Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  111 112 113 [114] 115   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/18/2022 4:07:16 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I have been in this position as Japan, but in the Kuriles with an Allied invasion fall of 1942. But here Marcus has no supporting bases, and crushing it will expose Japanese ships to frictional losses in an environment friendly to the USN...if I play my cards correctly.


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3391
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/18/2022 4:17:44 PM   
Q-Ball


Posts: 7336
Joined: 6/25/2002
From: Chicago, Illinois
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

I have been in this position as Japan, but in the Kuriles with an Allied invasion fall of 1942. But here Marcus has no supporting bases, and crushing it will expose Japanese ships to frictional losses in an environment friendly to the USN...if I play my cards correctly.




I do think it's different than the Kuriles....that is even more exposed and risky for the Allies, since it's so damn close to Japan.

Did you kick the Allies out of the Kuriles? Hope you did.......

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3392
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/18/2022 8:58:01 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball


Did you kick the Allies out of the Kuriles? Hope you did.......


I did, but Americans can suffer lots of losses and recover easily. I do remember sinking the Yorktown? I also remember losing a slow battleship as it dithered on a bombardment run and was hit by torpedo bombers.

Biggest take away from it was it ruins Japanese plans and causes them to react...as I was in no way prepared for it. It was a pickup game where the previous Japan bailed after losing 4 division on Java in early 42.

(in reply to Q-Ball)
Post #: 3393
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/18/2022 9:35:32 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Night of the 22nd, September, 1942

Much is a foot in the Gilberts...our float planes are busy spotting Iboats at night...a good thing!






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3394
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/18/2022 9:36:42 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Meanwhile, heavy bombers raid Nanning's light industry... 12 hits. I believe at some point the hits are already on damaged light industry.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 2/18/2022 10:07:30 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3395
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/18/2022 9:38:17 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Two ACMs are sunk at Marcus Island by destroyers, but the heavy action is in the Gilberts...for now we have avoided the Iboats, and Tabby is being pounded:






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3396
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/18/2022 9:39:29 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Losses are heavy...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3397
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/18/2022 10:01:56 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Amazing....I thought for sure the KB would show up and launch a 600 plane strike....but instead Tabiteuea falls, although there is still some clean up needed as only one unit is destroyed outright.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3398
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/18/2022 10:05:01 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		No food, disease takes its toll on the Japanese defenders....wiped out to a man!






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3399
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/18/2022 10:30:28 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		A slugfest...


Ground combat at Tabiteuea (137,134)

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 12266 troops, 221 guns, 179 vehicles, Assault Value = 508

Defending force 11549 troops, 95 guns, 16 vehicles, Assault Value = 133

Allied adjusted assault: 349

Japanese adjusted defense: 10

Allied assault odds: 34 to 1 (fort level 3)

Allied forces CAPTURE Tabiteuea !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: forts(+), disruption(-), preparation(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
4184 casualties reported
Squads: 102 destroyed, 67 disabled
Non Combat: 40 destroyed, 47 disabled
Engineers: 76 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 60 (52 destroyed, 8 disabled)
Vehicles lost 17 (17 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 1

Allied ground losses:
327 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 57 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 6 (1 destroyed, 5 disabled)

Assaulting units:
5th Marine Rgt /1
1st USMC Tank Battalion
1st Marine Regiment
145th Infantry Regiment
148th Infantry Rgt /2
5th Marine Defense Battalion

Defending units:
21st Ind.Mixed Brigade
53rd Naval Guard Unit
Kure 5th SNLF
51st Nav Gd /7
13th Naval Construction Battalion
6th Naval Construction Battalion
24th Air Flotilla
2nd Naval Construction Battalion
4th Field Construction Battalion
3rd Naval Construction Battalion
144th JAAF AF Bn


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

21st Ind.Mixed Brigade Wiped Out at Tabiteuea by attrition!!!

4th Field Construction Battalion Wiped Out at Tabiteuea by attrition!!!

2nd Naval Construction Battalion Wiped Out at Tabiteuea by attrition!!!

3rd Naval Construction Battalion Wiped Out at Tabiteuea by attrition!!!

6th Naval Construction Battalion Wiped Out at Tabiteuea by attrition!!!

13th Naval Construction Battalion Wiped Out at Tabiteuea by attrition!!!

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3400
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/19/2022 3:12:52 AM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Losses are heavy...






Only four devices were lost. The rest will recover, most of them by the next turn. Wet soldiers just need a new rifle and ammo!

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3401
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/19/2022 1:15:57 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		China,

Japan making slow but steady progress in the north...our first units caught without a valid retreat path. Which is something I like, they are shot but now will fight to the death over the next week or more slowing down the Japanese advance and it might make it slightly easier to supply the other troops.

