Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

Minimalists (and their intention to restrict goals and progress)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Minimalists (and their intention to restrict goals and progress) Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Minimalists (and their intention to restrict goals and ... - 10/24/2003 12:02:08 AM   
Tristanjohn


Posts: 3027
Joined: 5/1/2002
From: Daly City CA USA
Status: offline
Isn't it a grand day?[indent]"I can feel my pain, Lord. And I thank you!" [/indent]Say, does anyone feel the suction in this room? As if every shred of intelligence were just being vacuumed out of it at an unholy rate? [quote=Chiteng]Minimalism is when know events or combat parameters are ignored, in the pursuit of a statistical model.[/quote][quote=pasternakski]Where did this nonsense definition come from? "Minimalist art" is representation of the artist's vision through sparse brush strokes. I know of no other credited use of the term or any similar one. Please explain.[/quote] All right, Pasternakski, I will.[indent]Main Entry: 1 min·i·mal·ist Pronunciation: -list Function: noun Date: 1907 1 : one who favors restricting the functions and powers of a political organization or the achievement of a set of goals to a minimum 2 a : a minimal artist b : an adherent of minimalism [/indent]One might also look up the term maximalist for a comparative slant on that, though that's more of an idle suggestion. If you do so choose to look this kind of stuff up a decent online source may be found here:[indent]http://tinyurl.com/63z [/indent]You might well employ this source to better catch my typos for me, Pasternakski, a service for which I'm always grateful. And while you're not busy at that giddy pursuit, and as incredible as it seems, you could possibly learn something new to squeeze into that tiny head of yours, and should you learn enough they might even appoint you jack-in-the-pulpit around here. One never knows. But now let's get on to other and happier subjects. I get a kick out of running down thoughts presented online, and while a ton's been written on Douglas MacArthur this item strikes me as a fairly good synopsis or abridgment if you will, or at least it is a fairly good blurb of the man the mass media came to portray, and should it come across as somewhat cliche this far down the road maybe that's understandable after all and perhaps even something warmly sought after in our day's vanilla age of comfortable truth and easy fiction.[indent]http://tinyurl.com/s26g [/indent]As long as Morison has been brought up lately, one perspective of this author which I've never quite gotten or have been able to warm up to is his apparent admiration for MacArthur. At one juncture Morison goes so far as to declare that no officer who ever served under MacArthur had anything to say of the man which not was not highly complimentary of his organizational skills, his grasp on firm leadership and seeming ease of ability in all phases of supreme command, or words to that effect. That is not my impression of MacArthur, but then again I never got to rub elbows with the man, was instead bombarded by the storm of media circus around him and only after the fact at that. Something Mogami wrote drove my attention back to MacArthur, who was to my generation broadly presented as a regular American icon, a man to be revered above the normal respect one usually accords our country's highest-ranking military men who have distinguished themselves in service. And yet as time wore on, as I grew bolder intellectually, as my interest in military matters led me to closer study of this figure of history my opinion of him and his work swung completely round to where now when I conjure MacArthur's image I see instead of America's hero of the 1950's more the darker and vaguely threatening profile of a bombastic and opportunistic individual, with maybe some of the buffoon thrown in. Well, my thoughts and impressions of MacArthur must remain where and what they are for the time being. There is small chance to alter one's lifetime of thinking patterns, a lifetime of having been actually thought for by others to some extent in a moment passing. Nevertheless I do wonder what my opinion of this magnetic personality might be today had I been born a generation before my allotted time and actually walked side by side with MacArthur in danger and with our fear along the northern shore of New Guinea.
Post #: 1
- 10/24/2003 12:39:59 AM   
pasternakski


Posts: 6565
Joined: 6/29/2002
Status: offline
Uncited 1907 sources don't impress me. Definition number one is merely a popular, inartful use of a specific term from another field of endeavor.

_____________________________

Put my faith in the people
And the people let me down.
So, I turned the other way,
And I carry on anyhow.

(in reply to Tristanjohn)
Post #: 2
- 10/24/2003 12:44:46 AM   
VicKevlar

 

Posts: 881
Joined: 1/4/2001
From: Minneapolis, MN
Status: offline
Alright kids....listen up....I'm only going to say this once.

Almost everyone here knows the forum policy here at Matrix. Here's a quick reminder for those who do not what I am talking about:

"The forum policies apply to ALL of the Matrix forums and all forum users. There is to be no spamming, trolling, personal insults, vulgarity, bigotry, profanity or porn. Inappropriate language or conduct can lead to a short vacation or outright dismissal from Matrix. All topics and behavior that is deemed unsuitable or improper will be locked with an explanation given as to why."

Personal insults and trolls, such as in this thread and a few others around here, will not be tolerated. This is a heads up to any and all....not just Tristanjohn in this thread. In short, take it to IM, PM, email or whatever. If you can't follow the aforementioned rules......I will put violaters on vacation.

_____________________________

The infantry doesn't change. We're the only arm of the military where the weapon is the man himself.

C. T. Shortis


(in reply to Tristanjohn)
Post #: 3
Page:   [1]
All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945 >> Minimalists (and their intention to restrict goals and progress) Page: [1]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.656