units of zeros remain. Plenty of Aviation Support, some engineers and 3 RGTs of AA are there as well. If he won't take Truk directly, I want to be able to sortie subs from there and use the airfields for raids on nearby shipping as he pushes north.

I believe Nomad's next targets are the Marshall Islands. With these, he can bypass Truk and take Wake and Marcus island and then move into the Marianas. Evacuees from Truk are settling in on the Marianas bases as well as reinforcement units from Japan. The trouble is deciding which islands are more important than the others: Guam, Tinian or Saipan. Saipan is the closest and would allow him to bomb Japan itself with B-29s, but I am not sure if they can reach from the other two or not.

Xargun

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 114
May 3rd, 1943 - 2/9/2022 1:40:52 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
Some overview for the past few turns...

Allied Division plus landings at Manu, Kavieng and Lae and the subsequent attacks turn all those bases over to the allies. A brief intel glimpse showed a bunch of CVEs playing invasion escort for the allies and some idiot at Truk ordered two Sentais of Nells to attack the invasion at Manus and I lost 30+ G3M3 Nells. By some fluke, I only lost 11 pilots and the rest were wounded so they must have survived to the ground and picked up by my troops there. But now my Nells at Truk are stood down taking replacing aircraft and pilots.

I don't understand the AI for long range air attacks. I see ships moving around all the time and my Nells just sit rusting on the airfields... But as soon as some ships show up with CAP over them they blunder right into them.

The allies air force in Burma have been conducting night training mission over my northern bases. Then they switch gears and have plastered the oil at Magwe. I tried to put up some night fighters but the air attacks would come in in small packages of 4-7 planes that made my cap useless. I haven't looked but I would be surprised if much oil remains undamaged in Magwe. Not much I can do about it since my fighters perform so poorly at night and the Allies can accurately night bomb with little to no moon -- my bombers still mostly miss with 100% moonlight.


Xargun


(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 115
RE: May 3rd, 1943 - 2/9/2022 1:54:32 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
My operation in the Indian Ocean is starting !! Its a risky move on my part for so late in the war. I used Dinah IIIs from Adaman island for some long range recon over the course of a couple weeks (to build up detection levels) and have cancelled one of the two operations.

The cancelled operation was to land some expendable troops behind the lines in India - places like Vizagapatnam and Cocanada but my recon showed 80k+ troops between those bases and there was no way I was landing that many troops to have a chance to beat them.

The Op that is moving forth and starting this turn is the invasion of Ceylon !! My recon of the island showed low amounts of troops there, including one base completely empty.



As you can see by the pic, my invasion fleet is moving into position this turn - 3 hexes off Ceylon. Within the invasion TFs is the Carrier escort TF which I am highlighting - the Akagi and Hiyo have normal complement of aircraft (for some attack power) and everything else is fully laden with fighters. Within the TFs are 2 fully prepared divisions (6th and Imperial Guards Division). One division is 100% prepped for Koggala and will land first and secure the port then the second will land. Following 10 hexes or so behind the main TFs is another TF with a 3rd fully prepped division along with a replenishment TF.

The initial invasion by the 6th Infantry Division is supported by a large TF including 2 BBs, 3 CA and a dozen DDs. A small TF of DMSs is attempting to sweep Koggala this turn in case there are mines there.

Next turn the 6th Division will hit the port. The Carriers will sit back and provide LR CAP over the invasion fleet.

I have been lucky as there are storms in the Indian Ocean and my TFs have only had low detection values - even now 6 hexes away from the target you can see the CVs only have a 2/5 detection value. I won't say this landing will be complete surprise as I'm sure he knows something is up, but it may keep him on his toes elsewhere that I am not done attacking.

I have no real use for Ceylon, other than taking it from him and maybe making him adjust his defense of India.

Xargun

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 116
May 4th, 1943 - 2/9/2022 7:35:37 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
The Invasion force is in position - but the waters are full of subs -- at least 5 subs have been detected with two unsuccessful attacks by them so far. My original location for the TFs to sit has a sub in it, so we are moving to a new location. The 6th Division is heading for the port and my airborne assault on Dumbulla was successful, capturing the inland base !!

The DMSs found no mines so they are heading south to safer waters.

No air traffic in the are has been detected other than some patrol planes. I think Nomad ignored Ceylon on his infrastructure buildup and the defenses here seem very light. I hope its not a trap.


Xargun

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 117
May 5th, 1943 - 2/10/2022 12:36:20 AM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
I was anxious for the turn - worried about my ships off Ceylon. But there was nothing to worry about. In fact, one of my subs found an allied CVE near Rabaul !!

Sub attack near Umboi Island at 101,124

Japanese Ships
SS I-171, hits 10, on fire, heavy damage

Allied Ships
CVE Sangamon, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
CA Salt Lake City
CA Pensacola
DD Benham
DD Wilson
DD Sterett
DD Stack

Ammo storage explosion on CVE Sangamon


SS I-171 was sunk, but the Sangamon is heavily damaged - a nice Ammo Explosion !!


Back at Ceylon a small allied air strike attempted to hit my invasion force.

Morning Air attack on TF, near Koggala at 29,50

Weather in hex: Moderate rain

Raid spotted at 16 NM, estimated altitude 2,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 5 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 13
A6M3a Zero x 35
A6M5c Zero x 14

Allied aircraft
Beaufort VIII x 12

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
Beaufort VIII: 7 destroyed


Intel report showed 14 Beauforts destroyed. My CAP did their job.


More allied bombers attacked my new base at Dambulla.