Two IJA Tank Divisions have rotated off and are attacking on another front...but they are only at 2/3rd AV I think....Japan really pushes their troops hard.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3402
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/19/2022 1:27:40 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Burma






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3403
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/19/2022 1:36:30 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		I expect to see a point or more damage show up at Nanning in subsequent days...now to take advantage of the moonlight for some experiments.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3404
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/19/2022 1:38:22 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		These early lightning are scarce and now the squadron needs to rest after losing 3 planes to op losses...they swept the Akyab yesterday doing well.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3405
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/19/2022 1:56:50 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Consolidation phase now, but need to keep pressuring Japan so some new bases are targeted...need to establish our forward CAT bases and defend what we have.

Most big ships will retire...whole raft of upgrades on cruisers happen next month.

Big E has had her minor flooding pumped out, and repairs progressing on minor engine damage. Quite a few sub chasers are in the area, and will eventually escort her back to Pearl.






I have been thinking about tactics to bleed the KB of planes should it show up here.

Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 2/19/2022 1:59:38 PM >

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3406
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/19/2022 2:02:24 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline 		Some perfect ops there Lowpe




_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3407
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/19/2022 2:09:52 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Far from perfect, but also done on a shoestring budget basically...1 BB & 3 CVs torpedoed!

However, I was planning on going small forces and keeping the fleet carriers, battleships, and cruisers out of harms way in the fourth quarter of 1942. Too many IJN advantages.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 2/19/2022 2:12:29 PM >

(in reply to Encircled)
Post #: 3408
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/19/2022 2:38:31 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Will attempt this expansion with flying boats, ssts and perhaps very small merchant shipping. I doubt Japan cooperates as well.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3409
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/19/2022 9:26:47 PM   
Encircled


Posts: 2024
Joined: 12/30/2010
From: Northern England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Far from perfect, but also done on a shoestring budget basically...1 BB & 3 CVs torpedoed!

However, I was planning on going small forces and keeping the fleet carriers, battleships, and cruisers out of harms way in the fourth quarter of 1942. Too many IJN advantages.







Well, by perfect. I meant, two landings successfully done, two bases successfully taken, and no huge Japanese response!

Hey, you are playing the allies now, getting stuff torpedoed by subs in 1942 is perfectly normal

_____________________________


(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3410
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/20/2022 11:43:31 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Sept 24, 1942

Had to pull back at Marcus, but will try unloading a fair bit today...might lose everything, but hopefully they get a chance to unload something.

Extremely worried about the DL on the Fleet Carriers....better safe than sorry and will make a full speed run southeast. I don't think the IJN could have maneuvered the KB into a position to strike from the N...but they could have put together some kind of ad hoc group. With only two American Fleet carriers present, our job is light air protection and some additional bombing runs and ASW...not any kind of actual engagement!

Neosho goes under...a valiant struggle...but the remaining fuel kept the fires burning.




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3411
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/20/2022 11:54:40 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Resolution & Ramillies can steam at 2 hexes a day...wondering about sending one to the East Coast for repairs.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3412
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/20/2022 12:42:47 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Lots of activities...major cleanup and organization needed here. New Prep targets etc, etc.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3413
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/20/2022 3:53:51 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Major ship losses, British hit hard...






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3414
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/20/2022 3:59:02 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Because I could... 0 DL when the bombers went in, but I got solid intel in the afternoon.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3415
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/20/2022 9:58:43 PM   
JohnDillworth


Posts: 3100
Joined: 3/19/2009
Status: offline 		Oh I'd say the Japanese CA's have been pretty badly treated too.
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Major ship losses, British hit hard...








_____________________________

Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3416
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/21/2022 7:32:12 AM   
CaptBeefheart


Posts: 2301
Joined: 7/4/2003
From: Seoul, Korea
Status: offline 		Well done on Tabby and Marcus. I can't help but think the KB is up to something dastardly.

Tabby is a great place to unload one of those USN mega bases you get in the Babes series, the ones with 400 nav support or something, since you can't get it above Port 4 and it holds plenty of troops.

Cheers,
CB

_____________________________

Beer, because barley makes lousy bread.

(in reply to JohnDillworth)
Post #: 3417
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/21/2022 11:13:51 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		September 25, 1942

Pleased that I managed to get some CD guns ashore & more engineers, supply only at 5k though and the worst news, can't create any PT boats since port damage is too high....should have sent them in a task force like I did for the Gilberts operations. Submarine mines are enroute...should have prepositioned one or two...but I needed them for advanced pickets.

Not sure I want to risk my minelayers...they might reroute and drop at Midway instead.

Runway is operational, but only size 1 as is the port.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to CaptBeefheart)
Post #: 3418
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/21/2022 11:21:06 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		China continues to be a slug fest...Japan continues to push forward with units, which I continually try to encircle. Unfortunately, I don't have the troop strength or supply to actually reduce a pocket.






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3419
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) - 2/21/2022 11:40:00 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline 		Gilbert Islands




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 3420
Page:   <<   < prev  111 112 113 [114] 115   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A)) Page: <<   < prev  111 112 113 [114] 115   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.844