Morning Air attack on Dambulla , at 30,47

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid spotted at 18 NM, estimated altitude 11,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes

Allied aircraft
B-17F Fortress x 24

No Allied losses

Airbase hits 4
Airbase supply hits 6
Runway hits 15


Then my ships detected an allied sub and pounded on it at Koggala.

ASW attack near Koggala at 29,50

Japanese Ships
CA Kako
CA Suzuya
DD Arashio
DD Tokitsukaze
DD Kazegumo
DD Yugumo
xAP Hakozaki Maru
xAP Asama Maru
DD Murakumo
DD Shirayuki
DD Yugure
DD Wakaba

Allied Ships
SS O24, hits 12


My troops waded ashore at Koggala under naval support.

Pre-Invasion action off Koggala (29,50)
Defensive Guns engage approaching landing force

12 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
BB Yamashiro
BB Mutsu
CA Kako
CA Kumano
CA Suzuya
DD Yugure
DD Wakaba
DD Michishio
DD Kazegumo
DD Yugumo
xAP Hakusan Maru
DD Arashio
DD Murakumo

Japanese ground losses:
10 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
80 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 12 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Amphibious Assault at Koggala (29,50)

TF 397 troops unloading over beach at Koggala, 29,50

Japanese ground losses:
47 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost from landing craft during unload of 6th Div /2
17 troops of a IJA Infantry Squad lost overboard during unload of 6th Div /4


Over 40 AS in troops have landed and I am betting on landing a bunch more this next turn, so I ordered the unit to attack. With a bit of luck I will take Koggala. That will allow me to offload troops much safer.


Xargun


< Message edited by Xargun -- 2/10/2022 12:37:17 AM >

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 118
May 6th, 1943 - 2/10/2022 4:08:32 PM   
Xargun

 

Posts: 3690
Joined: 2/14/2004
From: Near Columbus, Ohio
Status: offline
The turn started off with a RN surface TF attacking my landing force at Koggala.

Night Time Surface Combat, near Koggala at 29,50, Range 8,000 Yards

Allied aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft losses
Walrus II: 1 destroyed

Japanese Ships
BB Mutsu, Shell hits 16
BB Yamashiro, Shell hits 2
CA Suzuya, Shell hits 1
CA Kumano
CA Kako
DD Yugumo
DD Kazegumo
DD Kiyonami
DD Natsushio
DD Amatsukaze
DD Tokitsukaze
DD Arashi
DD Michishio
DD Arashio
DD Wakaba
DD Yugure
DD Shirayuki
DD Murakumo, Shell hits 1
xAP Asama Maru
xAP Tatsuta Maru, Shell hits 7, heavy fires, heavy damage
xAP Hakozaki Maru
xAP Hakusan Maru

Allied Ships
CA Dorsetshire, Shell hits 4, and is sunk
CA Sussex
CA Cornwall, Shell hits 6, on fire
DD Isaac Sweers, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DD Van Galen, Shell hits 4, on fire
DD Tjerk Hiddes, Shell hits 2, on fire
DD Jupiter

Japanese ground losses:
160 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 4 (1 destroyed, 3 disabled)


Little to no moonlight made it a tough slug match. Not sure if the British ship had radar or not. Overall very little damage inflicted on my ships other than the xAP Tatsuta Maru which ended up sinking. The worst damage was 11 sys damage to CA Suzuya.

The amphibs continued to land more troops throughout the day while my Vals and Kates found some fleeing targets.

Morning Air attack on TF, near Colombo at 28,49

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid detected at 40 NM, estimated altitude 18,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 15 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M3a Zero x 45
B5N2 Kate x 10
D3A1 Val x 15

Japanese aircraft losses
D3A1 Val: 1 damaged

Allied Ships
DD Van Galen, Bomb hits 1
DD Jupiter, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
====
Afternoon Air attack on TF, near Colombo at 28,49

Weather in hex: Moderate rain

Raid detected at 36 NM, estimated altitude 17,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 13 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M3a Zero x 60
D3A1 Val x 27

No Japanese losses

Allied Ships
DD Van Galen, Bomb hits 5, and is sunk


At the turns end my troops at Koggala attacked but were repulsed. On my side it is mostly low supply and probably disruption from the landing.

Ground combat at Koggala (29,50)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 2817 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 161

Defending force 1575 troops, 16 guns, 1 vehicles, Assault Value = 8

Japanese adjusted assault: 34

Allied adjusted defense: 17

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 3)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), leaders(+), preparation(-), morale(-)
experience(-)
Attacker: leaders(-)

Japanese ground losses:
21 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
60 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled

Assaulting units:
6th Div /1

Defending units:
Ceylon Base Force


More airborne troops land and seize Jaffna.

Ground combat at Jaffna (31,45)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 74 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 6

Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 7

Allied adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 7 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Jaffna !!!

Combat modifiers
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(-)

Assaulting units:
Yokosuka 3rd SNLF /2



Xargun

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 119
RE: May 6th, 1943 - 2/10/2022 8:34:14 PM   
JanSako

 

Posts: 47
Joined: 1/16/2022
Status: offline
Is it just me or do Allied ships tend to land way more hits than IJN ships in general? (this time 27 vs 17) Is it the overall better tech (radar, fire control, guns)? Cause mid-war the CL & up combatants tend to have gained plenty of XP.

I am surprised Dorsetshire sunk only after 4 hits though, even BB main guns. Must have all been side hits w/significant secondary damage.

(in reply to Xargun)
Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Mar 7, 1943 Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.859